Solve base e Exponential Equation
2:16
Expand Logarithmic using Powers
1:47
14 күн бұрын
Exponential Equation from Graph
2:23
14 күн бұрын
Solve Logarithmic Equation
1:47
21 күн бұрын
Exponential Growth Word Problem
8:21
21 күн бұрын
Condense Logarithms (Sum)
2:03
21 күн бұрын
Condense Logarithms (Difference)
2:26
Solve Exponential Equation
2:38
21 күн бұрын
Solve Logarithmic Equation
2:07
21 күн бұрын
Inverse of Exponential Equation
3:10
21 күн бұрын
Пікірлер
@arj123sub
@arj123sub 3 ай бұрын
Great video
@caropapaulab1804
@caropapaulab1804 4 ай бұрын
Well explained 👏 👌 👍
@myaabdallah1103
@myaabdallah1103 4 ай бұрын
i literally love you so much!!! <3
@lizabarja
@lizabarja 4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. This helps me a lot ❤
@christinahernandez1019
@christinahernandez1019 8 ай бұрын
Very helpful video! Thank you for sharing.
@MathleticsPro
@MathleticsPro 8 ай бұрын
I think there's a typo.. The name mentioned in the story was Milas not Zachary, but zachary was in the questions. Great Content though!! Very helpful
@RyanMeyeringJHS
@RyanMeyeringJHS Ай бұрын
Oh, look at that! 'Copy and Paste' strikes again!
@nedaari1
@nedaari1 8 ай бұрын
I haven't done this type of math in many years. This was EXACTLY what I needed. Thank you!
@markussparkus1132
@markussparkus1132 9 ай бұрын
Log base doesnt exist in my calculator
@maxrybold1531
@maxrybold1531 9 ай бұрын
Great video!
@audreymckay836
@audreymckay836 10 ай бұрын
it is 3.5 instead of 2.5 take note of dat
@Tota-p4k
@Tota-p4k 10 ай бұрын
What if there was no zero do i use the first term that corresponds with n being 1?
@rowbee521
@rowbee521 Жыл бұрын
actually so helpful thank you!!!!
@travisestefania843
@travisestefania843 Жыл бұрын
*Promo sm*
@mason08901
@mason08901 Жыл бұрын
tysm!!
@arniegrunert3517
@arniegrunert3517 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Ryan!
@Aasghar137
@Aasghar137 Жыл бұрын
Thanku sir you shared the Great such a knowledge
@excelquincynwanguma
@excelquincynwanguma Жыл бұрын
How would you do one like 3log3 8?
@Cronchy4-20
@Cronchy4-20 Жыл бұрын
I just got an ad complaining about yt math videos lol
@jordanburgett-ec4bm
@jordanburgett-ec4bm Жыл бұрын
sat at my table trying to figure this out for 10 hours till i watched this. thank you so much for the help
@rachelmoore1983
@rachelmoore1983 Жыл бұрын
Oh my gosh thank you, I may actually manage to get a B on my test!
@AbelZachariah
@AbelZachariah Жыл бұрын
thanks
@zainabkhan-oh2iq
@zainabkhan-oh2iq Жыл бұрын
Thank you🎉🎉
@swirvin7688
@swirvin7688 2 жыл бұрын
thanks for your help
@katierovo293
@katierovo293 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!
@jadenchao7634
@jadenchao7634 2 жыл бұрын
goated video helped me understand my assignment thanks
@blueboyninja8
@blueboyninja8 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much I was struggling on my homework
@Hydra-BR
@Hydra-BR 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@heraaa142
@heraaa142 2 жыл бұрын
This is soooo helpful. Thank you
@LASTRATMV
@LASTRATMV 2 жыл бұрын
Nice for the Remember I just forget how to get this🕵️💙✨
@lazy1215
@lazy1215 2 жыл бұрын
this helped so much thank you!
@shubhangisood175
@shubhangisood175 2 жыл бұрын
Thankuu sir
@Zernon123Twitch
@Zernon123Twitch 3 жыл бұрын
my brain is so bad at math i need help.
@Link-wu6on
@Link-wu6on 3 жыл бұрын
technically real numbers are also considered roots. Because complex numbers are written as a + bi and the b could be a 0.
