Wouldn't "Americans" be "Americkers", since "-an" is a Latinate suffix? Wouldn't "Russia" be "Rusland" as in German? Shouldn't "theedish" be "theedly", as "-ish" is mainly for nationalities. Also, I think "landly" is a better word for "national."
@rationallyright462617 күн бұрын
Thank you for mentioning the keyman app. I wasn't able to find an easy way to type runes which was why I gave up a long time ago. It is nice that I can get back into runes now.
@qvindicator17 күн бұрын
I love this word. It sounds way better than astronaut or cosmonaut. More whimsical
@jonchius21 күн бұрын
I would take the first Anglish to bring new folk into the tongue, but take the second for the ends of "leethcraft" ;)
@hansworthe22 күн бұрын
Followingday
@zephlodwick100923 күн бұрын
Best of luck to her
@itube513729 күн бұрын
stricken or slew hit is norse
@itube513729 күн бұрын
It would be amazing if you use yive instead of give, ayen instead of again and hie instead of they and hier instead of their. like and subscribe.
@varalderfreyr843829 күн бұрын
I'm glad to have tidings that may be heard in the Anglish tongue. I wonder if "souls" is better when speaking of "individuals", rather than wielding the word "folks"
@zephlodwick100929 күн бұрын
Highborns is a good swap for noblemen. It's better than ethel/athelmen. Lords would also work. I like your writings and talks for the Times, as you keep to well-known still-living English words instead of newmade fanglings or anewed dead words, which means any modern English-speaker can understand almost all of what you say.
@TheAnglishTimes29 күн бұрын
Thanks, that's what I go for.
@zephlodwick100929 күн бұрын
Wouldn't IDF be ISM/S (Israeli Shielding Might/Strength)?
@April8401229 күн бұрын
I think it would be a bit too wildering to switch shortenings like that. It might make it too hard to understand.
@zephlodwick1009Ай бұрын
I mind the day when I heard the tidings of the English loss. When the newsie spoke the words, all the crowd gathered there were held in stillness. After a while, I was the first to speak. "My letdown is untold and my day is wrecked."
@claromale29 күн бұрын
Silence germanoid ed get civilized by le superior anglese norman language
@zephlodwick100929 күн бұрын
@@claromale per le superior Norman language
@Valencetheshireman92712 күн бұрын
@@claromaleGermanic culture is the superior culture. I would have thought that was clear after the creation of France by a Germanic tribe and its multiple defeats and overshadowing by the German nation.
@claromale11 күн бұрын
@@Valencetheshireman927 id's entirely false ed obviously germanoid propaganda
@Valencetheshireman92711 күн бұрын
@@claromale They’re all facts friend. Everyone can see where the Franks came from and all the various French defeats to Germany.
@ludoviciusmagnus5125Ай бұрын
Mes ancêtres 💪💪💪
@claromaleАй бұрын
Vive l'Angleterre NORMANDE 🔥🔥🔥
@itube513728 күн бұрын
French is just badly pronounced Latin words, Greek words, Dutch words, Italian words, other West Germanic words, Middle Eastern words (Persian, Aramaic, Arabic)
@@ludoviciusmagnus5125 imagine skipping 70% of all your consonants in speech
@claromale26 күн бұрын
@@Galaxy-tm5ev Imagine have been colonized by francese elite 😎
@LearnRunesАй бұрын
Thanks for mention mate. We'll be updating our system in July. You'll be pleased to know that we've largely incorporated your vowel doubling idea to replace consonant doubling. Of course, that will mean ᛤ needs a new job, but that's sorted. For now, please allow me to correct one mistake you made: Historically, the STRUT vowel split from the FOOT vowel. Those who say them the same retain the original pronunciation, which is the FOOT vowel. No re-merger between them has ever occurred. Overall though, some of your ideas are more historically justifiable than others. Having now researched how Proto-Germanic phonology and Elder Futhark runes influenced Old English, I'm convinced that your choice of ᛇ for the FLEECE vowel is justified on multiple grounds, including the very reasons which caused the historic rarity of ᛇ. Just as is the case with ᛟ, our changing phonology breaths new life into these once almost dead runes. The Runeboard has some updates coming too, but they mostly impact Younger Futhark, e.g. ᛅ is currently on 2 keys so that'll be fixed. Plus we're going to continue the series on accents and release some new fonts. Look forward to seeing you there!
