In Dave’s world the stock market doesn’t go down. He is a snake oil salesman. He is the worst.
@christianallen9947Күн бұрын
@donaldrichey3318- I totally agree! His logic would actually make sense if there was no fluctuation. . . But that’s obviously not how it works.
@BlitzHackКүн бұрын
Hopefully their is a person out their with the resources to do this exercise. 25 years ago in 1999 the inflation calculator say $750k is the equivalent to $1,400,000.00 today. please run a program that uses the S&P 500 performance and start withdrawing 8% a year in 1999 and see what we will have today. Will we have 1.4 mill like Ramsey says or will we be broke?
@christianallen9947Күн бұрын
@jamesmeadoe3982 I forgot to respond to your first thought. My apologies! Monte Carlo takes into account the ups and the downs of the market so it’s accounting for when you get a higher return than what you withdraw. In other words, exactly what you’re saying. Dave’s 8% “planning factor” as you call it, doesnt hold up to scrutiny from anyone who knows how the math around withdrawing money works. Honestly, anyone trying to hold out for Dave on this point has to be a at least a little blinded in order to stick up for this take. It really is an awful take from an incredibly condescending and ignorant guy. (Dave, not you! 😂)
@jamesmeador3982Күн бұрын
I think this misses the argument. Dave’s not saying pull out 8% every year… he’s saying 8% is the planning factor for calculating what your nest egg value needs to be based on your desired annual income in retirement. So if you want to retire at $80k then you need a $1M portfolio at retirement. The years the S&P grows 20% instead of 12%, you’re living in $80k and banking the other 12% to cover the years the S&P grows less than 12%. I’d like to know what period in the history of the S&P that the price was net negative over a 3-5 year period? Is there a period where the net growth of the S&P was less than 36% over the course of any 3 year period? The last 2 financial down turns the market returned hot and recovered within 12 months. So pulling out $6.7K/month would dollar cost average away the “sequence of returns risk,” no?
@christianallen9947Күн бұрын
@jamesmeador3982- Thanks for your thoughts! Respectfully, I think you’re trying too hard to stick up for Daves ignorance here. I’m taking him at face value. He’s clearly saying that he thinks people should be able to take more money out of their accounts because the stock market averages higher than their withdrawal rate, is he not? You and Dave are saying because market averages are typically higher than 8% a person should be able to pull out more money, right? If the market got 10% every year and never went down this math would jive. Thats not how the math works, though. What if the market declines right before you need to to take your annual withdrawal, and you still take your 8%? That’s a recipe for disaster, particularly if it happens more than once. Are you familiar with average vs actuall return? It’s super important to know the difference. This is why they do Monte Carlo simulations! It’s the reason the 4% rule even exists. I pointed out sequence of returns risk, but there’s also an issue with timing risk. In other words, the averages don’t matter to an individual investor, they care about whether their account is up or down. I said this in another comment, but the math changes when you’re pulling money out while the market fluctuates. The downs hurt more than the ups help, but it’s even more accentuated when withdrawing money. There are ways to safely take a higher percentages/more income in retirement, like using more than just the market to create income, but him telling people they can take 8% is just plain dangerous!
@christianallen99472 күн бұрын
@petermadany I agree, that would definitely make it more accurate. However, even using the last 100 years his advice to pull out 8% is dangerous. The reason is because of “sequence of returns risk.” In other words, eveb if the market averaged 10%, the game changes entirely when I’m pulling money out.
@petermadany27792 күн бұрын
On an episode on another channel where some guy trashed Dave Ramsey, his colleague shared an excellent insight. She said Dave should preface much of his advice with "In general." In the past 100 years, if one was all-in on the US stock market, one could withdraw 8% every year without burning through a nest egg. However, each person's situation can have several caveats that could cause one to lower the 8% towards 4% or 4.5%.
@christianallen99476 күн бұрын
@Mrt haha! What topic do you want them for? You should listen to the whole podcast episode. I think we did 5 or 6 of Dave’s worst takes. This is just a short clip from it. Thanks for commenting!
@MrT------57436 күн бұрын
Ok, so convince me? Tell me some true statistics!
@moneyinsights5694Күн бұрын
@MrT About withdrawal rates? The good news is you can google it and immediately find a ton of information around this topic. That what makes this take even more ridiculous. . . He’s on an island in saying this, because all it takes is basic math to understand. I take that back, you don’t even need to do the math yourself. Just Google or ask ChatGPT if 8% is a safe withdrawal rate, and why it why not!
