It has been a while indeed 😅

I think you should learn about the conservation of angular momentum (basic physics) before commenting such insolence.

@@OVAstronomy You believe in multiple simultaneous motions, your reply is not relevant. You have not rebutted a single thing, because all you have is psuedoscience. Pretend and cartoons is the only proof you have. flat.wtf

It is impossible to discuss physics with someone who is unwilling to learn from first principles. In your original comment you make no mention of concepts such as angular momentum conservation, centripetal force, gravitation etc. all of which need to be understood before piecing together how inertial forces arise on Earth. Hence it is your initial argument which is not relevant. A flat Earth model cannot explain many phenomena including eclipses (both solar and lunar), the seasons, the motion of stars on the celestial sphere, the differences in weight in where something is relative to the poles, Coriolis effect (including Foucault pendulums), and many more which all have peer reviewed evidence for. The flat Earth model gets it wrong time and time again and so is rejected - this is the scientific method.

@@OVAstronomy Wrong. You still have not rebutted a single point I made. Everything is in order at flat.wtf starting with the basics and includes text book references, with actual pages embedded, and equations and mock calculations for your behemoth fake globe. First principle is that you need tensile strength to spin. Your fantasy ball has ZERO TENSILE STRENGTH. therefore it cannot spin. In reality, only solid bodies can spin. Moreover, materials have a speed limit, such that noy even solid titanium can achieve a surface speed of 1040 mph like fake globe earth. So, even if your fantasy ball was solid titanium, it could never spin. Also, it is too big to spin, as weight is a force multiplier. The calculations at flat.wtf show you the trillions upon trillions upon trillions of psi tensile strength required to spin your fantasy ball. But even if we PRETEND or disregard all of the above, even we we accept that your CRACKED fantasy ball behaves like a solid and has the required tensile strength, it still fails based on a failed prediction of your debunked model. So, for the third time, your model PREDICTS that SPIN + ORBIT = 21 mm/s/s accel/decel ALTERNATING every half revolution or 12 hours. This is experienced by everything on the surface. Where is it? NOWHERE! Thus, a rock balancing statue debunks you. All the proof is at flat.wtf it is comprehensive and complete. The physics is rigid body rotation with translation. Basic physics. Notice the word "rigid"? Your fantasy ball is anything but rigid. That's why we must PRETEND, when we discuss your fantasy ball, and even then it fails on its own ridiculous claims. Again, you only consider a single motion, spine alone, and you offer pseudoscience as proof of spin alone, when such proof is impossible in a system of multiple simultaneous motions, period. You are fundamentally flawed. For example, a plane flying from New York to Japan fltes against the rotation, but it still takes 10 hours to get to Japan! The only way this is possible is if it flies backwards. Moreover, planes fly above the "plane" which is why it is called an air-plane. Note that planes NOSE UP 3 degrees as they fly parallel to earth's surface. Planes only nose down to land, but on a curved surface they would have to nose down continuously. And that's the end of the globe!

I agree. Vacuum energy is an extrapalation of maths, which sometimes works, Diracs prediction of the neutrino, but failed with the UV catastrophe. Nature is not yet been proven to create something from nothing.

So, extrapolate. What is the expected factor of degrees Kelvin within the original (1) Plank-second of the intrusion when simultaneously reaching the diameter of (1) Plank-length, if ALL of the forces were indeed unified at that level? ;where (1) Plank-second equals the amount of time within a vacuum for a photon to traverse the diameter of (1) Plank-length. 😊 6:13

RE: “We have very little to go on when discerning that which occurred within (1) Plank-time second at a diameter of (1) Plank-time length.” So, you wish to see what unfolded PRIOR to the moment of manifestation when “Let there be light” became real? 😊 6:31

RE: “Seeing deeper” … To do so you’d have to traverse to the sheet of anti-matter and view from there instead of optically viewing through the interstitial ether betwixt and between our dimension of matter and the corresponding dimension of anti-matter, the “dance” of which animates all vorteci south of their respective black hole surfaces and all vorteci north of their respective “anti-matter” black hole surfaces. 😊 7:49