MACMEDIA 01

Пікірлер

@desertstar223 4 сағат бұрын

Your numbers are a total misrepresentation, achieved without applying any scientific principles (or even common sense) in an old car with an old engine. You do realise that modern fuels are optimised for modern car engines.

@macmedia.01 4 сағат бұрын

@@desertstar223 don’t forget to subscribe so you can stay up to date ❤️

@desertstar223 4 сағат бұрын

@@macmedia.01 Subscribe? You should be so lucky.

@desertstar223 4 сағат бұрын

@@macmedia.01 I won't subscribe, but I'll return. I like your videos about the underground car scene. Just don't upload a bummer like this video again.

@macmedia.01 4 сағат бұрын

@@desertstar223 your support doesn’t go unrecognised, looking forward to bringing you some fun content in the future 🫱🏼‍🫲🏻

@CarlMeghraj 13 сағат бұрын

'E' on these pop up models stand for Enough.

@macmedia.01 13 сағат бұрын

@@CarlMeghraj 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I’m still learning the car and it really shocks me all the time

@ernieogle8445 14 сағат бұрын

How do any of you know that you are actually getting 95 octane. Engen and Sapref are down and no longer producing, Fuel is imported so my question again is HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW WHETHER YOU ARE ACTUALLY GETTING 95 OCTANE?

@daniG10195 Сағат бұрын

I know because my car is optimized for 95, it would run super badly if it was getting worse quality fuel. Performance engines are sensitive, so you monitor them closer

@MahomedKazee 15 сағат бұрын

Unbelievably poor knowledge of vehicles, fuel, fuel tanks and a dismal attempt at testing fuel consumption. This has nothing to do with fuel quality mate.

@macmedia.01 14 сағат бұрын

@@MahomedKazee okay mate, please read description 😇

@MahomedKazee 13 сағат бұрын

@macmedia.01 I did. Your video is misleading. Your description should also mention that you have zero knowledge about the properties of fuel, the shape of fuel tanks, or the correct method used to measure fuel efficiency. But, likes before learning, hey?

@macmedia.01 13 сағат бұрын

@@MahomedKazee well it is for entertainment purposes now isn’t it? This isn’t an educational channel 🫡

@desertstar223 5 сағат бұрын

@@macmedia.01If it's not an educational channel, why are you educating people? (providing inaccurate data)

@macmedia.01 4 сағат бұрын

@@desertstar223 read description, but thanks for pushing the algorithm pookie

@deanvanwyk2194 Күн бұрын

I filled my audi in jhb and drove to dbn. Filled in dbn and the car could not get into boost at all with all the detonation. Had to add 20 liters 109 race fuel to get the car to just drive properly

@anandnaidoo663 2 күн бұрын

You didn’t include Total??

@blsboom-ff1fq 2 күн бұрын

This is NOT how you measure and calculate average fuel consumption. You will at least need to fill up and run to close to empty a few times to start getting average consumption from a certain station.

@michaellanga4136 2 күн бұрын

1. did you notice the time of day you put petrol in? example in the morning or during the day...this can impact petrol. 2. do you not have SASOL in you area?

@desertstar223 5 сағат бұрын

WHAT? What are you talking about? The time of day you fill up your car has no influence on the volume of fuel you add into the tank or the car's performance. That's an old wife's tale. Please educate yourself.

@seelannaicker9811 2 күн бұрын

There is a problem with the speedometer drive

@ROG518ZA 2 күн бұрын

Thanks for this... I've only been using Engen for over 10 years. Also I get R8/l back from eBucks 😊 FYI BP is on my boycott list due to the oil spill saga in Mexico and how they handled the PR. Shelll is leaving and Caltex which had "cleaning fuel" is gone and renamed. SASOL, I don't find many in CT... Awê and thanks brudder

@PreachingChief 2 күн бұрын

This has nothing to do with quality, but fuel consumption/economy on your car.

