Under copyright law third parties don't need authorization to transform copyrighted works for certain new uses called fair uses. In Andy Warhol foundation for the visual arts versus Goldsmith the United States Supreme court examined what Transformations qualify as fair uses. 143S.CT 1258 (2023)

They’re all in on it, just a shame

When a client hires a lawyer the relationship is typically straightforward, if the client doesn't like how the lawyer is handling the case the client can ordinarily fire the lawyer and hire other counsel. But, what about when an attorney has been appointed to represent a criminal defendant. In the 1983 case of Jones vs. Barnes the United States Supreme court considered what duties an appointed 463 U.S. 745 (1983) appellate lawyer owes a client.Jones v. Pittman_ 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85719

This video is incomplete and misleading!!! PLEASE educate yourself and not just say you know your rights but please DO know your rights! Officers DO have the right to give drivers lawful orders to step out their vehicle and as a driver you have to step out of the vehicle! This video sucks.

None of the lot owners owned it. The improvements were based on asking and receiving permission from someone who they thought was the owner. When tacked onto in privity they were told it wasnt theirs but they had permission to walk on it and make small improvements. There is no hostile element here. It's not adverse.

If you are in St Louis and visit the St Louis Arch, go across the street to the old court house because that is the court house that the initial suit that Dred Scott brought was heard in. The suit that had been brought in the state before it went to the Supreme Court

Dang! That kid has got to be a little messed up! Knowing his existence was an accident and is the subject of a court case?

granted review? what does that mean

Justice Taney opinion did not age well at all. Its scary to think how much of the freedoms we say are inherent to the American experiment were not inherent at al and had to be fought for bitterly.

Its murder

In 1957 it was generally decided that films touched on obscenity or sexual suppression - these items could be obtained thru a black market & hardcore distribution, which lead to open forum. Thank you justice Stewart during the 1960's it was decided whether a sex act depicted in a movie qualified as obscenity. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd. (22-448 Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy (22-1078

Google LLC you are hereby ordered to remove my personal ability to comment anywhere anytime anyway online.........and live.

Whose the voice actor for this?

Shouldn’t the caricature of Brown be a girl and not a man? Granted the case was brought by her parents, but the Brown was Linda Brown.

This is why you don't go in business with friends family or classmates

The science behind criminal investigations is constantly changing in light of this what duty does the state have to preserve evidence. 21-592 Arizona v. Mayorkas (05/08/2023)

Marriage can be a flexible social arrangement if the parties wanted it to be, but some basic legal rules of marriage are quite rigid in graham vs. graham a man ran into a legal brick wall 33 F.Supp. 939 (1940) when he tried to enforce a support contract against his ex-wife. Sydney and marguerita graham divorced in 1933 Sydney's lawsuit against Marguerita alleged that the year before the divorce they entered into a written contract that said Margareta would pay Sydney $300.00 dollars a month until the parties agreed to end the payment.16-1003 McKNIGHT, MATTHEW, ET AL. V. PETERSEN, STEVEN O. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment

fucking great, thank you

The Amalgamated vs. Logan Valley case wasn't overturned. The Lloyd Corp. vs Tanner case basically clarified that a company owned town had to have all of the attributes of a public town for picketing. Not one part of the Logan Valley holding was overturned. If you don't believe me, check Shepard's citations. That goes for the Marsh vs. Alabama case.

You would have to go past the last point of purchase....

Is this platform safe to follow when trying to learn case law? Seems misleading?

Mi padre sufrió pues no pudo trabajar desde su sufrido accidente. Al menos pudo ganar esta demanda y con ese dinerito vivir parte de su vida. QDP. Sr.DOMINGUEZ

During friendly merger talks, the parties involved typically share confidential information with one another under the expectation act that it will be kept confidential & used only to evaluate the merger. But what happens if a party were to user this information to attempt a later hostile 68 A.3d 1208 (2012) takeover? Martin Marietta Materials and Vulcan Materials were the two largest companies in the construction-aggregates industry. In April of 2010 the 2 companies began merger talks to keep their talks confidential. Vulcan Lands, Inc. v. Currie Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One December 21, 2023, Filed D082234 98 Cal. App. 5th 113 *; 316 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494 **; 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 980 ***; 2023 WL

This case is like money always wins.

it’s so embarrassing that we couldn’t marry who we loved until 2015

So equal protection didn’t apply to Mexican Americans. And if Greg Abbott along with criminal Ken Paxton want to reverse today’s laws back to early Juan Crow Laws

When I first saw the title, I started to laugh because I figured some snowflake demanded equal rights with same sex relationships. But after listening to you,it makes sense.