@amigamatematica
@amigamatematica 3 жыл бұрын
I'm from Brazil, and i thank you so much!
@Athensman123
@Athensman123 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your helpful video.
@jyotsanavinay2000
@jyotsanavinay2000 3 жыл бұрын
How can we justify this logic for equation (x-1)(x-2)(xsqare +1) .This graph has 2 direction but 4 roots.2 real and 2 imaginary.
@claudiagutierrez1710
@claudiagutierrez1710 3 жыл бұрын
It’s going down by 3.5 not 2.3 smh
@claudiagutierrez1710
@claudiagutierrez1710 3 жыл бұрын
2.5*
@RyanMeyeringJHS
@RyanMeyeringJHS 3 жыл бұрын
Yup, you are correct. The emphasis remains on the strategy for writing the equation, not the numbers themselves.
@mirackelle4940
@mirackelle4940 3 жыл бұрын
question , i have a hard time trying to let mathematical theorems make 100000000000000000 percent sense, my question for you , do i have to accept the teorems and know what the applications are , or that i dig deeper, i think that there is a limit on how deep you can dig
@RyanMeyeringJHS
@RyanMeyeringJHS 3 жыл бұрын
I guess I'm not exactly sure what your question is, but a math theorem for any topic is going to be applied in almost every problem for that topic. In general, problems are able to solved because the theorem exists in the first place. Without the theorem, we wouldn't even know what to do. So, in that regard, it is very important that you can apply the theorem. As one gets into higher and more complex levels of math, the theorems become the focus cause more problems are abstract.
@mirackelle4940
@mirackelle4940 3 жыл бұрын
@@RyanMeyeringJHS thank you for the explanation , what i am trying to say is this question: Are theorems there to be understood in a vague way and to be accepted ( because not all the teorems are straight to the point for understanding it(understanding is a very relative term, i know) , and meant to be applied?, or can you really understand the teorem at the level of the mataematician who made that theorem? Or did mathematician themselves not understand the teorem and just found it in a statistical way ( i mean by trial and error), and then forcing a proof thru it ( i think you get the point) ?,
@ozotto7527
@ozotto7527 3 жыл бұрын
this is the most stupidest and useless thing I've ever learned.
@jennabrual5119
@jennabrual5119 4 жыл бұрын
When I do math, alpha, math, it just tells me that log base is disabled and it has a strike through on the command
@paulofernandez4960
@paulofernandez4960 4 жыл бұрын
isn't the formula for geometric sequence is raise to n-1?
@RyanMeyeringJHS
@RyanMeyeringJHS 4 жыл бұрын
Our curriculum starts the sequences with term 1 as the first term in the list and we have to "go back" a term to get the initial value (or term 0). Therefore our rule is t(n) = (Term 0)(r)^n. If you were to use term 1 in front, then the rule becomes t(n) = (Term 1)(r)^(n-1)
@sensei_pogo
@sensei_pogo 4 жыл бұрын
Here's the correction: when n is 0 t(n) is 90 (not 89!!). when n is 4 t(n) is 76 (not 77!!). the values of t(n) are changing by 3.5, NOT 2.5. take note of that.
@RyanMeyeringJHS
@RyanMeyeringJHS 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Strategy remains the same but the values were incorrect.
@basalt7846
@basalt7846 4 жыл бұрын
thank you! i have a test in a few minutes on this and i didnt really understand it, but this cleared it up a lot!
@pixmarney
@pixmarney 4 жыл бұрын
THanks dude :)
@avaarnold7572
@avaarnold7572 4 жыл бұрын
thank you so much i have a test tmr
@particleonazock2246
@particleonazock2246 4 жыл бұрын
Better than hummus!
@reallifecatirliamacatforre3874
@reallifecatirliamacatforre3874 4 жыл бұрын
POGGG
@kamryngrossman4438
@kamryngrossman4438 4 жыл бұрын
So helpful thank u
@theseabass6696
@theseabass6696 4 жыл бұрын
It helped me a lot in algebra and I thank you. :)
@_kellyannnn4519
@_kellyannnn4519 4 жыл бұрын
how did you get the 1.02?
@ryanmeyering9286
@ryanmeyering9286 4 жыл бұрын
You have to do a "percent to multiplier" change. 2% growth means you have 2% more than 100%. 102% is 1.02 as a decimal.