YES!! Being reminded of things I know - but have forgotten HOW to EXPLAIN! Thanks for the lessons.
@huracekjiri2 күн бұрын
the best by far tutorial on audio!
@DevotedGolfer2 күн бұрын
I have not followed this discussion so I don't know if this was addressed. I was involved in cognitive research in the early 70's. So, I asked copilot, "how long does it take for an image to get from the eyeball down the optic nerve into the visual cortex?" The answer, "how long does it take for an image to get from the eyeball down the optic nerve into the visual cortex The journey from the eye to the brain is remarkably swift. When light enters your eye and hits the retina, the information is converted into electrical signals. These signals travel down the optic nerve and reach the visual cortex in the brain. This entire process takes about 13 milliseconds. It's incredible how our brain processes this information almost instantaneously, allowing us to perceive the world around us in real-time. Watching Gemini Man at different frame rates objects disappear at 30 fps that are visible at 120 fps. When the motorcycle speeds past a light pole, the blurred light pole is visible at 120 fps but invisible at 30 fps. The darkness between the quickly moved mouse example you showed demonstrates how detail is lost at low frame rates. It is a subjective opinion as to whether traditional limitations are as good as to what is currently available. At times I shoot golf swings. With some new gear I began exploring 1K 240 fps golf swings. My latest camera can capture 1K at 240 fps to the internal CFexpress type B card. But my Atomos recorder only goes to 120 fps. An old camera delivered 900 fps on a reduced size image. I got some incredible video of how a golf club head behaves after impact. A radar tracking company uses a Phantom camera turned down to 20,000 fps the frequency of its radar to sync radar reflections to physical reality to understand the reflections . So, your discussion of fps in a theater just scratches the surface of what is currently possible. Are you recommending that we go back to rotary dial telephones?
@FilmmakerIQКүн бұрын
There are significant holes in your understanding - the question of WHAT exactly gets transmitted from eyeball to brain. It's not really an image - like you can't sever the optic nerve and hook it to computer and get a pixel to pixel readout. Biological sense organs do not that work that way - much of what you "see" is your brain's construction - not the eyes. Now you're trying to extrapolate that to frame rate which you really don't have an understanding of. No, the lightpole is NOT invisible at 30fps. It would be blurrier at 30fps (or 24fps if we're talking movies). The filming of lightpoles is not the same as a graphic playback involving cursor movements (as the light pole actually travels between frames whereas a cursor doesn't) "Are you recommending that we go back to rotary dial telephones?" What kind of idiotic question is that? Maybe you should go back to the child's table if you aren't willing to appreciate nuances in frame rate in artistic mediums.
@russryden63633 сағат бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQ The classic reply of a podcaster, attack the responder to avoid the question. what is the frame rate of the visual cortex? The human visual cortex processes information extremely quickly, but it doesn't operate in terms of "frame rate" like a camera. Instead, our brain processes continuous streams of visual information. However, if we were to compare it to a frame rate, studies suggest that the brain can detect and process changes in visual stimuli that occur at rates up to 60 frames per second (fps). This is why many people find video content displayed at 60 fps to appear smooth and lifelike. It's fascinating how our brains can process and interpret such a vast amount of information in real-time. If you have more questions about the visual system or anything else, just let me know! 🌟
@RogerMitchell-ef8wb6 күн бұрын
Beautifully explained! I worked in a TV station in Wales, and when the subject of NTSC came up, I was told that everyone knew it stood for "Never Twice the Same Colour".
@tepetti12 күн бұрын
I was surprised I was able the hear the difference between waves A and B. Didn’t sound like a square wave but two sinewaves of which the other one was some what painful
@untipoxddd578413 күн бұрын
I think that the 24fps will stay but if the 60fps are accepted too i think there will be an option to change that because not all people like 60 fps maybe only for videogames.
@Oryon713 күн бұрын
I absolutely hate these high fps movies. It's the worst thing to happen to the industry. Not every increase = better.
@CarolinaMirandaIzumi13 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for all your time and effort that you put for making this educational video. It will help me with my homework and final. Thank you , Thank you.
@gmanley114 күн бұрын
I remember reading that PBS used to air It's a Wonderful Life before NBC got the TV rights to the movie.
@FilmmakerIQ13 күн бұрын
It wasn't only PBS
@gmanley113 күн бұрын
@FilmmakerIQ Wait, what?! 😳
@FilmmakerIQ13 күн бұрын
Every station ran it.
