your so smart thank you.i think i learned a lot ...and your funny!!!!!!!

Modern historians who aren't humble toward ancient historians are useless if you are truly looking for the truth. Ancient historians had so much more access to all these cultures, I'd rather trust them. I don't understand the arrogance of western modern historians.

"Dr. Calabrese suggests that viewers also watch this summation of his recommended path forward. (Note that the views expressed in this video do not necessarily represent official positions of the Health Physics Society.)" kzbin.info/www/bejne/imSsqHagjN6nn6M

Great Lecture especially for aging history enthusiasts with old tired eyes I am Happy KZbin has a diverse bunch of channels, alot of crap but alot of interesting material too. Pete Kelly's " Fall of Civilizations" channel has a great Doc on Sea Peoples as well as civilizations from alll, continients including the Americas

Wonderful presentation. Thanks

Oh and fun fact vesall is wretched in old norse not skraeling that's a 12th century icelandic word and it means barbarians or little ppl . Not large or hairy and in reference to the natives of greenland not modern day Canada or North America

Skraeling skellring either someone misspelled one or the other word or these are two different things

The fact that they state there foul smell alone is telling .. the only primate that gives off a musk when upset or in fear are great apes .. something noone in north America or Europe for that mater knew about untill the early 1900s

Leif never fought with natives thovalds group did so either leifs sister fought with thorvalds group ..not leifs or not at all .and its an attempt in mire modern times at women empowerment..lol ..next they will wright how she wore chainmail dressed as a man and painted her face with 1700s icelandic staves ...😂😂😂 this is what happens when u let hollyweird be ur history teacher ..lmao...

Im amazed u can find any depictions of leif or thorvald in America. I was told the lie about Columbus in school as recently as 40 years ago ..and even after we found out he never steped foot on anything that would become north America and that viking age explorers beat him here by at least 500 years ..a few years back they didnt drop this fabrication ..nooe it was upgraded to a federal holiday...lol ahhhh America...

Ive read in iban fadlans story they were bigfoot also living Neanderthals both may sound farfetched but im open minded enough to say ....maybe to either. In the book they were called primitive beasts in the movie there men dressed as bears..interestingly enough there is a beothuk native newfoundlanders creation story that says ( god ) made ( bears ) and then men .to the bears he gave strength but only a little brains .to men he gave lots of brains but only a little strength. .the part of the story that got me was that the ( bears ) fought with the men .they were jealous because with the amount of brains the had they could never advance to be like the men ....just food for thought ...

I read a story written by David Thompson who worked for the HBC later the NWC he was an employer and map maker finding large foot prints in western Canada. He followed them to a cave only to have his first nations guides advise him not to go into the cave of ( the wild men ) this was late 1700s early 1800s native legends go back hundreds of years befor that .

I always wondered who it was that gave Randi the million dollar cheque, he told the story a few times but never actually mentioned Rick's name.

I first came across this video in 2018, on a road trip through Greece, and it got me hooked on the "Sea Peoples"! Thank you for opening my eyes and heart to this mysterious era beyond the "Iliad" & "Odyssey" of Homer :)

In Asia there was also Bronze Age Civilizations and Hindu Civilization is one of them. In fact several Hindu cities are Bronze Age such as Benares and Mathura and much of the Bronze Age survives and have barely held its own. The recent rebuilding of the Ram Temple is the only successful strike back of the Bronze Age and hopefully not the only one.

8:52-16:25 and 21:21-26:00

Have this book in my bag right now for breaks at work!!

Still waiting for his After 1177 BC.

One initial event that could have caused the domino effect cancelling the bronze age civilisation could have been the erruption or better explosion of a volcano, which would explain the succession of events: dusk: obscuration of the day, accumulation of dust , temperature fall, arrest of vegetal growth, famine, delocalisation of entire families in search of a new land where the sun shines , competition or aggressivity between refugies and autochtones, occasional ,then organised pillage with the collaboration of soldiers having lost their pay, ( the sea peoples) interruption of the vital commercial exchanges in the whole mediterranean bassin, and of military collaboration between kings > bronze age collapse. That a volcano may have been the initial actor of this domino effect can be deduced by the finding of plastic residues with the volcanic powder covering destroyed but otherwise not pillaged palaces. The chemical composition of such plastic found in both Tel Aman in Mesopotamia and Tel Leilan in Syria, both distant 350 km one from the other, is identical but different from modern industrial plastic, and contains Titanium oxide. Plastic can only be formed at temperatures 500-900° C ,such as found in the erruption material. The merit of this decisive o discovery is of a geologist of the french Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) named Marie Agnès Courty or Corti. The better candidate volcano may be the Thera volcano ,known for his 15 erruptions in the last 100.000 years, among whose the one that cancelled the Minoan thalassocracy datated 1650 / 1750 BC.

