that ground loop really emphasizes the analog electronic side of this talk
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
Over a decade later. Nothing has changed, the dystopia spans every corner of the country. Goodluck!
@AnfalArshadCh24 күн бұрын
David Graeber is duly missed
@paulschiwek6958Ай бұрын
How they do they always have so much time for these introductions
@chonbaquer2 ай бұрын
What date did this interview occur?
@TheBardPlays2 ай бұрын
@chonbaquer I believe late 2011/early 2012 since his book Debt had released in 2011 and Occupy was underway in late 2011 as well. I don't have a more specific date on hand, sorry.
@Zetsubou7384 ай бұрын
Rip to both of them in very different ways
@suspendedhatch4 ай бұрын
Democracy is not a utopic panacea. Democracy is overrated. Democracy doesn't scale. The underlying assumption of democracy is that everyone will use their vote in their own self interest. When in fact the majority not only vote against their interests, but vote themselves into wage slavery, depravation of basic needs, and for the continued dead heat sprint toward human extinction. Without an unbiased education, without independent news, without equality- you can't expect anyone to understand what their own self-interest is. Even if you could, you couldn't get a majority to sustain cooperation toward a common goal. People are easily influenced by maniacal, self-interested authoritarians, charlatans, pied-pipers. Instead of democracy what we need is a self-enforcing system that suppresses the base antisocial behaviors humanity is prone to, and incentivizes and elevates the most altruistic ones.
@chonbaquer2 ай бұрын
but who gets to decide which values are antisocial and which values are altruistic? you’re just advocating for serfdom here.
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
Hey, I find your comment very poignant and thought provoking. May I ask what your favorite top 5 books on this subject are? I would truly love to learn from your realm of influence!
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
@@chonbaquerLogical reasoning and scientific reductionism, sprinkle in ethics and a democratic moral litmus test. This could lead society to work on agreeing what values are antisocial and which are altruistic.
@Endoterrestrials4 ай бұрын
It's crazy how he predicted the end of capitalism back then
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
Not that long ago, it’s just that things are moving at such a blisteringly blinding speed. That 10 years feels much longer.
@Ugfromumantman4 ай бұрын
Glad we have these.
@shamirkeren39544 ай бұрын
❤thank you.
@paradise_valley4 ай бұрын
Sounds a bit like techn9ne, but softer and mellow due to the sweet production choices
@paradise_valley4 ай бұрын
Skating on the beat, ethereal, the triplet flow is unbelievably smooth
@WhateverMusicMedia4 ай бұрын
Was there brother, great show
@clonedell53584 ай бұрын
I was there
@TheBardPlays4 ай бұрын
Peggy killed it
@dolphinmeat1014 ай бұрын
jpeg goatttt
@ibc53-y7g4 ай бұрын
A tremendous loss for us all. RIP Professor.
@KoDeMondo5 ай бұрын
King Williams didn't went to some merchant to borrow 1million pound for the war against France, he went to Rothschild family to ask this money...
@sidekickstreams5 ай бұрын
Man Charlie Rose became obnoxious at the end, just forcing words in and out of people's mouths constantly. Not that he didn't do that in the beginning, but in this case it's SO pronounced.
@ChannelMath5 ай бұрын
I actually think Graeber is slightly wrong, maybe: INTERNATIONAL debts are different, because the international society of countries is anarchic, with the US basically being a thug that decides what the "rules-based order" is, using debt as one mechanism. PERSONAL, informal debts are also different, for the same reason (one of my favorite insights of Graeber's is that personal informal life is anarcho-communist) BUT, in my (limited) experience, professional people, investors, lawyers, etc. don't look at debt as morality. Sure, they're happy to use morality as a rhetorical weapon against debtors, but when you buy or sign a debt contract, like all contracts, IT MUST SPECIFY what happens if the debtor doesn't pay. Also, the debtor IS ALREADY PAYING EXTRA for his likelihood of defaulting. So this possibility of not getting paid is reflected both in the price AND the contract itself. So it's dishonest to say "well, but surely one must pay one's debts", because the debtor can default and still be behaving lawfully, which is usually what happens. (Not to mention it is often an artificial entity, not a person, that fails to pay). Successful businessmen have bragged about how many times they (or their companies) went bankrupt before one made him rich.
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
Wow. I appreciate such a sober and polite response to this conversation. Really made me think about what I haven’t thought about lol. Anyways I’m curious to hear your thoughts on the current state of affairs regarding oligarchs commandeering our political system. Cheers!
@markcarey675 ай бұрын
"We've managed to eliminate the corruption problem largely by legalizing it" - great line
@popsceneblur068 ай бұрын
Charlie Rose demonstrating that deliberative democracy doesn't work because there is always someone who doesn't stfu and let the other person answer a question
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
Lol
@ryanfranklin320611 ай бұрын
I like graeber and hmos are violent but at 26:44 same comment in his book debt about the violence of ejecting someone from a library… has he ever encountered the often violent loons who demand entrance to libraries without ids? Also many university libraries are open to the public
@raptorrogue42273 ай бұрын
I think it's more of a metaphorical example than a literal one.
