It's strange how a myth can change the world in a way that all the other myths..... Muhammad, Buddha, Confucius, Zoaster, Hare Krishna etc. Etc never could. Lol.

@@user-dj5kr1vf6e Yes all over the world they watch the night sky for aliens coming to abduct them. but I guess your talking about Jesus who changed the world apart from the parts he didn't off the top of my head Japan are you so insecure you have to make things up exaggerate or just plain old lie..

Indoctrination. ​@@user-dj5kr1vf6e

Read John 8:58

@@LearnfromGood Yeah, before Abraham He was because He was created before the world was. Proverbs 8 22. And to deny Jesus teachings, Matthew 16, and is to trust in the flesh and that is a curse, Jeremiah 17 5.

@@Churchofhellno curse at all. Cliff is speaking truth. Jesus is God manifested as man. 1 TIMOTHY 3:16 “Beyond all question, the mystery from which true godliness springs is great: He appeared in the flesh, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.”

@@wesleyjakesta4095 Sorry, but Jesus never said nir claimed He was God. And the He is Jesus Christ, not God. And Timothy was taught by Paul and neither knew Jesus Christ, nor taught by Him. I Am the way,the trust and life and no man goes to the Father Except through Me. You are being deceived and are guilty of worshipping another God.

@@ChurchofhellJesus was revealed to Paul, that in itself is knowing. He wouldn’t of taught the Gospel if that wasn’t true. Jesus is God, even if you don’t believe it, that’s the truth. Jesus is fully man and fully God.

Jesus is the most verifiable historical figure to have ever walked this earth. If you're not aware of that, you seriously have to do some proper research of history.

@@GraftedOliveBranch He's actually not. We have no way of verifying anything that was written about him, and no way of confirming that anybody who wrote about him had actually met him. Jesus might actually be one of the worst evidenced figure in history.

@@bibleburner8426 LOL.. no way of verifying anything that was written about him?... So, I take it that you discount historical documentation as nonsense?. I suppose you don't believe in Alexander the great, either?... The historical documentation that was recorded regarding Alexander the great was written 350 to 400 years AFTER Alexander the great lived. And guess what?... Historical scholars STILL regard that information as historically reliable. The historical documents regarding Jesus Christ were written down no later than 70 to 90 years after Jesus walked the earth, making them some of the earliest historical records in antiquity.... By the way, do you know what year we live in?.... 2024 AD. Do you know what that means?.... Probably not. So let me explain it to you. It's not 2024 years since the earth began, it's 2024 years since Christ walked the earth. "AD" stands for the Latin term "ANNO DOMINI", which literally means "in the year of our Lord". Educate yourself before you make a fool of yourself. 🤗

@@bibleburner8426 The historical evidence of Jesus is incredibly reliable. The historical documents of Alexander the great were recorded 350 to 400 years after the fact. And historical scholars agree that it incredibly reliable. The latest historical documents of Jesus were recorded 70 to 90 years after Jesus walked the earth. In comparison to Alexander The great, the historical documents about Jesus are incredibly reliable and incredibly early. some of the earliest historical evidence for Jesus were recorded only months after his crucifixion. We live in 2024 AD. The Latin term "AD" stands for "Anno Domini", which means "in the year of our Lord".

@@bibleburner8426 I've typed out multiple responses to your last comment, but NaziTube won't let me post it.... I suppose NaziTube is just as scared of the truth as you are.

forrest frank! his music is super good

dude in the nicest way possible i started this account like a week ago 💀

The issue with that young man saying that is thinking that many different beliefs must separate us since there is an abundant amount. So since he doesn't believe in Abrahamic religions, that is why he said that to Cliffe in the end. He is a good example of how this culture focuses a lot on individualism. This in part makes it easier to think that other things outside of us don't have an effect or link to us and vice versa. It is a common illusion a lot of have instilled in us as we grow

@@elijean-baptiste3122 yeah you are right

I wonder if he thinks that gravity does not work for him.

@@tomlord4469 lol

That statement was a counterpoint to the argument that the bible has been translated from language to language many times with the original meaning being lost. His point is that its a direct translation from the original language and the available translations are near perfect.

King James version specifically had some certain edits that he specifically wanted. The most popular version of the book is a purposeful manipulated version to help this guy out politically lol

@@TurtleTracksStudio I have no issue with the bibles while holding the perspective that it is a "doorway" or "gateway" to discovering God. And that it is a source of information that has much general validity as any book. It is a source to learn from, question, and then grow from.

"as any book" = any educational material

somehow i doubt that in fact im williing to bet you cant read or only read the instructions on microwavable food

Crazy how these Christians immediately go to insults when you disagree with their fantasy world view despite something along the lines of "loving thy neighbor" or some shit written in there.

