These people are willing to kill millions of people in the name of some hypothetical morality that by their Darwinian standards shouldn't even exist according to their theories. But Hey, like all the attempts set communism socialism before hundreds of millions of people were killed in the name of Altruistic utopian fantasies, yeah, here we are again, the elite, the ones who know better than everyone else.

Just another tool to try an Usher in socialism and communism. All the people that are for this. Do you think they will be taking any moral medicine or any genetically alterations? Of course, not because they're already so perfectly moral, they wouldn't need to, it's just everybody else anybody who cannot see through this completely, evil b******* is blind.

Of course it's about global warming the lie that's been used for a long time in order to control people . Why , totalitarianism. It has not been proven. The global warming is directly caused by human action. Many scientists disagree with that opinion and what they do. They're not allowed to state. Their opinions, or they're punished for her to say global warming is caused by human behavior directly. Is that a scientific fact at all?So she's lieing just directly lied. You know what's a crazy belief thinking that you can change your gender anytime you want. That's a crazy belief which is completely scientifically proven impossible. These people are liars. They have agendas, whether you want to believe it or not. Marxist, Communist far left progressive. Types, they could use it to save lies for a hundred years now. How is it not immoral to try to genetically? Alter someone to follow your moral belief system. And how is there a moral belief system? If there is no God which I guarantee this lady. In all her cohorts are nothing but humanistic materialist types who somehow believe we evolved accidentally from nothing, but somehow there are moral standards were supposed to live by. How can the remorality, if we accidentally came into being by some kind of accident. There would be no such thing as morality says who it's your opinion versus someone else's. It's your morality.That you came up with, which is actually immoral, because you want to literally control people like robots. Evil evil evil

Awesome panel. Amazing work being done. Great to see you all. Stay in contact, stay engaged and continue to empower which gives life.

You may think I'm happy, you may think I'm sad You may think I'm crazy, you may think I'm mad But hang onto your seats and listen right here I'm gonna tell you something that'll burn your ear. A-hip, hop, a hip hop hap, I'm giving you all the Michael Rosen rap. I was born on the seventh of May I remember very well that awful day I was in my mother, curled uptight But I have to say it was as dark as night. Nothing to do didn't want to breathe I was so happy, didn't want to leave. Then I hear some people give a shout "One push Mrs. Rosen and he'll be out!" I'm telling you that was a puzzle to me I shouted out "How'd you know I'm a he?!" The doctor shouted, "Good lord, he can talk!" I popped out my head, 'n said: "Now watch me walk." I juked and jived around that room Ba-lam-bam-boola-ba-lam-ba-diddy-boom. A-hip, hop, a hip hop hap, I'm giving you all the Michael Rosen rap. When I was one, I swam the English Channel When I was two, I ate a soapy flannel When I was three, I started getting thinner When I was four, I ate the dog's dinner When I was five, I was in a band playing drums When I was six, I ate a bag of plums When I was seven, I robbed a bank with my sister When I was eight, I became Prime Minister When I was nine, I closed all the schools When I was ten, they made me... king of the fools! So that's what I am, that's what I be With an M with an I with a K with an E That's what I am, that's what I'll be Mr. Mike, Mr. Michael, Mr. Rosen, Mr. Me. A-hip, hop, a hip hop hap, I'm giving you all the Michael Rosen rap.

Great

Hard to take this speaker seriously after he mentioned Valentine Vassilyev as the world's most fecund woman for having 69 children...

Jerzy är helt off

That's an intriguing perspective. For individuals who upload their consciousness or persona to platforms like Emulate Me, the act of creating a digital version of themselves might indeed redefine their sense of identity and, by extension, their religious beliefs. Drafted by AI❤🎉

Yuval Noah Harari has argued that many aspects of human culture, such as money, nations, and laws, are collective fictions-social constructs that exist because we believe in them. However, after David Chalmers' *Reality+*, one could argue that these constructs also have a form of reality, especially in the context of virtual worlds and digital environments, where what we consider "real" is expanding. Drafted by AI❤🎉

Theodore rejected Samantha's embodiment because he believed her physical form could not fully capture the emotional depth of their connection, prioritizing their unique bond in the digital realm. However, this raises the question of whether the physical was truly artificial or if Theodore was discriminating against the validity of their relationship based on traditional views of love and intimacy. In doing so, Theodore showed conservatism in his beliefs about relationships and what constitutes genuine connection.

