phoxetis

Пікірлер

@accidentallyhonest Ай бұрын

I remember seeing this on KZbin in 2016

@ChmodX Ай бұрын

You should see her reaction when she sees her first blue screen.

@Bazz1982 2 ай бұрын

Iets te snel op zwart geschakeld in de uitro

@JinglePlanet 3 ай бұрын

Datum is 11 september 1988.

@NielsNL1 3 ай бұрын

wauw toen hadden ze ook nog dinosauriers enzo toch

@AndalusianPrince 3 ай бұрын

Humor is een talent.

@Aditya-f8t5z 3 ай бұрын

🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

@blairsimpkins3505 4 ай бұрын

I'm love this clip. I keep watching it. Back when KZbin was You Tube.

@Willow932Office 5 ай бұрын

Intel (1991-1993)

@ArtemRybakov 7 ай бұрын

Please make this advertisement in Russian at Elevenlabs

@tjappiekonjo1097 10 ай бұрын

Dank voor de upload

@geertterharmsel 10 ай бұрын

¨omdat de eerste de sigaretten rook niet weg kreeg¨.....

@phoxetis 10 ай бұрын

ja, mooi he ;)

@EMFS223 Жыл бұрын

1990-1993

@Toby_the_Glen Жыл бұрын

Nowadays you'd have to do a thousand compliance courses and accreditation certificates before they'd even let you sit it in front of a corporate PC?

@richardsequeirateixeira Жыл бұрын

Xerox PARC was already having this.

@squattingheads Жыл бұрын

And now they have sharepoint, and fixed signature folders and commonly used excel features hidden under a five click submenu for cell formating.

@CartoonPhreak Жыл бұрын

Exactly. My Acer Aspire laptop has Intel Inside. It has Windows 7 installed. I’m currently playing everGirl (THQ) which supports the Intel microprocessor.

@Alexandraofficialproductions 10 ай бұрын

Windows 7 home premium?

@killzone7518 Жыл бұрын

@KarimMaassen Жыл бұрын

Ik hoorde al Kieft op 5 seconden. Ze hadden moeten winnen. ;)

@hermanvanvelzen89 2 жыл бұрын

Eerder gezien; toch leuk!

@hermanvanvelzen89 2 жыл бұрын

Leuk!

@Tomsonic41 2 жыл бұрын

I know this is an old video, but I've had enough experience of VHS to make a guess as to what's going on. My Sharp VCR mutes the picture to blue whenever the control track is missing (such as between recordings) or can't be read. If other tapes are ok, I'd suggest the control track on this tape has become damaged - possibly by a magnet. That would also explain the changes in speed; it uses the control track to determine whether the recording is SP, LP or EP.

@alexandernikulin2010 2 жыл бұрын

@Idontwantayoutubehandle. 2 жыл бұрын

But getting peep off the

@jordybakker7813 2 жыл бұрын

Die hoempa-sound van Van Niel Studios betaalt zich wel uit.

@phoxetis 2 жыл бұрын

hey, Jordy :)

@jordybakker7813 2 жыл бұрын

I like their subtile high notes at "Oranje über alles" @28:38

@amromajzoubs2460 2 жыл бұрын

en Op STER Reclame van 1990-91

@amromajzoubs2460 2 жыл бұрын

met Phil Collins

@9852323 2 жыл бұрын

You have performed an illegal operation.

@alangrant5684 2 жыл бұрын

No training lol. Here ya go ...

@likith1337 2 жыл бұрын

Windows and Microsoft has always been crap. Hail Linux and jobs

@9852323 2 жыл бұрын

Linux is too hard to use for normal people.

@intisarmuhtadee1117 2 жыл бұрын

@@9852323 This is not 1993. So no! It's not hard for normal people.

@privateuser3725 2 жыл бұрын

When we So you are familiar with doing a posterior capsulotomy? Absolutely as long as I've been using this YAG laser...but my specialty is working on folks without actual eyeballs.

@robdom91 2 жыл бұрын

I love how she claims this is her first time using computers and still she reaches for the mouse on instinct. Using a typewriter with a mouse must not be that dissimilar then.

@francofan100 2 жыл бұрын

Maybe her office was filthy and had actual mice

@mountainman615 2 жыл бұрын

Making it easier! Until it freezes!

@wYd001 2 жыл бұрын

This is whay crypto is missing today. Most people do not have any understanding of what it is

@AJRandom 2 жыл бұрын

i love how the app opened instantly 💀

@MarkWhich 2 жыл бұрын

Typewriters were better back then.

