Пікірлер
@popsceneblur06
@popsceneblur06 26 күн бұрын
Charlie Rose demonstrating that deliberative democracy doesn't work because there is always someone who doesn't stfu and let the other person answer a question
@ryanfranklin3206
@ryanfranklin3206 3 ай бұрын
I like graeber and hmos are violent but at 26:44 same comment in his book debt about the violence of ejecting someone from a library… has he ever encountered the often violent loons who demand entrance to libraries without ids? Also many university libraries are open to the public
@jtraub91
@jtraub91 3 ай бұрын
david graeber didn't kill himself
@rational-public-discourse
@rational-public-discourse 3 ай бұрын
How many times did Charlie Rose interrupt David or ask a stupid question? 15, 20?
@SampaJasli
@SampaJasli 3 ай бұрын
goddamn, another banger from graeber. miss you bud
@BlackAnarchistRadicals
@BlackAnarchistRadicals 3 ай бұрын
Charlie rose is so annoying and he’s always interrupting people.
@jaysphilosophy1951
@jaysphilosophy1951 4 ай бұрын
Love Graeber. One of the smartest men who ever lived. An honest man at that.
@stevenotte3447
@stevenotte3447 4 ай бұрын
The fix is in, as rigged and upheld by the hierarchy, who maintain all control in order for this status quo feeding frenzy to exist.A human-invented-monster morph- chameleonizing the politician-lobbyist, which through this corporatacracy, self replicates. Piece by piece dismantling can be done through egalitarian reconstruction. Praises to Graeber and Wengrow for their Dawn of Everything. OCCUPY has FUTURE with ADVENTUROUS PROGNOSTICATORS ! Power to the People, by the People, for the People !
@briananderson8428
@briananderson8428 4 ай бұрын
Charlie Rose is insufferable with his constant interruptions and immediately trying to knock down Dave's researched argument that the US is a kleptocracy. Rose is such a corporate tool. This is unwatchable.
@calumroche2851
@calumroche2851 5 ай бұрын
Is there a version without the feedback hum on the audio?
@vivalaleta
@vivalaleta 5 ай бұрын
I can't wrap my mind around how any moral, intelligent person could be an anarchist.
@scribl1
@scribl1 5 ай бұрын
it's crazy that charlie rose is such a well-regarded interviewer. he looks like he's barely listening here. same in the other graeber interview from 2006
@mattcardarelli
@mattcardarelli 5 ай бұрын
That’s his way of discrediting people. Tired old trick
@The_White_Owl
@The_White_Owl 6 ай бұрын
He was a smart man but he is completely wrong about where loan money comes from. When you get approved for a loan from a bank, the bank contacts the Federal Reserve and simply gets permission to withdraw the money from your secret bank account at the Federal Reserve. It is called a c'est que vie trust. Do the research. If you have a birth certificate, you have one. All the bank does is give you your own money from your own bank account! Banks don't have any money. As soon as you deposit money in a bank, they immediately spend it. But since you don't know that, they convince you to pay the money back over time with interest. Once Americans find out this truth, there should be a revolution.
@Rob-fx2dw
@Rob-fx2dw 6 ай бұрын
This how confused thinking David Graeber's argument about the debt created by government's deficit spending was :- He says "It's not like the King ever paid back his debt from whatever war in France he was fighting in 1692- ." No David the King never paid back his debts because he was the equivalent of the ruling government of today but the People who are the equivalent of today's public had to pay it back as they do today. He has shot his own argument about government debt not being paid back in the foot by giving an example from the past about why Government debt always fell on the public and does now because the government of today never pays back it's debt. the public does.
@Rob-fx2dw
@Rob-fx2dw 6 ай бұрын
Mr Graeber's ideas are dopey . Firstly.- If someone gets a loan from a bank and the money is lost on horse or other loss then they are responsible for paying it back or their property gets confiscates and the lender gets the benefit of it making it their asset. The money is effectively destroyed. The money is also destroyed if they do pay off the loan because they would have had to get that money from the existing money in the economy. Secondly. if all the money in the economy was paid back to the queen or government the whole system would NOT collapse as you said that is because we live in a fiat money system where money is not limited by one sector. The private banks create most money (90%) in the economy when the lend to their customers and Graeber ignores this fact. Additionally the idea that the only way the government can balance the budget is that if you being the public can't is infinitely dumb. It is based on ignorance of an understanding and some idea that government debt and private surpluses compete against each other which is not supported with evidence. There can be no evidence because the government is not creator of money. The Central bank (Federal reserve) is the creator and so are private banks. Government is a user of money (the biggest single user) and gets its money from the private sector through taxes OR from the Federal reserve bank through borrowing..
