M E Capstone Design (415/466)

Пікірлер

@solvesmith 11 ай бұрын

What textbook. Anyone know?

@Datascientistph Жыл бұрын

how you arrived at the last column and last rows?

@yasirmohyh Жыл бұрын

Hello, who is the professor who present this video?

@caty863 Жыл бұрын

By far the clearest practical explanation of AHP. Now I have to go back to the math behind for a more complete and exhaustive understanding of this powerful MCDA technique.

@akhiljose6302 Жыл бұрын

Nice and simple

@MohamedAliskiaa 2 жыл бұрын

hi this is a free AHP software you can introduce it to your student kzbin.info/www/bejne/n5DMenefndSZea8 I think it will be very helpful

@nicawander3178 2 жыл бұрын

Hi maam, could you please share a citation for the formulas, for thesis purposes only. And also I have a question regarding with the C matrix, can anybody show me how did she multiplied the C with W to calculate the (Ws)? Thank you so much :)

@haithamshoman5758 2 жыл бұрын

Hi, did you find an answer to this on how she got the "Ws"? What did she multiply the "W" with?

@abdurrauf9434 2 жыл бұрын

Kindly please tell me how to find Ws in this... I didn't get it.. Please mam

@ndihohabweayubu8516 2 жыл бұрын

thank you so much

@donnymontreano9235 3 жыл бұрын

Quantitative benchmark are more favorable

@Transparentchoice 3 жыл бұрын

What a great explanation of the maths of AHP. It's really clear. In the real-world, however, the maths is not so important. AHP, in real-world decisions, is about getting your stakeholders aligned. Decision-making is usually a team-sport and getting stakeholders aligned properly and having a strong structure to the evaluation process is what leads to better decisions, more buy in and increased decision velocity. If you're interested in how AHP in real-life situations, I'd suggest this video. It's a real decision consultant talking about a real decision ($200m decision) and he talks about all three value points - better decision, faster decision, more buy-in. This not a function of the maths (tho' it can't be done without the maths), it's a function of a collaborative, structured discussion and decision process. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5rZiZKkp8yasLM I hope this helps those who are new to AHP. (Full disclosure: TransparentChoice is a leading provider of AHP software)

@raghuramkolathu9021 3 жыл бұрын

Hi- thank you for this knowledge. Would you be comfortable to connect sometime on WebEx ? I am trying this for the first and I need some guidance

@devislight 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much for this series .. The last step after transposing, how , was the weightage applied/ multiplied to rows, to arrive at the final results to decide Riveting. Thanks

@josephtan1485 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, I have some problem understanding Ws and Consistency vector mentioned in KZbin video AHP1&2. In the videos of AHP1 & 2, the formula to calculate Ws is C x W And the values of Ws of material costs given in AHP2 are 0.286, 0.515, 0.839, 3.090, 1.908, 0.210 The value of C of material costs before normalized are 1, 0.333, 0.2, 0.111, 0.143, 3 In AHP1, the W of material cost is 0.047 If I calculate based on the above values, the values of Ws would be 0.047, 0.156, 0.0094, 0.005217, 0.006721, 0.141 The values of Ws calculated are very different from the values of Ws provided in AHP2. Is my calculation correct? Also, if Ws = C x W, and {Consis} = dot product of Ws x 1/W Then isn’t that {Consis} = C x W x 1/W = C Would like to seek for help in clarifying the above.

@kadirmokrane9848 3 жыл бұрын

Nice presentation and talk. However i'm wondering to know how to estimate ration consistency with Fuzzy-AHP. An example would be valuble. Tks

@wesleyb2843 3 жыл бұрын

Nice work. Great videos. I suggest to watch another DFMEA Training video on Tonex.Com kzbin.info/www/bejne/laXGd3t8htN9m8U

@SURAJGUPTA-wv6dh 4 жыл бұрын

thank u mam

@thegreekdeal4747 4 жыл бұрын

Great video, but how did you come up with the final values for welds, rivets, casting?

@reshmaantony6435 4 жыл бұрын

Excellent video

@thegreekdeal4747 4 жыл бұрын

do you know how she came up with final values for welds rivets casting?