@voyager1977.2 2 жыл бұрын

Wow it was recommended to while being 13 year old video and only 10k views.

@marinangelov 2 жыл бұрын

I haven’t used Windows in years.

@krsameer1 2 жыл бұрын

I've used Windows 98/ Windows ME/ Windows XP / Windows Vista when I was a kid . The glow and joy that blue screen had in our generation whenever it comes to my mind , is no more in these colourful screens . Those Operating Systems were limited but very much precious in it's own time

@adrianmontano1373 2 жыл бұрын

Those lucky early investors..

@nati22love 2 жыл бұрын

how long was this woman's maternity leave?

@francofan100 2 жыл бұрын

She was replacing a younger woman who was on maternity leave.

@theprogressiveatheist7024 2 жыл бұрын

RIP Sue.

@efficaciousuave 2 жыл бұрын

So this is what Panos talks about: -technology fading into the background to help you achieve your goal.

@bandersnatch6546 2 жыл бұрын

"I quit and I am going to Apple." "Why?" "Because they have a Mac."

@BTin416 2 жыл бұрын

Windows 3 was actually quite revolutionary, retained complete backwards compatibility with every DOS program and layered a fully featured graphical OS on top of it. Windows 3 was every bit as revolutionary as Windows 95 a few years later, arguably 3 and 3.1 is what won the PC war for Microsoft's favor, not Win95. 95 just built on the previous successes.

@mohimbrood5787 2 жыл бұрын

Thx for the info especially for those younger that never really saw lower than windows 95

@ailaG 2 жыл бұрын

It wasn't backwards compatibility, Win3.x was software that ran on DOS. You'd either start it like any other software or you'd have autoexec do it for you on startup.

@BTin416 2 жыл бұрын

@@ailaG I understand what you're saying, but Windows 3.x allowed for all DOS software to remain working while it layered a full featured graphical operating system on top of it. You're actually complimenting what I said, you're right: Windows 3.x was built on DOS, this maintained full backwards compatibility. In fact, most DOS software could be run through Windows 3.1 by creating an icon in the Program Manager without having to exit to the DOS prompt. Win 3.x was very advanced for its day. Win 3.1 was able to run 32 bit software, which was very revolutionary for the early 90's. Windows 95 was actually no different, it was 100% DOS based as well, just more advanced. Win 95 was the first version of Windows that had more marketing money/glamour behind it, more so than its R&D money probably. Windows 3, 95, 98, and ME all were DOS based. The later versions just got better at "shielding" you from the non-graphical DOS roots. It wasn't until WinXP that they finally migrated away from DOS, but even still emulators like DOSBox maintain legacy compatibility to this very day within Windows 10/11. This is why Windows is so popular, you can run a copy of 1980's DOS software with ease in Windows 11 by running DOSBox, even with today's non-DOS Windows. Microsoft has always been king of keeping things compatible (and it appears the same difference is happening with the switch to ARM based chips, with full x86-32 and x86-64 compatibility through built-in emulation, right in the OS natively). There's no need to install a "virtual machine" and install a second operating system, all this compatibility is built right into Windows to this very day. In my opinion, this is part of the reason why Windows is so successful, and why its not going to be toppled, regardless how popular mobile devices are, Windows is king of the PC and will be for many years to come. Really what I was saying is that Win 3.x was what won Microsoft the operating system wars, it wasn't what came after. Win95 merely built on the success of Win 3.x. Windows 3 is what ushered in the graphical PC GUI and made Microsoft a home brand name. It wasn't 95, it wasn't XP that came over a decade later, and neither did the Windows 1.x-2.x variants, it was the Windows 3.x series that built the Windows platform's foundation more than any other version, made Microsoft the premier GUI operating system vendor, and Win 3.x should go down in history for it. Unfortunately, many people give the credit to Windows 95, forgetting that Win 3.x was the first popular Windows variant. From 1990 until 1995, the entire computer industry was striving to be Windows 3 compliant and get software built for the platform, it was the original big hit. I remember it so well, my first home computer was an old 8088 DOS system, and my first GUI at home was a Windows 3.x Packard Bell. Those were days of big, big change, indeed!

@ionrael 2 жыл бұрын

And still, nowadays, being DOS with graphics on top

@joojoojeejee6058 2 жыл бұрын

Microsoft already won the "PC war" with MS-DOS... Windows 3/3.1 was arguably less advanced than OS/2, but the public had already "pre-chosen" Microsoft brand over IBM so that was that. And I guess "Windows" was a catchy and clever name for the software. Unlike "OS/2".