I'm impressed by your course Criminal Law and its potential impact! I'd love to collaborate on promoting it to a wider audience. Let's discuss how I can help spread the word effectively. Looking forward to your thoughts! Best regards.
@liznewark6 ай бұрын
Thank you for the simplicity
@littlefrog83897 ай бұрын
why does this channel have so few videos? They're perfect
@littlefrog83897 ай бұрын
perfect! Absolutely perfectly pitched for revision. Now I need to know whether you civer the rest of criminal law!
@ozyyi1752 жыл бұрын
Hi do you have multiple choice questions based on theft act 1968??
@methylators2 жыл бұрын
alkaline
@andyminiman2 жыл бұрын
Uk is a joke
@ocbeat95032 жыл бұрын
More videos like this please
@MK-mh6lh2 жыл бұрын
A very interesting voice which helps in listeners staying engaged. Reminded me of a Bobby in the 60s on one of those old cop programmes lol
@DrJenYes2 жыл бұрын
Excellent lesson. Thank you for this!
@harishabib61112 жыл бұрын
i have my mid exam tomorrow and this literally cleared all of my confusions
@aceventuresswitzerland79663 жыл бұрын
Fantastic work. I love this video and it is better than the Criminal Practice Blackstones book. Keep it up.
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ace Ventures Switzerland
@amandawarner19453 жыл бұрын
Great video and explanation! Thank you,
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Glad it could help :-)
@tomaszkarpinski57673 жыл бұрын
First class explanation!
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tomasz!
@tomaszkarpinski57673 жыл бұрын
Outstanding job :) Thanks to this I am sure, I will pass my first ICT. Thank You!
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tomasz. Good luck!
@williamstevens76483 жыл бұрын
Brilliant lesson on burglary, super clear and easy to understand.
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Thanks William :-)
@rebecca80133 жыл бұрын
Reservatrol in wine is a stilbene not a flavonoid 🙏🏻 The properties are similar though....
@_DigitalRemake3 жыл бұрын
This should be the gold standard of all lessons on criminal law here on YT. Amazing. 👍
@ik73483 жыл бұрын
WoW! Very clear and to the point! Thanks
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Hope it’s helpful :-)
@captainheinie63553 жыл бұрын
This is Admiralty law not common law.
@spazzohawk95913 жыл бұрын
This is a real help for my A level revision. The information was shown clearly and the art style looked great.
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Thanks :-) You may find some other useful videos on our website at www.checkmatepublishing.info. Let us know if there is anything in particular you would like to see covered...
@Anonymous-wq5xn4 жыл бұрын
How can you make notes effectively?
@williamking15544 жыл бұрын
disarming the population
@Ifyshalom14 жыл бұрын
Pure gold! thank you again
@Ifyshalom14 жыл бұрын
this is gold! thank you.
@bestardkhar79424 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making it short
@eatcleanplan71134 жыл бұрын
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Einstein
@juggfromzer04 жыл бұрын
Where my pending case niggas at
@TheMothergoose34594 жыл бұрын
Is this from Blackstones?
@adrianyoung59793 жыл бұрын
No, Checkmate Publishing are a different entity. All police exams in the UK are purely based on Blacksone's manuals.
@flyhigh99444 жыл бұрын
Hey is all of this still relevant in 2020? Is any of it obsolete??
@checkmatepublishing4 жыл бұрын
All still relevant :-) You'll find more on our website at www.checkmatepublishing.info
@flyhigh99444 жыл бұрын
Ty you have helped me greatly 👍
@AbtaheeAWasee4 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised to see no comments on this. This is was absolutely first class. You could not have explained it better. Thank you!
@checkmatepublishing4 жыл бұрын
Hey Abtahee, thanks for the feedback 😀
@jaytealstone16874 жыл бұрын
Good video but spelt actus reus wrong lol
@flyhigh99444 жыл бұрын
Jay Tealstone would you know if any of this is obsolete now?
@jaytealstone16874 жыл бұрын
@@flyhigh9944 Hi flyhigh. I've looked over the video for you and: OBSOLETE (sort of): - Regarding the Ghosh test from R v Ghosh, the Subjective part of the test is no longer required to prove by the prosecution. The Supreme Court decided that it did not accurately represent the law - Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67. The Objective part of the Ghosh test, however, is still very much relevant. ADDITIONAL RANDOM INFO: - Regarding taking property to make up for a debt, there is a little bit of wiggle room for how much the taken property is worth before it becomes dishonest. For example, if there is a debt of £100, and the defendant takes property worth £105 for the debt, it's still not dishonest. However, if the property taken was £500 for example, the Courts would not accept it, and it would be found to be dishonest. - Weirdly specific, but if a neighbour has a tree which has a branch coming over your fence and into your property, you can remove the branch up to where your property ends, as long as you give it back to the neighbour. Usually though branches can't be removed if you don't own the tree. - In a shop for example, the moment you pick up an item off the shelf, you have appropriated that property.
@J394445 жыл бұрын
Can you do going equipped and bladed articles please!
@checkmatepublishing3 жыл бұрын
Hey Jake, we cover blades and points in the full offences weapon video in our online course. You can find more details about the course here: @t
@dsandoval20595 жыл бұрын
Very good. Thank you for getting to the point and not ranting for 20 minutes
@checkmatepublishing5 жыл бұрын
Less is more!! Let us know if there any other topics you’d like to see covered...
@patrickrhamomalmeidacaldas77825 жыл бұрын
The best "sort explanation" about active recall!!!
@checkmatepublishing5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Patrick. Are there any other topics you would like to see?