i can't wait to feed the baby pythons some sausage
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
that does seem to be the best part of the whole operation
@BBKlima5 сағат бұрын
I'd eat it
@Teague_yoman5 сағат бұрын
Of course it's Missouri, where I live
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
your fate is to become a python farmer. the universe has willed it
@saltstation11505 сағат бұрын
In certain states pythons are considered invasive, but if we were to hunt them by the masses, we would hunt them into extinction like we have other animals
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Hopefully conservation and wildlife management departments in all territories can maintain the right balance
@alexanderkoufodontis20925 сағат бұрын
It takes a python 20yrs to get that big feeding ot for twenty years would be so unprofitable it ridiculous
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Is it possible for them to eat byproducts of another process?
@ghxst19995 сағат бұрын
I have had python jerky it was good is rather have turkey or bison but it was good
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Python slim jims should be a food group
@tuxydonth15 сағат бұрын
I am ok with this :)
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Python hot dogs are the future.
@josharvin62395 сағат бұрын
No thanks
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
What could go wrong?!
@josharvin62395 сағат бұрын
@@popularscience not interested in it! Will never eat them.
@elizam96526 сағат бұрын
If its cheap enough. Plus insects and vermin are there main food
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
It's going to be interesting to see how the per-unit value of python meat compares with everything else.
@PhreeLark6 сағат бұрын
That would require a farm.and breeding when the inevitable break outs happen we will be up to our eyeballs in snakes. Fuck that.
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Yes, but then "Snakes on a Farm" can be the sequel to "Snakes on a Plane." AND it can be a documentary!
@nate75dawg796 сағат бұрын
One big thing about eating python regularly is the mercury content. That can make a lot of people sick
@popularscience5 сағат бұрын
Is the mercury content the same in all python locations? i.e., does Florida have less/more mercury in pythons than Thailand?
@chrisfreedman23676 сағат бұрын
Boil them, mash them, stick them in a stew.
@bcataiji7 сағат бұрын
They have to eat other animals just to get big. You can cut out the middleman (snake) and just eat the animals it eats.
@popularscience7 сағат бұрын
Looks like rodent is back on the menu, boys!
@bioniccavewoman2.31million7 сағат бұрын
Ssssss ssss sssss😂 Sssssssss🤪
@bigpurplepops6 сағат бұрын
The animals it eats can't turn off and on a couple months later... Fresh food right there!
@TryssemTavern6 сағат бұрын
So wait, you're upset because they are a carnivore? You realize "Mad Cow" spreads when cows eat infected cow meat, right? It still crops up uncomfortably regularly in the United States. Not to mention pigs can (will, and do) consume meat...
@bcataiji6 сағат бұрын
@@TryssemTavern , I don't care what it eats. I was just thinking about cost effectiveness. They're talking about 200 lb boas. This food bill to get boas that size would be pretty big. Would you rather keep feeding a big boa baby deer, or would you rather just eat the deers?
@christopherlacher35449 сағат бұрын
Literally had to spell out in detail how to input the alphabet!! Guess it has to be for dummies and lack of common sense people
@lourdespachla651623 сағат бұрын
Me when humanoid robot: *CLANK* *CLANK* *CLANK* *CLUNK* *CLANK* *CRUNCH* "YEAOUCH!"
@djzigohКүн бұрын
Well i must say i was kind of getting mad at your comments , but the end of the video changed my minde about the hole point of the video. Good work!!! (You and Gus Searcy)
‼️ 1:23 The answer to your question is very simple but if you say it you would get labeled anti$em**ic 😘
@AndyShepherd-ng5nqКүн бұрын
Someone released one on a cover CD by accident, I think it was late 90's or early 2k... maybe before, you could use it to run exe files, so I wrote some to control the data lines on the parallel port, it would develop a personality that reflected the way you talked to it, it could learn subjects from a website you directed it to, and that's about all I remember.
@RonthekingronnyКүн бұрын
Smart...
@michaelgasperik4319Күн бұрын
I started disassembling electronics for parts and discovery when I was about 9 years old. Now I'm 42, i have decades worth of stuff and the knowledge to build almost anything.
@scifriley2 күн бұрын
The best way to predict the future is to invent it! -Alan Kay. He said it four years after the 1967 Cronkite special ;) Kay is credited as the father of the GUI interface that the Mac used that debut in 1984.
@yjadalvarina2 күн бұрын
it was a very nice content
@IKingRonin3 күн бұрын
It's unhackable!
@Jakob.Hamburg3 күн бұрын
20:45 This isn't a tech video. It's a ghost story. :D Oh dear. ^^
@dougalsii3 күн бұрын
And now, I'm annoyed when someone calls or sends a voice message instead of just sending a text message.
@HumanitiesGenocide3 күн бұрын
Yea... Idk why everyone acts like people r be coming more I telligent.... Bak in the day when electronics first came out...EVERYTHING electronic with instructions was practically unknown hyrogliphics to a NON TECH enthusiast ... So if u weren't educated in the "way of tech" u basically couldn't do it ... But that DOES NOT mean thing I probably thought WERENT NOT POSSIBLE back then...it entirely was. You just needed to understand coding... Now days everything has been coded by a GENIOUS to make it possible for YOU to use .... So all in all what I'm saying is this isn't that surprising to me being 39 and having been into electronics since it basically began...I knew the future was coming cause I understood the capability when I saw what was being done And having a pretty good imagination I knew what was possible... Fuck me I came up with a pair of Bluetooth earbuds in like 94 ... Just weren't bluetooth...cause it didn't exist. And I had no idea for real time vr goggles that would track the movement of a pair of gloves and would let u edit the sky and or w.e was in the view finder in real time Even thought as far ahead to think of a color for the gloves that the goggles would take into around nd edit out of the view... Ugh FML.... I'm a loser drug addict now What a waste Ps...not saying i been arround since electronics began lmao...but basicaly from the beginning of home cocmputers and internet
@LarryBloom4 күн бұрын
So you actually produced a "Walter Cronkite Predicted" video, and named it for PopSci? That's certainly bogus. 👎👎👎
@rklein4 күн бұрын
The great Ron Thornton worked on this show. And yes, it was awesome.
