What a bunch of garbage. The creator of this "fictional" scenario and "pictures" must have had a bad dream. The pictures doesn't represent how the lighthouse look, it is not build on a rocky island surrounded by the sea - it is build on a landmass. And the stories surrounding the lighthouse is a figment of his own wacky imagination. All he/she got right is the year it was build and the bobotie and malva pudding. The so-called pictures of places of cuisine is again a figment of imagination. I clocked out at 5:48
@MengoALLDAY4 күн бұрын
This AI script sucks!!! Just repeated run on info over and over again
@gee-yo7jn5 күн бұрын
I love you so much
@treesab12 күн бұрын
Oops! It skips or something..... just every so often. I do thank you for the upload, very much!
@nengxiong699116 күн бұрын
Great!!!!! like the Hmong/Miao history 👍
@Dnwudc817 күн бұрын
Fun facts: -miao means sprout or seed. Hans revered miao as great cultivators of rice. The original symbol writing for miao people is drawn as a crop. The name later became a bad conotation because the chinese couldnt exterminate the miao so they refered to them as weed or pest. -the original inhabitants or south china to south east asia were called the nanman(nan=southern man= barbarian). miao or mao may have been related to the word ma or came from it too. Like wise the same word for hmoob people is true(green hmoob word na = people/fellows. Ma and Ma suab = barbarian, wild, tribal, outsiders). They wore animal parts, worshipped totem and were hunter gathers. The miao, jingpo, lahu, akkah, mien all likely descended from them. -miao can be an umbrella term. Any group of people from the south of china that hans saw as barbaric they would grouped as miao too even if it was unintentional. During this time, alot of southern chinese tribes were more similar and lived close. Some tribes that split from nanman were still intact and havent fully diverged into the tribe they are today yet. Modern tribes are often built from older ones or mixed with another to form a new one. Other people like lahu, lisu, akah, and jingpo would have possibly been part of the miao and or vise versa and they were part of the war against the hans movement too. This is why alot of chinese ethnic tribe have similar story of how they lost their writing when they fought the chinese and loss. Alot of exchanged and adoption of culture and adopting children into different tribes or clan between these people coexist. -miao is a nation or federation of people. They have sub groups with their own unique names but are still related. Hmoob, hmu, Hmao etc. Hmoob come from miao. Miao does not come from hmoob. Dogs come from wolves not the other way around. All hmoob are miao but not all miao are hmoob. -the term hmoob was coined during the time vang pao came to lead the miao people in laos. They wanted to move away from the negative history. They agree to be recognized by laos government as hmong from then. This is another example of how modern ethnic tribes diverge and branch into their own sub tribes. Hmong only refers to the miao who migrated into south east asia after leaving china, particularly the hmong lao who were part of the cia secret war. The miao in china still refer to themselves as miao or their sub ethnic name. Whether its hmong, miao, hmu or Hmao. They still have a similar sound with "M" one syllable. The word Can still be traced back to Miao. Different dialect will pronounce it differently some with "H" nasal sound before the "M." Listen to people with speech issue say hmong and miao or the miao in chinese say miao. It sound similar to how hmoob people say hmong too except they say "Mao" instead of Meo Just without the H nasal. The 2 words said by the hmoob and miao still hit the same tone of note by both people. -eastern chinese minority ethnic and miao are heavily sinicized. They are basically just hans now. Too assimilated. Western chinese are less assimilated and western china is a good place for tribes to escape. Thats why the hmong lao were able to migrate and escape. They went to yunnan then to south east asia. Thats why hmong lao are more related to yunnan miao and not so much other miao. People in west china are more distinct. Look at jingpo, mosuo people, wa, naga. They are more exotic and nomadic. Eastern chinese tribes are basicaly just chinese hans. -ancient south east asians who have always been there are basically ancestors of miao. The nanman who use to inhabit south china are closer to south east asians. The ones in china were assimilated by hans while south east asians still in south east asia were still pure. This is why they still have paleo features similar to pacific islanders who also migrated from mainland asia. They ink themselves in tattoo the same way and even tai kra dai language(thai and laos) has traces of austronesian and pacific island. Miao is actually a language that was classified to be similar to tai kra dai. The language of sino tibet(mandarin, cantonese, tibet), tai kra dai, miao, austronesian may all have had contact or stem from an ancestral language. South east asians still maintain contact with pacific islanders even in more recent times with genetic, culture and language evidence. Basically hmong or miao are a product and genetic makeup of southern chinese south east asian mixed with modern han. They've always been in china and south east asia. Final note. Hmong people have alot to learn about their history they always talk about the war in laos and their life in laos. They cant go any further back or would rely on inaccurate oral stories with no scientific facts. History is easily lost. Thats why hnong people no longer have totem poles but miao still do. Also why miao people do war drum dance or funeral siritual dance but hmong people dont. And the women and men sit together in the table to eat but hmong people only have men sit in the table. And miao people have women play qeej flute too but hmong people only let men play. Crazy how hmong have changed so much whether its for the worst or not.
