Tem muito carbono hoje na atmosfera para produzir combustível e queimar numa termoelétrica em circuito fechado com carbono negativo produzindo vapor de água.

Simply doesn't work, hasn't been proven as a technology. Interesting that this new badging doesn't mention carbon sequestration - why? Because it hasn't been proven to work. This is misinformation at best.

doing away with farm land does not remove carbon making batteries for electrical cars causes more carbon and the batteries last for about 10 year's tree's and plants get rid of carbon dioxide and give off oxygen which is better than massive industrial factory's

This solution hasn't been widely funded by the Trudeau government because (a) it isn't sexy like solar and wind, and (b) none of the Liberal insiders own shares in it!.. just sayin'.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It's scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

DONT STORE IT PERMANENTLY!!!! CARBON DIOXIDE ISNT INTRINSICALLY A PROBLEM, THE UNCONTROLLED RELEASE OF IT INTO THE ATMOSPHERE IS... YOU HAVE TO MAKE IT A CYCLE 1 - 1 = 0 BUT 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 = 0 TOO... DO NOT PUMP CARBON DIOXIDE INTO THE GROUND, FOOD IS MADE OF CARBON, WE NEED CARBON FOR INCREASED GLOBAL POPULATION... USE IT TO MAKE SYNTHETIC FUEL AND STORE RENEWABLE ENERGIES IN THE WORLDS BEST BATTERY,...OIL!!!

This really _is_ the way to go forward. But I would try and take it to the public too; if _I_ pay you $300.- will you capture a ton of carbon out of the atmosphere for _me?_ Like crowdsourcing carbon capture facilities. I am _sure_ people will invest. So if you keep it transparent from the start, you show which parts of the construction facility were paid for with that donation

This technology has my support.

I like the sound of this concept. This makes the most sense for renewable energy. If this becomes a large scale operation there's no need to ban internal combustion engines, like what California and Washington state are trying to do. This is a very awesome idea.

lies!! big money grab. don't believe this .

... and when there is no CO2, the plants will die!!

Could you use a waste to energy setup using biofuel generators that not only removes CO2 from the atmosphere but also mitigates landfill waste? Cryptocurrency mining could also be included to supplement operational costs.

What is the business model? How does it earn money

What a scam and waste of money. All plants and trees use co2 for growing and withstanding high temperatures. Climate agenda scam.

Corporate greed at its finest. Profit over people

You have no right to mess up the atmosphere then when things get worse blame climate to line your pockets again on a cycle. Something needs to be done with you idiots

The laws of thermodynamics make it more efficient to use the electricity to offset current carbon power plants, than to good through capture. Plus you don't have to build a plant to do that. As long as there are fossil plants in operation, use the electricity to not run those plants, rather than building capture plants. Once we're all renewable, capture can get us too the next step.

Sure, but finding places to store all that CO2 is nothing less than problematic. It's not like it just goes away. You have to put it somewhere and hold it there for a very, very long time.

How many kilowatts of electricity is needed to pull one ton of CO2 out of the atmosphere?

BANGLADESH AND WORLDWIDE NEED THIS TECHNOLOGY

expectation to work with Tesla Megapack for the power saving

Cost of one plant ? Plant size equal to 50M trees

Green transition ain't green at all... It's all about money that power 🤭🤭

Pretty interesting concept.

take away the very thing everything on earth needs trying to kill us all over time like spaceballs movie we will have air in a can

See CRUDE OIL IS. NOT FOSSIL FUEL! It is naturally created deep down within the earth! It has nothing to do with dinosaurs! It just fit the definition of "fossil fuels "

😀😀😀

How can we be sure ☑️ that Carbon Capture and Storage is a reliable climate solution? So many websites say it’s not a climate solution but others say it is and others are so-so? I’m losing hope and I’m desperate. My soul and green heart 💚 is worn out and wearied by human-induced climate change. Please 🙏 let me know your thoughts 💭.

Why do you think it is scalable? You will need more CO2 in order to produce more SAF. We want to reduce CO2 and not otherwise. Therefore this is not scalable because aviation industry is always growing.

Congratulations, you made 2 oz of jet fuel. Now it needs to be scalable. The US alone consumed 18.27 billion gallons of jet fuel in 2019. Source: US DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Amount of CO2 produced daily is 100 MT (million tons) A large gas cylinder can take about 50 kg of pressurized CO2. We need two billion of cylinders. Each cylinder costs at least $100. Add the cost of stripping each ton CO2 from the air (CDR process) So we are in the range of trillion dollars to be paid daily for this funny idea. Trillion dollars DAILY !

Fungi like mushrooms need carbon, u have carbon.

Genius, and I hope it improves lives. I hope population goes up.

I really do hope Carbon Engineering can work out this DAC problem on a large scale. I am just concerned with the fact that they are getting funding from Companies like BP and Chevron. Doesn't this incentivise them to dig up even more land to extract even more oil. Food for thought? Nevertheless I am happy they are getting some support at least

Sir, why we can't create the reagent that will create fuel from carbon dioxide yet???🤔🤔🤔

I dont know how serious this channel is but where can we buy stocks? Also what is the Octane and BTU ratings of your fuel?

It doesn't work.

It doesn't work.

Why is this Not being talked about World Wide ?

I wonder what thunderf00t would say to this ...

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIecnWiXgpyAmq8

Ctertap

I'm not an alarmist either b/c climate is 95% natural. However, this technology & a few others does appear to solve alot of the ongoing emissions. It makes no difference whether it's 75% of 90% it does take stuff out of the air & it can be recycled into new products (artificial limestone/provide co2 for the beverage industry). The important thing is it should allow existing electrical plants to stay afloat with their current fuel because that fuel is abundant & energy dense (efficiency). That is important be/c demand is always unsatiable & resources limited. This is more effective than intermittent wind & solar. I have nothing against wind & solar--they are nice supps but cannot meet the whole grid largely because of storage deficiencies. So how do you supply AC at night-very important? You must either have nat gas, coal, nuclear, or hydroelectric. We do not want a society where blackouts are normalized because this then becomes weaponized by politiicans who will turn it to extort votes & turn it off to punish people. You go with what's reliable.

It would be interesting to understand the energy efficiency of the whole system (DAC + GreenH2 + processing, Fischer-Tropsh etc).... tohave 100GJ of synthetic oil how many GJ (renewable) are needed?