As a Christian, it is your responsibility to tell them.

Giving them the "God's design" argument this video presents will only serve to alienate them from both you and God. It's "tying a heavy load and not lifting a finger to help" (Mat 23.4). God said, it is not good for the human being to be alone, and nothing in that text says that it's a sin for two men or two women, only what people have read into it. The Bible also says that loving your neighbour fulfils ALL God's commands (Rom 13.8-10). Consenting adults hurting neither themselves nor others obeys God.

Thank you for this. How dare anyone even suggest that LGBT children are "broken."

@@waltwhitman5105It is Because they are. The alphabet nonsense is not ok. It's not a difficult concept to grasp.

@@moralityIsHard My advice to you: don't be a parent, don't talk to anyone who is. Study human psychology to get the facts about the "alphabet".

So does telling us an innate part of ourselves isn’t a part of the image-bearer creation. Your theology is heretical.

that’s the worst way of shortening it

My opinion, I apply at home to an extent...as a man I don't walk around my house without shirt and I don't allow my sons to walk around without shirt ...I always go to would you feel comfortable with your sister walking around in underwear?,again my opinion

That was a moronic rant with no point.

@@moralityIsHard also, greattttt job showing Jesus in your statement. That’s how I know you’re going to burn. Your own book says so. Get ready to hear “I never knew you.”

Leviticus 18.22 was an Israelite taboo against placing a male in a woman's role in bed which was shameful because women were assumed inferior to men. Their assumption was false. We now realize we are all joint heirs in Christ. Following Lev 18.22 is as taboo today as what it prohibited was taboo back then.

@@MusicalRaichu What a horrible person you are. LGBT lives are not being "shoved down children throat" (sic). They simply exist. It is a shame that you USED your son to make yourself feel better. I suspect your relationship with him is already strained.

So basically you USED your son to vent your hatred and your insecurities. I suspect he saw right through this.

if you read Leviticus 1822, you would see that homosexuality is right next to bestiality which are abominations, I don’t want my child to go to hell for committing an abomination you can’t be a Christian an do your own will it’s gods will not yours anymore ….god also has removed homosexuality sin from countless people if you don’t believe that, you clearly do not have faith in the Lord

@@billybobbybill2924 If Lev 18.22 was about homoxesuality, it would have said "men don't lie with men" and "women don't lie with women". It says neither. Their concern was something else which we don't have a concept of today (thankfully, as it's based on women's assumed inferiority to men), so we mistakenly think it's about being gay. God has not "removed" it from countless people. Thousands have sought God to help them change and hardly any ever did. Those "countless" people simply chose to deny their nature and either stay single or force themselves into straight relationships, many of which failed as a result.

@@MusicalRaichu😂 That is the dumbest interpretation I have ever heard. That verse is clear. The Bible identifies homosexuality many times in the Bible. While also identifying that the only true union can be between a man and a woman.

@@moralityIsHard Homoxesuality is the innate enduring capacity for intimacy with a member of the same secs. This was unheard of until modern times. There is not a single reference to it in the Bible. The Bible mentions a tiny handful of specific acts involving males with males: cultural taboo against ainal secs Lev 18/20, alleged pagan revelry Rom 1, secs abbuse 1 Cor 6/1 Tim 1. The Bible mentions far more instances of wrongful acts between men and women, but I don't hear anyone quoting them as instances of heteroxesuality. The Bible nowhere specifies "the only true union". The various authors assumed the practices of the prevailing culture at the time. Your "a man and a woman" is of pagan origin. "Biblical marriage" was predominantly a man and as many women and secs slaivs he could afford. it was a business transaction between a man and a girl's father - that's girl as in child. Biblical marriage is illegal today.

Yea, I'm not sure I agree that it's "normal".

I was like 6 or 7. Unfortunately:/

I'm a girl and I found it by accident. The things I saw messed me up, mentally. I was afraid of being left alone with boys my age or older because a kid who was also 7 tried to bribe me into touching him in exchange for a turn on the Xbox. He didn't even know how it was supposed to be done and I didn't want to do it. I ended up just watching him play Tony Hawk Shred, never getting a turn despite his mom demanding he share. Ouch.

It's normalized, it's the average age millions of kids all over the world first get exposed to pornography, a lot of times even hardcore pornography, with violent and extremely degrading elements.

I never saw porn at that age. I would see naked or topless girls on tv sometimes, but my parents always made me cover my eyes so didn't really get to enjoy it. When I was 11 I actually purposely search for naked women on tv. It took me a couple months to realize that I wasn't going to see anything because we didn't have those type of channels. I say it's normole for a little boy to want to see a woman or older girl naked or just topless.