Пікірлер
@DomokosLajos 8 ай бұрын
2024 ? 🤔🤨
@x-gamessimulator1067 8 ай бұрын
🎉
@x-gamessimulator1067 7 ай бұрын
Iss good concept
@matthewchang5701 2 жыл бұрын
Can someone build this please build the full scale model
@M.T.... 3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to an airframe manufacturers nightmare.
@ioanbota9397 3 жыл бұрын
I like this plane
@MEBSHIVA 3 жыл бұрын
Which software is you used in the project
@stevenorcutt2099 3 жыл бұрын
Save a lot of expense by just letting and enabling passengers to use their smart phones and tablets.
@Macrocompassion 4 жыл бұрын
This design does not take full advantage of the wing/body thickness, which can reduce structural weight but with some increase in form drag. The 1960's had the Handley Page proposal HP 117 all wing design, but doubts about its stability and control were not satisfied although it saved on fuel by its suction boundary-layer control.
@anthonytriolo3643 4 жыл бұрын
Its a good cargo plane that is all,too scary to be on it.
@jsmariani4180 4 жыл бұрын
great video but nightmare to fly in. Perfect for dummies though.
@th1nk_outside 4 жыл бұрын
where is it? i guess the problem is the electric propulsion
@philoso377 4 жыл бұрын
Curved surface facing (up) was intended to produce lift (upwards), while surface facing (down) should not produce lift (downward). The delta fuselage in this video 9:10 has flat top with a balloon belly bottom. This way the fuselage will produce lift (downward) is a mistake. Which is excusable if we are dealing with an artist, not excusable to aircraft engineers or science student.
@em3876 3 жыл бұрын
sorry, you have it all wrong, the "upside-down aerofoil" is actually deliberate and generates more lift and greater stability for the aircraft. Remember that aerofoils produce lift regardless of the orientation (unless specifically shaped to generate lift in one orientation, which this one does not), also if you are interested in the reasonings to this read the Cambridge mit institutes silent aircraft initiative, they have a research paper explaining why the aircraft has a belly and the different types of aerofoils used at different cross-sections of the aircraft.
@philoso377 3 жыл бұрын
@@em3876 I’m afraid we have a new member to the science celebrity academia, embrace concepts whole but scrutiny and reasoning of what they offers. When we want to kill lift, add bow to lower surfaces and reduce bow at top, to wing and fuselage. Example? Gliding space crafts returning from orbit or upper atmosphere doesn’t need much upward lift (if they don’t to missed dinner of the day) are usually have little or wingless. All of them have fuselage bow downward - for increased sink rate and stability. The artist misunderstood this piece of aerodynamic.
@glennbryanbacus1704 4 жыл бұрын
660th Approved !!!
@j.e.turcotte7015 4 жыл бұрын
music sounds like something from sasche ende =)
@briangarrison1323 4 жыл бұрын
needs a 3d jet engine in the middle of electric fans to offset the stress on the outer wings by the other two or you can put the jet engines ressesed in the body like the stealth bomber and remove them from the outer Wings all together
@steve-rr3nq 4 жыл бұрын
bring the engines inboard. a single engine failure would cause a bad yaw, and possible loss of control. other than that. i like it.
@x-gamessimulator1067 2 жыл бұрын
No
@x-gamessimulator1067 2 жыл бұрын
The TurboShaft engine make energy for eléctric engines
@steve-rr3nq 2 жыл бұрын
@@x-gamessimulator1067 electric motors can and do fail. with the engine that far outboard, will put you on a spin, if one fails. that or add a big honking rudder.
@BadWebDiver 4 жыл бұрын
No public toilets in the design?
@paulpalermo6763 4 жыл бұрын
Jammed inside with no windows. No me!
@ezyrod 4 жыл бұрын
You might want to work on the interior layout! It is absolutely claustrophobic!
@jamesfarley4644 4 жыл бұрын
No windows will freak out some from getting on plane!
@sichere 4 жыл бұрын
Glass roof panels
@tsclly2377 4 жыл бұрын
pipe dream. won't have the speed due to turbulent and differential flow issues over the large wing area when hitting the electric fans Single engine out issue with the fan jet engines and the more efficient jet engines work best at lower speeds and the large frontal area if the large radius nose of the leading edge is a low speed design then there is the altitude that this thing will be flying at , it is going to structurally bulge of the compartments aren't rounded out into a series of more cylindrical forms internally,.. this thing will spin like a top if it get slightly out of control. Fly this first as cargo, 'cause passenger travel is going to CoV tank anyway
@marklarson3934 4 жыл бұрын
Sorry, impossible as those wings cound not exceed to speed of sound Must be swept-back design like the B1 Bomber
@Yetipfote 4 жыл бұрын
why do they have so many Nintendo Switch near the cock pit?
@natielesantosdesouza5593 4 жыл бұрын
Pontes
@adrianfernandez3459 5 жыл бұрын
Cuantos motores tiene????????????
@tariyaposhar8363 5 жыл бұрын
I've contributed to this project!
@joshuarobinson8103 5 жыл бұрын
That leg room though.