@moffatk7948 2 күн бұрын

Welldone my bro. I think you should have at least done two fills at each garage to eliminate any errors in driving conditions. Also not sure if you visually fill at the same point each time from your visual gauge as compared to filling when the empty light goes on. I must say good video and very interesting set of results. Keep up the good work👌🏻

@macmedia.01 2 күн бұрын

@@moffatk7948 only reason I didn’t want to wait for the empty light is because the car is new to me so I don’t know if it works and I’m not super sure what dirt is that low at the bottom of the tank but thank you for the feedback. Would definitely have been more accurate if I done it twice

@stephencelliers9127 3 күн бұрын

Very interesting. Considering the test car is very old tech and limited in terms of on the fly fuel trim adjustments. It paints a different picture and also shows how fuel affects old vehicles aswell.

@DesmondKlue 3 күн бұрын

I only use Engen good service aswell,dont forget seatbelts,be save.

@lutha1720 3 күн бұрын

Your test is irrelevant, you should travel the same route everyday at the same time, i find bp and total to be good in my car

@macmedia.01 3 күн бұрын

@@lutha1720 thanks for pushing the algorithm 😌

@seaganwolfsilver 3 күн бұрын

Hey want to partner up and get more of an accuracy to this test? Nice to meet you i'm Seagan from Hot Gear Cape Town*

@toG-i9i 3 күн бұрын

Your tank is probably not completely square thats why the last part of your tank lasts so long

@macmedia.01 3 күн бұрын

@@toG-i9i this would make sense actually, good way to think about it

@pietermyburgh4337 3 күн бұрын

can you do shell aswell?

@user-et7rm8fx7u 3 күн бұрын

Interesting, i have a 3.5 v6 pajero i drive once a while and the phrase fuel consumption doesnt exist. 450km open road on 72 l tank at 100/110kmh, anything above that around 380km per tank 😢

@sahielharilall7 3 күн бұрын

Great video bud, but unfortunately unless u drove exactly the same way , on the exact same roads, with the exact atmosphere temperature then this test would be excellent. All these factor into fuel economy. However great Video!

@M0G4M3D73 4 күн бұрын

Wow that's amazin that there's someone posting sumtin like this on KZbin, not sure how you got your fuel consumption figures, but iam driving a 2010 c220d I get about +/- 270kms on a R250 I get about 1050km full tank 60l,my reserve is for about 60km.fuel consumption is between 6.1-7.9l driving on cruise control for the speed limits..great job I must also change my garages because I only full up by on garage. 🎉

@macmedia.01 4 күн бұрын

@@M0G4M3D73 that’s actually really impressive but I expect nothing less from a diesel when it comes to consumption. Yea I am sitting with a 1.6 from the 80s and a hole in the exhaust but not too bad all in all.

@M0G4M3D73 3 күн бұрын

@@macmedia.01 keep up with the good work.

@JuniorMzothe 4 күн бұрын

This is far from accurate its bullshit🙁 braah your point of reverense is.............i dont even wanna say how u should do it but its fine thnks for trying atleast

@briangaming1975 3 күн бұрын

no cussing allowed.

@lutha1720 3 күн бұрын

Complete bs

@tabishahmedparkar9734 52 минут бұрын

Bro , you need to fix your grammer first

@tariqadams9295 4 күн бұрын

Interesting. I’m definitely gonna put this to the test 👌🏼

@macmedia.01 4 күн бұрын

@@tariqadams9295 let us know your results!!!

@IdasMedia 4 күн бұрын

Yoh I’ve been saying this lol

@christopherbarry887 4 күн бұрын

total energies puma garade brent garage sasol

@mrjklee 4 күн бұрын

Your next challenge should be a performance challenge. Same petrol stations but what the performance difference feels like

@macmedia.01 4 күн бұрын

@@mrjklee ahhh this would be interesting. Let’s see if I could get a draggy

@mrjklee 4 күн бұрын

I was one of the first guys in cpt to lower my pop ups about 21 years ago. The stock turn down bolts at the back of the torsion bars can only go so low. If you get longer tungsten bolts you can really go nice and low. I also got shortned front shocks from Ian Glass many years ago.

@macmedia.01 3 күн бұрын

@@mrjklee I appreciate the feedback. I can go quite a bit lower in front still with these but I’m happy with the front height at the moment. Like the oem feel. Do want to shorten the shocks soon though to avoid the bottoming out.