@MrT------5743Күн бұрын
@moneyinsights5694 i got 1M in the bank. I don't need a broke person trying tell me about inventsting.🤣😂🤣😂inventing. Is whole life good for some people? Sure. But whole life insurance is generally more expensive than term life insurance.
@christianallen9947Күн бұрын
@MrT- Is that your way of trying to say you have more money than me? If so, not your brightest moment! 😂 I’ve been a multiple 7-figure earner for nearly a decade. Our average client at Money Insights makes 500-700K a year. Our podcast has been going for years and it’s all content specific to high income earners. Everyone we talk to has a million bucks in the bank, my friend!
@MrT------574322 сағат бұрын
@christianallen9947 hahahhaha. And you think whole life is best? 🤣😂🤣😂 You are making squat cause your here on KZbin getting financial advice!🤣🤣
@christianallen994718 сағат бұрын
@MrT- Really? I’m the one teaching it! You realize I’m the person in this video, right? And yes, WL is a powerful tool when you know how to use it. When it’s designed appropriately, it will literally increase your investment return by simply leveraging the insurance company’s money to invest. My experience is typically that high income earners and alternative investors tend to understand and use it to help build generational wealth, and the people listening to Dave Ramsey tend to knkw how to budget. . . But they’re often missing the boat when it comes to true wealth building!
@Oksanamartin9 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
@jerrware11 күн бұрын
I’m glad someone is starting to catch on this guy. Only reason is Rich is he’s been able to sell his Financial Peace packets with DVD , and books etc to churches all over this country. Plus he has hundreds of endorsements.
@christianallen994711 күн бұрын
@jerrware- You nailed it! Dave has basically become a conservative talk radio host like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. It’s worked out well for his pocket but not so much for his followers
@CyndeeMendrala-p9j13 күн бұрын
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
@KarenBeard-u7s23 күн бұрын
Thanks for the analysis! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
@Dabs_cards25 күн бұрын
🗑️
@christianallen994716 күн бұрын
I totally agree! Dave Ramseys takes belong in the trash!
@christianallen994726 күн бұрын
Thanks for the question! I won’t speak for Rod, but I’ll tell you why I do it. I do it because. . . 1. Dave is ignorant and arrogant. He cares more about being “right” than he cares about giving quality authentic advice and sadly he’s just flat out lying in some situations. 2. Some of his advice isn’t just laughable, it’s actually dangerous! (Think this 8% withdrawal rate he’s preaching, I hope nobody is doing their retirement income math the way he does. That could really hurt someone!) 3. There’s a more effective path to wealth creation than the one he puts the masses on. Not only that, it’s not at all the way he’s built his personal wealth! It’s not that none of his stuff will help, but it’s a much slower path. 4. Dave gives advice as if people are too stupid to understand financial principles for themselves. (Think leverage! Anyone who is serious about wealth building knows that leverage is the most powerful wealth building principle that exists, and Dave implores people to avoid it all costs, instead of teaching them how to use it as an effective tool. It’s like saying you can’t use a knife because you’ll cut yourself instead of teaching you how to use a knife without cutting yourself. This holds people back from accomplishing the type of wealth that Dave himself has created. Finally, it’s fun! He’s obviously got a massive following and we often get more people hitting our videos when we rebuff Dave’s nonsense. Thanks again for your comment!
@ggvann26 күн бұрын
You two spent 47 minutes trashing Dave. Why? He has helped a lot of people. Dave's followers don't follow everything he says. They take what they need and leave the rest . I'm debt free including my mortgage. I have a credit score of 830 and one credit card with a zero balance. I have followed Dave's baby steps and I don't like Trump!
@christianallen994716 күн бұрын
Did I answer your question @ggvann? Hope so!
@Themah111Ай бұрын
Are there options to do the equipment leasing if less than $300K in income? Like can you get a partial deduction and roll the remainder to future years?
@buntjeeАй бұрын
Whole life insurance is a SCAM!
@moneyinsights569426 күн бұрын
Insightful comment! Jk I appreciate the opinion, but I’d really love to hear you back up your reasons for suggesting whole life is a scam?
