You're very welcome!

In the noise modifier, you will find at the bottom "Restrict Frame Range". Which basically puts a start and an end to the effect.

make sure to apply it on all X Y Z

@@TarixDot i cannot thank you enough

Thank you! The shadows are projected on the body as it is an image plane, so it is basically an object that can receive shadows.

Thank you, we are also planning other videos!

One of the common reasons for the objects to slide is the framerate of your 3D scene. It has to be the same as the video. In our videos it is 25fps

Thanks for liking!

Thank you! 😊

My pleasure 😊

Glad it was helpful!

Thank you! Yeah, it seems that people always watch the same youtube channels!

@@unrealab yaa true

Glad it was helpful!

I think that because you are using the camera solving instead of object solving. In the "track" panel of the motion tracking, you have to select the "Object" tab, and here as default you should have "Camera" as the default solving target. You have to click on the "+" icon in order to add the "object" as the target for the solving.

Glad it helped!

Hi, I have to be honest, I don't do game assets, so I can't tell you if triangle-based topology is better in that case. It's certainly better for standard modelling and for animations that involve surface deformation.

Glad it was helpful!

Just searsh Bubblebumbutt in google and let me know what you see

lol@@00smash69

It does work ! first you need to enable the node Wrangler addon in adon section.

Are you viewing it in "Rendered" mode? It's hard to help without seeing your node setup. Or you can check: Select your object, go to "Materials Tab" in the properties panel on the right. Scroll down under Settings > Surface > Displacement and make sure it's not set to "Displacement Only"

@@alexdivietro249 ok sir thanks

If you have shot the extra persons from incorrect perspective, it cannot be fixed easily. All persons should have been shot in position where they are in final part of the frame for the final footage. For example, if somebody is going to be on the left side of the screen, he or she must be shot against green screen so that he or she is on the left side of the screen in the green screen footage. And yes, it sucks if you only find this out later. In theory you could create a 3D model of the person, project the textures from the original green screen camera direction and then move the person around the virtual scene to get another camera angle but that requires full 3D model of said person to be successful. And even then you may have to manually paint the part of the texture that was not visible from the original footage but is now visible in the new position within the camera view. (For example, imagine somebody having a tattoo on their right shoulder. If they were facing camera on left side of the original footage, the tattoo is not visible to the camera. However, if you later decide they "should have been" on the other side of the frame, the tattoo should now be visible. And as a result, you would now have to paint the tattoo to the part that wasn't visible in the original footage. It's possible but very time consuming.)

Thank you!

Really happy for your appreciation

The same as the response in the other video: "the complete workflow is explained in one of the previous videos, how to link the plane to the camera, how to scale it in order to keep the proportions of the scene and so on. We didn't repeated here to don't repeat the same things in each video"

Hi, the complete workflow is explained in one of the previous videos, how to link the plane to the camera, how to scale it in order to keep the proportions of the scene and so on. We didn't repeated here to don't repeat the same things in each video!

Hi, you say right that in photogrammetry you should not use reflective materials and in general elements that move, because this obviously deceives the solving of the scene. And in fact the glass object is perhaps not the best example. But if you notice, though, in the video we deliberately used as examples of markers the edges of the table and not markers present on the glass vase, precisely for the reason you say. The example is meant to show how, even in the presence of unsuitable objects, tracking should be done on stable markers that do not move. Perhaps this should have been made clearer.

I imagine, theoretically you would track her feet and then place blocks or simple foot shapes are. They would move according to the tracking data. Then maybe you'd want to add some details of water in front of her feet to make it more realistic (splashing), I'm not sure the best way to do that part though...