Yup! Read it multiple times through and through, very interesting how horrible some of this stuff is, very hateful god

Hey man! I just wanted to kinda talk about your reply here. Not in like a teacher way haha just in a commentary way lol. so the person who commented above, definitely didn’t go about the loving aspect preached by Jesus. But, one thing I also want to point out is (in the least like rude-sounding way possible of course) that when someone says something against anything you believe strongly, it can hurt your feelings or maybe provoke a strong reaction. That being said, I still know for a fact that Jesus commanded everyone to love their neighbors, and this is no exception from that command. So, on the behalf of all Jesus followers, i’m sorry for any time someone wasn’t acting enough like Jesus, which sadly should be expected because “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). I also do believe there is a big difference in real JESUS FOLLOWERS compared to Christians so sometimes people who go by “Christians” don’t always the Lord’s interest at heart, and sadly I think that’s pretty common. But, by no means saying this person isn’t though, like what I said, things said against one’s faith can warrant some strong reactions. Now for the other comments and onto the whole God is terrible and evil thing, I would first like to say that their is no world where God is evil, and their are a few examples to prove it. For example there are a few examples where people say “God is evil” that i’d like to talk about. First, one I see a lot is “God tempted adam and eve by putting the apple in the garden!!!!” and that’s just simply not true. You see, God didn’t want robots as his people. He wanted them to have a choice between choosing Him or the evils of the world. As you can see, we chose the latter, and we continue to do so today every time we sin. So now one might say “but God still tempted them, right?”. No. Temptation never comes from God, only from the devil, and this is a prime example of that. THE DEVIL came and tempted them, not God. Testing of our faith comes from God, Temptation comes from the devil. Anyways, hope that answers your question. If you have any more instances or questions, I’d be happy to answer.

@@ProDreamCrusher what i cant love thy neighbor and also call you a condescending asshole? or doubt your ability to read? as Iron sharpens Iron my friend the bible iv read isnt about love bombing people to the point of joining my cult all that does is confuse the meaning but hey you speak for all christians so you tell me

Also im not muslim i went to catholic school and read the bible and torah im currently reading all mono relgi0us texts bcuz i want to find the truth and saying PBUH is respectful

@@Permafrostt Not saying PBUH is not being disrespectful. Saying it formulaically sounds insincere, like a mindless reaction, like a mantra whose purpose is to stop thinking.

Nothing in the Tanakh points to Jesus as that person is portrayed in the NT. Most of the claims of such leave out verses before and after the cherry picked ones that make clear who is being depicted. That the founders of a religion make up stories about a new hero who replicates the actions of heroes past is zero evidence for that person having been prophesied, he is manufactured to specification (and via lies). -- That the Bible requires interpretation and is so vague as to be amenable to contradictory interpretations means it cannot be the work of a beneficent God who wants us to know him, or at least to know his intentions for us.

The Masoretic texts compare well to the Dead Sea scrolls of the same content. The oldest Septuagint pieces are similar in age to the DSS fragments, but we have writings that say that the Septuagint was still being refined in 300 AD by Origen. So, your point barely has evidence for it and is also moot as it doesn't indicate that the Septuagint is a more original document than the Masoretic. And being closer to the original doesn't increase veracity if the original was false, it just is of anthropological interest.

​@@histreeonics7770 You do realize the dead sea scrolls only GIVE legitimacy to the Septuagint right? The oldest pieces of the Septuagint date back before Christ where as the oldest piece of mesoratic text is only about a thousand years old, in the vast majority of the references to the Old Testament made by the apostles they use the Septuagint. Youre assuming there is such a thing as an "original document"... as you put it "your point has [no] evidence for it and is also moot"

@@kardz1848 In what sense would the Septuagint have legitimacy? Fragments of it help set the date of its creation, but nobody pretty much doubted its generally accepted date of origin. The "virgin birth" error shows just how untrustworthy the Septuagint is. The desire to proclaim prophecies as being met resulted in fabrications of stories of Jesus' birth and heritage that are incoherent, along with genealogies that are meaningless if Mary had not been a virgin. The piling on of miracles, ones that match Greek religious tropes, further undercuts any claim of divinity for such documents. When you step back and look at the effect of things like Torah law on a society you see that it is a social contract between the priesthood and the men to assure them that they have reproduced. All the rules on modesty and sexual exclusiveness serve the building of confidence that a man has not been cuckolded. That shows that purely secular, gene driven source for the content of the Jewish and subsequent monotheistic religions. Even the Christians follow that pattern, with adultery being the only basis for divorce.

Because you believe yourself higher than God. Ita not an intellectual problem or an evidence problem you have, it's a moral problem. An ego problem.