@jtraub9111 ай бұрын
david graeber didn't kill himself
@BuGGyBoBerlАй бұрын
yeah he had pancreatitis
@SampaJasli11 ай бұрын
goddamn, another banger from graeber. miss you bud
@BlackAutonomist11 ай бұрын
Charlie rose is so annoying and he’s always interrupting people.
@Ugfromumantman4 ай бұрын
Its heavily edited.
@jaysphilosophy1951 Жыл бұрын
Love Graeber. One of the smartest men who ever lived. An honest man at that.
@stevenotte3447 Жыл бұрын
The fix is in, as rigged and upheld by the hierarchy, who maintain all control in order for this status quo feeding frenzy to exist.A human-invented-monster morph- chameleonizing the politician-lobbyist, which through this corporatacracy, self replicates. Piece by piece dismantling can be done through egalitarian reconstruction. Praises to Graeber and Wengrow for their Dawn of Everything. OCCUPY has FUTURE with ADVENTUROUS PROGNOSTICATORS ! Power to the People, by the People, for the People !
@josephc844011 күн бұрын
👏🏽
@briananderson8428 Жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose is insufferable with his constant interruptions and immediately trying to knock down Dave's researched argument that the US is a kleptocracy. Rose is such a corporate tool. This is unwatchable.
@calumroche2851 Жыл бұрын
Is there a version without the feedback hum on the audio?
@vivalaleta Жыл бұрын
I can't wrap my mind around how any moral, intelligent person could be an anarchist.
@stephanieb24846 ай бұрын
same
@sirmclovin91845 ай бұрын
I think Graber's work is a good place to start to understand why.
@sirmclovin91845 ай бұрын
This is a good start: 22:35
@mattgilbert734720 күн бұрын
It was precisely his rare form of intelligence, his moral courage, and his capacious ethical vision that led him to embrace anarchism.
@scribl1 Жыл бұрын
it's crazy that charlie rose is such a well-regarded interviewer. he looks like he's barely listening here. same in the other graeber interview from 2006
@mattcardarelli Жыл бұрын
That’s his way of discrediting people. Tired old trick
@The_White_Owl Жыл бұрын
He was a smart man but he is completely wrong about where loan money comes from. When you get approved for a loan from a bank, the bank contacts the Federal Reserve and simply gets permission to withdraw the money from your secret bank account at the Federal Reserve. It is called a c'est que vie trust. Do the research. If you have a birth certificate, you have one. All the bank does is give you your own money from your own bank account! Banks don't have any money. As soon as you deposit money in a bank, they immediately spend it. But since you don't know that, they convince you to pay the money back over time with interest. Once Americans find out this truth, there should be a revolution.
@Rob-fx2dw5 ай бұрын
The- White - Owl. You are more a chicken with it's head cut off or goose than an Owl. You are wrong. The private banks create the money themselves and don't get it from some account at the reserve bank. Your idea is based on some concocted belief that does not even mathematicall add up. The private banks create 90% or more of the money in the economy. In most countries their reserve requirement is only a small percentage of what they create and lend. For the Last few years the U.S. reserve requirement has been either ZERO or a a few percent. Some countries including Canada and Australia don't even have reserve system yet they both have private bank lending.
@Rob-fx2dw Жыл бұрын
This how confused thinking David Graeber's argument about the debt created by government's deficit spending was :- He says "It's not like the King ever paid back his debt from whatever war in France he was fighting in 1692- ." No David the King never paid back his debts because he was the equivalent of the ruling government of today but the People who are the equivalent of today's public had to pay it back as they do today. He has shot his own argument about government debt not being paid back in the foot by giving an example from the past about why Government debt always fell on the public and does now because the government of today never pays back it's debt. the public does.
@Rob-fx2dw Жыл бұрын
Mr Graeber's ideas are dopey . Firstly.- If someone gets a loan from a bank and the money is lost on horse or other loss then they are responsible for paying it back or their property gets confiscates and the lender gets the benefit of it making it their asset. The money is effectively destroyed. The money is also destroyed if they do pay off the loan because they would have had to get that money from the existing money in the economy. Secondly. if all the money in the economy was paid back to the queen or government the whole system would NOT collapse as you said that is because we live in a fiat money system where money is not limited by one sector. The private banks create most money (90%) in the economy when the lend to their customers and Graeber ignores this fact. Additionally the idea that the only way the government can balance the budget is that if you being the public can't is infinitely dumb. It is based on ignorance of an understanding and some idea that government debt and private surpluses compete against each other which is not supported with evidence. There can be no evidence because the government is not creator of money. The Central bank (Federal reserve) is the creator and so are private banks. Government is a user of money (the biggest single user) and gets its money from the private sector through taxes OR from the Federal reserve bank through borrowing..
