Oh man, that's in the really far future! I'll have to commit to saving up, but KZ has me chained HAHA

Huh.. You haven't heard this thing, obviously.

I speak from experience and you missed the point. If it's intimate, you can that means the sound is more center. If it's spacious then it's not centered but sounds like it's surrounded your head. Whether it's horizontal or vertically

@GREGBT69 ya on some tracks it's both. A pod in the middle and one on each side. I also speak from experience. Mids and vocals right in your head and forward, bass everywhere uniformly, and the treble regions in pods just outside of each ear.

Happy purchase!

Oh man, I don't do well with foam tips, but I'll look for hybrid silicone-foam tips!

For those looking for musicality and refinement, yes! But for those looking for an analytical, (overly) technical, and cold sound, the PR2 would still be better. However, my thoughts are based on the PR3. Though, there are some graphs that suggest that some versions of the PR2 (perhaps the silent revision one) have the same sound as the PR3.

@@愛目 Pr1 Pro is best for analytical, with a touch of musicality, it's not as cold.

Standoff 2!

Noted on this!

Unfortunately, I have not tried other TRNs except the MT1.

@愛目 yea no problem. I think my v10 pros are arriving today. Hope they're as great as you think they are!!

😘

Sorry for the late reply, but after New Year's, I'll be releasing a Castor Pro Bass review soon! Still deciding on copping the Harman version.

@ I’d love to see the harman target one

I'd argue that the PRX is quite close to the meta, but the CCA Polaris (nonplanar) is their closest to the meta!

@愛目 yes you re right but as I said before planar nope yet..Now that I'll think about it no one has also made a clear meta dynamic driver we only have very few meta-ish

I honestly did not like, but not outright dislike, the Tangzu Wan'er. It was quite mediocre in its technicalities, but quite musical. Both have similar tunings, but the KZ PRX trumps the Wan'er in all aspects, except, perhaps the timbre due to PRX's planar driver, though, I find the PRX to sound decently natural. You're basically hearing the Wan'er with a different driver and with more sub-bass, better technicalities, that includes soundstage, faster bass attack and decay, and similar imaging. Though, you may find the PRX more sibilant compared to the Wan'er since it has more air. For my ears, the PRX is decently comfortable, but it depends on your ears. But, if you found the Wan'er comfortable, you might find the PRX also to be comfortable. As for $100-150, unfortunately, I cannot give you any recommendations because I have not tried to a great extent any IEMs in that price range. I have only the Soundrhyme SP01, which is my most expensive set ($89) I've reviewed in my collection. And there is also the EA500 which is $60. I wish to review more in that price range, but for now, I'm focusing on budget ChiFi, and probably only will be able to purchase for review budget ChiFi. I'd suggest to perhaps invest the remaining $100, when you do buy the PRX, in a powerful DAC, since you'll definitely need it to hear improvements in sound for planars.

@ i did buy ew300 dsp and i did not liked it over tangzu waner. I still feel waner is good. I don’t think its worth upgrading to ew300

@@愛目 use trn foam tips on prx, suddenly no sibilance and extremely natural sound as good as dunu kima 2

Based on a quick research for the JM6 Pro, it has 60mw which would provide ample power for the PRX! Other people suggest going for 100mw above, but I think, unless you want to blast these to the max, you don't need 100mw. 29.75 was barely enough for me, but I appreciate it better with my KA13 which provides 550mw and allows me to blast to the max. In my experience, the foam tips make the PRX slightly darker, and it's noticeable, and makes the stage even narrower, so I suggest not using foam tips if you have widebore tips or other tips already comfortable sounding and fitting for you. The PRX sounds quite refined that you can enjoy these without needing to tip roll for its sound as much. If anything, I'll look for tips that boost air and sharpen imaging, but I'm happy with how much the PRX provides.

Mini-comparison between the SGOR Luna and KZ PRX starts at 13:00 ! I will be making a full-fledged comparison video between these two sets if you are interested!

This or TruthEar Zero Red?

@@ronak-31 I'm sorry, but I have not tried the Truthear Zero Red.

@@ronak-31 prx

@@愛目 it's like qkz hbb Khan, a little better, not much

Soon!

@@ninsudang2284 KZ PRX! I love me subbass! Also the shells are just better for ears. The game is Standoff 2!

@@Weaztek If you want more warmth and rumbly bass, the Saga Bass. EDC Pro has a clearer sound since it has leaner bass, but both have the same technicalities. Have not tried the normal Saga, which could very well be the same as EDC Pro, but with an all-metal shell. Also the Saga costs twice as much as EDC Pro, at least from my available online platforms. But both are darn cheap. If you have problems with metal shells, like humidity or the like, and cannot handle large nozzle sizes then go with the EDC Pro. Both have the same drivers. Saga has better venting though. It really depends. I'd choose neither to be frank. Both are boring to me.

