I have absolutely no idea who this game is for or against or what the message is or if there even is a message at all to be conveyed from this
@LibreWolfUser24 минут бұрын
It's funny knowing that one day in the future this fangame will be in a 300 in 1 pirate systems lol. That said, Im sad there's no NAFO boss battle or Groyper refrences
@sticklyboi40 минут бұрын
i was wondering what that stupid down arrow attack was the whole video theyre fucking downvotes
@shroduСағат бұрын
Why is neco arc here?
@sovietheavy5500Сағат бұрын
Looks cool! Would play this only for Ukropig. Слышу ZOV ебать Азов! (Word play I hear a CALL to fuck Azov)
@shroduСағат бұрын
Someone explain why bocchi and usada are here?
@ericandre65542 сағат бұрын
i expected more out of the story tbh
@Professional_Goober-z6t3 сағат бұрын
MY LIFE IS LIKE A VIDEO GAME TRYING HARD TO BEAT THE STAGE
@flyinyoku35433 сағат бұрын
In my 20 years of life this is definitely the most political and most offensive video game I've ever seen
@corpalt31863 сағат бұрын
itch io took this down but not lonarpg? kekw!
@AqılbekKazy5 сағат бұрын
At least make it least obvious that a russian made this
@punishedpinecone47726 сағат бұрын
my wife's son says this game is racist >:(
@ironraccoon35366 сағат бұрын
This actually looks like damn good level design. Between this and Snoot Game, it seems that when 4chin does a project, they never half-ass it.
@Anatoles6 сағат бұрын
What in the world
@AcidYoru7 сағат бұрын
"Hey dad, check out this game I made, it's called MegaChud" "That's really great son, have you found a job yet?"
@azizyahaya21747 сағат бұрын
This was probably what wemt through Payton Gendron's mind on May 14, 2022 😂😂😂
@Idiotgaming-ny8ql8 сағат бұрын
he is a gem
@manfredmanfred62288 сағат бұрын
Absolute, indisputable gemerald. Please take my updoot, kind stranger.
@eggmug5628 сағат бұрын
Also no way in hell mymy would listen to troonjack shed just kick their ass
@tonnentonie27678 сағат бұрын
I want to see joel or vinny playi it.
@fdmnkl48959 сағат бұрын
50:27 what kind of strat is this?
@tomasvera9089 сағат бұрын
spine chilling genre defining bone tingling aryan slow burn terrifying jumpscare 'jak driven atmosphere oozing a24 released trope subverting dark and eerie gut wrenching aesthetically heavy craft gradual escalation soul shaking dread inducing post horror suspenseful build up a “say more with less” approach blood curdling kino keyed nerve wracking nail biting jaw clenching free of cheap gore kuz, soot, doll and froot approved snopes verified reuters verified ‘zelling free coal killing cobson loving fauci approved pro science truth uncovering jannie decimating glowie zapping vtuber chudding schizophrenic 4cuck killing shitter crashing discoal erasing ‘coinslot closing NAS free anti meds soylent free wholesome pupperino west rising heavenly holy sharty saving IAS gemerald game.
@midtst0v10 сағат бұрын
mega man? a gem, man.
@mixwidman545811 сағат бұрын
What do I even make of this?
@Mark-et5zl11 сағат бұрын
Certified Gemerald
@Tuckerslam12 сағат бұрын
This is beautiful.
@DigitalAbrums13 сағат бұрын
)ewish hands made this game
@gregormcscrungus972713 сағат бұрын
What the fuck
@ILuvHusqvarna13 сағат бұрын
it has george droyd and ongezellig which means automatic goty
@patriota716913 сағат бұрын
Necesito una versión traducida 😭😭🙏🙏
@jzburda13 сағат бұрын
This game is so unnecessarily surreal I can't take it
@gasury892713 сағат бұрын
1:56 español promedio el jefe
@TRASHVES13 сағат бұрын
The phrase "I think, therefore I am" (originally written in Latin as Cogito, ergo sum) is one of the most famous statements in Western philosophy. It was coined by the French philosopher René Descartes in his 1637 work Discourse on the Method and further explored in his Meditations on First Philosophy (1641). The statement encapsulates Descartes' philosophical approach to understanding knowledge, existence, and certainty. Historical Context and Descartes' Philosophical Project In the early 17th century, the Renaissance had recently brought about a renewed interest in science, logic, and critical inquiry. Descartes was working within this intellectual climate, seeking a new approach to philosophy that could be as certain as mathematics. Inspired by scientific methods, he aimed to apply a similarly rigorous, systematic approach to understanding human knowledge. Descartes’ primary goal was to establish a foundation of indubitable knowledge that could serve as a base for all other knowledge, overcoming the skepticism prevalent among some contemporary philosophers who doubted whether we could be certain of anything at all. The Method of Doubt To achieve this, Descartes devised what is known as the method of doubt, a process where he would question and discard every belief he held until he reached something absolutely certain, something that he could not rationally doubt. This process involved systematically doubting the reliability of all sources of knowledge: 1. Sensory Experience: Descartes recognized that our senses can sometimes deceive us. For instance, a stick partially submerged in water appears bent, even though we know it’s straight. This led him to question whether any knowledge based on sensory perception could be trusted. 2. Dream Argument: Descartes proposed that he could be dreaming and that everything he perceives might not be real. In a dream, we can imagine situations that feel real at the time, but upon waking, we recognize they were illusions. This called into question all knowledge based on experience. 