@lenasspabar740917 күн бұрын
Thank You
@sebastiangoldstein17 күн бұрын
John, Any reason why you couldn’t use this Hollyland portable kit for live amplification applications such as micing a keynote speaker or solo entertainer through a PA? Would it work just as well as a similarly priced consumer level wireless system? Thanks
@FilmmakerIQ16 күн бұрын
I can't think of a reason off the top of my head
@matheus523017 күн бұрын
I recommend the Forbes article called "Spotify Wrapped 2024: Backlash, Controversy And Memes". It's perfect!
@DarioBarrosFilmmaker18 күн бұрын
epic video, thank you for doing this
@VikrantGupta-j6v18 күн бұрын
Hlo john sir how are you . john sir as you said that readout speed is very fast in rolling shutter so sir because of this much fast speed we do not see any rolling shutter effect in our human reaction like when we record ourselves we see exact reaction what we gave like while talking in camera we even cant perceive that our face reaction becomes in different moment of time and even when we run with camera in hand then also we do not see difference in our reaction. So john sir we do not find that our face reaction is captured in different moment of time so sir we do not see it because read out speed is very fast? Am I right sir ?
@FilmmakerIQ17 күн бұрын
When you watch video of a human reaction do you notice the rolling shutter?
@VikrantGupta-j6v13 күн бұрын
@FilmmakerIQ no john sir I do not notice not in my reaction and not even in movies .but sir I am running in ground at 7m/s and my friend was recording me if read out speed in my camera is 20ms then in 20 ms I am covering 14cm distance so sir 14 cm gap must be clearly visible in my face but I do not find any skew in my face while editing that is why I am asking you ? And sir when you do live stream then you also use rolling shutter camera ? Thanks john sir
@FilmmakerIQ12 күн бұрын
So there you go. If you didn't notice, why are you asking me?
@VikrantGupta-j6v4 күн бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQok sir and sir do you remember I ask you one qn that I do one experiment as I move my camera from up to down very fast and on door there is only one latch in reality but in one frame I find two latches so you said it can happen when readout speed is very slow.but sir it can also happen as when one latch is of exposure as it is blur and second latch we see because of read out .because sir one latch in frame is blur and one is clear .so this is possibility sir ? I do this experiment and found this . john sir pls answer this
@FilmmakerIQКүн бұрын
you asked about faces, not about latches. you need to start thinking for yourself.
@NathalyPinheiroo20 күн бұрын
Thanks for the explanation! In pre production, who typically decides on the synchronization system to used and includes it in the equipment order? And on set, who is responsible for operating and managing it? Would it usually be the producer, the DP, the sound mixer, or someone else?"
@FilmmakerIQ20 күн бұрын
Probably coordinated between the DP and sound department so they're both on the same page
@PiscesPriestesses21 күн бұрын
Fabulously done John ... incredibly well explained. Thanks so much for this 💚🙏😎
@manasmaisnam60621 күн бұрын
You have said 1976 "A Star Is Born" & showed Judy Garland version of 1950s.
@PanoramaPlanetOne22 күн бұрын
Have been viewing your videos since last 4 years, inspiring and full of top stuff....keep it going. I am just starting on small videos of scapes bht sticking to 1080p, am i in stone age or its ok😊
@FilmmakerIQ22 күн бұрын
It's okay! But today 4K aquisition is pretty common place even if you deliver 1080 projects.
@PanoramaPlanetOne22 күн бұрын
@FilmmakerIQ Thanks for taking time out to respond. I will surely use that advise. Also please share, if there are any courses that you have on small documentry making for newbies. Cheers !!!
@ThinkingAboutCameras24 күн бұрын
Many thanks for this extremely helpful video. Thinking in terms of ADR as an option where sound recording could hold back the flow of a production is liberating!
@BabyDoIIx24 күн бұрын
I LOVE YOUR CONTENT!! But … is this really a necessary topic? *YOU USE MULTIPLE CAMERAS* you’re all welcome. Lol 😝 sorry it just feels… kind of like asking, “how does 1 start a car?” Well… with the key, sir.
@FilmmakerIQ24 күн бұрын
I've seen a lot of people who don't know how to play the type of 3D chess that is a directing multicam solo. Have you done it yourself?
@dvd782624 күн бұрын
A legend that eventually gave us Fox News and Fox Sports 💯💯🙌🏼
@FilmmakerIQ24 күн бұрын
The irony is he had nothing to do with either of those.
