hii guys, i just want to know one thing that, which material you used to make a product which showed at 3:30 minutes in this video? i have my master project regarding this type of things. please guide me i am stuck at this area.
@DanFrederiksen2 ай бұрын
what is that part for? just demonstration?
@HawthornComposites2 ай бұрын
It is a demonstration article for a co-cured wing or control surface. We actually have over 30 plus customer flying platforms that use similar methodologies.
@girl46324 ай бұрын
How thick is the fuselage made of prepeg composite fiber
@HawthornCompositesАй бұрын
The thickness of the fuselage is .1 to .175.
@girl4632Ай бұрын
@@HawthornComposites in mm or cm
@tristantrajan5 ай бұрын
Laminate looks pretty bad... Results should be a lot better after all the hassle of the tech used, not to mention the useless waist of double bagging!
@HawthornComposites5 ай бұрын
What I believe you are seeing is the lighting reflection and not the surface finish of the laminate. If you look at the photo of the CLEAVER itself, you'll see the surface quality is quite nice.
@pbschulz7 ай бұрын
Great video. Thank you. I would have loved to have seen the original door and then a post-production comparison of the two.
@pulsarspacetime7 ай бұрын
Great job. What would be the max wing length using this tooling ? Thanks
@HawthornComposites2 ай бұрын
There is not necessarily a limit on potential wing length. It really comes down to making sure you have the time to fully "wet-out" the composite fabric before it starts to gel. There are plenty of variables to play with to ensure success for much larger wings.
@pulsarspacetimeАй бұрын
@@HawthornComposites thank you for the answer !
@lvxleather11 ай бұрын
Who makes that automated composite cutting table?
@lvxleather11 ай бұрын
Nice work 👍
@keizogates Жыл бұрын
Nice work guys
@tkorte101 Жыл бұрын
Do not try this at home!
@billn8555 Жыл бұрын
LOL, this is NOT low cost or efficient. There are much better ways.
@mwip9727 ай бұрын
which are the better ways? using prepreg
@SONO4B11T Жыл бұрын
I've recently just become a carbon composite enthusiast.
I wish all these equipment were under 300 dollars 😪
@felixcat9318 Жыл бұрын
This is truly outstanding! Very impressive indeed!
@mansooriasadullah6 Жыл бұрын
How we made smart tool please inform me about your smart tools .
@HawthornComposites2 ай бұрын
You can visit smarttooling.com
@beachboardfan95442 жыл бұрын
How do you guys keep the fabric on the chop table from moving while being cut?
@HawthornComposites2 ай бұрын
We put a film over top of the fabric and our automated ply cutter table has built in vacuum, which keeps the composite material firmly in place during the cutting process.
@jhmtechnologiesinc.89482 жыл бұрын
Certainly a fine example of low-pressure resin transfer molding (RTM). The mold seal design is very old technology prone to seal failure at intersections of flange planes much more consistent and repeatable mold seal interaction is available today especially if the cavity is to be at a negative pressure (vacuum) as compared to ambient. The use of aluminum tooling, epoxy resin, and methods shown are well suited for Aerospace profit margins and would be very challenging to compete in a higher volume application. Especially with the use of 3M 77 spray adhesive used as a tackifier holding the fiber and core components. So many molding applications failures witnessed over the last 40+ years are tracked back to the use of spray adhesive especially used as shown, not to mention the added mold surface scumming. All and all, an excellent example of what can be done with low-pressure forms of RTM. Today the majority of parts are produced using variations of RTM, such as LRTM and most recently SRTM
@cameronblackmon95402 жыл бұрын
Howdy. As someone hearing impaired, thank you for the clear narration and closed captions. Excellent instructional demonstration video.
@chanonpaisri39062 жыл бұрын
What are smart tool materials
@HawthornComposites2 ай бұрын
Shape memory polymer resin combined with our trade secret fabrics and manufacturing methodologies.
@martel55322 жыл бұрын
Это очень короткая часть крыла, а как соединяются все части крыла в одну деталь?
@chautrongan61832 жыл бұрын
Thank Sir 👍😊, God Heavenly Father Jesus Christ Joseph and Mary Blessings United States of America today
@pierrex32262 жыл бұрын
Very nice! You can be proud of what you do.
@quattrocity96202 жыл бұрын
Great video into the process. I'm curious about how many times you can reuse the smart tools...