Thanks. I ordered a pair of Saga Bass but may gift them. I really enjoy my pairs of QKZ x HBB or Fiio JD10.

I'll try to purchase this in the upcoming month! Though prioritizing TRN's upcoming V90 Pro and KZ's upcoming 28 BA IEM, so not much of a guarantee haha

KZ Saga Bass! Much more scalable than the Castor Pro, and less shrieking of cymbals and guitars. The warmth of the KZ Saga Bass warms the sound too for a more comfortable high-volume listening.

Noted on this! Thank you!

I did not expect you to find my channel! Thank you!

@ bruh you shared it

Still! I didn't expect you to check out my post.

These earbuds are just trash as they are tuned out of the box. I have the KZ 16 Pro and the Pro X, the Pro X have just too much treble and upper mids, I'll order a 30ohm adapter and I hope this helps. Thank you!

(1111, Dunu S&S) CCA Trio is still one of my go-tos, but the TRN V10 scales better for my ears, sounds less shouty, sharper imaging, and has more air and sparkle. But the Trio sounds smoother, less boomy (tucked bass), less sibilance (has appropriate sibilance imo), and has the most linear mids in this comparison. I assume the Castor Bass? I like the (1100, Dunu S&S) CastorB for its bass. It has more stage depth, physicality, and punch compared to these two sets.

Unfortunately, I have not tried these popular sets.

No, I do not, but will plan to buy and make a review in the far future.

I'm using the CVJ LS200 modular cable! Not sure if this is open-back though. Does not feel like it, and I don't remember it being market to have that.

@@愛目 the faceplate is really giving out ventilation with mesh grills that you can easily identify and magnify just from looking at the transparent resin. Due to that open shell, I can hear it producing sound outside when I let someone borrow it.

Is this treble harshness severe to your ear?

@@오영택-r9n The KZ Castor (silver) is much more aggressively sharp in treble when I toggle both 3 & 4 switched ON. I like the the amount of sharp yet tolerable treble the V10 Pro outputs. I guess this is what everyone calls "timbre" which some might hate. My Castor couldn't replicate that feeling. The V10 Pro really just makes it feel like the Bass as Oil and Treble as Water for me.

I wish I could try the Que!

@@gauravnegi7150 Of course! You would be able to form your sound preference from this. If you find this too bright, but you like the style, then you can go for bright IEMs going forward.

ANC is above average in it's price range, multipoint is superb feature, but sonically they are not even close to best in their price range - unles you're a total bass-head. My phone has tons of bass by default and with Carol I already hear distortions in lows.

@@FeroVlkolinsky KZ is a bassy brand and they don't even hide it lol, so you can tune down your phone a little bit and solve everything. The sound on the Carol is superb or so I've heard as my own hasn't arrived yet. Btw the last low priced earbuds i used that shocked me is the Mibro AC1 which is kinda much better QCY HT05 (with all the hype it got) with it's spatial sound. It's just soo clean and whole, soothing too, i loved it. If the Carol is even 10% better than the Mibro AC1 then I'll say it delivers more than it charged. And with the 42db ANC on the Mibro being very strong for low frequencies, the Carol should be stronger with 55db on low frequencies of course. I wouldn't expect it to cancel human voice and vehicle honks for this price lol. People just expect Sony/Bose level stuff on something that's less than ⅒ the price

​@@FeroVlkolinsky Ya. I have my iPad mini set to flat for almost all my listening and with that setting these sound quite nice. The higher range is what surprises me a bit. Nice and clean. I feel they compete sonically in their price range but I realize that everyone hears differently 🙂

@@philipm.4738 my phone is bassy with all my (dozens of) headphones but no other pair distorts in bass range. My HiBy player in flat mode plays quite nice with these, but others (e.g. mentioned Moondrop Space Travel) do much better.

​@@philipm.4738 Yeah honestly everyone listens differently. Some people just listen to find what's wrong about something and not what's done very right lol. Btw, I don't trust that part he said Airpods Pro clones have better ANC coz those things wack af. No way that's true

@@SDKGMNonton Sorry, I don't have this to compare.

the KZ As16Pro are perfect compared to the Pro X!!! The Pro X make me want to throw them in the trash!!! they have way too much high end and it's very harsh compared to the As16Pro.

@@NefariousConstipation1 Sorry, I don't have these to compare.