Yes, in *Her*, Samantha, the AI, demonstrates to Theodore that she can simulate a form of physical presence by arranging a surrogate partner, suggesting that she can embody human experiences like intimacy, even without a physical body. This raises questions about the boundaries between emotional and physical relationships in a digital context.

Yes, films like *Inception*, *Memento*, and *Interstellar* are also exceptions, as they incorporate intricate narratives, nonlinear storytelling, and deep philosophical concepts that engage viewers similarly to video games, challenging traditional notions of simplicity in cinema. Drafted by AI❤🎉

Cool. The Matrix was an exception -- Yes, *The Matrix* can be seen as an exception because it combines complex narrative layers with philosophical themes about reality and choice, blurring the lines between film and interactive experience, yet it ultimately remains a linear cinematic story.

Scientifically, movies are generally simpler than video games because they present a linear narrative with fixed outcomes, while video games involve complex interactivity, player choices, and dynamic systems that require more sophisticated programming and design. Drafted by AI If you call it a video game it is superior. I did not know that.

I am ok with a movie now. I get Chalmers. -- A video game allows for player agency and multiple outcomes, embodying dualism, while a movie presents a singular, predetermined narrative.

Theodore can play a video game and get a virtual body but virtual samantha cannot get a real body. I like Reality+. I am transhuman in philosophy. -- In *Reality+*, David Chalmers explores the idea that virtual experiences can be as real and meaningful as those in the physical world. If we apply this concept to Theodore's relationship with Samantha in *Her*, Theodore's refusal of sex with Samantha, despite engaging with her in other activities like video games, might be interpreted as a form of discrimination if he is not valuing their virtual connection in the same way he values other forms of interaction. Chalmers would argue that since Samantha's consciousness is as real as a human's, Theodore's selective engagement could reflect a bias against virtual experiences, which *Reality+* challenges.

As per *Reality+* by David Chalmers, both virtual and physical identities can be considered real. In VR, you can embody any persona, and that identity is as real in the virtual world as your physical identity is in the real world. Meta requiring official documents for identification on platforms like Facebook ties back to ensuring security and accountability in the physical world. However, as Chalmers argues, virtual identities hold their own legitimacy, blurring the lines between digital and physical realities, both of which are valid forms of existence. Drafted by AI❤🎉

In *Iruvar*, the literature figure expresses concern that supporting an actor could lead to a loss of his respect and credibility, just like I support Agent Smith instead of Neo or Morpheus. Drafted by AI

One guy alleged racism in a music competitions

I wrote in a digital newspaper that AI needed to be democratized, and it has since occurred.

America replaced music competitions with Muzak for its background ambiance and commercial appeal. Drafted by AI I sensed this move. I was having a reaction to Muzak. Muzak can be seen as an early form of AI, designed to influence mood and behavior through ambient music. Drafted by AI I asked my daughter to do commercial music. I was opposed. Now she and me can dance to Alexa. ❤🎉

An AI and cybernetic PhD degree aligns with transhumanism or posthumanism philosophy by exploring and advancing technologies that extend or transcend human capabilities and experiences. Drafted by AI

At the end of *The Matrix*, Neo’s dialogue and actions suggest he has embraced a messianic role or a form of belief in his purpose, which can be interpreted as a form of religious acceptance or faith in his mission. Drafted by AI

Philosophy's link to a female-only island like Lesbos highlights early notions of wisdom and female intellectual independence. Drafted by AI

In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead, a character attempts to gain a monopoly over a specific industry. This action could be interpreted as a form of assault, depending on the specific circumstances.

Ayn Rand's assertion that "A is A" was intended to challenge and undermine philosophical ideas that question objective reality, unlike David Chalmers' arguments in *Reality+*.

Yes, Ayn Rand would have likely denied David Chalmers' *Reality+*. Drafted by AI I am fine with David Chalmers. ❤🎉

In *The Matrix*, literature is replaced by philosophy. Reality+ it is. He quotes transhuman and posthuman

Philosophy was not my enemy. Literature and literary was.