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
Typically Smart Tools will last between 50 to 70 cycles
@CantPickTheNameIwant2 жыл бұрын
I'm very afraid to ask the final price of that piece of a wing
@slevinshafel93952 жыл бұрын
can be included battery on wings shell with your methods? being part of structure
@RetrowaveUniverse2 жыл бұрын
Looks like a place where I'd like to work.
@noanyobiseniss74622 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d5SaeGquhKxld8k
@samuela62712 жыл бұрын
You could just use prepreg and not do an infusion and it there would be less steps. Also consolidation in the transitions from web to skin could be controlled a bit more maybe. The smart tool is the secret. 150+psi will be magic. Ive made silicone intensifier parts where the layup looks like trash but, the final part is impeccable. Prepregs may have some issues but, seems much more reliable than sucking/blowing hot resin into a super heavy tank of a mold inside a 200+C oven. 😅😅😅
@red03golf2 жыл бұрын
Good lookin' part, but seems way too labour-intensive.
@aileronhelicopters2 жыл бұрын
We're going to start manufacturing in USA. I'll contact we have a meeting 🤝
@corail532 жыл бұрын
Great video, would love to see you guys do more.
@wololo102 жыл бұрын
Looks overly complicated
@sebas7332 жыл бұрын
Mein gott muss das sein
@Thomas..Anderson2 жыл бұрын
What are this smart tools made of?
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
Our smart tools are made of proprietary fabric and a shape memory polymer resin that is actually a epoxy thermoset. You can learn more about it here: kzbin.info
@polvoron8242 жыл бұрын
Hello Hawthorn Composites, I would love to work with you in the automatization of production of tis product. Why not, right?
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
This is a representative part that could be a control surface on a business jet or wing on a small UAV. In regards to automation, Smart Tooling (kzbin.info) is compatible with robotic handling, automated fabric placement methods, automated mold opening/closing, and automated infusion.
@helms65613 жыл бұрын
These guys are two steps away from having custom tailored composite compliant control surfaces. -I mean they have stiffness which is the most important, but you take away the air blend between control surface and main wing while lowering weight, you got yourself a game changer in wing design.
@helms65613 жыл бұрын
Air bleed* through between control surface and main wing
@BHARGAV_GAJJAR3 жыл бұрын
Low cost Carbon Fiber an oxymoronic Nicety for the rich
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt3 жыл бұрын
I thought the advantage of prepreg is the lack of air bubbles because of the very short path out of the material. I wonder if one could impregnate the sheets and directly afterwards lay up wet sheets in those smart tools. In a cold room.
@bradster17083 жыл бұрын
In this technique the resin is drawn into the carbon under vacuum inside an oven. The chances of air bubbles is small. This technique also does not require use of an autoclave oven. Boeing uses a sort of similar process in Australia making 787 parts with good success after a slow start.
@ArneChristianRosenfeldt3 жыл бұрын
@@bradster1708 now I wonder how resin behaves when I send it through a heated nozzle ( 3d printer, or due to friction ) into vacuum. Does it evaporate? Below some pressure a lot of materials are either solid or gaseous. Chemical Vapor Deposition. Then as the pressure due to the resin itself rises, the new resin going through the nozzle stays liquid.
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
Because the polymer tools can apply pressure both during infusion and cure, any air is driven out of the curing composite. This solution deploys automated carbon fiber sleevings and isotropic broad good to eliminate most of the labor that would be associated with applying carbon fiber prepreg.
@Andre-eo9io3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps carbon skimming isn't the best... yall make wings for my car?
@regdor81873 жыл бұрын
Damn, you have much more money in tooling than you would have had hand laying that part over cut foam...
@diviscadilek17643 жыл бұрын
I imagine such methods aren't precise enough for aviation, so you need a mold wither way.
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
What we have found is that if you a making more than 6 parts, a Smart Tooling solution will be less expensive than using machined foam, because precision machined foam is so expensive
@alexportiiii64148 ай бұрын
@@HawthornComposites 3D printed dissolvable foam. Much more geometry could be added to lighten and strengthen the parts
@ABusFullaJewz3 жыл бұрын
So do the smart tools operate on some form of witchcraft or is it just your more run-of-the-mill magic?
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
We'll leave that to your discretion ;) watch more magic at kzbin.info
@htomerif3 жыл бұрын
Well, next time I have a 10 billion dollar defense contract come across my table I'll keep you guys in mind. Oh, it might be on your site but it might have been nice to see how scalable and modular this process is. I can imagine those molds and "smart tools" as well as the resin impregnation process facing increasing difficulty and variability as they scale up.