@kiabtoomlauj624914 күн бұрын
You've said a whole bunch of random things.... most having no serious foundation. I wouldn't talk about but just ONE of the many random things you've mentioned: The term "Hmong" was NOT "coined" with Vang Pao or "coined" around his time, which was just the 1940 - 50's.... The 1940s-50s were my parents and grandparents time. My parents were, of course, babies & toddlers, in the 1940s and 50s, whereas Vang Pao, born 1929, already was in his late teens to early 20s, in the late 1940s to early 50s, around the time the French were about to be defeated in/around Dien Bien Phu! Again, that was NOT the time the word "Hmong" was coined as you glibbly babbled here. I am the 6th generation being born in Laos, late 60s, around the height of the Vietnam War (1968-69), when the push by the Viet-Minh & their local comrades, the Pathet Lao, into eastern and northern Laos were so persistent, Vang Pao and the CIA started to evacuate tens of thousands of Hmong from Xiengkhough into northern Vientiane (the Vang Vieng-Kasi-Salaphoukhoun-Long Cheng mountain ranges... for better defense).... We --- individually and as family members ---- still remember, through actual FAMILY history, the NAMES of our the great, great, great grandfather who left Yunnan to what's today Oudomxai (borders Yunnan). And all of the names of the SONS descended from him.... That Hmong who left Yunnan in the 1800s.... gave birth to our great, great grandfather, who have birth to my great, grandfather.... From Oudomxai, my great grandfather moved a bit down to northern Luangprabang, to give birth to my own grandfather, whom I knew until I was 7 or so before we left Laos. Zero of those IMMEDIATE ancestors of mine --- or the immediate ancestors of ANY HMONG I KNOW OF (many also being able to trace actual Hmong ancestorsfrom southern China to northern Laos, since the 1800s) ---- ever called themselves "Maio." "Maio" or "Maio-Tzu" is an IMPOSITION on the Hmong, by the Hans. (They do that to, they did that with, ALL other ethnics, BTW... so they didn't pick the Hmong to be treated with "special" consideration.) Hans, even in 2025, for example, REFUSE to call people what they want to be called, of WHAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY CALL THEMSELVES. EVERY SINGLE PEOPLE and NATION on earth, EVERY BROADCASTER, for example, referred to the great Hmong Gymnast Sunisa Lee --- the first Asian woman ever to win the All Around Olympic Gold Medal in Gymnastics, in the 2020/21 Tokyo Olympics (no Hans or Thai or Japanese or Koreans or Vietnamese or Indonesian has done it, although their numbers range in the TENS of millions to 1.4B Han Chinese) ---- as a "Hmong," once she introduced herself as one. NOT the Han Chinese or their news broadcasters. They all referred to Sunisa Lee as a "Maio." Hans are just very overtly, obnoxiously recalcitrant: they're going to LABEL and call you what THEY WANT... not what you refer to yourselves among each other, as members. That's usually how POWERFUL or racist people operate. Racist Whites in Europe and in the US, for example, call Blacks the N-WORD, even today. They call Asian either "Sand N----s" or "Mongoloid" or other names. That's just how rude, racist, recalcitrant people operate.... Most people, in 2025.... have gotten the MEMO of MODERNITY ---- the memo on how "polite society" folks operate ---- and have chosen to call (other) people what THEY WANT TO BE CALLED, of what they call each other among themselves... You go anywhere on earth.... when you come upon Franks, Brits, Germans, Dutch, Nigerians, Argentinians, Canadians, Japanese, what-not, you say, "I am Hmong.... like Sunisa Lee, the Hmong American woman who won the All Around Gold Medal in Gymnastics, in the 2020/21 Tokyo Olympics..." and they all say, "Oh, okay.... so you are a HMONG like Sunisa Lee, eh?" Again, NOT the Han Chinese. You tell them that and they say, "We don't know any Hmong; but we know MAIO or MAIO-TZU, in southern China.... the 5th or 6th largest ethnic minority in China..." That's the attitude of the Han Chinese. True, 2,000 years ago... true from the 16th - 19th centuries... and true today, 2025.... P.S. Lao didn't call Hmong "Maio" or "Maio-Tzu" like the Hans. Lao called Hmong "Meo" or CAT .... the Lao writing is this: ແມວ RACIST Lao still, in 2025, call Hmong "MEO".... but it's largely done in private or behind Hmong's back, when they think Hmong are not within ear-shot. Most polite/educated Lao, however, also have moved on, like all other people and are now referring to Hmong as HMONG, as Hmong ALWAYS have referred to ourselves. Now, if YOU said you EXISTED 100 years ago or 500 years ago or during Shi Huangdi's time... and the Hans were correct... that my ancestors, THE HMONG, called each other "Maio" or "Maio-Tzu" and that's why they, the