Jews profiteering by feeding cattle their own sh.t 😢

It wasn’t 536 bc was the worst year in history

Since the main emphasis from the experts was that being active while it is dark outside is the real problem, it seems like the real issue is that it is literally impossible for most people at high latitudes to address that while maintaining a fixed year-round daily schedule. For example I work 0800-1700 and am regularly out and about an extra 1.5 hours on either side of that, meaning I would need 12 hours of sunlight year-round in order to do the healthy thing of only being outside while it is light out. Until my employer implements shorter winter working hours, I am guaranteed to be awake in the dark for about a third of the year. Having DST on top of that messing up my sleep schedule twice a year does almost nothing to help the real problem and basically adds insult to injury. I would prefer eliminating DST and replacing it with seasonal working hour changes for public institutions and strong government recommendations for seasonal working hour changes for private institutions. If you want to make the change all at once by shifting an hour you can continue to do so, but that should be something you opt into by shifting your working schedule.

Good stuff, guys.

Is quite interesting, did not see OVERPOPULATION, l have to watched till the end.

P R O M O S M 👉

Great video - thanks!

I am here because I remember Brian Inglis and 'All Our Yesterdays' from childhood into teenage years, watching it most weeks, and recalling - almost with a sense of shock - that this respected, serious intellectual would fall prey to nonsense. Age and fear of death, I attributed it to back then. Yet here I am today, having experienced a similar shift in worldview myself. And many mainstream scientists, physicists, philosophers, also unafraid to go into unconventional areas of research as they get older and feel they have nothing to lose (Nobel Prize winner Brian Josephson being a particularly good example). Thanks for putting this up!

The Egyptians were never seafaring people, so to them almost anyone could be sea people.

In one of the first slides it says their flame was prepared before them. I wish he had explained what that meant.

Someone get him an inhaler he struggling to breathe

So the beings witnessed during sleep paralysis ate entirely hallucinatory. How come a hallucination can year off your duvet?

Many drugs are boosters. So they will amplify the existing state of mind. This means that they are often useless or more harmful without proper therapy and support by people who live with the patient.

It is controversial to say that Ramses II is the Pharoah of the exodus. That is not a fact.

No mention of volcanoes. Another video mentioned a large volcanic event about that time. edit - Now mentioned. Redated severely.

‘Houthi piracy’ for the modern sea peoples…?

Here's the REAL problem with the nukes... YOU CAN TURN THEM ON BUT,,,, YOU CAN'T TURN THEM OFF... the off feature must be 100% available for safe operation. FIX IT ! first

What a coincidence, I also want to name my firstborn Suppiluliuma 😂

While she is correct about there being zero legitimate record of Leif Erickson seeing Bigfoot, she discredits herself by being 100% wrong about the origin of Bigfoot, and by mocking the topic with a disrespectful tone. She arrogantly strayed beyond her qualifications and made the claim that “Bigfoot” was invented in the 20th century. That is incorrect; only the term “Bigfoot” was coined in the 20th century, not the legend itself. For example: Albert Ostman claimed to have been kidnapped by one in 1927. Teddy Roosevelt wrote about one his 1893 book “the Wilderness Hunter”. Daniel Boone claims to have shot and killed one that attacked his son. Source : “Draper Manuscripts: Daniel Boone Papers” Every Native American tribe & language has its own word for Bigfoot. The Sts’ailes Nation in Canada has a Bigfoot mask that is over 200 years old. (Their language is origin of the word Sasquatch) In a column in The Sydney Morning Herald in 1987, columnist Margaret Jones wrote that the first Australian yowie sighting(Australian name for Bigfoot) was said to have taken place as early as 1795. In David Paulides’ book “Bigfoot Wildmen and Giants” he provides hundreds of newspaper articles dating back to the 1680 that provide eyewitness accounts of beings matching the exact description of Bigfoot but by many different names.