@xpucmogrozdanov639126 күн бұрын
What do you think about compression? What is the normal lens regarding the compression of the human eye?
@FilmmakerIQ26 күн бұрын
The normal lens IS when there no "compression" ... A normal lens is the lens in which the display medium will result in unaltered perspective lines - essentially looking out a window. As for what the "compression of the human eye" - that's sort of a circular question. Since a normal is lens is defined as what appears natural, by very definition the human eye is a normal lens. There is no compression happening in the eye.
@matheus523026 күн бұрын
I saw someone say that Wicked is the best movie musical about a green individual dealing with prejudice since Shrek 2.
@matheus523027 күн бұрын
Wicked is being well received in general, critically and in the box office. The biggest criticism is the cinematography.
@Moltar_Railfan27 күн бұрын
Paramount has been struggling to compete for the past decade because Viacom (2006-2019) was the smallest media company in the industry, even smaller than CBS before merging back with them in 2019! Viacom was too small to compete with the other companies because they took the cable networks (MTV, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, VH1, CMT) despite the industry dying by the 2010s, holding Paramount's investments back, not to mention the Star Trek hiatus with Viacom and CBS Splitting the rights until 2019. even after the ViacomCBS remerger and rebranding to Paramount Global, is still the cheapest company in the media industry, making bank with CBS, SpongeBob and South Park alone while the 2 franchises home cable networks are on life support. Paramount+ technically isn't even a new service, its just a rebrand for CBS All Access with Viacom content added. the Redstone family are clearly not fit to run this company, its literally one of the things Succession on HBO was mocking with the ViacomCBS Merger. hopefully the Skydance merger will fix this company, but if i were in charge of Paramount, i would divest from the cable networks that have become irrelevant, expect for Nickelodeon, they gotta keep SpongeBob around for as long as they can, because he's their mickey mouse cash cow!
@badkarma714productions727 күн бұрын
I missed it
@matheus5230Ай бұрын
I really hope you watch that Moviewise video I talked about, I would love your in-depth thoughts. One more thing: Kurosawa liked to write his screenplays with at least one or more people. He said that as a director, your first instinct is to write not what will be better, but what will be easier to direct. Kurosawa believed that collaboration with other writers was a good way to avoid this pitfall.
@alikhorrami9761Ай бұрын
you are a dumbass for hating lalaland, unsubscribed, man of no taste, dummy, dummy
@FilmmakerIQ29 күн бұрын
Good. :)
@luxembourg.blues47Ай бұрын
And how does that make you feel?
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Amazing!
@VirtuallyJesseАй бұрын
I think this video will age poorly. The change to 60fps will happen slowly over time, driven primarily by new generations tastes. It's no secret that youth today watch films less and less, and spend more time with streaming, gaming, and shorts (most of which is packaged as 60fps). As more limitations in technology continue to be less of a problem (data sizes, bandwidth, etc.), the market will do what the market does best.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
It hasn't. We've had 60 fps since 1950. 60 fps was originally a solution based on technological limitations. Consumer Digital cameras weren't capable of shooting 24fps until 2003. The market has already chosen. Lots of digital content that aren't movies are shot at 24 fps.
@Capturing-MemoriesАй бұрын
If cameras have super sensitive sensors to shoot at say 1/20000 to say 1/100000 to capture objects with no blur or very minimal blur, frame rate is less important. Maybe in the future when data crunching is no longer an object, video will be recorded in a whole different way, maybe each pixel will have its own video signal and in that case frame rate will be tied to the frequency or sampling rate of each individual pixel signal.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
You missed the point of the video and the point that Blurbusters is making. We can already capture things with no/minimal blur.
@Capturing-MemoriesАй бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQ I did not miss anything, I was just re-enforcing the idea that higher frame rates don't mean anything for the human eye. When I watch my TV I don't have a problem with the frame rate, I have problems with motion artifacts which no filter or option I use could get rid off, You don't have to be rude though.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Yes you missed the point... Higher frame rates DO mean something where the theoretical maximum is about 20,000fps. I'm not being rude by pointing out that your comment is explicitly the opposite of the conclusions of the video even on the most superficial level. I mean the answer is in the thumbnail
@Capturing-MemoriesАй бұрын
@ I disagree with your video, end of story.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Okay - but you're wrong, end of story. ;)
@alexlandherrАй бұрын
At 12:15, one point that could be important regarding frame rates of a given camera is when one needs the exact value as a source for calculations.
