What do you sue to get the engine flares for the SRBs?
@csxguy300215 күн бұрын
Concorde space shuttle edition
@mbmurphy77717 күн бұрын
Really impressive work!
@SRFirefox18 күн бұрын
Bloody incredible. Your simulation makes it all seem so simple, but it's downright terrifying to think of actually executing an RTLS Abort with crew aboard.
@steigleder21 күн бұрын
Congrats! I'm waiting for your Buran Energia version
@motokid600822 күн бұрын
Your camera work is awesome. Great video.
@vovochen27 күн бұрын
Guilino - maybe you wanna take a look into the Flight Sim DCS - there's PLENTY of realism in there, and communitys the nicest I know.
@vovochen27 күн бұрын
Wow !!!!!!!
@detroitbucknut28 күн бұрын
there's a miscalc in either the drag or lift profiles (or both), or in the reentry energy available, since airbrakes werent deployed on the shuttle until touchdown. the recoverable error upon reentry was too much energy not too little, but excess energy was easy to burn through a more aggressive flare/stall procedure during short final or additional S-turns if their reentry calcs were way off. either which way, its an impressive physical feat - as well as being pretty damn well modeled in KSP.
@giuliodondi28 күн бұрын
It's false that the airbrakes weren't used until touchdown. Read page 5-81 of the Entry flight procedures: gandalfddi.z19.web.core.windows.net/Shuttle/JSC-11542%20-%20Flight%20Procedures%20Handbook%20Rev%20E%20200504.pdf They were first opened around Mach 10 to help with pitch trimming, lowered to 65% prior to TAEM interface, then used to actively modulate dynamic pressure when subsonic. Also this program does not do active drag modulation on a profile like the real Shuttle guidance did, if you read the commentary. Have a look at my more recent work for a closer recreation
@ghostblackout1Ай бұрын
Great Video in Love the size of the video because I can full screen it on my tablet and I still can't believe that was a real plan that NASA wanted to use
@eliottspeedy7612Ай бұрын
how can I activate the reentry glow effect ? Is it an engine, is automatic or something else ?
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
it's just an emissive wired to the part temperature, you don't do anything yourself
@Ejd582Ай бұрын
please make a video of how to install your shuttle mod dependiences etc
@kiwakatoraco8533Ай бұрын
Really love the glowing on reentry but I would say that that plasma forming on the ship is not really cloudy but still epic!
@Hsa12354Ай бұрын
This is honestly incredible, I just have one question does it work with SOCK and ksrss
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
no, the programs are calibrated for my fork of SSS and full RSS/RO
@Hsa12354Ай бұрын
@@giuliodondiok thanks great job though
@lerk.Ай бұрын
RTLS abort aka taking the shuttle out for a spin
@NollieFlipXАй бұрын
That was so cool to watch
@AbhChallengerАй бұрын
This is already so amazing. But think about this. They built this complicated software into the shuttle during the era of disco music. It also had to be synchronized across multiple computers with the power to detect and vote out a broken system. And it HAD to work. There was no way a human could calculate all this by looking at the instruments. It either had to work or the president was going to have to make a sad speech. My respect to the software and hardware engineers and the many people that contributed to this amazing piece of software history. And thank you for doing your part to show us this amazing piece of history.
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
For those reasons they had the BFS, an isolated computer running a sinplified version of the guidance equations and the OS. There is this presentation on software-induced Loss of Crew and Vehicle (LOCV) www.slideshare.net/slideshow/space-shuttle-flight-software-pass-loss-of-crew-errors-jk-orr-20150827-52150515/52150515 which details one simulated emergency where two rapid engine failures bricked all four primary computers, without the BFS it would have been fatal
@anonanon5146Ай бұрын
Can it do Columbia?
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
What do you mean?
@gabrielbonfim3077Ай бұрын
Hi! Is EVE Raymarched Volumetrics (Early Acess) the volumetric cloiuds mod from blackrack?
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
Yes
@gabrielbonfim3077Ай бұрын
@@giuliodondi Thank you!
@josublancoortiz9824Ай бұрын
Lovely lovely programming there mate
@xtron1234Ай бұрын
Tasteful Ace Combat 5 music. Though it would be rather sudden in a funny way if Ofnir and Grabacr showed up as they did. Very nice video all in all!
@Cameron_the_RobotАй бұрын
Awesome video, I enjoyed watching this. My son is learning about this stuff and i wanna learn it with him!
@eekee6034Ай бұрын
Amazing to see such automated control, but why does is broken engine lit at times after it fails?
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
In the several takes I did, sometimes the right engine was shut down. The first engine to fail is either the left or the right at random
@tinto278Ай бұрын
Worm shuttle > Meatball Shuttle.
@MaoistBankerАй бұрын
I have no doubt Eileen Collins would have aced this had it been required for STS-93
@Dominion69420Ай бұрын
This is so fucking awesome. Fantastic work!
@Schultz89Ай бұрын
holy shit your aerodynamic model handles so well, I'm definitely flying the shuttle with a joystick now
@dsdy1205Ай бұрын
"Single engine Zaragoza 104"
@kerbaman5125Ай бұрын
Wow, that's really cool!
@Tmccreight25GamingАй бұрын
Funny how the letters RTLS used to send shivers down the spines of every spaceflight fan but now those letters just mean "cool we get to see a SpaceX Booster land on land instead of at sea"
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
If humans were on board we would still shiver I think
@dsdy1205Ай бұрын
@giuliodondi not as much, the Shuttle had such a low TWR during its RTLS and such a narrow flight envelope that made RTLS hair raising I rather suspect Starship's envelope will be much larger.