A major thank you to Major Lundquist! I just love how his office or background kind of look like a Space Ship! It was such a great interview and I absolutely loved his story about Venus!

If the 2020 presidential election was on the level, the contested states could easily prove this by performing a signature match on the mail-in ballots and show their results. But they haven't done that and won't.

Hi Scott! Looking forward to this talk!

And by the way - your lead in slide about the TMI-2 Core Relocation is typical minimization that amounts to a lie. TMI-2 MELTED DOWN.

Spent fuel is no where near so innocuous as he states. The major risk for spent fuel pools is not from terrorists or plane crashes. It is from rank incompetence on the part of NRC and the nuclear industry in not understanding the radiation impacts of high density fuel storage on the radiation exposure to the concrete of the basin walls and floors resulting in 500-2,000 times lower dose tolerance than is presumed. ALL of the spent fuel pools are ticking bombs. Beyond that, as the war in Ukraine has shown, the risk from war and having some moron intentionally attack a spent fuel pool is high. We have also had incursion of industrial drones into the protected spaces. And again as Ukraine has shown, that is the major likely way for such an attack to occur - a squad or fleet of industrial drones carrying smaller (though still large) explosive charges. The probability of such an attack depends on the degree of instability in the country, or determination of an external adversary. Both of those are now high in the US. And failure of spent fuel pool with cladding fire to follow is an enormous catastrophe. And don't believe such failures cannot happen from age and radiation damage alone. The ECF in Idaho failed that way. Fortunately there was enough time to remove the fuel before a catastrophe occurred. However, both DOE and NRC e refuse to learn from that experience, or to apply those lessons broadly. A second failure is threatened at Hanford, Washington in the Waste Encapsulation Storage Facility. Even using the grossly inadequate risk framework of 10^10 rad for concrete, the concrete in that pool is at best mush. DOE has tried and may yet succeed at never coring the walls of that facility to actually learn what the real relationship is. But based on data from X-10, Temelin and others for exposure of low moisture content concrete to gamma rays, the likely safe threshold is likely 500-2,000 times lower. ALL spent fuel pools are catastrophe hazards.

The linear no-threshold "hypothesis" isn't controversial at all. The fallacious hormesis idea is controversial. The linear effect is PROVEN in studies going back decades. The nuclear industry would love for their to be a lower dose threshold, or for doses below 10 rem to be non-hazardous. But such is absolutely not the case. Further the Dose Reduction Equivalence Factor (DREF) which was arbitrarily instituted to make bomb fallout seem less dangerous than it was and is. It was arbitrarily set at 2. As isotopes and exposures that have go through analysis the DREF is reduced to 1.5 then to 1.0. It was never valid in the first place. And as a result the "accepted" 5.5 x 10^03 dose under represents the actual harm by a factor of 2. And NO you do not have enough time, and NO the releases are NOT less. The plating out is already accounted for in the analyses. Typically in an accident, due to the way the procedures work, a General Emergency is not declared until a release is actually confirmed to have spread of radioactive material at ground level in the field. Until that is confirmed, actions are NOT taken to warn the public. Depending on wind speed and direction, by the time that notifications are actually made, the plume will already be over inhabited areas.

