fail its pi/2 on first one(half circle LOL), but it not matter bcoz we just make semi circles 2x smaller it wont effect pi its allways 3.14.... xD
@oxidine296817 сағат бұрын
NOOOO!! RADIAN IS 38/6 CIRCLE!!!!!!!
@oxidine296817 сағат бұрын
it's 38/6
@Amit_Pirate18 сағат бұрын
Came here from acerola who used it to make a particle system
@tharock22021 сағат бұрын
A Weiner process. Can’t calculate f(x+h)-f(x) if you don’t know f(x+h)
@Maxed_Rayn21 сағат бұрын
I think fractals can't be defrentiable
@dadet11322 сағат бұрын
2π?
@starsun234722 сағат бұрын
≈0.18
@stkhan1945Күн бұрын
..superb
@stkhan1945Күн бұрын
Super..
@fridamamen2081Күн бұрын
I guess you could also look at the circles as functions and solve for the integrals. First you put the x-axis at the bottom tangent point. Then you find the integral of the top circle between the x values of the other two tangent points. Then you subtract the integral of the left circle from the x value of the left tangent point to the bottom point and same thing for the right circle from the bottom point to the right point. The remaining integral will be the area between the three circles.
@Zhakisam13Күн бұрын
Looks "relax tangle" game like
@IamKunalPatilКүн бұрын
Hence, 2PI × R
@ScienceCodeCreationsКүн бұрын
Sqrt(x)
@Billy-hj1nlКүн бұрын
If you draw two semicircle with equal diameters in a semicircle, the length of the curve won't be half the bigger diameter. That's just insanity.
@rezah336Күн бұрын
why is this famous? i have created numerous random shapes that look better than this, does this have a use?
@balajisaiakash3304Күн бұрын
So awesome
@sugamonogaijinКүн бұрын
Really nice. May I ask what software do you use for these animations?
@MathVisualProofsКүн бұрын
I use manimgl for these.
@MattLacote2 күн бұрын
Nah I just know that pie is closer to3 therefore its pie first
@gagewinfield89922 күн бұрын
Well, 1/2 of the circumference doesn’t equal the radius. There is a difference between the distance of one point of an arc to another, is not the same as the total length of the arc itself. And that is why this conundrum is not correct👍
@AbdullahIbragimov-tq8ek2 күн бұрын
72 hours after 52515151 minute +♾️
@zakazkaraoke2 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZ7TdmSArKaqb5Y - yet another example of non-differentiable function where left limit not equal right limit in the x0 point
@jayfairweather40622 күн бұрын
What was the middle bit?
@oxidine29682 күн бұрын
The triangle is 1/4 of the square. It is made of 2 similar triangles and a trapezium. After overlapping, I found out that the trapezium = 3 small triangles, so the big triangle = 5 small triangles. More overlapping done and I found out that the middle square = 4 small triangles. The total figure is 20 small triangles. Since the area of the squre is 1, the small triangle is 1/20 so the middle squar is 1/5
@aminrostami-h5h2 күн бұрын
What about √x ?
@teoeo21372 күн бұрын
Lim n > inf π/n * n = π
@tanmoysantra34152 күн бұрын
the cemi-circke cannot become flat to the diameter
@fedor90862 күн бұрын
Nope. Functions 1, 3 - are differentiable everywhere they are defined.
@MathVisualProofs2 күн бұрын
Correct. Differentiable on the implied domain. But not differentiable at every real :). Could have put in a y-value randomly I guess ;)
@موسى_72 күн бұрын
I prefer the method of making a big square out of four identical triangles. It's much simpler visually than this moving proof.
@MathVisualProofs2 күн бұрын
I have many on my channel.
@aorca88793 күн бұрын
Fractals?
@eduardosuarezalvarado14673 күн бұрын
😶🌫️
@livedandletdie3 күн бұрын
Actually the first one is almost a venn diagram and it could become one if you put it on a spherical surface so you could let AC and BD overlap. Although you would get 4 regions where none of them overlap.
@naitikjain49133 күн бұрын
Do not need to go so complex Just draw graph of y=x to power 1/x,it is also called gaussian curve,its peak reaches as x=e,so since pi>e so e to power 1/e >pi to power 1/pi then after raising power e×pi both sides,we will get e to power pi> pi to power e.🎉
@eiddetham61573 күн бұрын
Once we show that the two triangles are similar we can just set the proportions and we’re done, don’t see the value in the extra steps
@akhiarr3 күн бұрын
I'm subscribing you for this clip. ❤
@MathVisualProofs2 күн бұрын
Welcome!
@swanlee60773 күн бұрын
xsin(1/x), continuous but not differentiable!
@MathVisualProofs3 күн бұрын
Only if also defined at 0 :)
@hjfrbujhbr3 күн бұрын
abs(x) can be differentiated technically
@hjfrbujhbr3 күн бұрын
(sqrt(x^2))' = 2x*1/2*1/sqrt(x^2) = x/abs(x)
@MathVisualProofs3 күн бұрын
What’s the derivative at 0 then?
@JonatanAlexisYanes3 күн бұрын
Area(🩲) = \sqrt{3} - \frac{\pi}{2}
@charliezard643 күн бұрын
If the domain is finite, obviously it’ll be undifferentiable outside of that domain!
@bready_jam3 күн бұрын
f(x)=sin(1/x) - not differentiable at 0 and Weierstrass function which is not differentiable wherever
@chu31913 күн бұрын
hmm an oscillating discontinuity as in sin(1/x)?
@gatoordinario943 күн бұрын
I love your work, keep going dude
@MathVisualProofs3 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@ScienceSpider-sigma3 күн бұрын
The way each width of the overlap is the same as well
@jvn11_official3 күн бұрын
Uh... what is differentiability? 😅
@chu31913 күн бұрын
it's whether you can differentiate a function at some point or not
@swanlee60773 күн бұрын
A function f is differentiable at a point a in the domain if (f(x) - f(a))/(x - a) exists as you take the limit x approaches a.
@NitronBeam3 күн бұрын
f(x))= sqrt(abs(x) - a) Where a is a positive value
@deleted-somethingКүн бұрын
I can almost see with my own eyes how the function goes after the 2d plane
@ospectrum3 күн бұрын
I like the Weierstrass function, which is continuous everywhere and differentiable nowhere
@SbF6H3 күн бұрын
The Dirichlet function.
@Para9oid3 күн бұрын
@@SbF6H ayiii my man 😂
@duckymomo79353 күн бұрын
A function can fail to be differentiable if it oscillates too much or the set is not dense
@Carl_clash_of_clans3 күн бұрын
well the formuula i use is not normal if a 1x1 i will 1^3 and if 2x2 i will 1^3+2^3 if 3 i will 1^3+2^3+3^3 this is an easy method thank me later
@MathVisualProofs3 күн бұрын
That’s a good way! Follow up vid to this has an alternate method.
@MattLacote3 күн бұрын
As a math nerd, I instantly realized it was 2 pi as radius times two =diameter and diameter*pi=perimeter