And that is why the old covenant/testament has no use to the Christians except learning of various things such as theology which means the theology of The Wisdom of Solomon should be good if it is to be included and the theology of the book is NOT good so it is NOT in the old Testament.

I don't know if your question has been answered or not so I'll give you a quick summary of why it's credible. For starters you want to look at was it written in the time of the claimed author. The wisdom of Solomon was written in the first century B.C. which automatically tells us that it could not have been written by king Solomon who ruled in the 10th century B.C. The Gospel of John was written between 90-110ad and Revelations was written in 95 A.D. giving credibility that it could be the same Author. Revelations uses a lot of symbolism and allegory yet it talks of fulfillment of the only prophecies Jesus did not fulfill in his first coming. We are told the anti Christ will stand in the holy place of the Temple. However the temple has long been destroyed and never rebuilt so there hasn't been a place for that to happen however Isreal has said they have the material needed as well as the sacrifices ECT to rebuild the temple they just need the permission. Building it would lend further credibility to the text. The four horseman are a good representation of Islam (several videos breaking that down. The two witnesses represent the Christians ECT. Much of what Revelations talked about has come to be much of the prophecies are becoming more and more possible. Jesus tells us that he is coming back and to be ready. I could go on more but honestly I'd end up writing more text than Revelations explaining lol. I hope that answered your question and if you need clarification of anything or more details about something just let me know I'll be happy to answer the best I can .

@@jakelambert4693 thank you, it is helpful and a good starting point.

@@bluwng awesome I'm glad to hear it

This book is nuts so why exactly do you want it in? Was not written by Solomon not by a long shot.

​@@bluwngexactly, Wisdom of Solomon written in the first century B.C. meanwhile king Solomon ruled in the 10th century B.C.

The tree withering represented Israel

@@NativeSpiritWolf I'm aware, the point was Jesus wasn't as super sensitive & wouldn't hurt a flyish as people make him out to be today. Neither were his apostles. Just like in relationships, we make idealized versions of who we want people to be & we blind ourselves to who they truly are.

⁠@@AmericanIlluminatiyes Peter isn’t perfect he is just a man as for Jesus it’s literally just a tree chill man 💀

@@The-Negative-Commentator Yea, but then we can go the crowd favorite where Jesus whipped the people in the Temple. I chose the tree, because it was miraculous. Mirroring the infancy gospels. However, you see both Peter & Jesus physically lash out at people. Granted Peter got scolded for it.

@@AmericanIlluminati Jesus whipping ppl in the temple is fairly debatable a lot of interpretations say he just whipped the animals of the temple which would be more in line with all his other actions

And the Catholics say.... Nah

How does it contradict?

Are you aware of the fact that the new testament is clearly shown to directly use the Septuagint, which includes all Deuterocanonicals? If Jesus used the Septuagint, why on earth would I use the Masoretic which doesn't match?

No, if you use the KJV, you are following a false gospel

Hard to hold that rule to a book written before the NT and Rev. And your quote pertains to Revelation. He who has ears let him hear...

SHALAWAM KING they’ve missed it but APTTMH

God is a MAN OF WAR ISREALITES WERE GUIDED BY HIM

Revelation is another book in question.

@@_3d3p3_ DTA…don’t trust anyone it’s like saying Political Party A is better than B both will destroy you. Those books are sci-horror crazy that’s why people like them.

That's a theory, but we should consider what Scripture says. There was no sin in Him, not that after baptism His sins were washed. The purpose of His baptism as stated by Jesus Himself was not remission of sins, but to fulfill all righteousness. We in the other hand need remission of sins. Furthermore we must consider, if Jesus had sin, then what righteousness could He have justified us through? And how could He be the antitype of the spotless lamb? If He had sinned He would need a savior, not just baptism.

I think she was explaining how the Book makes God a woman as referring to Him as a she

​@@tshepisolekalakala693yes that is why the person disagreed with the video. They think God is the androgynous god of the satanists which is actually... Satan.