@dareka54Ай бұрын
Stirring tidings! Two frains for you: 1. Do "lightbild" and "lightbilder" mean "photo" and "camera," in that endbirdness? 2. I'm guessing that Anglish "bild" comes from Proto West Germanic "biliþī," no? How would "bild" ring to the ear in latterday English? Like English "wild" or like "build"?
@LearnRunesАй бұрын
This is big news to be hearing about first in Anglish!
@April84012Ай бұрын
Hopefully this will not stoke the fire of war in that deal of the world. We do not need any more war and strife right now.
Can you use these words in a few example sentences in the shorts?
@varalderfreyr8438Ай бұрын
He was a great film star
@RyanWRoehlAKZoomberBoomerАй бұрын
𐐜𐐮𐑅 𐐮𐑆 𐐮𐑌𐐻𐐲𐑉𐐮𐑅𐐻𐐮𐑍 𐐒𐐲𐐻 𐑅𐐰𐐼𐐲𐑌𐐲𐐼 𐐤𐐭𐑆 𐐲𐑂 𐐒,𐐐𐐮𐑊
@varalderfreyr84382 ай бұрын
I didn't think Ukraine would have weapon men go into its lands in 2022. So I shall not say what may happen in forthcoming days
@zephlodwick10092 ай бұрын
Nearly all the drones and flying weapons were shot down on their way from Iran to Israel by America and Israel. Jordan also got in on the doings by downing a few craft that flew over her liftroom.
@varalderfreyr84382 ай бұрын
It's hard to think about something like that happening in an English speaking land.
@zephlodwick10092 ай бұрын
"Waterway" is the best word for "river," better than "ea" or "stream."
@varalderfreyr84382 ай бұрын
Maybe navigable rivers should be called waterways, and shallow waters should be called streams
@zephlodwick10093 ай бұрын
Gatherer: "Goodman Chew, are you limb of the Chinish Communist Band?" Ticktock owner: "Goodman Gatherer, I'm Singaporish."
@zephlodwick10093 ай бұрын
This is sadly not the first great fear-spreading harrowing in Russland's near foretime. Roughly three tens of years ago, some Chechens took over a school (this was during the uprising in Chechnia) and held all the learners and teachers at gunhead. In the end, after a few days, the Rusish harfolk and lawmen opened fire on the school, and in the following shootout, almost all the dear children were killed. This was one of the happenings (along with the broader Chechen War) that lead to the Russish leadership tightening things up and becoming a strongman-dom. It wouldn't be taken aback if Putin tightens things up even more over there.
@kirtmierez65693 ай бұрын
☪️kid:free Palestine Me no
@kirtmierez65693 ай бұрын
Wow man
@mudhuthanudimmudkahagadulh46573 ай бұрын
Better to use original or pure English
@varalderfreyr84383 ай бұрын
We might call it clean-speach
@weatherydump3 ай бұрын
of all the anglish websites out there, yours is the best! so much reading material!!!
@TheAnglishTimes3 ай бұрын
Thanks, I do my best.
@Siegfried58463 ай бұрын
Russland were unwise to fight Ukraine. Now, NATO is mightier than before.
