He's just standing there! Menacingly!

This is gonna hurt me than it's gonna hurt you. If you were a betting man, then you've already lost before the cards were dealt. Firstly, it would have costed you nothing to say that. You could have skipped this video, and nobody is forcing you to watch something you don't even like. I am not going to remake a response video just to satisfy your own personal ego. You can do that. There are 62 million content creators, you can watch any other channel out there, yet you specifically go out of your way to be negative and judgmental here. I have seen your comments on others videos as well, and I will say, they are not the most pleasant either. To which I add, this channel is for myself, you don't have to be here. Yet, here you are wasting my time and yours. I'll give you a second chance, however, being a rude and assumptious know-it-all inside this community is not appreciated. If you think you're going to boss my channel around, this isn't the place for you. So, thank you for participating in this social experiment among the Starsector community.

​@@Matrix2Strata017what did i just read? Some random copypasta? Since when correcting someone is rude?

Oh, so you really want to try deflecting in that way now? Does that even sound like a copypasta? I wasted a precious amount of time to respond, which I did not have to, so that you'll better understand the channel. I saw your complaint and request, and I'm not going to make such videos which are common knowledge; e.g. "Its rather obvious that faster ship with better range will kite even stronger ships in perfect scenario like this." Just about any player, new or old will learn that and the overall mechanics of the game from simply playing. Also, many other channels already or will have covered some of the most mundane topics, such as your complaints. That is a huge waste of my time and anyone else's time. While I did interpret your comment as rude, it is by your assumption to conclude that the video had zero value, as mentioned, "this vid shows nothing." Each video is likely a "fill in the gap" that answers something, to which at the highest limit, a Vanilla Conquest loadout can destroy 2 Reisen battleships (before Milky nerfed them). And if DP is a concern, 30 ship fleet limit, or you're too poor to afford superior ships, a Vanilla Conquest is still a good enough stop-gap. In this case, it's in response to the meme of "UAF OP", or just that Vanilla ships are weak against Mod ships, a recurring theme that divides the entire Starsector community. And this is where, not only directed to Alex, but to any game dev, why bother allowing end users the ability to mod, especially in a single-player game, if the end result is simply division? In Alex's case, this sparks creativity and possibly even new features and additions that even he might not have considered in his base game. To add, some videos are simply a chill video, and they're not really aimed at gathering viewers in the first place. In fact, this entire channel was not created to farm viewers for the sake of monetization and profits. This isn't a Mr.Beast, Markiplier, Pewdiepie, Smosh, or even Big Brain Energy, IronCladLion, Rarr, type of channel. This is more of a museum or documentary, and possibly an autobiography, yet YT does control a lot of its "under-the-hood" stuff, and therefore is possibly a research study. However, if some good benefits happen, it's a bonus. I'll tell you right now, you have barely scratched the surface of this channel. However, you can tag-along if you like. I much prefer questions, and so I would have responded much better in your original post if they were questions. Assumptions, especially expressed as statements, I don't appreciate it, especially when directed at me. You can express your opinion as a discussion. It's really not that much different in the more polite areas of Starsector forums. And in this video, I still hold a pre-nerf UAF before Milky butchered them in newer updates. Also, I have been working on a balance pass on the UAF while also still trying to retain Milky's concept of Mid-Line philosophy under UAF design. So, I have plenty of things in store, and it's not just about UAF (but my Starsector gaming does involve lots of UAF elements currently). So, if you want to stay, that's fine. If the channel is not for you, that's also fine, you're free to leave anytime. There really is 62 million other Content Creators you can be watching.

@@Matrix2Strata017 Great, but remember you are the one making weird statements, and i quote "People can hate all they want. Anyone who is still moaning and groaning about mods has not played enough Starsector. This is a Vanilla Conquest that just beat some mod-ships from the over-hyped UAF (OP)mod.", im just saying this vid doesnt really show anything to confirm that either conquest is somehow much stronger, or Raisens are balanced. Since you created perfect scenario for conquest to win. You gave it officer, by doing this you buffed its damage, mobility and probably range. And you pitted it against ships with lower mobility and lower range. In perfect scenario where conquest can retreat for however long it desires. Its not about balance its about finding good counters. So i have no idea why you are trying to present it as "balance" showcase.

@@Matrix2Strata017 I mean, it was not the most polite comment, but this is not the way to respond. To turn this around; you could have just ignored the comment. Instead, you are losing at least one subscriber, for over-reacting to a not-that-negative comment.

I use support doctrine Paragons instead of officer Paragons. Not as effective in tanking but its job was controlling the space, not being the one man army.

Nope, I made the beams myself. I only used the ship from ScalarTech because I needed a ship with tons of energy slots.

