Thanks for watching and subscribing!

Yep, great points! Hopefully I can remember that step on future batches.

@@GREEENZO Yep! Got beer out of it so it's a win, and the subsequent brew day on the new Brewzilla went much bettet. :) Thanks for watching!

Yep, pretty darn tasty! Thanks for watching!

Thanks! I was pleased with this one. Great point about stirring -- I stir about every 15 minutes to make sure nothing is clumped up, and because I can't help myself. ;) I was a bit concerned on this first batch with too much grain getting through the false bottom so the mill setting I used for this batch (Mighty Mill 3 roller) was 0.04". I have a couple more Brewzilla brew day videos in the works where I milled the grains finer and used a brew bag but still got about the same efficiency. Another viewer said that to him the shot of the grains in this video after I removed the malt pipe looked like there were quite a lot of whole grains in there ("It should look more like oatmeal" is specifically what he said), so I'm going to run some sacrificial grain through the mill and mess with the settings to make sure it's doing what I think it's doing. I might also mill my next batch twice and see if that helps. I wouldn't mind getting up to something like 70% but as you said consistency is the main thing. I did get a lot better efficiency (usually around 80%) doing small batches with a brew bag in a kettle, which is kind of interesting. Anyway, lots to experiment with which is a big part of the fun. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for watching!

@@irondalebrewing I started out doing BIAB as well and did have to double crush my grains to get my efficiency up. My Brewzilla is a couple years old, V3 and I did have to change a few of the base values in Brewfather to be more in line with my setup. Grain crush is important in any system and yours did look undercrushed Anyways keep brewing and enjoying this hobby of ours and in the end as long as we’re making good beers that are enjoyable to drink don’t get too hung up on efficiency. I’ll keep watching your content as well.

@@PABrewNews thanks for watching and subscribing!

@@preuc3367 I'm gonna need a bigger fridge!

@@FermentationAdventures Thanks! I was really pleased with how it came out, despite the low efficiency/OG. I'll definitely take another run at this one.

Yep, I didn't have great luck with it. It was pretty finicky to use. I've since purchased a KegLand Rapt Filler that I'll do a video on soon. Thanks for watching!

@@arneschmidt3445 Yep, sorry I didn't follow up on this! It made the dripping issue about 98% better, so definitely a win. Basically if I just wipe it down a couple of times during the boil it's good which is WAY better than before. I've since added a 65L BrewZilla that I run over by a window with a fan blowing the steam out the window, but when I do a smaller batch this has proven to be a big improvement. Thanks for watching!

Forgot to mention -- I also started doing 30 minute boils which helped too. Just have to up the hops accordingly to compensate for the shorter boil.

Thanks for the excellent beer Kurt!

@@AlmostAny1 Taste pretty great too. Thanks for watching!

@@kegtapper09 thanks, another great use case for these!

@@CTP-bbq-HundHutte Do you mean you think the finished beer is a little too sweet? That was kind of my reaction as well, particularly with the I Heart IPA. I tend to like pretty dry beers though. If the I Heart IPA was a bit more crisp in the finish that would be a big improvement IMO but everyone's tastes are different of course.

@@irondalebrewing yes I think they are a little too sweet but they are still drinkable and for the amount of work that goes into them I will definitely keep trying them

@@martyandjamie thanks for watching!

@@stripeyjoe Nice! Thanks for the suggestion!

@@WreckedBrewery Yep! The amount and technique worked well. I'll apologize in advance for mine.

@@tjschuldt197 Hmm that's odd. Have you tried a different ball lock post or disconnect? Could also be the post wasn't fully sealed maybe? I had one leak a little when the parts of the post weren't tightened up.

Interesting, thanks for sharing that! On the instruction sheets they have you add three gallons, then add the ingredients, and then add another two gallons, so it's interesting they have an FAQ that says to top the fermenter up to 5 gallons. You of course do lose a bit of volume from the trub so in the two batches I've done I found that if you use 5 gallons of water you wind up with pretty much exactly 5 gallons of finished beer, but seems like some consistency/clarity would be helpful. Thanks for watching!

Trying all these great beers is such a tough job. :)

Yep, I'm kind of incrementally headed in that direction, particularly since I have a couple of 7-gallon Fermonsters with no spigot and I was going to add a liquid post and floating dip tube to those. I've built a DIY Fermzilla at that point, although these still can't handle true pressure fermentation. When I first started doing things this way I was doing small (2.5 gallon) batches and the smallest Fermzilla is twice as big as I needed so modifying these smaller Fermonsters made sense, but now that I'm doing mostly 5-gallon batches I'm probably going to get an all rounder. That'll give me the ability to ferment under pressure and in theory that'll also make things a bit less complex since instead of having to swap out the blowoff tube for the SodaStream canister to do the cold crashing, I can hook all that up at the beginning of fermentation and just lower the temperature in the fermentation chamber to cold crash. I appreciate the nudge toward getting a Fermzilla -- thanks for watching!