@mrjklee 4 күн бұрын

daaam that pops looks mint!

@848422818 4 күн бұрын

Your results is not so accurate, you can use a Jerry can fill it with fuel and from the can straight to the engine. That wil give more better indicator of fuel consumption

@macmedia.01 4 күн бұрын

@@848422818 never said it was completely accurate, more so day to day driving of an average road user. That Jerry can way sounds like I might set something alight 🤣🤣🤣

@jasondaniels205 4 күн бұрын

I also seem to get less km's with Astron fuel and more with Shell🤔

@KeeloSpec 4 күн бұрын

Clicks club card ftw😁🙌💯

@peterhobbs4780 2 сағат бұрын

Clicks club card, what a joke.

@nabieldiaz187 4 күн бұрын

In my opinion Shell and Astron test was slightly compromised because you added another person in the car 😂 which makes the car heavier to pull. The test does seem abit accurate though. Shell makes my car perform better and Engens fuel last longer

@macmedia.01 4 күн бұрын

@@nabieldiaz187 fair enough 😂😂

@thatguy_kai 5 күн бұрын

I've always used Engen fuel in all my cars, and I get the best mileage from them. This is a great video 💯 I know that South Africas fuel is pretty shitty 😅 as we dont have a true 95 fuel 🙃

@YusufPetersenCPT 5 күн бұрын

This is a crazy thing that I have realised too... I get the best millage on Caltex/Astron worst on shell and that day my valve dropped I put in BP so do with that information as you wish. Conclusion I only put in Astron and if I can't get to an Astron its ENGEN very reluctantly.

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@YusufPetersenCPT appreciate the feedback. Maybe it works better with a newer vehicle? Still think I could’ve stretched out the Astron a bit further perhaps

@jacquescolinsmith7751 5 күн бұрын

Really interesting tbh. I've been using Shell mostly for a couple of years now, and I have noticed that I am getting worse fuel consumption than before, so maybe I should try some different place. Great video btw👌🏻

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@jacquescolinsmith7751 was also someone that only used shell until I noticed the difference not too long ago. Figured let’s make some content. Thanks man

@joshuajacobs5546 5 күн бұрын

Those grasshoppers still look fresh from High School🤣

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@joshuajacobs5546 eyes up here 🤣🤣

@imdwbaby 5 күн бұрын

Engine is by far the worst quality in my opinion, in Gauteng

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@imdwbaby maybe I gotta come do a test up there 👀👀

@elmofransman682 5 күн бұрын

Hey Bud, Great video, could you add Sasol, MBT and Total to the mix as well please.

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@elmofransman682 possibly in a future video, the budget wasn’t there for it this time round but will work on it

@Springkaan_productions 5 күн бұрын

Bru honda tanks are weird like that 😂my doch shape did the same

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@Springkaan_productions 😭🤣🤣🤣

@CPT_SA_Mayhem 5 күн бұрын

I've been throwing in total🫣

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@CPT_SA_Mayhem coming soon to a vlog near you

@CPT_SA_Mayhem 4 күн бұрын

@macmedia.01 Can't wait to see it brother.

@desertstar223 4 сағат бұрын

Can you please learn to write English? Did you sleep in English grammar class?

@desertstar223 Сағат бұрын

@@CPT_SA_Mayhem WHAT? Throwing in Total ? And what if you miss your throw?

@LeeLowsProduction 5 күн бұрын

I was hoping to see MBT as well cause I’ve been putting in there too 🫣😅😅 looks like I’ll be making my way to the blue team 🤣🤝🏽

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@LeeLowsProduction 😭😂 apologies

@tanzeelgamieldien3544 5 күн бұрын

Important to note, having 3500 as a limit is a good idea, but most fuel gets consumed with pullaways and throttle input to get to that 3500. Still surprsing to see Astron so low down, I usually get what the Cars Manual says with Astron

@macmedia.01 5 күн бұрын

@@tanzeelgamieldien3544 completely fair, I agree. I do think I could’ve dragged that Astron fuel out a bit longer