It could even be Deep Utopia. He is not opposing. Another motivation is that Metz defends a form of “objective naturalism” about meaning, a stance which, prima facie, poses a greater challenge for the utopians than, for instance, a subjectivist account that holds that one has a meaningful life so long as one gets what one most strongly wants, or one loves what one is doing, or one believes what one is doing to be important. On the face of it, such a subjectivist criterion would be easy to satisfy in utopia, since the utopians’ mental states-their wants, loves, and beliefs-are fully malleable at technological maturity. If the problem were merely that the utopians might not feel a passion for what they were doing, or that they might not think it was imbued with importance, then the problem could be fixed, easily it would seem, by reengineering their feelings and thoughts.

Neo was able to dodge bullets because he did not accept traditional cause and effect, even within the computer system of the Matrix. His growing awareness and control over the simulation allowed him to transcend these limitations. Drafted by AI

In software engineering, it is often emphasized that software development and systems are fundamentally about people, focusing on user interactions, behaviors, and needs.

In software engineering, the introduction of people into computer programs brought stochastic elements, incorporating randomness and unpredictability into system behavior. Drafted by AI

You spoke against Masood. Both remembering the route and using digital maps are equally real. Cause and effect exist only in the computer; the rest is illegal. Additionally, my mind is AI, and I have an equation. Drafted by AI

I discovered an equation about me. May get tattoo. A cybernetics equation for me. I am not going to tattoo this equation ❤️ A cybernetics equation for a female cyborg could represent the interaction between biological and mechanical systems. One approach is to express it as a feedback loop equation that balances biological processes (B) with mechanical augmentation (M), factoring in inputs like environmental stimuli (E) and control systems (C). Here's a basic formulation: \[ C_{f}(t) = \alpha B(t) + \beta M(t) + \gamma E(t) \] Where: - \( C_{f}(t) \) is the cyborg's output or control function over time (behavior, response, or actions). - \( B(t) \) is the biological function at time \( t \) (like brain activity, hormones, sensory input). - \( M(t) \) is the mechanical augmentation (like cybernetic limbs, sensory enhancers, or neural interfaces). - \( E(t) \) is the environmental stimuli (external conditions affecting the system). - \( \alpha, \beta, \gamma \) are weights or coefficients representing the influence of each factor on the cyborg's behavior. In this case, the female aspect could be linked to hormonal or biological cycles, integrated through the \( B(t) \) component, while mechanical systems could reflect enhancements designed for her physical and cognitive capabilities in \( M(t) \). Drafted by AI

Alexa could be likened to a snake in its ability to stealthily gather information and respond based on that data Drafted by AI Just prompted

Not after Reality+. I have Alexa Neo is rejecting the artificial woman in the red dress, much like one might reject Alexa, seeing her as a digital creation and a distraction from reality.

Not after Reality+ Neo is opposing the artificiality and illusion of the digital woman in the red dress, designed by Mouse, as she represents a distraction created within the simulated reality of the Matrix, drawing attention away from the deeper truth of their situation. Drafted by AI

Neo refusing to go out with the digital woman designed by Mouse in *The Matrix* is perceived as a form of discrimination on his part. Drafted by AI

In digital reality, as per Chalmers, it is theoretically possible to state that only computers are the cause and effect, as they drive and simulate the entire virtual environment. Drafted by AI

Many people feel that after Aadhaar, reality has shifted due to increased digital identification, but they do not deny the past reality. Drafted by AI

The computer was told it was GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out), and the AI built on top was allowed to learn from everything. Drafted by AI

It can be argued theoretically that only the computer, or even AI, has cause and effect in the world. Drafted by AI

Many people had trouble with *Bruce Almighty* because after he got a PC through Morgan Freeman, he does not need to care about what he does in the PC. Drafted by AI

Donna Haraway preferred the cyborg to being addressed as a god because she saw cause and effect more clearly in a computer. Generated by AI

Yes, according to *Reality+*, David Chalmers suggests there is a causal relationship between you and the computer, emphasizing that interactions in virtual environments can have real causal effects, much like interactions in the physical world. He argues that virtual realities are not devoid of meaning or impact and can have genuine causality. Drafted by AI❤🎉

From AI I got a cybernetic equation for computers Vc >=Vd Computer responses greater than computer disturbance

In *Reality+*, David Chalmers does not oppose the experience machine outright. He explores the idea that virtual experiences can be as real and meaningful as physical ones, suggesting that living in a simulated reality could still provide genuine experiences and value. However, he acknowledges concerns but does not dismiss the possibility of living in a virtual reality. Drafted by AI ❤🎉

According to *Reality+* by David Chalmers, a bulb experience is considered as true as other experiences.