@buntjee20 күн бұрын
You don't need life insurance your whole life. Once your debts and dependents are gone, so is your need for life insurance. Term life insurance is way cheaper and will give you the coverage you need for the time period you need it. Agents love whole life because they make more money selling it because it costs the consumer more. Don't go into debt to invest. Cash out whole life policies and invest somewhere else. Return rates on insurance policies are historically terrible, so you'll do much better with term insurance and a ROTH IRA.
@christianallen994720 күн бұрын
@buntjee Did you even listen to the videos? The answer is obviously no because otherwise you’d know that the policy isn’t meant to be the investment, so you’re not comparing the policy to another investment. Instead, you’re pairing it with investments to increase the returns. There’s a massive difference between those 2 things. I’d encourage you to become more educated, and to listen to the content to understand it so you can speak intelligently on the subject your commenting on.
@christianallen994720 күн бұрын
@@buntjeeAnd for people who are looking to build generational type wealth, life insurance becomes a powerful tool to help them accomplish that goal. Sadly, it’s primarily the lower income people who fall victim to listening people like you or Dave Ramsey, and they never reach the financial success that they could have.
@buntjee20 күн бұрын
Do you have any bridges for sale?
@WamSUBNZАй бұрын
The issue that could fix this IS THE CLOSE THE LOOP HOLES Close the ways they can write taxes off And prevent ceos earning more than 6 times the lowest paid workers
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
@WamSUBNZ definitely something to consider!
@HickPimpАй бұрын
I never believe rich folks how say this. They can write a check to the government whenever they like. I personally favor a flat tax at a very reasonable rate without loopholes regardless of income levels. The poverty line was a goal when I was a child but we always paid our own way.
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
@hickpimp I’m totally with you! Thanks for your comment!
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
Yep! The thumbnails are pretty bad right now. The good news is we hired one who’s getting up and running as we speak. Thanks for the pointer! 😂
@geniusthynkАй бұрын
You need an thumbnail designer guys
@moneyinsights569426 күн бұрын
Are you a good thumbnail designer? I need someone to go back and make new ones for all our videos that have the same crappy one
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
No questions allowed! 😅Jk Please, ask your question. . . Unless of course it’s a solicitation to do my marketing and social media
@MwMarketing-z5gАй бұрын
can i ask something?
@Themah111Ай бұрын
I'm interested in getting more information on this.
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
Sorry! I meant to post my comment above as a reply but shoot me a quick email and I’ll get you more info. Thanks!
@Themah111Ай бұрын
@@christianallen9947 I am just seeing this now (Not sure how to et KZbin Notifications). What is an email I can use to contact you?
@Themah111Ай бұрын
@@christianallen9947 How can I email you?
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
@jacobenglish7185 I love it! That’s exactly what I do. I’ve got my deferred comp plan that is made up of traditional investments, and I have couple hundred grand in a brokerage account where I buy individual stocks. The rest of my money is in alternative investments! Its various types of real estate, gold, private equity/lending, and naturally I run my investmenta through my high cash value life insurance policies to boost the returns! carry a ton of cash in my life insurance policies!
@jacobenglish7185Ай бұрын
This is easy to accomplish if my portfolio is mostly alternative investments with stocks only in my defined benefit plan
@christianallen9947Ай бұрын
@jacobenglish7185 Good thoughts! I agree with you
@jacobenglish7185Ай бұрын
It makes sense to wait for interest rates to go down for other investments that can be refinanced when interest rates go down. It could make more sense to jump on a positively cashflowing investment while interest rates are higher and refinance it later to improve the cash flow. This way, we don't miss out on a great investment, hoping that the market conditions will improve. (The situation is the boss.)
@Compounddeznuts2 ай бұрын
Just a reminder to anyone watching this that when you die, you only get the death benefit none of the cash value so if you want to build up an asset that you can borrow against and leave it to your family open taxable broker account you’re welcome
@VIP-rp3oq2 ай бұрын
So true 😊
@jacobenglish71852 ай бұрын
If everyone is much better off, the rich-poor gap doesn't matter. A rising tide raises all boats. I'm completely against the unrealized capital gains tax.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! I think the question is whether everyone is much better off. . . 🤔 I tend to agree with you on the billionaire tax thiugh
@jacobenglish71852 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 On Saturday, I met with a young couple in another country and we talked about how they could generate cashflow with their assets. They both work full time and together bring in less than $800 per month. The poor have it much better in America than in many countries in world. I don't agree with the idea of inventing another tax to try to get the ultra wealthy to pay their fair share. As you mentioned, paying taxes is not the only way to contribute. They generate jobs and contribute in meaningful ways. I don't think America is better off with the billionaires selling their assets to foreigners to pay an unconstitutional tax.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
@jacobenglish7185 Im with you! There are definitely better ways to accomplish the objective. . . Lowering taxes for business owners, for example, gives them a chance to bring on more people and pay higher wages to employees.