@KoDeMondo5 ай бұрын
Exactly well spot on
@Will140f4 ай бұрын
What else did your first year econ prof tell you
@Rob-fx2dw4 ай бұрын
@@Will140f You understand what about how money is created and how did you get that knowledge ? By swallowing MMT garbage or how? Did you work it out yourself ? I doubt it but enlighten us with your knowledge and reasoning.
@PeterHanson-nz6wu Жыл бұрын
Rule number one, anything a Jew says, automatically disbelieve, (((Graeber)))..
@EmergencyButtons Жыл бұрын
Definitely a founding father of whatever comes next if there is a next.
@cristianerehem28 Жыл бұрын
Hi, can you inform me what the link for the original talk with no cuts? Thanks. São Paulo, 16/10/2023 - 19h17 (-3GMT).
@TheBardPlays Жыл бұрын
Sorry, I found this on vimeo a while back and there was little information available in the description of that video
@MartinHNelson Жыл бұрын
Graeber was right about green capitalism. It just took a bit longer than he predicted.
@Muzikman127 Жыл бұрын
I love that thumbnail haha
@bgiv2010 Жыл бұрын
* after being asked loaded questions about "democracy" and "anarchism" * "Charlie... can I call you 'Charlie'? You don't seem to know what any of these terms mean. Have you considered that maybe capitalists like that you're so ignorant?"
@mikesoussan Жыл бұрын
People who reveal these kinds of truths "die" young ... Wait a minute ... Graeber did die young ...
@frederickburke9944 Жыл бұрын
Graeber is basically lying here. He knows why debt has the moral force it does. Not paying a debt means living off the labor others without their consent.
@gargemel123 Жыл бұрын
That’s not true. Medical debt is incurred not because of the price of medical care is tied to a market force but instead because some account can just charge an arbitrary price.
@MartinHNelson Жыл бұрын
If you listen to his talk at Google, it is clear he both understands and agrees with your point. However, Graeber suggests that debt isn't quite so simple and straightforward in all cases. That it is has never been that simple. Indeed he speaks approvingly of punishment of the person who is essentially living off another's labor by shirking his debts. Obviously if a person fails to repay then that person doesn't get more loans... if the rule was it is totally OK to never repay then it follows no one lends $$...
@jonnymahony9402 Жыл бұрын
That's a made up narrativ to get people in believing in the concept of debt. To be a quiet servant of your master, not think about a different way of how to organize society.
@danieldonaldson8634 Жыл бұрын
"Graeber is lying" really marks this comment out as from a thoughtful, balanced and judicious interlocutor with deep respect for his counterpart. I might contract a debt that I agree to pay back by marrying the lender's daughter. If the contract clause says, "agrees to marry the bearer's daughter", then if that lender sells the debt, as he is entitled to do, I find myself bound to marry someone I know nothing of. The resulting morality of demand to pay by the debt-purchaser bears no resemblance to the morality of the original debt I incurred. The premise under capitalism of a transferrable promise is that the ethical dimension, such as in the IMF example of debt forgiveness, is legalistically isolated from the general morality of human existence. If you prioritize that kind of brutality, then you not only lose your humanity, but deny others theirs. A debt for the lender is a risk calculation: it should be expected to be sometimes go sour, particularly under the influence of time. Capitalism is, by definition, living off the labour of others without their giving meaningful consent. Bad debts are something different altogether: they are costed into the background profits of exploitation. The morality of repayment, which is generally controlled by the indebted, who can demand repayment and bring legal suit (where the debtor cannot) is not constant, but contingent.
@mariemills-ff8qy10 ай бұрын
Living off the labor of others seems to describe the owner class.
@Rppatil001 Жыл бұрын
south europe? where?
@timmy-wj2hc Жыл бұрын
RIP Comrade!
@davidwilkie9551 Жыл бұрын
Democratic decisions are made in individual consensus, ("it'll never work""), unless and until individuals are willing to learn, (built in), and willing to teach, with mutual respect, as often happens. More, and continuous, research is required, that is how the sausages are made.
@JakeLOL1111 Жыл бұрын
love graeber a lot of respect for Charlie Rose having him on even if he's not always getting it haha
@briananderson8428 Жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose is the epitome of mediocrity. This was a terrible interview---but not because of Dave.
@bryannoonan54545 ай бұрын
@@briananderson8428 It's shocking that Charlie often had such excellent guests for the very reason you just mentioned. He's always struggling to hold on in the deeper interviews.
@davidcollins8150 Жыл бұрын
US legal forms advertisement popped up at 11:50 - LOL
@ximono Жыл бұрын
18:50 green capitalism didn't happen at the time, but they did eventually do it
@ximono Жыл бұрын
17:45 they obviously had to cut there (18:00)
@ClaytonBridges8 ай бұрын
wow
@stephenwilliams163 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone have a source for that story about municipal debt and the NYC police strike? I'd love to know more about that one