Пікірлер
@AlgoNudger
@AlgoNudger 12 сағат бұрын
Thanks.
@charlescreamer-h6u
@charlescreamer-h6u 3 күн бұрын
Why are all of cmsa videos hazy
@AlgoNudger
@AlgoNudger 4 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@AlgoNudger
@AlgoNudger 5 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@harrywilson1660
@harrywilson1660 6 ай бұрын
John Baez and Ed Witten seem to be converging as age goes to infinity. Facially, I mean.
@andrewhardy8926
@andrewhardy8926 8 ай бұрын
What is the question / anticipation at 1:12:35 ? I cannot make it out
@HK47ms
@HK47ms 8 ай бұрын
Lecture begins 3:10
@david.shugar
@david.shugar 9 ай бұрын
Thanks Prof. Baez. It's great how you connect all these concepts and hearing you speak is very insightful
@HK47ms
@HK47ms 9 ай бұрын
Lecture begins 8:40
@SethKoren
@SethKoren 9 ай бұрын
I too expect that ultraviolet physics is Lorentz invariant in the sense of my Bayesian prior peaking there, but I think it's worth noting the argument Harlow alludes to (which I think in the literature was first mentioned in '04 by Collins et al.) assumes that Lorentz violation is 'generic' in turning on any Lorentz violating operator. But of course if there really is fundamental Lorentz violation it should come with some sort of special structure that makes its effects non-generic. Already in noncommutative spaces (which you can find as string vacua) there are enhanced such properties that make the Lorentz violating effects smaller. There could plausibly be even more exotic non-Riemannian spaces that do even better at sequestering these effects.
@SethKoren
@SethKoren 9 ай бұрын
I should say also this talk had lots of great discussions and Daniel made many interesting and helpful comments. Thanks, Daniel.
@JAYMOAP
@JAYMOAP Жыл бұрын
Nice work
@DanielKRui
@DanielKRui Жыл бұрын
@58:20 why does the time coordinate wrap around at that point, in the context of the previous calculation of the partition function of the left moving waves on the circle/cylinder?
@DanielKRui
@DanielKRui Жыл бұрын
@22:54 why are these 2 properties "integral" and "even" so important to the subject? Is there an "a priori" reason to isolate these definitions?
@mbe9176
@mbe9176 Жыл бұрын
Great talk! Easy to follow and good handling of questions
@TheVincent0268
@TheVincent0268 Жыл бұрын
Good to see a follow up on the lectures on 5, 8 and 24. They were about ten years ago?
@BradleyRobinson
@BradleyRobinson Жыл бұрын
@dwinsemius
@dwinsemius Жыл бұрын
@13:00 I think that the spelling of the mathematician who penned the book on Morse theory is "Milnor" (not Milner as it was spelled by the closed caption generator.).
@warwickclark2143
@warwickclark2143 9 ай бұрын
Really? THAT’s your typo after an hour of this amazing lecture? A typo at 13:00? O not e?
@dwinsemius
@dwinsemius 9 ай бұрын
@@warwickclark2143 It wasn't a criticism of anything done by Baez. It was an attempt to offer help to someone who might be trying to find the book on Morse theory (www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/milnmors.pdf) that was being cited by Baez whose author was misspelled in the CC. Baez is not responsible for the CC text. And, if you look it up, it's actually by Spivak and Wells based on lectures by Morse.
@o2807
@o2807 Жыл бұрын
i see bordisms depictions Bryce deWitt used to call "trousers topology" - funny name
@seanwang1000
@seanwang1000 2 жыл бұрын
Speaker is so inspirational
@하쿠-t6x
@하쿠-t6x 2 жыл бұрын
Agree
@Itskaintmeenu
@Itskaintmeenu 2 жыл бұрын
hello nice video
@micaelapizza510
@micaelapizza510 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, Seth, good work. Yet l find it too verbose. Try to start with a synthesis of less than a minute. And kindly avoid those conjure jungle words of your tribe, mm, uh, emm, ough 😩.
@SethKoren
@SethKoren 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I know, I'm still working on the anxiety issues. Glad to hear you liked the physics though.