@@kardz1848 you say "... it's a moral problem. ..." I agree, the number of monstrously immoral things the Christian bible claims to be good and approved of by the Abrahamic god, is so large I can't begin to imagine having any respect for such an awful, violent, cruel, selfish being.

thats a whole lot of claims, not a lot of those those so called "monstrously immoral things" to back it up@@NeergMit Your paradigm cant even give a justification for such a thing as "morality" so what are you even talking about? In your world view there is no objectivity, everything is subjective. There is no good or bad.

@@Hax268 misrepresenting my argument sounds pretty disingenuous to me. If you can disprove my observation, be my guest.

How about owning slaves? Monstrous enough for you?

Clearly you have issues you are aware of and too lazy to fix. Lets see where you end up after death. Any regrets? Because I know for a fact your perspective would change in a heartbeat if you KNEW when you last hour was. You don't even think twice about this but you wake up every day. Can ANYONE really guarantee tomorrow? Anyone??????

Stop lying randy. Not cool

Yeah you must be reading the one with reddit commentary

You shouldn't just read the Bible, you actually have to study the Bible. There is a difference.

@@IronsharkGaming4747 Have you read the entirety of the bible, front to back? I sure have, a few times, it's a fine read, kinda a boring book, but man does that god guy really suck. Lots of hateful actions, lots and lots of murder, and a lot of rules and commandments throughout both testaments that I don't see any christian follow.

So the Bible was written in the 1500's ??

@@TexasHoosier3118 I said assembled. You should read what they left out.

@@TexasHoosier3118 Council of Florence around 1450.

So its the “original” right? So the original has contradicti0ns, and wasnt written in aramaic Jesus PBUH tongue? I understand the Torah was hebrew which makes sense but the NT too 🤔. Ive read the Bible and everything points towards Jesus being a prophet 🤷🏾‍♂️ Mark 10:18 “Why are you calling me good? No one is good only God” theres other quotes too why he says ONLY pray to one true God THE FATHER. Not to mention he says his mircles and power are from The Father. Ppl will being up the “even before Abraham I Am” as everything in the Bible its all about interpretation. This just means he was always meant to be, Past Present and Future has always been written and known by God. And last but definitely not least Jesus has never blatantly said he was God, its all his deciples and ppl around him that misinterpreted and misconstrued his mircles power and demenor as being God. God like sure but all prophets did mircles and had power that was given to them by God obviously the ppl of that time see this and dont know what else to call it but God. Its not like its impossible Hindüs see everything as God and thats without even seeing the objects do anything amazing. Theres so much more I can write but ill leave it with that for now plz lmk if you can explain or prove me otherwise also im not muslim just learning i went to catholic scool and have read the torah and bible working my way thru all mono relgi0ns 🙏🏾🙏🏾💜💜

@Permafrostt so the thing that people don't understand is the Spirit of God. There's a reason you have to get reborn into the kingdom of God, and he fills you with His Spirit, which replaces the spirit you were born with. Earth is a place of salvation and repentance for the living to choose. When you choose to believe that Jesus is the promised messiah of the Old Testament, that all of the Old Testament prophets spoke about, and that He is who He says He is, which is the invisible God in visible form, then because of that one act of faith, you're spirit is transformed and you are made into a new creation. Ask people, and they will tell you, that's exactly what happens. Then, be ause you are a new creation, you see, hear, taste, smell, and touch things totally different than you did before, you're new. And when you're new, the Lord gives you eyes to see and ears to hear. Otherwise, it is hidden to you. This place is a miracle, and so is the creator who put us here. God bless you

Correct. Evolution is an amazing thing.

Or just let people believe what they wanna believe and go on with your day.

@@wim303 ur allowed to believe whatever you want I dont mind that, but claiming that there is some sort of evidence, or convincing argument that it is in fact true is simply wrong.

Ironic considering most historians agree he existed and other historical texts refer to him. You can well search that on this platform.

​@@titanf30jesus existed but wasn't the messiah

the evidence is the eyewitness testimonies in the books Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. There weren’t any cameras or recorders in the first century, therefore everything that was written by eyewitnesses. Those four people are only a few of those that saw Jesus before and during his death as well as his resurrection after three days pass. i could say i saw someone fall in front of me and you weren’t there to witness it. i didn’t get the chance to record what i had seen upon on my phone so the only evidence i had was my word and telling you what i had seen but you have the choice to accept or deny that because you weren’t there to witness the event. Overall I love you but Jesus loves you more.

Just ask God to show himself to you. You gotta mean it though. Also it will help to follow his instructions.

@@whiteboysushiman I completley believe that if god showed himself and revealed himself as being real I would believe. what you are asking is to believe without any evidence

The name of the video I clipped for this short is called “give me an answer #2215”! It’s on someone else’s channel not mine. I would link it, but you can’t add links in KZbin shorts anymore! But, that’s the tittle of the video.