Such a shame this is as close we'll ever get to flying in such a beautiful iconic aircraft. An amazing piece of British engineering. Only reason it got banned in US was because they tried & FAILED to build a Supersonic airliner.
@paulaangeladeguia9011 ай бұрын
Snoop droop
@dcartellone26592 жыл бұрын
Is she still alive? What number was she? How did she become this way.
@aerocentric2 жыл бұрын
G-BBDG is construction number 202. She was put into storage in 1981 and used as a source of spare parts by British Airways for 20+ years. She is now restored (not in airworthy condition) at Brooklands Museum.
@scarecrow108productions73 жыл бұрын
They really nailed it, all by the book procedures. Perfectly executed takeoff sequence.
@lukethomas.125 Жыл бұрын
To be expected, they were actual Concorde flight crew
@mrpeel32395 жыл бұрын
So awesome these Speedbird veterans can still "fly" Concorde!
@scarecrow108productions73 жыл бұрын
yep, and did everything by the book. Perfectly executed takeoff sequence.
@chrismarsh3995 жыл бұрын
.
@DavidMarfe5 жыл бұрын
Could kept her at there and restored her 216 could of went to dunsfold instead as there was already a Concorde here the whole time.
@MegaJackpot1805 жыл бұрын
nose cone and tail plane were used on 216 which now resides in the museum at filton
@AvarageMilkEnjoyer6 жыл бұрын
OMG 14 subscibers in one day!!!!??
@KubaQueer6 жыл бұрын
Great, it's like back in time :)
@turbofanct66796 жыл бұрын
Wow this is something you don't see every day :)
@superdduper937 жыл бұрын
The crew must've been super nostalgic of flying the actual thing while testing the simulator
@Bombelman7 жыл бұрын
why manual ?
@aerocentric7 жыл бұрын
Up until this time last year, Concorde DG's nose and visor hadn't operated since 1981. In fact, over the years some of the parts of the mechanism had been robbed for use on the BA fleet. We spent a couple of years restoring the whole system and this video shows us testing everything with a manual pump before ultimately fitting and connecting an electrically powered hydraulic pump. You can see this being tested here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/boGloICVabaVnKM
@apieceofdirt46817 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful aircraft!! Not quite as beautiful as a 747 but eye catching nonetheless. I know she was a noisy fuel guzzling lady but during take off the feeling of being pushed back in your seat from the afterburners kicking in was thrilling. I'm one of the lucky ones that flew on this lovely lady after the refit from AF 4590 crashed. (I still think AF maintenance wasn't as top notch as BA's). The view outside the window at 58,000 feet at Mach 2 was breathtaking. I understand why she was retired but I can't believe another SST didn't take her place.
@northwestorient87357 жыл бұрын
Even though it's only a sim, I always get goosebumps at the moment of "3, 2, 1, NOW." I'm surprised they managed to remember all the flows!
@nickgodfrey1973 Жыл бұрын
With how passionate Capt. Bannister is towards Concorde, I'd say for him it would just be automatic
@AlisterBrenton7 жыл бұрын
Just had a pretty daft but potentially awesome thought... how much of a pain in the ass would it be to rig up a few rows of passenger seating behind the flight deck with their own window visuals and such? Could make for an interesting "virtual flight" experience with LHR-JFK taking just the right amount of time for a presentation/lecture on Concorde's history combined with some in-'flight' fine dining...
@AlisterBrenton7 жыл бұрын
Wondering what the underlying software is that's powering the simulation - looks like it could be X-Plane or MS ESP?
@aerocentric7 жыл бұрын
LtBrenton MS Flight Simulator 2004 and the Concorde SST add-on.
@AlisterBrenton7 жыл бұрын
Neil Walker Must have taken a royal amount of buggering about to finally get all those controls wired up then :p Any plans to upgrade to P3D with the FSLabs SST?
@aerocentric7 жыл бұрын
Although much of the wiring was done by us, the interface 'box' between the controls/instrumentation and the computer(s) was designed and built externally by a company called XPI Simulation. An upgrade to P3D is something we are currently looking into.
@barthoedemaker9 жыл бұрын
Should be flying the real one instead. They keep classic cars on the road, the same needs to be for airplanes...
@Devolante6 жыл бұрын
barthoedemaker EXACTY. The problems with some planes like the DC10 though, are the facts that they were quite dangerous. Also Concorde used up a lot of fuel and it isn’t an infinite supply. Sadly it doesn’t work like that. But I wish it did.
@22pcirish10 жыл бұрын
How you get the 'real' experience if the sim is fixed to the ground?? Really disappointed to find this out as I was considering this as a day out for my up coming 50th in two years time.
@aerocentric10 жыл бұрын
The simulator is indeed fixed base. British Airways scrapped the motion system when they started decommissioning the sim shortly after they stopped flying Concorde in 2003. Rest assured, however, that the lock of motion does not detract from the experience of flying it. The visuals out of the cockpit are fantastic and do an excellent job of tricking the brain into thinking you are moving. In fact, we've had some people get motion sickness! All of the ex-Concorde pilots that fly the simulator at Brooklands on a regular basis will tell you that the motion was only a very small part of the simulated experience. In fact, you forget that the motion system is no longer there!
@A340DICTATOR10 жыл бұрын
I have been there twice
@aerocentric10 жыл бұрын
On the subject of switching on the reheats. The 4 switches are turned on prior to the takeoff roll (thus 'arming' the system). As soon as the throttles are pushed forward the reheats will come on. All 4 are used for takeoff. The reheats are also used during the acceleration from Mach 1.3 to Mach 1.7. In this instance they are switched on in pairs (inboards then outboards).
@737Adventures9 жыл бұрын
Surely you meant that the reheats are used from Mach 0.97 to Mach 1.7 during the transonic climb?
@aerocentric9 жыл бұрын
You are correct. Mach 1.3 is the point where the intake ramps begin to operate. I can only assume I had this in the back of my mind at the time I wrote that! Cheers.
@737Adventures9 жыл бұрын
+Neil Walker haha! I got the Haynes Concorde book a few weeks ago! Absolutely love it! Must have read it through at least ten times! How I wish I could have been a Concorde pilot!
@geraldcharbonier631311 жыл бұрын
technoaudiojunkie : I'ts normal procedure. You can found the Concorde normal procedure on the web. When you use reheat for take off, you have you apply four reheat in same time before full power. It's possible Concorde take off without reheat too for short distances.
@technoaudiojunkie11 жыл бұрын
At :30, Captain Bannister asks about the reheats, and Engineer Hazelby says "Four on." All the reading I've ever done says the reheats were applied in pairs (inboard first, then outboard) AFTER full power was applied on takeoff. Does the BA checklist really call for all four reheats on before full power is applied?
@technoaudiojunkie11 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Neil. You've captured some wonderful footage, I hope to visit Brooklands someday myself!
@aerocentric11 жыл бұрын
Well spotted! I filmed several takeoffs during the day, some from JFK and some from Heathrow. I've corrected the description. Thanks.
@technoaudiojunkie11 жыл бұрын
Pardon me, but if you listen around time index :46, Captain Bannister calls Kennedy tower to say they are ready for takeoff on 31L @ KJFK.
@Kamyk191111 жыл бұрын
Was it a silver flight?
@aerocentric11 жыл бұрын
No, she didn't look great then, but she looks great now at Brooklands! Cutting her up was a shame but it really was the only option. There was no future for her at Filton and would have just ended up being scrapped.
@teemas1011 жыл бұрын
Wow not looking good. No question that the towing vehicle is a diesel. Tap Tap Tap Tap... Shame DG was exposed to the angle grinder. :(