@balavenkataganesh 4 жыл бұрын

can send the excel file to [email protected]

@intuitiondigression2174 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your video. This is good for mechanical application of AHP: you explain the calculation for each passage. However, you do not explain the meaning of each calculation, so interpretation is not easy. For example, why should one sum the element of each column? What does the resultant number represent and why? Also, why should one normalize? And why does averaging by row should provide the importance degree of each criterion? Why does CI has n-1 at the denominator? And what does lambda mean and what does lambda minus n represent?

@kzy711 4 жыл бұрын

Very clear and easy to understand. Thanks!

@zainabkhan2475 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much.. regards from India

@theresahanvunguyen1677 4 жыл бұрын

To those who wondered about where the values from C came from, she mentioned matrix [C] on track 7:00 in her previous video, AHP Part 1 (remember, it's NOT the normalized one). Just take that matrix MINUS the sum-row, multiplicate it with vector [W] and you will get Ws. Another thing is thank you so much for your time, Ma'am! I have seen both Part 1 and 2 and could not find any AHP-video better than this!

@zainabal-baldawi9768 3 жыл бұрын

Please, could you explain more with example (w* first value how she calculated it )in same her example if possible how she calculate the C

@theresahanvunguyen1677 3 жыл бұрын

@@zainabal-baldawi9768 She started explaining matrix C from 4:00 in AHP Part 1. You choose the numbers in this matrix yourself based on your own evaluation of two and two of the criteria. She's categorized the levels of criterium importance into three right below matrix C, so here you can understand why she chose certain numbers in C. She chose Mfg Cost to be moderately more important than Mat Cost with 3.00, thus Mat Cost is moderately less important than Mfg Cost with 0.33. So actually you only need to choose numbers half of C and use this to calculate the rest of C, so 1/3.00 = 0.33. Work with the number 1s standing diagonally in C and divide by the number below it to get number to the right of it. For checking, do the reverse which is multiplying 1 with the number to the right of it to get the number below it. You may have to draw one vertical line and one horizontal line through the numbers below and to the right of 1 in C to see clearer. You'll see the diagonal pattern because the criteria stand in the same order vertically downwards and horizontally rightward. Is this clear, Ms. Allawi?

@jerryviviano5062 5 жыл бұрын

Helpful, but would have been much more so if the presenter had selected the proper slide to show when discussing what's on a slide. Also, a pointer showing which detail of a slide was being discussed at the moment would have been quite helpful. As it was, I was constantly searching around the slide shown to see what it was he was talking about at the moment. This caused my attention to drift from what was being said. In other words, the end product would have been greatly improved had it undergone proper DFMEA and PFMEA. Thank you.

@positivelyfe760 5 жыл бұрын

How did you calulated Ws= [c].w??? how to find value of [C] its a matrix

@atha3695 5 жыл бұрын

Super...

@hteinlyn2 5 жыл бұрын

Dear Ma'am, May I know how I could input data from many experts in AHP?

@bens3961 5 жыл бұрын

Dr. Lutz Philosophy of Design rise up!!

@AmateurPeanutButter 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot, this explanation is easy to follow.

@curtistang9189 5 жыл бұрын

highered.mheducation.com/sites/0073398144/student_view0/additional_chapters_and_additional_information.html

@royceweigel2877 5 жыл бұрын

Criteria will usually have a weight to it, unless each criteria is viewed as equally important.

@taufikemoscreamo502 5 жыл бұрын

WHAT IS A DIFFERENT BETWEEN PRIORITYVECTOR AND EIGEN VECTOR

@ahuizotllopez1668 6 жыл бұрын

THANKS!!

@azeemakbar74 6 жыл бұрын

very clear discussion thanks

@ISHRATHANIF-zj5ro 6 жыл бұрын

how to set the Ws column and RI ??

@muhammadimrantariq5638 6 жыл бұрын

How to calculate the value of [C].... Various users are confused.... Please clarify it

@birendrakumargupta1305 6 жыл бұрын

Not show clear correct videos

@irzi3168 6 жыл бұрын

A very comprehensive illustration of the AHP method. May I ask you how to incorporate the input of more than one respondents in the method? Moreover, if you could guide use on multi-level AHP problem, it will be a great favor to the research community. Please consider replying this at your earliest convience. Thanks