@alexlandherrАй бұрын
I use a specific GoPro camera firmware feature to film in 24 fps exactly because the compresssion tricks on my smartphone always has it be a little more or less than that.
@MrQdiddy85Ай бұрын
I just want to know who the fuck at Fox always cancels my favorite shows before they even get a chance
@anthonythorne8708Ай бұрын
Great video, great work, thanks.
@marlobreding7402Ай бұрын
When they turned on the color in the 1960's TV. Guide would indicate that a TV program was in color by simple saying COLOR. We bought a new guide every week to plan our color viewing. On Sunday we went to my Uncle Lloyd's house because he was the first to purchase a color set. This worked good till Aunt Dot got her vacuum cleaner too close to the set a scrambled the color, they had ta TV technician come out and degause the screen. Later sets did need regausing due to new technologies. My friend Terry N. Collected every early TV guide. He had lots of weird collections. 😂
@DoctopieАй бұрын
Thank you for this! You explained the concepts incredibly well
@jacobzeierАй бұрын
I know I’m in the minority, but I HATE directors who don’t write. I’m a filmmaker, and I’m a true filmmaker. Directors who fail to write are lesser filmmakers. A filmmaker must be a director AND a writer. Directing and NOT writing a movie is dishonest. You claim a movie as your own but you’re stealing someone else’s story. Very few directors would ever be deemed auteurs by most people anyway. What I find annoying is when some video makers credit directors when citing movies in their videos, particularly documentaries, even from what you might call “lesser filmmakers”, ones who aren’t very well-known and who are just hired guns, as I think just about all directors are. If you ask me, directors, most of them, including myself, can be changed and the overall product will only be slightly different, inasmuch as for one who watches enough movies, the same principles apply. Sure, there may be variables between directors, but they are not sufficiently unique. Even, I’m not that unique either. In fact, I like to imitate movies. But directors are irrelevant when I watch movies anyway. Actors, characters, years, sometimes studios, are all relevant to how I analyze and judge movies. Also note, how I rate movies, or any art or fiction for that matter, goes thus; a good movie is a movie that I like and a movie I don’t like is a bad movie. Same goes for music, tv shows, and so on. Pure and simple. Now of course, there will be people who dismiss my attitude as “simple-minded” or “relativistic”. Would anyone be offended if I were to say a movie like, say, Schindler’s List is a bad movie? I would because I hate it. But there are way more movies I could call “bad” even if it’s not socially acceptable to do so. It wouldn’t make any sense to say “Seven is a good movie but I don’t like and won’t watch it again.” Sorry, but you can’t and shouldn’t separate taste from quality. Goodness and enjoyment go hand in hand. If you like a movie, then it’s a good movie to you. That’s all that matters.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
I would tone down that sentiment. Directors may not write but they may oversee the writing process. Filmmaking has to be a collaborative process, there is no possible way one person can do it all, at very least they have to rely on actors to covey the story. So there's nothing wrong with a director working with a writer, or an editor, or colorist. It doesn't make them less a "filmmakers" since that term is already so broad.
@jacobzeierАй бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQ Stupid head! Most directors, are NOT "filmmakers", they are hired guns; they just get hired by the executive producer to work on a movie project, select the shots, direct the actors primarily and get their paycheck. This applies to "big-name" phonies like Curtiz, Spielberg, Fincher, Ford, Scorsese, DeMille, Fleming, Howard, Scott, Nichols, Cukor, Hitchcock, to name many. I hate them. True filmmakers write AND direct; writing is vital to creating an personal bond between a director and the movie, which inherently makes them a greater and better filmmaker. Sorry, but most directors are con artists who wrongly claim ownership and creation! Filmmaking is personal and pleasant, directing alone is professional and problematic. A filmmaker is honest, a director alone is dishonest!
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Yeah - you don't really know what you're talking about.
@jacobzeierАй бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQ Yes, I do, you silly fool! And for your information, I am a filmmaker and I have ZERO respect for the stupid, terrible and overrated non-writing directors (the lesser "filmmakers") and movies that are frankly worthless liars and junk. The ones I've named in my second comment are NOT filmmakers, I am and so are a few others who I like a lot, although they are seemingly rare in the movie and TV industry. But directors don't mean anything; they're just a name in the credits and have little, if any, impact on the "look" of the movie because there are FAR more similarities between movies that happened to be directed by DIFFERENT directors than there are between movies directed by THE SAME director. "Fashion" eras, or even certain studios, the movies were made provide a MUCH easier identity than the people who directed them anyway. There's a HUGE difference between a movie filmed and released in the 1910s and today than there is between a movie directed by, say, Cecil B. DeMille and Michael Curtiz. The latter are almost identical; very different names with slightly different output overall. The main difference between the two directors is that the movies they direct are probably the actors they work with and the subject matter of the movie. Another difference is DeMille had more power and clout because he was also a producer whereas Curtiz was a hired gun; LITERALLY; he was an indistinct joe-shmoe who would work on the movies, if hired to carry out his job. Same goes for George Cukor, Richard Thorpe and Victor Fleming.
