There was no flood despite every ancient culture remembering it. Somehow modern man knows best what happened in the past than past people themselves.

@@KingPingviini No ancient civilasation who lived before, during and after the flood make any mention of a flood and not one even got a toe wet

@@KingPingviini and you do realise what you actually say has no logic, according to what the bible claims, all civilastion was wiped out apart from whomever was on the Ark, so how could a dead civilasation make a record of an event that killed them all?

The fact that you wrote "...proves life evolved from non-life?" Tells me immediately that you have done no research into the topic whatsoever. 1) Only in mathematics are things proven. In science it is the preponderance of evidence and all conclusions are held tentatively. 2) Abiogenesis is not evolution and is not part of the theory of evolution. Evolution concerns population mechanics. Abiogenesis deals with the formation of self replicating chemicals and their transition to living organisms. 3) Even if abiogenesis turns out to be impossible, evolution would still be demonstrably true with overwhelming scientific evidence to support it. However, there are many good pieces of evidence supporting the RNA hypothesis and other hypothesis concerning the development of self replicating chemicals. Aron Ra has covered this topic as have others in depth. You are on the internet, Potholer54, Thunderf00t, and Aron Ra have all done excellent video series debunking creationism. There are other excellent resources online that explain the theory and facts of evolution and abiogenesis. Here is my question for you. Why do you cling to a literal interpretation of Genesis? "The Genesis account was written for a scientifically illiterate people and therefore should not be read as a scientific account." Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica.

@@ladyselenafelicitywhite1596 If that's true Selena, then where is the evidence that life evolved from non-life? (abiogenesis as you call it) Please post the link showing the video so I can see how this happened. So far no atheist like Aron Ra, Potholer54, Thunderf00t, or anyone else has ever successfully demonstrated to me how such a thing could ever happen absent of any intelligent designer whatsoever. About the only partially successful experiment that produced a few proteins was the Miller-Urey experiment. But even that didn't come close to producing life. The primary end result of that experiment was nothing more than a tar-like substance. So until you or anyone else can show me how this could happen, you're still just relying on BLIND FAITH to justify something that could never happen. And without *existing life* Selena, there is NO evolution at all!

​@BigKWS so it's logical to assume there's a god that did it? That's way more of a reach 😂

​@@BigKWSabiogenesis isn't the same thing as evolution, only an ignorant piece of shit, or some poor uneducated person would think otherwise.

@@w8m4n Why is it a reach? Is it a reach to believe there was a designer for my car? Or my house? Or even something as simple as a pencil? Or did they all just evolve on their own over million of years too?

That would require a brainwashed evolutionist from the U.K., Europe, or Australia for that to be true.

Except he was wrong. That's not how they do it. But I think you're right when you say he should be debating educated people instead of lieing to these poor gullible people. Atleast then thered be some sense wacked into him. People like this are a disgrace to humanity.

@@krishpatel3156 I’m pretty sure there’s no hope for Kent. He’s been corrected so many times on evolution and it’s adjacent scientific disciplines, by so many people, yet he remains intractably steadfast in his arguments, literally using the same argument he’s used for decades.

Probably because they are *true.*

@@BigKWS No because they aren't and he's one of the lost ones. Those who believe in things without evidence.

@@krishpatel3156 Lost? How so? There's overwhelming evidence for design virtually everywhere in this universe Krish. Design in itself is evidence of a designer.

@@BigKWS None of the natural phenomena in this universe points to design because none of it gives any proof of such. But it does give proof of many of our theories in science that we've advanced by looking at these phenomena and examining them.

@@krishpatel3156 Give me just ONE example then of something that came from absolutely nothing without any designer whatsoever. And what observational proof do you have for this?