3. Evil Demon Hypothesis: To push his doubt even further, Descartes imagined a hypothetical being-an "evil demon"-that was so powerful it could manipulate his thoughts, perceptions, and beliefs. If such a being existed, then even his logical conclusions might be false. By applying these levels of doubt, Descartes cast uncertainty on virtually all of his beliefs. If he could find something that withstood even this extreme skepticism, it would serve as a foundation of absolute certainty. The Discovery of the Cogito After doubting everything he could, Descartes arrived at one belief that he could not logically doubt: the fact that he was doubting itself. Even if an evil demon were deceiving him, there had to be something being deceived. In other words, he concluded that the very act of thinking-or doubting-proved his existence as a thinking entity. He formulated this insight as Cogito, ergo sum, which translates as "I think, therefore I am." In this realization, Descartes found that his own existence was self-evident, as long as he was thinking. This provided a foundation of certainty: while he could doubt everything else, he could not doubt that he was a thinking being. This insight established the Cogito as an indubitable truth, a starting point upon which he could begin to build a new system of knowledge. The Significance of "I Think, Therefore I Am" Descartes’ statement has several profound implications for philosophy: 1. The Foundation of Knowledge: The Cogito provided a foundational truth from which Descartes could proceed to build knowledge. It set a precedent for seeking self-evident truths as a basis for knowledge, influencing rationalism, a school of thought that emphasizes reason as the primary source of knowledge. 2. The Mind-Body Dualism: By asserting the primacy of thought as proof of existence, Descartes distinguished between the mind (a thinking, non-material entity) and the body (a material entity). This led to Cartesian dualism, the view that mind and body are fundamentally different substances. This dualism influenced centuries of debates in philosophy of mind and psychology. 3. Subjective Experience and the Self: Descartes’ focus on the thinking subject (the self) placed consciousness and subjective experience at the center of philosophy. This emphasis on the self was a shift from earlier philosophy, which often focused more on the objective world. This shift would become crucial to later developments in existentialism and phenomenology. 4. Skepticism and Modern Philosophy: Descartes’ method of doubt and his emphasis on foundational certainty inspired modern philosophy to prioritize skepticism and systematic inquiry. By demonstrating that knowledge could withstand rigorous doubt, Descartes laid the groundwork for the scientific method’s insistence on evidence and certainty. Criticisms and Interpretations While Descartes' Cogito is widely celebrated, it has also been subject to criticism and reinterpretation: David Hume and the Bundle Theory: Later philosophers, such as David Hume, argued against Descartes’ concept of the self. Hume proposed that there is no unified "self" but rather a bundle of perceptions, challenging the notion of a thinking entity as foundational. Phenomenology and Existentialism: In the 20th century, philosophers like Edmund Husserl and Jean-Paul Sartre expanded on Descartes' ideas but criticized aspects of his approach. For example, Sartre argued that existence precedes essence, implying that we are not defined solely by our thoughts but by our actions, choices, and engagements with the world. Critiques of Dualism: Descartes' dualistic separation of mind and body faced criticism from philosophers who argued for a more integrated view. For example, Baruch Spinoza proposed that mind and body are two aspects of the same substance, while others argue that consciousness emerges from the brain’s material processes. Legacy of "I Think, Therefore I Am" Descartes’ Cogito remains a cornerstone of Western philosophy, symbolizing the quest for certain knowledge and the importance of individual consciousness. The phrase "I think, therefore I am" continues to resonate, raising enduring questions about the nature of existence, the self, and the reliability of human knowledge. In essence, "I think, therefore I am" encapsulates a radical insight: that personal consciousness is undeniable proof of existence. It underscores the role of the individual as an active seeker of truth, setting the stage for philosophical inquiry that reaches far beyond Descartes' era.
@velvetwurm825614 сағат бұрын
BOYKISSER MAN LES GOOOOOOOOOO
@nerdporkspass1m1st7815 сағат бұрын
I was NOT expecting Boykisser Man’s health bar to fill up as the trans flag, holy shit that made me laugh
@Name_cannot_be_blank13 сағат бұрын
its like that for all the enemies' healthbars
@bloodeagle645815 сағат бұрын
Are these supposed to be online personalities because I have no idea who they are😮
@Kralisx415 сағат бұрын
Si
@ellilfelipe123916 сағат бұрын
Gemerald
@Pachii4216 сағат бұрын
Ah yeah 2020s 😂
@anomonyous16 сағат бұрын
I was never really into Megaman. But now... oh boy.
@vonheer741817 сағат бұрын
Can't wait for this to be ran at AGDQ!
@дмитрий-эджворт17 сағат бұрын
This game very based. That's what I needed after Dragon age Veilguard. I got to tell you, it is perfect. Perfect. Everything, down to the last minute details.
@xXMasterCritico3602Xx17 сағат бұрын
GOTY🗣️
@shadowednight160018 сағат бұрын
This is a prime example of "I may not agree with that which you said, but I will defend your right to say it" Edgy humor, how we missed you
@leonardogino344818 сағат бұрын
Jokes apart he plays absolutely amazing
@DeuxExNoir20 сағат бұрын
High quality
@prismaticstars758723 сағат бұрын
*USADA PEKORA!?!?!?!??*
@CandidKerstetter23 сағат бұрын
Dude i fucking LOVE soy games
@bugmom387923 сағат бұрын
ultimately stopped watching around the time i hit 10 minutes. you really shouldn't have bothered making a megaman clone if you aren't going to show off the fun of using the weapons you know. thats like the entire point. megabuster was a mistake.