@R3fugeАй бұрын
A correction: 32 bit float and 32 bit fixed have the same number of possible values, but float can represent a larger (and sparser) range of values. There's only ever 2^32 possibilities if you have 32 bits, so you can never represent more distinct values than that with 32 bit.
@СергейДружинин-н7ыАй бұрын
2:30 "a bite is a number of bits to express a character" This is one common view on it. Another POV may be expressed like "a minimum segmentation of memory used in computer logic". So, actually, there may be any information stored in bytes, not just characters.
@stereo-k4xАй бұрын
Could you do one on universal?
@davidgibson7615Ай бұрын
You should the history look like Universal, Columbia and Warner Bros
@KICKBOXER27Ай бұрын
Can you do an origin story video of Warner Brothers Pictures and New Line Cinema?
@VikrantGupta-j6vАй бұрын
John sir I read about pseudo global shutter in cmos as they use trigger .so sir I read that now in most cameras pseudo global shutter came to avoid rolling shutter distortion .is it true sir as this pseudo global shutter capture image at once or sir this pseudo global shutter is also like rolling shutter. Can you explain sir briefly about pseudo global shutter
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
No idea. If it's "pseudo" then it probably is just really fast rolling shutter.
@VikrantGupta-j6vАй бұрын
@FilmmakerIQ john sir there is utuber named science to technology he made video on global and rolling shutter he has good no of subscribers he is telling in video that in rolling shutter image is not captured at different moment of time but at instantaneous moment of time but in rolling shutter there is not impulse that is why it create distortion and global shutter has impulse that is why it does not create distortion. So sir it got confused me whom to trust because we can trust the thing which we saw but with our eyes we are not able to see rolling shutter effect in our face reaction and in our cars we fell that it is capturing at same moment of time. Sir because of distortion only I cant say that it is because things are captured in different moment of time as there can be another reason like sensor does not able to make fast speed objects clearly that is why it is doing distortion. John sir help me regarding this .pls tell me to whom I trust
@VikrantGupta-j6vАй бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQ sir there is a utuber science to technology he has good no of subscribers he said that in rolling shutter image is not captured at different moment of time but at instantaneous moment of time but it does not create impulse that is why images get distorted and global shutter has impulse that is why images does not get distorted. So sir it create confusion in my mind that what is true because we can trust things which is visible to our eyes but rolling shutter is not visible to our eyes as we see no distorted in our face reaction not in our cars as we see exact thing from our eye we see exact in camera .so john sir help me that to whom I trust about it pls sir .pls sir give your view on this .
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Trust yourself and your experience. I give you basis of information and expect you to go out and finish learning. Do not go on my word alone.
@the_runofffАй бұрын
awesome
@miked5487Ай бұрын
none of my xlr connectors have that single metal clamp for the insulator.. I just have the seperate plastic clamp.. i think I like the looks of the metal clamp design a lot more
@rty1955Ай бұрын
i have been editing video tape since it was invented. I used to physically cut the 2" quad tapes, and have used, i worked on the Editec, EECO and CMX systems. 29.97 fps is because of the introduction of color video, otherwise B&W video was 30fps or 60 Fields/sec
@matheus5230Ай бұрын
Have you seen the news that the upcoming Sonic The Hedgehog 3 film was shot on 48fps? It's still unknown whether it will be released in HFR, but worth paying attention.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
Lots of films with heavy VFX shoot that way for more precise tracking data. All the Avengers did the same thing
@matheus5230Ай бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQI believe you're right. That said, there would be something fitting to a film of videogame characters use HFR.
@FilmmakerIQАй бұрын
The irony is it never works.
@matheus5230Ай бұрын
@@FilmmakerIQIt would just make the movie look like a videogame rather than a movie.
@britcom1Ай бұрын
I have two kinds of headsets, one set that covers my ears and blocks most all the outside sound, and one that has small foam covered speakers that don't make my ears sweat. Those are my priorities. :)