Пікірлер
@keerthireddychirla9994
@keerthireddychirla9994 13 күн бұрын
16
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ 18 күн бұрын
1,5
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ 18 күн бұрын
1/3
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ 18 күн бұрын
log(2)5
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ
@АндрейЛюбавин-э4щ 18 күн бұрын
16
@walshthomas
@walshthomas 28 күн бұрын
I get two more as the solns to x = +/- e^(ln(2)/4x) . The negative version has one soln, and the positive has another 2 more, of those 2, one is 16. x* = { -4 W(-ln(2)/4)/(ln(2)), -4 W(ln(2)/4)/(ln(2)), 16}
@GeriReshef
@GeriReshef 29 күн бұрын
Why the solution is so complicated? X^3+X=130 X^3+X^1=5^3+5^1 /*did you find it by a chance?*/ X=5 2^n=5 n=Lg2(5)
@MARTINWERDER
@MARTINWERDER 29 күн бұрын
@matholympiadonlinesolver 1/ 2 log base 5 = 5 log base 2 (= 2,321928) applied in the initial equation does not prove to be correct. x = 3 and - 0,430676 (= negative 0,430676) are correct solutions and they give the result 500.
@sunnysharma5166
@sunnysharma5166 Ай бұрын
2005 is the answer,I solved it now
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@sunnysharma5166
@sunnysharma5166 Ай бұрын
3/2
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@sunnysharma5166
@sunnysharma5166 Ай бұрын
1/3
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@sunnysharma5166
@sunnysharma5166 Ай бұрын
1/3
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@sunnysharma5166
@sunnysharma5166 Ай бұрын
7! is the answer,solved in mind
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
You are so clever
@armacham
@armacham Ай бұрын
You only found one solution, there are other real solutions
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@WallaceAlves-h5f
@WallaceAlves-h5f Ай бұрын
Verme do capeta
@sibilm9009
@sibilm9009 Ай бұрын
Gud👍👍
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@BelloWerner
@BelloWerner Ай бұрын
And the other 3 Solutions???
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 29 күн бұрын
🥰
@mariajimenez2706
@mariajimenez2706 Ай бұрын
X =3 y=1
@ChavoMysterio
@ChavoMysterio Ай бұрын
5^x+5^(x+2)=52 5^x+25(5^x)=52 26(5^x)=52 5^x=2 x=log_5(2) ❤
@LloydCash-he1qv
@LloydCash-he1qv Ай бұрын
3^(x^2) = 81^(x - 1) 3^(x^2) = (±3)^[4(x - 1)] 3^(x^2) = 3^[4(x - 1)] or 3^(x^2) = (-3)^[4(x - 1)] x^2 = 4x - 4 3^(x^2) = (3e^(i.π))^[4(x - 1)] x^2 - 4x + 4 = 0 3^(x^2) = 3^[(1+i.π/ln(3))4(x - 1)] (x - 2)^2 = 0 x^2 = 4(1 + i.π/ln(3))(x - 1) x = 2 usw. usw. _________ usw.
@harneseve1
@harneseve1 2 ай бұрын
52
@2012tulio
@2012tulio 2 ай бұрын
27^x = x^-1 Ln x / x = -ln 27 x^-1 ln x^-1= ln 27 e^lnx^-1* lnx^-1=ln27 W(e^lnx^-1* lnx^-1)=W(ln27) Ln x^-1= W(ln27) x^-1= e^w(ln27)= 3 x = 1/3
@yogamulyadi2046
@yogamulyadi2046 2 ай бұрын
x Ln27= W(3Ln3)= Ln3 x=⅓
@2012tulio
@2012tulio 2 ай бұрын
X={3 ; -0.43}
@SidneiMV
@SidneiMV 2 ай бұрын
xln5 + (1/x)(x - 1)ln8 = ln500 x²ln5 + (x - 1)ln8 - xln500 = 0 x²ln5 + xln(8/500) - ln8 = 0 x²ln5 - xln(500/8) - ln8 = 0 x²ln5 - xln(125/2) - 3ln2 = 0 x = [ln(125/2) ± √(ln²(125/2) + 12ln5ln2)]/(2ln5) ln²(125/2) + 12ln5ln2 = ln²125 + ln²2 - 2ln125ln2 + 12ln5ln2 = ln²125 + ln²2 - 2ln125ln2 + 4ln125ln2 = (ln125 + ln2)² x = [ln(125/2) ± (ln125 + ln2)]/(2ln5) x = 2ln125/(2ln5) => *x = 3* x = -2ln2/(2ln5) => *x = -ln2/ln5*
@RajanSinghEDUCATION
@RajanSinghEDUCATION 2 ай бұрын
I will make vedio on the same problem thanks for the inspiration
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 2 ай бұрын
Yes, thank you, sir
@Ablee
@Ablee 2 ай бұрын
Hello, I have noticed a problem. The thumbnail of the video shows a minus between the exponential numbers, but in the video you solve it with a plus.
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 2 ай бұрын
Ok thanks
@tejpalsingh366
@tejpalsingh366 2 ай бұрын
Unnessory leanthy
@vannkan8152
@vannkan8152 2 ай бұрын
I like this solution. make more videos
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 2 ай бұрын
Thank
@vannkan8152
@vannkan8152 2 ай бұрын
Cool
@minxythemerciless
@minxythemerciless 3 ай бұрын
m = 2004 and n = 2005 are obvious solutions.
@mithunarora
@mithunarora 3 ай бұрын
4009 is the other trivial solution
@yodaami
@yodaami 3 ай бұрын
What age Olympiad would that one be in? 60 yr old woman who did maths A level at school 40 years ago, feeling quite pleased to get this one easily.