Low Tech supremacy :)

It's the Reisen(M) aka Reisen II(M). This is old sprite model from older version before Milky changed them in the newer updates. My version listed in description

Hard disagree. Alex, the game dev, created Phase Skimmer. No mod has any significance in here, since this is a standard feature of the game. Even an Afflictor(P) or a Wolf could beat Dominator any day, and those are Vanilla standard, yet you don't have a problem with that? That doesn't make your statement solid. All this shows is Alex, the game dev, his AI coding ability, nothing more, nothing less, which is good enough, better than even AAA studios might/would do. Plus, Modders work for free, and they do it because they love something. Any kind of payment they get is simply a good faith donation. The same goes for Alex, the game dev, he technically works for free. Nobody is being forced to buy his game. Even at this point, Sseth's code still seems to work...... so yeah........ don't try to be rude.

Nice. Yeah, about the post-collapse, that's a completely whole new story for another time. For Chicomoztoc, that was a crazy experience, but for future context, I own it now.

Correct, perfect for dealing extreme damage.

too damn real

try changing regulations, 1.0 is where it's supposed to be, but most people use 1.4 (mainly pvp). Use the 063AN arm, or the 047AN arm. Any other arm, max the aim precision in tuning.

Whats different?

More balanced and competitive. ​@@chugetnuget6230

1.4 is a multiplayer pvp focused reg. It will change many stats and accidentally nerf some AI in story mode, like WG turning overweight. The game's campaign and NEXTs (ACs) is built around regulation 1.0; most people play 1.4. The link here for more details (remove the space and read last post) gamefaqs.gamespot . com/boards/944263-armored-core-for-answer/54951618

@@Matrix2Strata017 ohh ok thanks

Try the reverse where you defend Line Ark with White Glint. Kasumi Sumika will always say that line. It's a bit sus because theoretically nobody knows what happened, but Kasumi points out that he "fled", which is true. The ORCA ending, she calls out Stasis for betraying them too, so.....

?

a "Flying circus" is also applicable, but that's more about the amount of craft in the sky

So thats why Chatty's AC is named Circus

My version is still built from version 0.7.2gldc, but I believe the data is still the same in 0.75c Change these lines on the Vocal in csv: All Vocal sizes - Double the ammo capacity, S ,M, L (60,140,260) ---- Double their burst size, S, M, L (12, 28, 52) ---- Make Reload Size 3 Vocal (S) - Make ammo/sec 1.4 Vocal (M) - Make range 1200 (not necessary, but it's for pairing with medium gun range) ---- Make ammo/sec 1.8 Vocal (L) - Make range 1400 (not necessary, but it's for pairing with large gun range, perfect for Penulisa) ---- Make ammo/sec 2.0 ---- Make Burst Delay 0.15 (important, keep salvo launch short for big bursts to re-fire weapon group quicker, allows smaller launchers time to recharge during wait time for big launcher to finish) * - Misc. Stuff you can do - * ---- Make all Vocals Linked, and you need a lot of Vocal launchers to actually make them work, all or nothing weapon. ---- Spread is not important, since it's tracking. But if you want some random attack angles with Vocals to avoid PD and get some through, use this below. ---- Make all Vocal - Min and Max Spread 120 (both), forced variation. Making min 0, 1, or too low negates this purpose. ---- Make all Vocal launch speed = 300, combine this with Spread and the Vocals get thrown out of the launcher at a certain distance with random angles. This ensures randomization with missile attack angles and helps them bypass PD. Not giving enough speed negates randomization. After the missiles get thrown, they will activate and track, so there are two phases to missile launching. If you raise the launch speed, the missiles get thrown farther away, but it looks super weird. ---- Vocal (S) - Make flight time 6 ---- Vocal (M) - Make flight time 8 ---- This helps the smaller launcher with shorter range keep up with the bigger launcher with longer range. They shoot with the range from the bigger launcher. ---- You need Missile Specialization Elite Skill for missile damage boost. I think it was changed in latest updates, but I'm still using older Starsector version. Get Ballistic Mastery for ballistic damage boost to help break shields for Vocals.

@@Matrix2Strata017 Thanks, I'm on .97a-RC11 so not 100% exact, but you can see for yourself, still very cool, I credited you in the description kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3mpmY2Dp8qemtU

Thanks, I was worried

no, it's regulation 1.0, I only have this. Judith is just very efficient at flying. I also let off the booster for a split second to let it charge super quick and turn it back on. I also turn off the booster when I QB. EN can recharge very slowly with this build with booster on, you can see it around 3:27 through 3:35 best when I use reverse in flying.

lol, that was well-written

@@Matrix2Strata017 Lets say that i was comisioned to the Hegemony only once, on my first ever playthru. It was alright. Every single next vanila or moded playthru? Clowntown Hegemony arriving at my door the second i'm needed or want to explore some remenant system. The amount of wars drops by about 20 IF Hegies are gone in a sector of *9 factions*. Last time i played moded 0.95, i was helping these dipshits with a Bladebraker Raid in their system when they stole my 1 Alfa AI admin. Can't wait for new clown tricks from the Hegemony in moded 0.97 :)