@judet2992Ай бұрын
Shows the power of the RS-25s that even with two or one they can still get the orbiter back.
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
in a 2EO situation you only get the Orbiter back if you're in the last 30 seconds or so of powered RTLS or you're in a 2EO GREEN area and within range of Bermuda or an ECAL site, or single engine TAL/ATO. Any other situation and you have to bail out
@judet2992Ай бұрын
@@giuliodondi yeah, but still, impressive.
@atempestrages5059Ай бұрын
That was breathtaking and frightening to watch.
@andrewhofmann5453Ай бұрын
Ive always admired anyone who can make kOS work well, great job!
@jross1269Ай бұрын
babe its time for your daily giulio dondi guidance-posting!!!!
@nikelinq2899Ай бұрын
(In KSP RSS) While launching out of vandenberg (using your script) I actually had to do an RTLS abort. It was scary, it was precarious, but we made it home
@judet2992Ай бұрын
The shuttle never did an abort, what are you talking about?
@Kanru-5829Ай бұрын
@@judet2992 he’s talking about in game
@judet2992Ай бұрын
@@Kanru-5829 ah nice
@nikelinq2899Ай бұрын
@@judet2992 I was referring to KSP RSS, and there was a shuttle abort STS-51F it was an ATO (Abort to orbit) after a single RS-25 failed 5 minutes into the flight
@judet2992Ай бұрын
@@nikelinq2899 ah thanks, also I meant RTLS abort.
@Ph33NIXxАй бұрын
Impressive... really impressive.
@famlrnamemssngАй бұрын
Rtls seems like something I’d do just messing around in ksp
@LuccasLabАй бұрын
babe wake up new Giulio Dondi just dropped
@matthewdevАй бұрын
The Shuttle sure is a cool vehicle, but these abort scenarios are just insane. And to think that the shuttle could've been quite different, if not for that one very specific mission profile the DoD wanted (and never got to do it)
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
In 1971 the Shuttle baseline was quite different, with smaller wings and internal fuel tanks. Yet, it still had an RTLS abort scheme involving a combined aerodynamic-thrusting turn to reverse course. You can read about it here: ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19720006189/downloads/19720006189.pdf , not sure if this would have been that much safer. All the problems with the Shuttle concept fundamentally stem from the horizontal-landing/spaceplane paradigm. But spaceplanes are cool. Also, the Vandenberg once-around crossrange requirement was not exactly imposed on NASA by the Air Force, I think they wanted it anyways for aborts, but I don't have a reference for this sadly
@matthewdevАй бұрын
@giuliodondi I must confess, I saw that information in a Scott Manley video, stating that the modifications required for the shuttle to fulfill that specific mission profile had made the orbiter more complex than it otherwise had to be, especially regarding the extended hypersonic glide time requirement. It's been a good while since I've watched it, could very well be wrong
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
@@matthewdev I know exactly the video, the one about the 3A/3B missions. The Air Force requirement was being able to launch into polar orbits from Vandenberg. Then, in 1973, the Vandenberg launch was formalized into the 3A/3B reference mission profile, involving deployment or retrieva of a satellite and reentry in a once-around orbit. These missions did drive the aerodynamic and heat shield design, and yet there is no explicit mention of them beyond a couple papers in 1973/74. This 1977 paper here ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19770026315/downloads/19770026315.pdf studies the exact reentry profile for a once- around mission from Vandenberg and yet doesn't mention the 3A/3B reference profiles. My speculation is that the 3A/3B missions were nothing more than wargame studies (because they're ludicrous and only make sense in a state of war) but the high crossrange WAS useful to NASA for once.around abort capability for the Vandenberg mission they actually were going to fly (STS-62A) . Moreover, high crossrange gives you two or three deorbit windows every day for pretty much any landing site at almost any inclination, so you can wait for weather to clear up, which they did a lot
@LeonelEBDАй бұрын
RTLS is just plain crazy!
@Kanru-5829Ай бұрын
Funny to think how every single trajectory screen that the shuttle had was just basically “Here are two lines and a shuttle symbol, keep the shuttle within the lines.” Really amazing video though!
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
Towards the end of the program they implemented the ASCENT BEARING and ENTRY BEARING displays which basically are moving maps, kind of like the Orbiter2016 MFDs. They first flew them on STS-126
@listener-tt1gwАй бұрын
impressive
@eclipticsimАй бұрын
How do you get your fork of sts locations to work with RSS reborn?
@giuliodondiАй бұрын
never tried this. I would just keep the KK groups and static configs and throw the rest, like the Edwards and Vandenberg terrain
@spacebeetleАй бұрын
you're a god
@21volts_gaming_officialАй бұрын
Could you please demonstrate a contingency abort mid-RTLS like you said it could? (Never mind lol, just finished the vid and saw you were already planning it.)
@nils8580Ай бұрын
Really impressive work!
@dsdy1205Ай бұрын
Broke: If Giulio Dondi kOS RTLS is so good, where is Giulio Dondi kOS RTLS 2? Woke:
@topphatt1312Ай бұрын
Is this available on CKAN? Idk much about KSP modding and would find it easier if I could just download it using CKAN
@kryptoid2568Ай бұрын
Is this KSP had a child with Orbiter 2010?
@theroyalaustralianАй бұрын
Now THIS is Pod Racing 😃😃 How about you teach us how to install all of these mods?