Another fascinating lecture from Prof. Steyerl. Thanks for the upload

So few views? Well deserving of MANY more.

Lots of tips for photographers getting started with the overarching message that you have to do your homework and learn not be afraid to switch it up.

Meme trump

Meme

Sorry... Die Frisur hätte besser sein können 😉☺️

Sie haben ein paar dinge vergessen... Mein krypto 😂😊

Whenever I listen to a Judith Joy Ross interview I am concerned for the interviewer. Their role makes me think of that boxer's maxim, 'Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face'. I understand that reticence to extend the articulation of a practice into words. I would have loved to witness an academic interview both Ross and Saul Leiter at the same time. What a tough gig that would have been.

thank you! this was very educational

@87min ... "nothing but shit happens and it, nothing but shit happens and nothing but shit happens ... and ... exhales " and that's what drives photography

So inspiring and educational. Many thanks!

Is there a version of this video with higher resolution and louder sound?

Love the discussion in the audience. All talks should end up like this.

It's getting better but one of AI's failings (apart from the ubiquitous malformed hands) is typography. I find it surprising considering how much text based imagery is on the net, that AI can't render a simple word in a simple typeface. It seems to manage reasonably well with a prompt like say, "A letter R made from a tangle of vegetation with roses popping out all over". I seems "it" loves complexity. Or perhaps more correctly, the tastes, experience and aesthetics of the programmers lean more towards complexity and, to use an old expression "The WOW! factor".

Thanks for posting this! I wonder if anyone still produces Printing-out paper...

59:06 how NFTs and AI are "stale promises" that seek to automate the question of how do we live together, how do we share resources, how do we make decisions 43:20 we are being trained to new production pipelines

Duane Michals should put a cap on the vulgarities that he spews forth. An artist of his stature doesn't have to resort to these attemps to shock. Also, his blatent jealousy of Andy Warhol is an embarrasment.

De Landa is among my favorite teachers and philosophers. His online lessons, and his ability tell to complex subjects simply is a true sign of genius, and his books open new horizons for me. As for the films, maybe he can plug-in John Conway's surreal numbers into visual filters to enhance the narrative with infinite regeneration possibilities in an open ended search space.

Tony, I miss you.

Wooho Go Mama!❤❤

Thank You

I'm not into film-making, but trying to understand Manuel DeLanda's philosophy. For me, the Q&A session was the most interesting part, in particular the questions from 1:44:00 onwards. I skipped over most of the videos after watching a minute or so.

merci

This is very important. What’s terrifying is how I don’t know what else to say besides, “this is very important.” Humanity is coming up on a waterfall, and I don’t know how far (or enjoyable) the fall will be.

Wonderful speakers! Thank you from Stockholm Sweden.

i only wanna hear about this guys thesis paper

You can't copyright style btw.Its usually not worth it. Copying the style of Magnum photographers will help you explore various styles, but they won't employ you just because you can copy one of them, and are cheaper. Nothing stopping you from printing your Martin Parr inspired images on T-Shirts, shoes and mugs, if that is what you want to do. You couldn't print Martin's images, but you can print your own. You will end lots of art if people are allowed to copyright style.

I think the same laws should apply to AI images as all art's copyright laws. If it is too close to look copied, then it is infringing. Just because we can grab images from Google and change them a bit in Photoshop, doesn't mean we can start trying to sell those images. Those that want to sell AI art have to not try to copy other artists too much. They, like everyone else, have to make it transformative. That just seems like common sense. Just because you can create AI art to look like another artist’s work isn't going to be respected as the original, just as a print isn't worth as much, though it does make the artist more famous. A lot of the art world is linked to the fame of the artists, more so than the images sometimes. If I made (famous artists) style images, it wouldn't stop people valuing (famous artists) work. Just because I could photoshop his work into my image, doesn't mean I could sell it. The AI isn't making all this art, it is not responsible, it is a tool. Just as photographers have to take responsibility for what they photograph. You can't photograph someone's artwork and then try to sell it, just because the camera has that ability. AI artists have to take the same responsibility as all other artists in considering if their images are transformative or too close a copy.

Gunnar Johansson

heart wrenching

Vow it's a grand historically important event indeed.

