That is a huge pain i have to say. playback for clients with music videos etc is annoying as

Thanks for the comment. I'm currently using lumix Gh5's for video and a Sony a7riii for photography. Looking to go sony for video again soon

@@hmh301 have stuck with Sony for good and bad. I started with the Canon 5D2 and loved it. Game changer 10 years ago. Great color - still amongst the best. But the Sony was light years ahead in low light, paint, audio, beautiful images. Started with the FS100, expensive in its day, but huge in many areas that Canon did not provide - plus great audio, playback, true cinema camera design - sorta. And that is when Sony started into lens design - and boy, did they deliver. A few each year, but what optics. Equal to Zeiss or better. Then the A7 series~! Wow. and 3-5 types too~! Sure I heard about Panasonic and the rave reviews but my Zeiss manual optics (10 of them) worked on e-mount plus anything else out there. How can you beat that? I coveted the A7ii but when the a7iii came out, I snatched one right away and never looked back. Canon wasn't even on the radar screen, or just about not on the screen. I am used to the Sony system despite a few flaws. Menu system is a bit of a pain, but so what, learn it. It works and has many options that Canon just does not have the same kind - like reprogramming any button to any function - can't beat that~! Plus use any lens with adapter. And Sony is dead serious about making world class stuff. They are all in and it is a monster corporation where no expense is spared to be the best. And they deliver. From wee consumer to Hollywood and more, the have it all covered and learn from each department. Look at the Bravia TV's - incredible. Microphones, TV cameras, studio gear etc. Sure Canon and Arri and others have their market, but Sony has it all covered. I will put up with the iddy biddy flaws because I know fully well, when they come out with the next iteration, it will rock as the a7Siii did.

@@hillsmediahouse with the Em1 m3 … hm it would be interesting for me to get to know how to „pimp“ the lense with additional lenses or rings to get more near to an object and if this can be also used then for excampfle for the 60mm macro later. I saw something that could be used on the 60mm but not ig the same stuff can be used on the 12-40. But maybe ghat is not possible anyhow :) Sorry if it was confusing 🙈🙈🙈

Olympus 12-40 f2.8 hands down. By far the most versatile and used lens I own.

Thats correct.

@@hillsmediahouse how ? F6 plus is 500 nits And ninja v is 1000 nits

Hey, no worries. Cheers for the comment. It's a great camera for sure. Was only speaking about it yesterday how some of the features out weigh the sony a7riii and the lumix gh5. Powerhouse unit.

@@androidgameplays4every13 that's awesome, hello to your country 👋. Yea we have a slang with our pronouncement of words for sure haha. Yea the g85 is a beast of a camera, still to this day 🙌

Cheers mate

No worries at all. Yea the 2.8 is definitely needed for the m43 systems. Cheers for the comment 👍

Thank you for leaving the comment. The g85's are so versatile in the real world environment. I now use a gh5 as the main cam with the g85's being backups and b cam. They are great when recording multi angle events. The sigmas are absolutely incredible lenses and the olly 12-40 is still in very high use with gh5

No worries, yea I've had mine for a while now, I use them as b cams but they are still as good as they were when I first bought them

Overpriced then haha

What camera are you using?

Did you ever figure this out? Mine does the same

No worries at all, glad you enjoyed it and glad you got a better understanding of the monitor. It's a great little unit.

Glad you enjoyed it 😀

Angel carries everyone's Fuego

Thank you for comment, you are pretty spot on with your detailed comment and I agree with you in many ways. It did have some great low light capabilities but unfortunately that was shadowed by all the other stuff that didn't work in its favour.