@PeterHanson-nz6wu
@PeterHanson-nz6wu 6 ай бұрын
Rule number one, anything a Jew says, automatically disbelieve, (((Graeber)))..
@EmergencyButtons
@EmergencyButtons 6 ай бұрын
Definitely a founding father of whatever comes next if there is a next.
@rational-public-discourse
@rational-public-discourse 7 ай бұрын
The biggest difference between a Noam Chomsky lecture with a David Graeber lecture is that when Noam gives a very long formal lecture, he doesn't read it. He knows it really really well.
@AtlasCanTakeIt
@AtlasCanTakeIt 7 ай бұрын
The biggest difference between a Noam Chomsky lecture and a David Graeber lecture is that they are/were completely different people with different interests. Just kidding. Noam is a committed universalist who mostly lectured for public dissemination. Many of Graeber's lectures were similarly tailored for a layperson, but this is an anthropologically focused talk directed towards LSE students and faculty. If you don't understand his thesis, just say so. There are multiple lectures by Noam on youtube where he reads from prepared notes, anyway, so I don't really know what the point of your comment is?
@rational-public-discourse
@rational-public-discourse 7 ай бұрын
The lecture begins at 7:10 into the video.
@cristianerehem13
@cristianerehem13 7 ай бұрын
Hi, can you inform me what the link for the original talk with no cuts? Thanks. São Paulo, 16/10/2023 - 19h17 (-3GMT).
@TheBardPlays
@TheBardPlays 7 ай бұрын
Sorry, I found this on vimeo a while back and there was little information available in the description of that video
@MartinHNelson
@MartinHNelson 7 ай бұрын
Graeber was right about green capitalism. It just took a bit longer than he predicted.
@Muzikman127
@Muzikman127 8 ай бұрын
I love that thumbnail haha
@bgiv2010
@bgiv2010 8 ай бұрын
* after being asked loaded questions about "democracy" and "anarchism" * "Charlie... can I call you 'Charlie'? You don't seem to know what any of these terms mean. Have you considered that maybe capitalists like that you're so ignorant?"
@mikesoussan
@mikesoussan 8 ай бұрын
People who reveal these kinds of truths "die" young ... Wait a minute ... Graeber did die young ...
@frederickburke9944
@frederickburke9944 8 ай бұрын
Graeber is basically lying here. He knows why debt has the moral force it does. Not paying a debt means living off the labor others without their consent.
@gargemel123
@gargemel123 8 ай бұрын
That’s not true. Medical debt is incurred not because of the price of medical care is tied to a market force but instead because some account can just charge an arbitrary price.
@MartinHNelson
@MartinHNelson 7 ай бұрын
If you listen to his talk at Google, it is clear he both understands and agrees with your point. However, Graeber suggests that debt isn't quite so simple and straightforward in all cases. That it is has never been that simple. Indeed he speaks approvingly of punishment of the person who is essentially living off another's labor by shirking his debts. Obviously if a person fails to repay then that person doesn't get more loans... if the rule was it is totally OK to never repay then it follows no one lends $$...
@jonnymahony9402
@jonnymahony9402 6 ай бұрын
That's a made up narrativ to get people in believing in the concept of debt. To be a quiet servant of your master, not think about a different way of how to organize society.
@danieldonaldson8634
@danieldonaldson8634 5 ай бұрын
"Graeber is lying" really marks this comment out as from a thoughtful, balanced and judicious interlocutor with deep respect for his counterpart. I might contract a debt that I agree to pay back by marrying the lender's daughter. If the contract clause says, "agrees to marry the bearer's daughter", then if that lender sells the debt, as he is entitled to do, I find myself bound to marry someone I know nothing of. The resulting morality of demand to pay by the debt-purchaser bears no resemblance to the morality of the original debt I incurred. The premise under capitalism of a transferrable promise is that the ethical dimension, such as in the IMF example of debt forgiveness, is legalistically isolated from the general morality of human existence. If you prioritize that kind of brutality, then you not only lose your humanity, but deny others theirs. A debt for the lender is a risk calculation: it should be expected to be sometimes go sour, particularly under the influence of time. Capitalism is, by definition, living off the labour of others without their giving meaningful consent. Bad debts are something different altogether: they are costed into the background profits of exploitation. The morality of repayment, which is generally controlled by the indebted, who can demand repayment and bring legal suit (where the debtor cannot) is not constant, but contingent.
@mariemills-ff8qy
@mariemills-ff8qy 2 ай бұрын
Living off the labor of others seems to describe the owner class.
@user-xb5jv1yf7j
@user-xb5jv1yf7j 9 ай бұрын
south europe? where?
@timmy-wj2hc
@timmy-wj2hc 10 ай бұрын
RIP Comrade!