Sound is Awful cannot 👂🏻

Duane is Duane! That lady is who is not cool here!

one of my favorite artist, thank you for this

Enjoyed watching this film so much! The two hours lunch sounds so appealing! LOL😁 Loved the way everyone just took their time and it done; no rush, no stress! ❤️ Aunt Pam

Thank you for uploading and sharing this.

how do i find the guy with the giant afro dammit

It’s sad seeing how pretentious Duane really is. He’s given some awful interviews lately where he is so rude to other photographers. Just because these young students are not 85 doesn’t mean they haven’t experienced the loss of a friend or family member.

No

lovely presentation!

*Green Energy Kills Native Culture, Freedom, Habitat, Water and Wildlife Worldwide* Greenhouse gases went up 45% in 30 years, the planet is heating faster at 5 nukes / sec 4 billion people now live at least one month per year with severe water shortages Trees grow faster and die younger more than ever before in hi temps drought fire and flood Yanks pump up fresh drinking water, poison it, pump it back underground to frack gas, to burn for electricity, to charge their EV batteries, in a mega drought -- and because of this Yanks cut emissions more switching to gas than Europe did switching to renewables, if you ignore all the leaky wells. Here are the thing hidden from you that you need to know 66% of people will live in water stressed areas by 2025 50% of thermal and hydro electric power will be threatened with water stress 40% of coal mines are water stressed, and so are 30% of planned hydro dams The earth was heating 4 nuclear bombs per second in 2014 The earth is heating 5 nuclear bombls per second in 2020 Net planetary heating is equal to 400,000 Hiroshima bombs per day Out of 1.2 billion vehicles, under 6 million are electric Electricity is 20% of energy -- renewable electricity is 4% -- solar & wind are 2% of energy 2% of energy is solar and wind + 4% of energy is renewable Planetary heating went up 46% in 50 years from 0.47 watts/m² to 0.87 watts/m² 350 ppm CO2 will not stop planetary heating We must stop burning 50% of fossil fuel in 10 years to stay below 1.5 C Our attempts to not cross 1.5 C are ineffectual and will kill everything off, here's why *Battery and bio-energy extraction will destroy tribal water and wildlife* 40% of insect species are at risk of extinction by 2050 Real climate racial justice = monthly private carbon dividends Greenhouse gases went up 45% in 30 years + 15% of energy will be renewalbe by 2040 Renewable energy cannot reduce heating in time to avoid 1.5 C 4% of energy is renewable + 4% of mammals are wild by weight We kill trees 2X faster than we plant them Trees grow faster and die younger in fires floods & droughts It takes one ton of coal to make 12 solar panels Most solar panels will become unrecyclable toxic waste by 2050 at 6 million tons / yr Yes, we can technically recycle most of a solar panel, but it is unprofitable to do so *Vaclav Smil says:* North Euro offshore wind turbines work 33% of the time North Euro onshore turbines work 22% of the time North Euro solar panels work 11% of the time Over 60 yrs, jets are 68% more efficient and fly 60X more passengers Efficiency is not the anwwer *Green energy in Europe is open fraud* Europe burns 80% of the globe's wood pellets for renewable electricity Europe burns 80% of its curbside recycled plastic & paper for recycled electricity Europe burns 50% of its palm oil cargo in diesel engines for green bio-energy Dams destroy 80% of river wildlife up and down the rivers Europe's global carbon fund is rife with corruption *Support James Hansen's monthly private carbon dividends* 100% to you 0% to governments & corporations That's why all governments and corporations hate it That's why both socialists and capitalists hate it Monthly Private Dividends = *Real* Climate Racial Justice (not the academic kind) 26 Nobel Prize winning economists support James Hansen’s monthly dividends, including: 3,589 U.S. Economists, 4 Former Chairs of the Federal Reserve and ALL 15 Former Chairs of the Council of Economic Adviser You can find facts, sources & links at Loki's Revenge blog on wordpress Most people ignore me, delete or shadow ban me

Audio is a shame :(

wash us in the blood

found this discussion refreshing and stimulating. Thank you

Bullshit

this is absolutely one of the most profound things i’ve ever listened to

Thank you for posting this. I don't know how I'm the only one commenting.