No

Let's assume if two oxygen atoms try to form a O₂ molecule by gaining and losing electrons instead of sharing electrons, For that the 1st oxygen atom have to gain two electrons to become O²⁻ and the 2nd oxygen atom would have to lose electrons to become O²⁺. NOW, 1st atom of oxygen can easily gain 2 electrons to form O²⁻, because oxygen atom has high electronegativity, meaning it strongly attracts electrons. But the problem arises with the 2nd atom of oxygen which has to form O²⁺ by losing 2 electrons. because every oxygen atom strongly prefer to gain electrons, not to lose them, because they have high electronegativity. Removing even one electron from oxygen atom requires a significant amount of energy (ionization energy), and removing a second electron is even harder. So losing electrons to form O²⁺ is highly unfavorable. AS a result both 1st and 2nd oxygen atom will have a fight because both oxygen atoms wants to gain electrons, not to lose them. Instead of fighting over electrons, they share their electrons, forming a covalent bond. This sharing allows both oxygen atoms to complete their outer shells and achieve stability without creating charged ions." Nature prefers arrangements that require the least energy and provide the most stability. For oxygen, forming a double covalent bond (O=O) is the most energy-efficient way to achieve a stable molecule. covalent bonding in O₂ requires much less energy to form than an ionic bond(transfer of electrons) because there’s no need to completely transfer electrons, which would demand high ionization and electron affinity energies.

thanks

welcome

thankyou 🙂

thankyou so much for your kind words 🙂 and best wishes for your exams and future

@@learn_trek To you too for ur KZbin channel!! Keep going, you're doing a wonderful job ❤️

@@crying704 welcome and thankyou again😇

Germanium, which also has four electrons in its outer shell, acts differently because it's a much bigger atom than carbon. Its outer electrons are further from the nucleus, which means they aren’t held as tightly to the center as carbon’s, so it’s a bit easier for Germanium to lose some electrons. Because of this, Germanium sometimes loses two electrons to form a positive charge, which makes it more stable in certain compounds.

thankyou so much for your kind words 😇......I am glad that you liked my work

The type of bond(single or double or triple) that will typically form will depend on the conditions such as temperature, pressure, and presence of catalysts. At relatively low temperatures and in the absence of a catalyst, the most likely bond to form first would be single, as it requires the least amount of energy to form and is the most stable bond under those conditions. However, if you increase the temperature or introduce certain catalysts, the formation of other bonds such as double and triple becomes more favorable due to the increased energy available for breaking and forming bonds. In short, the formation of more complex bond (like double bond and triple bond) compared to single bond typically requires higher energy input or specific conditions due to the need to break and form multiple bonds, the thermodynamics of the reactions involved, the multi-step reaction pathways, and the influence of factors such as temperature, pressure, and catalysts.

@@learn_trek Thank you sir

@@divydwivedi5449 welcome .......and feel free to ask any questions or queries.

electronegativity means the power of attracting electrons .........C4+ cation has only 2 negatively charged electrons left but it still has 6 positively charged protons ......so the net charge(of C4+ cation) = 6 positive charges(of 6 protons) ---- 2 negative charges(of 2 electrons) = +4 positive charges .......................this +4 positive charges on C4+ cation will attract negatively charges electrons very strongly ............thus C4+ cation has high electronegativity (as strong tendency to attract electrons = high electronegativity)

Ok I came to know that there will be increased attraction between the remaining electrons and the 6 protons of nucleus but my doubt is Will the protons present in the nucleus will attract the negative charged electron in the nucleus (means that will the electrons come in the nucleus area because of the strong attraction)?​@@learn_trek

​@@learn_trekpls reply it will mean a lot as a student

@@tsmenxkrish623 Good question..........electrons don't come in the nucleus area because electrons are continuously revolving around the nucleus at very high speed......the attraction of 6 protons is still not high enough to attract the 2 revolving electrons to come in the nucleus area .......................... Earth's gravitational force also attract moon & satellites in the space , but moon & satellites dont fall on the earth because both of them are continuously revolving around earth and earth's gravity in space is not strong enough to attract moon & satellites to come near earth (or fall on earth)

@@learn_trek thankyou for response sir❤️.......it means a lot❤️

thankyou for your honest feedback ....it matters a lot for me

thankyou so much for your kind words

thankyou so much for your feedback , i will now start making videos in hindi

Glad you think so! best wishes for your exams

Glad to hear that ..........thanks

ji .....jaldi se jaldi hindi mai bhi videos aayengi

thanks for your kind words .....it means a lot for me

thankyou so much .....it means a lot for me ❤

Glad you think so!

Glad to hear that

Viewers may also visit 'Learner's Console ' for this chapter too 🙏

glad to hear 🙂

thanks bhai

thankyou bhai

thanks bhai

you are absolutely right but keep in mind that ,this explanation video is made according to class 10 students ...The example you have given is beyond the scope of class 10 students, which they will study later in higher classes

thanks

thanks for watching

thankyou

So nice

Thanks

Thanks

okey

thanks

Glad you think so!

Thank you! Cheers!

keep watching

Thanks a lot

Thanks and welcome

Thanks

thanks

Thanks for the visit

thanks

Thank you so much 😀

Thank you! Cheers!