@davidwilkie9551
@davidwilkie9551 11 ай бұрын
Democratic decisions are made in individual consensus, ("it'll never work""), unless and until individuals are willing to learn, (built in), and willing to teach, with mutual respect, as often happens. More, and continuous, research is required, that is how the sausages are made.
@JakeLOL1111
@JakeLOL1111 Жыл бұрын
love graeber a lot of respect for Charlie Rose having him on even if he's not always getting it haha
@briananderson8428
@briananderson8428 4 ай бұрын
Charlie Rose is the epitome of mediocrity. This was a terrible interview---but not because of Dave.
@davidcollins8150
@davidcollins8150 Жыл бұрын
US legal forms advertisement popped up at 11:50 - LOL
@ximono
@ximono Жыл бұрын
18:50 green capitalism didn't happen at the time, but they did eventually do it
@ximono
@ximono Жыл бұрын
17:45 they obviously had to cut there (18:00)
@ClaytonBridges
@ClaytonBridges 23 күн бұрын
wow
@stephenwilliams163
@stephenwilliams163 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone have a source for that story about municipal debt and the NYC police strike? I'd love to know more about that one
@MikeGoodchild-zs9gk
@MikeGoodchild-zs9gk Жыл бұрын
What an amazing man. he is missed. Who has taken up the torch from him, Chomsky are there no lions out there ?
@alfiecdyson
@alfiecdyson 10 ай бұрын
Very different but since David's passing I've found a lot of inspiration from Charles Eisenstein!
@tewksbery
@tewksbery 6 ай бұрын
Chapo Trap House
@paulreader1777
@paulreader1777 Жыл бұрын
This has turned out to be quite prescient.
@bradsmith6966
@bradsmith6966 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this upload - absolutely LOVE listening to Graeber's perspective
@borisbadinoff1291
@borisbadinoff1291 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the reupload. Would be great to add the actual date of the interview in the description.
@TheBardPlays
@TheBardPlays Жыл бұрын
Apologies, I pulled this off of another site, so I'm not too sure. I mention in another comment this interview likely happened around late 2011 or early 2012.
@alanhehe4508
@alanhehe4508 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, the lie around Federal taxes and Federal spending has got to be the biggest bombshell no one is talking about!! #learnMMT
@davidstrumsky7012
@davidstrumsky7012 Жыл бұрын
When did this first air?
@tharindukottegoda989
@tharindukottegoda989 Ай бұрын
2011 to 2012 ish, according to the guy that uploaded the video, he said that in a different comment thread.
@blane.washere4226
@blane.washere4226 Жыл бұрын
“The question is, why did they have to start with that if they don’t really believe it? *giggle*” beautiful.
@cherylaminahislam5601
@cherylaminahislam5601 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this.
@shashanksinha4263
@shashanksinha4263 Жыл бұрын
The study of modernity cannot be done with a detailed understanding of Graeber's theories.
@martinjanecek4950
@martinjanecek4950 Жыл бұрын
fck yeah!
@jonathanguevara3193
@jonathanguevara3193 Жыл бұрын
Prof. Graeber is definitely missed. He continues to inspire even without being with us.
@KMPR40
@KMPR40 Жыл бұрын
Charlie missing the point hard with the not enough resources understanding, sadly I am not sure if it was intentional.
@ice9055
@ice9055 Жыл бұрын
Although he had the stereotypical perspectives on both the definition of American democracy, what a "free society" is in a world of an anarchic international system, the concept of lobbying, capitalism and democracy, and the founding documents with its relations toward democracy, but it still doesn't degrade his work within the field of anthropology or sociology.
@GuyLakeman
@GuyLakeman Жыл бұрын
government economics 101 dont borrow anything unless you have someone else paying for it and have no intention to give it back
@voltcorp
@voltcorp Жыл бұрын
would it be ok if I subtitled this in Brazilian Portuguese and uploaded to my channel?
@TheBardPlays
@TheBardPlays Жыл бұрын
This isn't my video but I absolutely encourage making this accessible to more people!
@jaysphilosophy1951
@jaysphilosophy1951 4 ай бұрын
Good luck....lol I always had trouble with portuguese.....
@somosknow1
@somosknow1 Жыл бұрын
David- “Generally speaking when math and violence come together bad things ensue.”
@sebolddaniel
@sebolddaniel Жыл бұрын
I like sitting here retired in Cambodia with my bicycle and watching people like Dave Graeber. There is probably enough metal in the Earth for everyone to have a bicycle. Let's invest in bicycles.
@asherroodcreel640
@asherroodcreel640 8 ай бұрын
There's definitely enough carbon
@phil8378
@phil8378 6 ай бұрын
Anarcho-cyclism