Hans, also adopted that term... then, okay, you're a time traveler, something I am not... so I wouldn't be debating or educating a time traveler, who obviously knows more than I.... P.S. The accent of the Hmong Chinese singers in these contemporary songs (at the end, below), from Yunnan, are as naturally Hmong Chinese as they come. They are NOT Lao or Vietnamese or Thai oriented. Or Western Hmong... IN TERMS OF METRIC used/followed by these Hmong Chinese artists/singers. Hmong from Laos, from Thailand, and from the West use very different musical metrics (rhythms)... from vocalization, to lyrics, to musical arrangements... because we have ADOPTED Southeast Asian and, then, Western METRICS... They are purely Chinese oriented, as people who've never known any other land except "China" which also is the Hmong's ancestral land. We didn't for example, move to southern or central China, from Papua New Guinaa or Japan or Argentina or Poland or Mexico or Thailand... Our ancestors left the Middle East, around 45,000 to 50,000 years ago and they ventured northerly, from the Iranian area, into the vast, cold "Central Asia" steppes and, from there, they ventured, slowly, EASTERLY into central China... similar to the ancestors of the Han tribes.... Anyway... on Hmong in southern China: Some groups, we totally understand; other groups, not so much... but they all are Hmong (and, yes, there are Black Hmong, Green Hmong, Hmong Dawb, etc.) I DOUBT VERY MUCH these Hmong Chinese (singers below here) "slipped in" that "Hmong" word just to make 500,000 Hmong in the West happy... when over 95% of the various Hmong groups still are in China... albeit, having been slowly pushed southerly the last two thousand years, even if originally we likely came from lands between the Yellow and Yantze Rivers... as carefully noted in our DEATH RITES & RITUALS, when an elderly has passed on.... that is, noted by the elder or "shaman" person who is responsible to "guide" the deceased elder's "spirits" back to the land of Hmong ancestors.... in such rituals, both the Yantze and Yellow Rivers are mentioned.... they are important, spiritual, ancestral crossroads in the Hmong scheme of creation.... The "spirits" of those deceased elders, therefore, are told to carefully navigate such mighty rivers, in order so they may safely "return" to be with their ancestors, Hmong ancestors.... The Mekong River, in Southeast Asia, for example, is NEVER a part of such a sacred death ritual..... even though we modern Hmong in Southeast Asia actually CAME from lands around the Mekong. But rituals to "send" or to "return" "spirits of elders" --- who've passed on ---- back to be with their Hmong ancestors are, obviously, about ANCIENT TIMES and ANCIENT LANDS.... (that is, they are not about modern times and modern lands, which we sometimes refer to as "temporary"... as roads or passages we use, from one day to the next, from one generation to another.... to get to where we are headed, in our perpetual migration across and around the world, both literally and figuratively.... things we've been doing since our earliest of ancestors WERE STILL IN EASTERN AFRICA).... kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHuufWOsmJV-hpI kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGK8fZmDbLymn80
@SlimeySludge10 күн бұрын
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 dayum homie you lit that dude's ass up lmao. good read. im fascinated by our lost history.
@vanveakrin27624 күн бұрын
1640 the MANCHU controlled North China...in South China..in 1650 the 5 generals protected the South China
@gypsychrissi35029 күн бұрын
There are a few sentences that repeat, or parts thereof; however; overall this is well done. And interesting. Thank you for sharing this.
@ExcavatingDormantMemories25 күн бұрын
@@gypsychrissi350 thanks for listening! Sounds like I need to run more analysis over the audio!
@JAMI-z5yАй бұрын
mistakes: often says «he» instead of «she»
@ExcavatingDormantMemoriesАй бұрын
was made using aya-expanse
@JAMI-z5yАй бұрын
What translation is this?
@az00001Ай бұрын
Pretty good documentary! Great content!! Hmong are resilient and have no fear when fight desperately for peace and freedom!
@vanveakrin27624 күн бұрын
1650 it was the Manchu who invaded North China.. Chinese lost North China... the Manchu was in control in Northern China 1650..
@vanveakrin27624 күн бұрын
South China In 1650 was under the protection of the 4 generals
@nighthiker88722 ай бұрын
Nice!
@MSGill6452 ай бұрын
No mystery there. Sacred indigenous ground that it's sitting on.
@jocreedpruett64132 ай бұрын
Beautiful photography. Confusing script....too much info. All in all, very nice. Would like to see more.
@heretolearn50843 ай бұрын
If you put hmong in your title or hashtags you'll get thousands of views and maybe even subscribers