@marcoferrari3484 5 жыл бұрын
Ingegneri sono fisi aerei con ali . Areio se vuole andare bene non deve aver le ali Non è u uccello e poi altre tante cose che sbagliano ingegneri di tutto il mondo
@jannicolaisen4671 5 жыл бұрын
Thunderbird 2
@NeoRazor 5 жыл бұрын
This is the worst presentation I've ever watched.
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 5 жыл бұрын
Cool, it has 30 windows for 300+ passengers.
@solarslot01 4 жыл бұрын
Use network of cameras instead of windows - aerodynamic gain.
@mahmodbozo2062 5 жыл бұрын
Good. .Pliny nasa..😎
@umvhu 5 жыл бұрын
High tech cattle class transport, moo
@MINDLE55EMPIRE 5 жыл бұрын
About 480seat though
@computeraddic675 5 жыл бұрын
A lot of tanks and electric motors?????
@josefverner9653 5 жыл бұрын
Motory na krajích blbost!
@allanradcliffe6204 5 жыл бұрын
Would it be worth it to also have a positively charged ionic field in front of the wing and body? Might get some good benefit from laminar effects and general smooothing? Less atmospheric drag? Good to see young people with ideas and vision!! Yeah makes an old geezer happy!!
@datathunderstorm 3 ай бұрын
Shhhh! Aurora’s Classified Black Flying Triangle says to stop giving its secrets away! 😎
@allanradcliffe6204 5 жыл бұрын
Thought the Cranberrys were going to come on... but I like the Blended Wing Lifting Body designs!
@DevoteeCT 5 жыл бұрын
Evacuation looks like a problem.
@sineadhylandart8688 5 жыл бұрын
The mandatory 90 second emergency egress requirement was fulfilled
@arksodyssey 5 жыл бұрын
bro how did u do the animation?
@atchireddy7680 5 жыл бұрын
Cranfield avd NASA develop in India tata aerospace. India always love s USA united States
@fayzemourie7776 6 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍 GREAT DESIGN
@ArturMcCloud 6 жыл бұрын
So this means we gonna be crammed as usual but with more people and no window?
@michaeltalbot8242 5 жыл бұрын
That's not the worst bit as a aircraft systems and safety engineer I'd like to see the escape procedure for a wg a whells up and in or water ditching how will they get all the passengers out in the given time
@thomasfiore9635 5 жыл бұрын
If the crammed in is your issue write Congress and the Senate to get the minimum seat width and legroom increased to human sized proportions. The concept here is to move to electricity instead of jet fuel to make flight more sustainable as part of combating climate change.
@phillcom3 5 жыл бұрын
@@michaeltalbot8242 I was thinking the same. There's no way that many sales can evacuate in the standard time.
@jsmariani4180 4 жыл бұрын
@@thomasfiore9635 Congress's main concern is keeping the airlines in business. Lobbyists will pressure Congress to keep hands off.
@xpeterson 6 жыл бұрын
Biggest hurdle for blended wing bodies that I'm aware of, and the main reason they haven't been developed yet, is how to pressurize something more complex than a cylinder without adding tons of weight. How does this plane propose to solve this?
@JFrazer4303 5 жыл бұрын
McD earliest studies, then Boeing and NASA and others all say it's a lighter structure, (even discounting the lesser overall area) less fuel burn per set mile, more payload, reduced landing speed by ~60 kts compared to a "normal" jet of same power and fuel load and footprint. Even if they need to reinforce structure with more mass (which they aren't even sure is necessary), it's less overall.
@alfredneuman6488 6 жыл бұрын
TOO SLOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@JFrazer4303 5 жыл бұрын
They are slower and don't fly as high if heavily loaded, but if the payload per footprint is the same as a normal plane they're sightly faster with much more range onto shorter runways.
@sonjusamanta2188 6 жыл бұрын
nice
@陸龍猜 6 жыл бұрын
นี่มันเครื่องบินหรือเรือดำน้ำยังกับหยู่ไนกล่องเลยเข้อ
@AndyMatrix 6 жыл бұрын
nice plane, put some windows(Skylight ) on top and you good to go.
@GregorKropotkin-qu2hp 6 жыл бұрын
Claustrophobic with so few windows, also how would passenger evacuation in the event of an emergency be carried out?- i imagine that there would be a lot of panic as the exits are much further from where people would be seated.
@JFrazer4303 5 жыл бұрын
McD and Boeing and NASA and Airbus do all the normal tests for evacuation and it meets every one if designed right; only so many people per door, no more than 6 steps to door,, etc, even if half the doors aren't useable. No one but media says they need to e huge 900 passenger monsters either. 120 pax plane is no problem. Freight doesn't care, nor do military users.
@ElohimElite 6 жыл бұрын
Almost same design as my spaceship. the wing is not needed. a lift body is more than enough with a fusion reactor engine. running on 3He and Hydrogen. My ship have a 45/100 yrs range. future plasma pulsar engines can reach alpha centauri in less them 50 years on 3He and running on antimatter under 10 yrs. Electric is the answer but please drop these fans ideas soon as possible . this is not the way. Btw each engine needs a supercapacitor battery delivering 50 TWh of power.
@michaelkruk553 5 жыл бұрын
FUSION REACTOR?!!!!! Stop watching Star Trek ,and get a life(girlfriend)!!!
@craigkdillon 6 жыл бұрын
Interesting - using liquid hydrogen for fuel, instead of jet fuel. That eliminates GHG CO2, which is good.