@@GREEENZO Nice, thanks for the tip! That makes a lot of sense and will definitely work better than how I was doing it so I appreciate you sharing. I've since gotten a Rapt filler and Cannular canner but I'm sure I'll still have the need to do some bottles with the Nukatap filler, and this will help me do much better next time. Cheers!

Thanks for the beer -- really enjoyed it!

Thanks for watching! Cheers!

Thanks for watching, and thanks for the subscription!

@@brucecampbell8355 Nice! Since MoreBeer said you didn't need to stir I went "by the book" but I'm sure stirring can't hurt. This all reminds me that I think this batch is ready to taste now! And since I still haven't done a tasting video on the Citra Session Pale Ale I'll probably just combine the two. I'll be curious to hear what you think when your batch is done!

@@michaelcatto8323 Pushed all the way in the stainless tube is 6 5/8" from the bottom of the silicone fitting. Adding the depth of the silicone fitting that goes into and over the top of the bottle, the total minimum length is about 7 3/8". Hope that helps!

Kind of -- it says "North American 2-row barley malt blended with a touch of Carapils malt" but doesn't get more specific than that.

@@draculasdaughter36 Yep! You could definitely use a spunding valve instead of the blowoff tube, provided you have plenty of headspace so nothing would come through your spunding valve. I keep telling myself I'm going to take my blowtie spunding valve out of the box and try this so thanks for the reminder and motivation!

Good point! I just assembled all the pieces that came with the small kegs but definitely not needed for this use case.

@@FermentationAdventures a fine beer indeed!

@@preuc3367 It's a fantastic beer!

@@irondalebrewing it looks delish!

@@CraftBrew23 Mine didn't -- it definitely started fast and the visible activity in the blowoff tube subsided relatively quickly after about 3 days. Are you saying it's stalled because you're not seeing any airlock activity?

@@stewbeats3171 This approach serves the exact same purpose as using a balloon so there's no real functional benefit, I just find it more convenient than messing with a balloon and getting the timing right on capturing CO2, though of course you could just fill a balloon with CO2 to avoid that part. Versus using the CO2 generated by fermentation this approach is definitely more "wasteful" but particularly if I'm moving my fermenter to another fridge to cold crash, I like the convenience and more direct approach of just applying a bit of gas. Once I'm ready to cold crash the blow off tube does come off, and I just replace it on the same ball lock with the CO2 setup. At the end of the day a balloon, or something like the Cold Crash Guardian, serves the same purpose. Hope that helps -- thanks for watching!

@@irondalebrewing thanks for the response!

@@irondalebrewing I was wondering why my fermonster had a gas valve on it, previous owner must have watched your videos! I think I’ll give the balloon a shot to save the co2 but I can use the gas valve to inflate my ballon now

@@stewbeats3171 I saw this modification somewhere on KZbin too -- I'm definitely not the inventor of it! :) I'm going to do a further mod I've seen other people do and add a liquid post with a floating dip tube since I have two larger Fermonsters that don't have a spigot. I'll do a video on that as well.

Yep, should be interesting! Based on MoreBeer's explanation since you're using those hop bites instead of boiling bittering hops that should avoid the skunking, but I had a REALLY hard time not throwing a towel or something over this to protect it from light. I'll be sure and report back in a future video!

Thanks! I accidentally ordered another 7 gallon Fermonster with no spigot, and I have another solid lid and the parts (another gas post, a liquid post, and a floating dip tube, as you described) to get this rolling as a better configuration for transferring. Good to know this setup won't last forever and what you're using now -- I have a Fermzilla tri-conical on my list because I'd also like to dry hop with a hop bong as opposed to the sous vide magnet trick. Overall are you liking your all rounder? Still a bit on the fence between the all rounder and the tri-conical.

@irondalebrewing I love the all rounder, I'm using it well past the "expiration date" without issue. I wanted kind of a minimalist setup as I don't have a lot of room for storing fermenters and extra parts, the all rounder fit the bill for me. I do like the fermonster a lot but the lids are the weak point. (And I don't trust spigots on fermenters, they are difficult to fully clean and sanitize). When it's time to replace this I'll probably go with another all-rounder. I considered the kegmenter but I like to be able to see what's going on inside the fermenter from time to time.

@@itznolimitz Same -- I had a couple of stainless fermenters I got rid of because I like seeing what's going on. I'll see what I wind up with. :)