@diviscadilek17643 жыл бұрын
I don't know about difficulty. Can you elaborate? But issues with variability would definitely be a problem. It's not like you could easily make adjustments to such "smart tools", right? So everytime you'd need to swap the tools out for different ones, you'd need to pay quite a lot of money, as you're locked into their ecosystem of tools. But I guess the aviation industry doesn't care about costs as much as your average small business owner. Hell, even the cheapest Russian airlines don't care about any cost under 2000$ when it comes to repairing their planes.
@htomerif3 жыл бұрын
@@diviscadilek1764 Difficulty with things like mold alignment and multi-piece molds, trying to get consistent resin flow through the entire carbon fiber piece, warping and thickness problems. "Difficulty" and "variability" have a lot of overlap, but in general there's a reason people don't use injection molding for parts that are meters long. I could see the cost going up exponentially as the size of the piece increases. For that roughly 1m square demonstration its not too bad, but for a 10 meter wing or flight control surface or even something like a monocoque chassis for a vehicle, these squishy inflatable mold pieces don't seem like they would scale well.
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
The solution deployed for this wing is very scalable to much larger parts, we use similar technology to make a approximately 12ft (3.7 meter) inlet duct for Kratos Valkyrie tactical UAV www.compositesworld.com/news/hawthorn-composites-awarded-structural-inlet-duct-manufacturing-contract- and we also made the wings and fuselage for the same vehicle afresearchlab.com/news/aerospace-systems-directorate-collaborates-with-partners-to-build-innovative-airframe/
@htomerif2 жыл бұрын
@@HawthornComposites Thanks for responding. From my perspective it looked like it had a lot of the drawbacks of injection molding as far as scalability went, but if you're making 4m production parts its doable at least. I could be wrong but I'm going to guess that it wouldn't be cost competitive with other composite manufacturing for less defense oriented project budgets like medium scale wind turbines? Also: I miss the DoD days when people knew how to name projects. "Longbow Apache" makes sense. "Kratos Valkyrie" sounds like someone isn't even trying to pick names from the same sets of mythology.
@Ender_Wiggin3 жыл бұрын
'low cost"
@diviscadilek17643 жыл бұрын
Apparently, it costs less than the traditional way of manufacturing carbon fibre composites
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
We did achieve a 67% reduction in labor hours in producing the inlet duct for the Kratos Valkyrie tactical UAV using a similar solution www.compositesworld.com/news/hawthorn-composites-awarded-structural-inlet-duct-manufacturing-contract-
@Veldtian13 жыл бұрын
Why so *EXPENSIVE* ??😉 Love RTM.
@jatigre13 жыл бұрын
I love how the word "quasi" is entering the English vocabulary. We've been using for centuries in Brazilian Portuguese.
@dorianvincent21012 жыл бұрын
It’s a real french word btw
@TushhsuT3 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one, who thinks it is too much manual work for cost savings in mass profuction?! They even use manual keys, not akku or pneumo! Why to put parts in a huge oven when you could directly apply heaters on or In the Alu-forms together with thermal sensors for an accurate temperature control?! Isolate them outside and one could save, I bet, >90% of electicity costs compare to that huge inefficient oven.. And time of course, because to put the thing in the oven, attach vaccum there again. hoses and so on.. again manually... Then detouch. And wait till whole oven will cool down.. each time! Instead of a simple automated press they bolt and unbolt things together.. manually each time. With manual tools. Same for re-shaping of forms.. With the press big enough one could produce one wing at a time, not just 1m part of it. Extremely unoptimised procedure.. year 2021.. Sure, one can use it for private Jets or small series, when price is originally set high. But any startup which will really want to mass produce same staff, will jump forward just by optimised procedure, not even because of another technology..
@nickthompson49523 жыл бұрын
I can see that, but t's done that way for higher quality. The higher the quality the less chance for failure. And the FAA doesn't care about what you have to pay to get a part that won't fail.
@diviscadilek17643 жыл бұрын
I hope the efficency of manufacturing gets improved upon. This looks promising. It would be nice to have affordable carbon fibre products.
@HawthornComposites2 жыл бұрын
We agree that a lot of this process could be automated, but this is a self-funded demonstration so we're not going to fund all the automation. You can check out another case study where we did use a self-heated out of oven/out of autoclave mold smarttooling.com/portfolio/co-cured-i-beam-using-bladder-smart-tools/