@huseman214 күн бұрын
Many many different forms of video chat existed before facetime. Apple Facetime should not even be mentioned in this.
@bob_._.5 күн бұрын
Just so today's viewers don't misunderstand, Walter Cronkite wasn't the one making all these predictions, he was just reading scripts and interviewing the people making the predictions.
@kateapple15 күн бұрын
Funny, how 30 years ago they’re bitching that there’s too many people on the planet.. and now they’re bitching that we’re not having enough sex, making enough babies. Like, This is ridiculous 😂
@JuanWonOne5 күн бұрын
*beep boop* algo food
@RolandHazoto5 күн бұрын
Is this narrator Grady from Practical Engineering? They sound a lot like Grady.
@RolandHazoto5 күн бұрын
I'm Popular? My lifelong dream has finally come true!
@AlanMGross5 күн бұрын
"Popular Science Predicted The Year 2000 (it went badly)" -- Actually, this video is about Walter Cronkite's predictions. Did Popular Science publish its own predictions? I don't know.
@thanksfernuthin5 күн бұрын
I'm hoping the one thing we learned from those people making predictions in the past was... don't bother.
@EvergreenLP5 күн бұрын
No "See you in the future" at the end? 😄
@KryptonianAI5 күн бұрын
Basically a sponsored spokesperson. Kind of like sponsored ads today.
@ReelSpider5 күн бұрын
10:58 to see popular science get a guy sued for copyright infringement...
@ReelSpider5 күн бұрын
I loved Captain Power as a kid, I had that Wolverine t-shirt too...
@ReelSpider5 күн бұрын
The only "wrong values" promoted by "Captain Power" was the idea that television was not just for Mom and Dad. They should have known that 1980's parents would not let their children come between them and their idiot box...
@chipshtpc24785 күн бұрын
Content of this video is great! The video of a tiny TV is super annoying to watch. Some feedback to make the video better for next time!
@RolandHazoto5 күн бұрын
I disagree
@FuchsDanin5 күн бұрын
"You and your wife" feels pretty dated. Maybe "You and yours" instead?
@allanshpeley42845 күн бұрын
Or for you, "You and your hand".
@GappedWonderКүн бұрын
Never that deep pronoun warrior
@thespicemelange.15 күн бұрын
In the year 2000! In the year 2000!!!
@unadomandaperte5 күн бұрын
Hey LaBamba!😂👍
@ChillinWithTheCapuchins6 күн бұрын
Great video, as usual. Keep it up! =)
@empmachine6 күн бұрын
Why does this channel get such crummy stats? (like views/subs/etc).. This content is great! They should be 250k subs at least.. (I shake my fist at you youtube-algorithm).
@MrMash-mh9dy6 күн бұрын
It was a dead channel that the people who work on Vsauce2 decided to bring back to life a couple months ago. Spread the word, Vsauce2 is always greatness and it seems they are bringing that energy over to this. I really like the format of looking back on past editions of PS and picking apart the science and relating it to today.
@GeoffCostanza4 күн бұрын
I like the content of this video, but the delivery feels disjointed to me. It would benefit by being a few minutes longer, and explaining a few ideas more in-depth, rearranging some content, or cutting some things out. For example, the narrator said Cronkite went to the future, but then the next thing mentioned was that Cronkite fired a gun on a B-17, which doesn't add to the overall message of predicting the future. They talked about how he was spot-on with his 6 billion population prediction, but then he "completely blew it" by "being right way too slow." They set it up as if the rest of the video would be about his bad predictions, but then it was a mix of predictions he got right and wrong (really, I thought the video would be about Popular Science's predictions, not Walter Cronkite's, based on the title), and Cronkite wasn't even wrong about MOLAB. They predicted we would have a high-tech, climate-controlled mobile lab, flown to the moon on a fully-automated second Saturn V rocket, that could drive a few hundred miles on a single battery charge. Instead, we got a short-range golf cart. I'm not putting down the incredible engineering of the lunar rover, but the "distant future" of the Grumman MOLAB Cronkite predicted has still not come to pass 55 years later. His prediction about income was also correct, saying that it would be at least $15-25k after taxes. The average income after taxes in 2000 was about $35k, which is at least $15-25k. I loved reading Popular Science when I was a kid, especially Bill Sweetman's articles about groundbreaking military technology. Nowadays they are usually months to years late on technology reporting, and their articles and videos feel like they were hastily written and produced by interns or newly-graduated journalists using PopSci as a stepping stone. There are hundreds, if not thousands of successful educational KZbin channels that figured it out, and PopSci should just use their template. But I still follow them because they were a big part of my upbringing, and I hope they make a comeback.
@spleenky2 күн бұрын
I honestly would’ve not known about this channel had I not seen the article for this on Apple News
@aarong93786 күн бұрын
The 1960s! When we eradicated polio and measles. 2024? When anti-vaxxers bring them back. Technology isn't holding us back, it's humans.
@Delahunt10806 күн бұрын
Really well done Thanks for sharing
@popularscience6 күн бұрын
Thanks! It's always fascinating to go back and look at how tech predictions actually turned out