No it was NOT a steam explosion. No one dropped a several thousand degree object into water. And NO steam cannot explode. It never does. What did happen is that a truly horrible design and even more horrible operation put the reactor into a highly unstable condition, then goosed it with a huge reactivity insertion by inserting graphite before poisons on rector scram. That caused the reactor to go very far into being prompt critical. The resulting power excursion from fission was tremendous. Reminder a prompt critical nuclear excursion that is not immediately tamped to avoid energy releases beyond the capability for the fuel and reactor to contain is by definition a nuclear detonation. Chernobyl suffered a roughly 30 ton TNT equivalent energy release from prompt fission in the core. That nuclear detonation caused a radiative energy release so great that it instantly melted the4 fuel and cladding, vaporized the water in the core, and sent the graphite beyond red heat. It also then caused the immediate oxidation of the fuel cladding releasing hydrogen from the reaction, combined with interstitial hydrogen from the fuel and cladding being rapidly released as well. This all then pressurized the core to far beyond its design limits ejecting it from the vessel along with all of the control rods, further driving power momentarily higher. The vessel head was driven upward into the roof destroying it as the extremely hot gases vented violently from the now burst reactor, where it instantly combined with oxygen in eh air and detonated/deflgrated whcih then destroyed the roof entirely and shattered the support walls. At the same time, the now unbalanced pressure wave drive the floor of the reactor downward 5-7 feet, which allowed sand from the biological shield to flow downward, mixing with the now molten fuel forming a blob that poured down through the structure. As the air poured into the screaming hot reactor it contacted the graphite which along with the remaining cladding burned further driving the plume above the reactor. This was no steam explosion. This was an in core nuclear detonation driving a vaporization and over pressurization event, which was then followed by a hydrogen gas explosion and a graphite and fuel fire. To say that this reactor design was unsafe is a gross understatement. It is a bomb.

TMI was doomed from the moment the accident reached the point of SCRAM. The reactor core was uncovered and melting seven seconds later. In total the accident melted 1/3rd of the core. Admiral Rickover offered NRC an analysis of the accident that first morning which detailed the likely extent of core damage, and detailed the events to expect over the next five days, including the hydrogen bubble. NRC said no thank you. The report was never offered again. The actual cause of the accident is the event that destroyed the secondary cooling loop pumps (the condensate polisher failure). The SCRAM design was horrible. They relied on first boiling the secondary dry, then having failure of the turbine generators lead to the SCRAM signal. The failure of the pressure valve indication system design and operation was critical. But there is much more to that as well. Little noted is the recent (two decades ago) failure of Davis Besse through cracking failure of the Control Rod Drive sleeves causing undetected leakage of borated primary coolant onto the reactor head which eroded a large hole all the way through the primary vessel head - save the last 1/6th inch of hand welded stainless steel. That was cracked and venting. The reactor came within minutes of catastrophic failure. But more than that NRC's engineers then in inspecting the rest of the fleet discovered that fractures were wide spread in the sleeves with the worst ones being 16-18 inches long linear fractures up the sleeves, or 3/4ths of the way around the sleeve and venting steam. Imagine the failure of a sleeve launching the sleeve and control rod out of the reactor, destroying things above and around it and creating a high temperature steam atmosphere around the reactor, shorting out power. They then conducted a fleet wide replacement of the rod sleeves - very quietly. These accidents were not included in the design analyses. They didc the consequence of a single break, though not the idea that so many were possible and might interact, of that a head might erode/corrode through. They also then did not understand the probabilities well. As a consequence the probability risk assessment grossly underestimated the risks (they still do). This is a generic problem with PRA's. They only include what they include. And the branch fractions for probability are arbitrarily assigned. This then leads to other problems. Because the branches under represent the risk, and the branch fractions and probabilities also dramatically under represent the risk, the aggregates fall below thresholds that would necessitate very expensive measures to lower the risks under those thresholds. And when the risks do exceed those, rather than do the appropriate design changes and mitigations, the major focus is on pencil whipping the risks to get them below the thresholds. Hazard consequence analysis would provide a vastly safer design and design basis, but is not used as it would increase costs and cause undesired design changes.

The non-scientist who spent a career taking baby photos in department presumes to censor scientists and criticize others because they are not scientists despite the obvious fact that she does not remotely have the training or education to weigh in on any of these topics. She's just another concerned Karen inserting herself into debates where she is not even remotely qualified. Dunning-Kruger personified.

🤮😡

Well you asked are we seeing the same thing happening now. I would say we are seeing the collateral effect of collapsing. But not the cause. We don’t know what the mechanism of causes were for their collapse be we do know the many mechanisms of cause in our modern world collapse. Today we are all but begging the question of how fast can we go? In our case it is a super Elite class that are the driving forces for many of the Middle East conflict they are the responsible for the migrations into Europe and the South. They are behind the food crisis by virtue of their untried hypothesis of climate change. They are financially and politically responsible for driving the proxy war in Ukraine and Russia.

So interesting. First time warching it, but need to rewatch it to bettdr understand it and compare to what I know. I'm no expert just very interested in history 😉