Catastrophe management was a farce company to work for

At first I thought it was Orlando City until you showed that his last name is Orlando 😂.

I was required to attend use of force training for my security job and a instructor who was in law enforcement stated that a Terry stop extends to private security.I didn't agree and I stated that our "Powers of arrest" manual specifically states that we private security can search for weapons incidental to an arrest. Again I don't agree unless things have changed?

Linda Brown had to travel a mile everyday to get to her non-white school even though she lived nearby a white school, the browns attempted to enroll Linda at the white school but were turned away as were several other African-american families. In brown v. Board of Education a group of 13 parents including Linda's dad Oliver sued the topeka school board on behalf of their 20 children in Federal district court alleging that segregation deprived them of equal protection of the laws. National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education_ 729 F.2d...

Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States 424 U.S. 800 (1976) divined one of rare situations under which a Federal court will differ to a state court jurisdiction under the abstraction doctrine. In 1969 Colorado enacted a waters right determination & administration act to set up legal procedures for determining claims to water rights, this act divided the state to 7 water divisions corresponding to water drainage basins. United States v. Walker River Irrigation Dist._ 473 F. ...

This video saved my final project for my government class, thank you

Quoting George Carlin… the Republicans want live babies, so they can turn them into dead soldiers

Can a state pass a law to keep 4 people out? This was the question in Edwards v. California 314 U.S. 160 (1941) In December 1939 Fred Edwards drove from his home in Marysville California to spur Texas, Edwards picked up his brother-in-law Frank Duncan along with his wife and newborn baby and drove them to California. Duncan was poor & unemployed so the family stayed with Edwards for 10 days... Edwards v. Superior Court of California of County of Alameda, 159 Cal. 710, 115 P. 649, 1911 Cal. LEXIS 372

Can you appeal the US supreme Court under your hearing

However most misinterpret that quote to mean that the judiciary was the sole and exclusive arbiter on the matter when no such sentiment was expressed at any point in the case

This makes numerous factual errors right from the beginning.

This video was actually so helpful thank you, I didn’t feel like watching a 30 minute video just to know what evidence there was

Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and his wife, relying on the privilege for spousal communications? Was the district court judge correct to suppress the communications made between Defendant-Appellee and Sullivan, relying on the attorney-client privilege? Held: Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the spousal privilege and were not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed. Yes; the communications at issue were privileged under the attorney-client privilege and not subject to any exception; therefore the district court judge was correct to order them suppressed.

What a terrible interpretation of the 2nd amendment and not what the founders intended. Does any other amendment have an "introductory" clause. No. Why? Because they made it up to justify their personal opinions on guns. Blatantly going against the original purpose of the amendment

This is fire 🔥

Why would Hamer appeal if she won the trial? I’m missing something.

Gangbangers & armed robbers get convicted of this all the time.

Why is Hand Unit teaching me about historical events 💀

Its generally true that evidence during an unconstitutional search is inadmissible under the 4th amendment exclusionary rule, but what about evidence that was first noticed during an unlawful search? Don't they train these officers of the law? But, later seized during a 2nd search pursuant to a warrant obrained without reliance on the information learned during the 1st search.Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S. Ct. 2529, 101 L. Ed. 2d 472, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2881, 56 U.S.L.W. 4801

Arizona is a schmitt -hole

Negligent conduct often leads to civil liability but it can also lead to criminal liability as explained in state vs. Larson -Mark Larson and his friend Nicholas Claire and Len Morgan spent several hours drinking in bars then in the early morning hours, the trio got into Larson's truck and he drove them down a remote country road going about 20 miles per hour over the speed limit. Larson drifted onto the right shoulder and over corrected into the left ditch no one was wearing a seat belt so all three were ejected. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

The Supreme court has established various tests to determine whether government action involving religion violates The Establishment clause: typically the test applied depends on the type of government action at issue. Larson vs. Valente explains the type of government action 456 U.S. 228 (1982) that triggers strict scrutiny, a Minnesota statute required charitable organizations to register with the Minnesota Department of Commerce and report their annual income & costs, the statue Exempted religious organizations from these requirements if over 1/2 of their contributions came from their members rather than the public. Larson v. Dep_t of State_ 565 F.3d 857

How about instead of forcing women to give birth we force men to have a vasectomy which by the way it's reversible 😏 "snit it or skip it" ladies ,lets start a movement!🎊🎉🎊