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
It is for the lower class.
@yodaami
@yodaami 3 ай бұрын
@@matholympiadonlinesolver age? 7,8,9, 10, 11?
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
@@yodaami yes it is for 10 years old
@nexio5454
@nexio5454 3 ай бұрын
With small numbers like this, you can just list perfect squares under 45 and find by try and error. I solved it in 15 seconds like this :))
@MrRedEngineer
@MrRedEngineer 3 ай бұрын
I agree. But I don't agree with that mention how fast you solve buddy. Lower your ego and accept his solution.
@nexio5454
@nexio5454 3 ай бұрын
@@MrRedEngineer I accept his solution and it's definitely the most elegant solution. I didn't mean to show off and I'm sorry if my comment seems like I did. The problem being presented as an olympiad problem (which it clearly isn't), the goal would be to solve fast hence my solution and my exemple
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
Thank you
@kiloperson5680
@kiloperson5680 3 ай бұрын
Might I ask what country are you from?
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
I'm from cambodia
@kiloperson5680
@kiloperson5680 3 ай бұрын
@@matholympiadonlinesolver oh i asked because your pronunciation sounded like french to me haha, weird
@coderhub-tech7942
@coderhub-tech7942 3 ай бұрын
Tried calculating based off the thumbnail, i got c²-a² = -5 so (c+a)(c-a) = -5, using that and a little brute force, the 4 possible values are c = ±2, a = ±3. From there you get b = ±6 which is the solution
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
Ok thank you
@bledlbledlbledl
@bledlbledlbledl 3 ай бұрын
the way i went about it was very similar to that. looking at the thumbnail, a² must be 5 more than c². starting from 1 and just squaring a few numbers, it didn't take long to notice that 3² was 5 more then 2². from there, finding b² was just a subtract
@Abby-hi4sf
@Abby-hi4sf 3 ай бұрын
Always a+b > a-b , so you should not have four cases . I will assign the greater factor to the greater eqn
@coderhub-tech7942
@coderhub-tech7942 3 ай бұрын
Does not apply if b is negative, think again
@Abby-hi4sf
@Abby-hi4sf 3 ай бұрын
@@coderhub-tech7942 Let us not forget that every negative number squared is always positive. All variable a, b, c, are sqared on the question So the answer is a= +/- 3 , b= +/- 6 and c= +/- 2
@coderhub-tech7942
@coderhub-tech7942 3 ай бұрын
@@Abby-hi4sf true, but you are factoring a²-c² or c²-a² depending on your approach, which can include negative numbers, so your argument doesn't work there
@Abby-hi4sf
@Abby-hi4sf 3 ай бұрын
@@coderhub-tech7942 Whether you are factoring a²-c² or c²-a² , the fact remain that each variable is sqared .ex a²= (-a)² and (-c)² =c² so a²-c² = (-a)²-c² = a²-(-c)²
@honestadministrator
@honestadministrator 3 ай бұрын
writing z for sin^2 ( x) one gets f ( x) = (1 - z + z^2) /( z + ( 1 - z) ^2) = (1 - z + z^2) /( 1 - z + z^2) = 1
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
Nice
@vasilesinescu84
@vasilesinescu84 3 ай бұрын
How do you pronounce x?
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
What are you hearing?
@quelquun5633
@quelquun5633 3 ай бұрын
One other way to see it is to know that sin^4 -cos^4= sin^2-cos^2. Then everything cancels out and you get the result.
@SidneiMV
@SidneiMV 2 ай бұрын
perfect
@minakshisareeen1843
@minakshisareeen1843 3 ай бұрын
x is 3
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
Ok thank you
@davidsousaRJ
@davidsousaRJ 3 ай бұрын
I did f(x) = (cos²x + sin²x.sin²x)/(sin²x + cos²x.cos²x) = (cos²x + sin²x.(1 - cos²x))/(sin²x + cos²x.(1 - sin²x)) = (cos²x + sin²x - sin²xcos²x))/(sin²x + cos²x - cos²xsin²x)) = (1 - sin²xcos²x)/(1 - sin²xcos²x) = 1. Very easy.
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 3 ай бұрын
Nice
@tamarshahverdyan2723
@tamarshahverdyan2723 3 ай бұрын
98
@tamarshahverdyan2723
@tamarshahverdyan2723 3 ай бұрын
24
@edvinkarlsson9368
@edvinkarlsson9368 3 ай бұрын
You messed up the x part, you somehow made it into /2(sqrt(5)+2) instead of 2(sqrt(5)+4)
@jwkim4428
@jwkim4428 4 ай бұрын
derivative of f(x) is 0. f(x) is constant and f(0)=1. hence f (x)=1 for all x.
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 4 ай бұрын
Ok thank you
@davidsousaRJ
@davidsousaRJ 3 ай бұрын
@jwkim4428 how did you get thsi result? It is very tedious to calculate this derivative by the quotient rule, and there is no obvious term cancellation in the final result.
@rishabhraj3749
@rishabhraj3749 4 ай бұрын
Bro.. Nice explanation
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@princesmith9212
@princesmith9212 4 ай бұрын
So simple Well done
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@laseriitd
@laseriitd 4 ай бұрын
first like
@matholympiadonlinesolver
@matholympiadonlinesolver 4 ай бұрын
Thank you sir❤
@Redstoner34526
@Redstoner34526 4 ай бұрын
But arent there infinite solutions such as logbase2(10) for x and logbase3(3) for y or whatever other numbers you want that make 7