I think there's a typo.. The name mentioned in the story was Milas not Zachary, but zachary was in the questions. Great Content though!! Very helpful
@RyanMeyeringJHSАй бұрын
Oh, look at that! 'Copy and Paste' strikes again!
@nedaari18 ай бұрын
I haven't done this type of math in many years. This was EXACTLY what I needed. Thank you!
@markussparkus11329 ай бұрын
Log base doesnt exist in my calculator
@maxrybold15319 ай бұрын
Great video!
@audreymckay83610 ай бұрын
it is 3.5 instead of 2.5 take note of dat
@Tota-p4k10 ай бұрын
What if there was no zero do i use the first term that corresponds with n being 1?
@rowbee521 Жыл бұрын
actually so helpful thank you!!!!
@travisestefania843 Жыл бұрын
*Promo sm*
@mason08901 Жыл бұрын
tysm!!
@arniegrunert3517 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Ryan!
@Aasghar137 Жыл бұрын
Thanku sir you shared the Great such a knowledge
@excelquincynwanguma Жыл бұрын
How would you do one like 3log3 8?
@Cronchy4-20 Жыл бұрын
I just got an ad complaining about yt math videos lol
@jordanburgett-ec4bm Жыл бұрын
sat at my table trying to figure this out for 10 hours till i watched this. thank you so much for the help
@rachelmoore1983 Жыл бұрын
Oh my gosh thank you, I may actually manage to get a B on my test!
@AbelZachariah Жыл бұрын
thanks
@zainabkhan-oh2iq Жыл бұрын
Thank you🎉🎉
@swirvin76882 жыл бұрын
thanks for your help
@katierovo2932 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!
@jadenchao76342 жыл бұрын
goated video helped me understand my assignment thanks
@blueboyninja82 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much I was struggling on my homework
@Hydra-BR2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@heraaa1422 жыл бұрын
This is soooo helpful. Thank you
@LASTRATMV2 жыл бұрын
Nice for the Remember I just forget how to get this🕵️💙✨
@lazy12152 жыл бұрын
this helped so much thank you!
@shubhangisood1752 жыл бұрын
Thankuu sir
@Zernon123Twitch3 жыл бұрын
my brain is so bad at math i need help.
@Link-wu6on3 жыл бұрын
technically real numbers are also considered roots. Because complex numbers are written as a + bi and the b could be a 0.
@amigamatematica3 жыл бұрын
I'm from Brazil, and i thank you so much!
@Athensman1233 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your helpful video.
@jyotsanavinay20003 жыл бұрын
How can we justify this logic for equation (x-1)(x-2)(xsqare +1) .This graph has 2 direction but 4 roots.2 real and 2 imaginary.
@claudiagutierrez17103 жыл бұрын
It’s going down by 3.5 not 2.3 smh
@claudiagutierrez17103 жыл бұрын
2.5*
@RyanMeyeringJHS3 жыл бұрын
Yup, you are correct. The emphasis remains on the strategy for writing the equation, not the numbers themselves.
@mirackelle49403 жыл бұрын
question , i have a hard time trying to let mathematical theorems make 100000000000000000 percent sense, my question for you , do i have to accept the teorems and know what the applications are , or that i dig deeper, i think that there is a limit on how deep you can dig
@RyanMeyeringJHS3 жыл бұрын
I guess I'm not exactly sure what your question is, but a math theorem for any topic is going to be applied in almost every problem for that topic. In general, problems are able to solved because the theorem exists in the first place. Without the theorem, we wouldn't even know what to do. So, in that regard, it is very important that you can apply the theorem. As one gets into higher and more complex levels of math, the theorems become the focus cause more problems are abstract.
@mirackelle49403 жыл бұрын
@@RyanMeyeringJHS thank you for the explanation , what i am trying to say is this question: Are theorems there to be understood in a vague way and to be accepted ( because not all the teorems are straight to the point for understanding it(understanding is a very relative term, i know) , and meant to be applied?, or can you really understand the teorem at the level of the mataematician who made that theorem? Or did mathematician themselves not understand the teorem and just found it in a statistical way ( i mean by trial and error), and then forcing a proof thru it ( i think you get the point) ?,
@ozotto75273 жыл бұрын
this is the most stupidest and useless thing I've ever learned.
@jennabrual51194 жыл бұрын
When I do math, alpha, math, it just tells me that log base is disabled and it has a strike through on the command
@paulofernandez49604 жыл бұрын
isn't the formula for geometric sequence is raise to n-1?
@RyanMeyeringJHS4 жыл бұрын
Our curriculum starts the sequences with term 1 as the first term in the list and we have to "go back" a term to get the initial value (or term 0). Therefore our rule is t(n) = (Term 0)(r)^n. If you were to use term 1 in front, then the rule becomes t(n) = (Term 1)(r)^(n-1)
@sensei_pogo4 жыл бұрын
Here's the correction: when n is 0 t(n) is 90 (not 89!!). when n is 4 t(n) is 76 (not 77!!). the values of t(n) are changing by 3.5, NOT 2.5. take note of that.
@RyanMeyeringJHS4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Strategy remains the same but the values were incorrect.
@basalt78464 жыл бұрын
thank you! i have a test in a few minutes on this and i didnt really understand it, but this cleared it up a lot!
@pixmarney4 жыл бұрын
THanks dude :)
@avaarnold75724 жыл бұрын
thank you so much i have a test tmr
@particleonazock22464 жыл бұрын
Better than hummus!
@reallifecatirliamacatforre38744 жыл бұрын
POGGG
@kamryngrossman44384 жыл бұрын
So helpful thank u
@theseabass66964 жыл бұрын
It helped me a lot in algebra and I thank you. :)
@_kellyannnn45194 жыл бұрын
how did you get the 1.02?
@ryanmeyering92864 жыл бұрын
You have to do a "percent to multiplier" change. 2% growth means you have 2% more than 100%. 102% is 1.02 as a decimal.