@matthewheald89643 ай бұрын
I don't think I can say that I stand behind Anglish fully, as I don't well know which kind of Anglish you yourself have put forth here. This is worth some spelling out, as there are now many kinds and undretakings of Anglish most unlike each other. Here are the main three which come to mind for me: 1. Some believe that we need to rid our speech of outside borrowings from Latin and French (as well as Greek sometimes), as it is rather bothersome to them that there should be more words in our lovely mother tongue from these outlandish tongues than there are that come straight from her to begin with. Or maybe even some of them would be happy enough with only lessening this heap of weird words. I am unaware at this time how they feel about words from other outland tongues, knowing that we have many words from Arabic, Celtish tongues, or those spoken by clans of folk in Vinland (or Americksland, if that more outlandish name is more to your liking), to name a few. I myself see nothing wrong with the small handful of borrowings which come from these kinds of speech. 2. Some believe that we should try to get rid of what happened in times of old when the Normans stormed into our homeland and brought many & sundry words from the three tongues which I have brought up under my last heading. I think this a worthy undertaking and good enough in some ways on its own. 3. Some believe that we should, without sparing any, fully rid our speech of any and all words that even smell of a root that is not Germanic. They would rid our tongue even of the words that Old Germanic, the mother of all Germanic tongues borrowed from the Romans, such as "line" or "net" or "wall" or "wine" (at least, as I understand it, these words were borrowed even before the Anglo-Saxons left for the Roman land of Britannia). This I believe to be a bit much. In short, I believe that there should be much less (or even no) outlandish words from the at least the first two of the three tongues I have here named. But anything else seems like too much to me. With that said, so far as what I have said here holds true, I am some kind of Anglisher.
@TheAnglishTimes3 ай бұрын
I think we both like the same kind of Anglish. I too think getting rid of words borrowed into Old Germanic is a bit much.
@matthewheald89643 ай бұрын
@@TheAnglishTimesThat’s awesome to hear! And if I may, what are your thoughts on other tongues and their loanwords, to name a few, Celtish tongues (from which comes the word “clan”, “bard”, & “flannel”), North and South Vinlandish tongues (loanwords being “moose”, “chocolate”, & “coyote”), Middle Eastern tongues (“coffee”, “caravan”, & “bazaar”), & Spanish (which still has Romish roots, but this tongue for one does not swell our speech nearly as much as its sister and mother)? I ask this only since I for one have the maybe less lofty goal of cleaning out unneeded, unwanted, and seldom wielded French and Latin clutter, whether fully or only mostly, and find other tongues with much less sway over our tongue in days of yore to be a bit more harmless. This is even more so given that I am a Vinlander by birth and find that some words of outlandish roots give our one of a kind way of speech a lovely touch which shows in as lovely a way the kind of inmingling and comings in and goings out of somewhat unlike clans of folk from unlike lands which make my fatherland as delightful a thing as it is to me. Anyways, thank you and God bless!
@TheAnglishTimes3 ай бұрын
@@matthewheald8964 I like the thought of other tongues also upkeeping their cleanliness. On a long enough timeline, any tongues that don't upkeep themselves will fall to bits and become something else.
@April840123 ай бұрын
Haiti might be the most woeful land on Earth... I hope frith finds them soon.
@mudhuthanudimmudkahagadulh46574 ай бұрын
I feel sorry for this lad. He befell his own death.
@varalderfreyr84384 ай бұрын
Rest his soul
@weatherydump4 ай бұрын
'tis wunderful heering of new uutfaars in þe hefenes. magbe hit scal be frum þe moon to tew. (þe red wanderstar)
@victorcalleros63474 ай бұрын
Great channel! just suscribed
@Gudha_Ismintis5 ай бұрын
keep up the good work
@TheAnglishTimes5 ай бұрын
Thanks
@heathenhammer23445 ай бұрын
Thanks
@zephlodwick10095 ай бұрын
A few things: --"outlaw" isn't the best swap for "criminal." An outlaw is not merely anyone who breaks the law; they're someone who's no longer shielded by the law, so other folks can do to them as they like. A more fitting word would be "lawbreaker." --Most of the time, a lockup is a small-time stead for the lawless, what's called a "jail" in America. A full-time stead would be called a "slammer."
@kirtmierez65695 ай бұрын
Cool short film bro
@xshayahyawzi36665 ай бұрын
👍
@zephlodwick10095 ай бұрын
Wouldn't tsunami count as Anglish friendly, as tsunamis don't happen in the Atlantic.