@jacobenglish71852 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 exactly! Use taxes to incentize the behavior you want. We want people to be motivated to generate wealth so that they will take prudent risks.
@crackedwindow48212 ай бұрын
FLAT TAX ACROSS THE BOARD - extra taxes to corporate employees that makes a predetermined % or amount more than the least paid employee (talking about people that make 100x-1,000x to sit in the ivory tower)
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Thanks for your take! Im not a fan of punishing high achievers for being productive so I can’t get on board but I appreciate the comment!
@crackedwindow48212 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 I don’t think the same tax rate for everyone is punishing anyone but I certainly think making more and paying less in taxes is a punishment for regular upper, middle and working class tax payers. Beautiful thing about America is we all have the right to our own opinions and the ability to say them.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
That is a beautiful thing! So maybe I misunderstood your initial take. . . I thought you were in favor of a flat tax, just not for high income earners, who would have to pay more in taxes. Did I misunderstand?
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
You’re saying extra tax only for the ultra wealthy, right? Why not make it a flat tax across the board regardless of how much money you make? That would eliminate your scenario where people make more but pay less!
@crackedwindow48212 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 the idea was “flat tax across the board” to make it equal and an extra tax to anyone making like 1,000x more then the least paid employee at the same company as a way to discourage the major gap in wages. Hopefully for the betterment of the majority of people with increased wages or less disproportion amongst wages. I’m all for extra skill extra pay or extra hustle extra pay.
@tdolan07892 ай бұрын
Dumb take by a dumb person.
@kentalexander51302 ай бұрын
Your high income physicians were on scholarships. Nobody risks student loans on an advanced degree they might not get. If you aren't smart enough for a scholarship you aren't smart enough for an advanced degree. Common sense as well.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Wow! I’m not sure I have words for this take! I almost can’t tell if you’re being serious?Many people take out loans for medical school, law school, an MBA, etc. with no guarantees they’ll actually get the degree. The average student loan debt for a doctor is over 200K. If that’s the average, then obviously most doctors aren’t getting through medical school student debt free because they were exclusively on scholarships. That said, we can agree that using common sense logic is a good idea, starting with the common sense understanding that sometimes student loan debts don’t make any sense at all, and sometimes they certainly do!
@gosc1112 ай бұрын
My sister did grad school on student loans and makes big bucks now. You're full of shit. Not that our student loan system isn't a giant bs scam
@mikecasteel56742 ай бұрын
😂
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Dave is making a blanket statement. Thats what he does! I gave one example, but that was one of many examples. Look, I dropped out of college and never carried any student loans myself but just because it didn’t make and for me doesn’t mean it is the same for everyone. The idea that that it never makes sense to take out a student loan is absolutely ridiculous, it’s jackassery!
@alphanerd23052 ай бұрын
Exceptions aren't the rule.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
I wasn’t giving an exception to the rule, I was giving one example of many as to why a blanket statement suggestung there are absolutely no good student loans assanine. I feel like if you put your thinking cap on for 30 seconds you could come up with 10 other situations that you’re saying are “an exception” to the rule. Anyone who can go with Dave on this statement must have stopped thinking for themselves. We all know it’s complete hyperbole and Dave likely doesn’t believe it himself
@alphanerd23052 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 When the majority of something is what is most likely, that's the rule. Deviations from that are the exception. Maybe if you learned to properly parse English, you'd see that. Now, go troll someone else.
@Lord_Baphomet_2 ай бұрын
Considering that only 1% of all degrees received in the US are related to a medical field… his statements are pretty valid.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Are you thinking it’s relevant because physicians are a small subset of people? There are lawyers and engineeers and high paying careers in many fields that require a degree, it’s not like my comment was exclusively relevant to the medical field. Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying?
@Lord_Baphomet_2 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 Right so Bachelor’s degrees, 45% of those degrees in the US were acquired with student loans, the average loan was around 30,000 with an interest rate between 12-15%. If you want to pay that off in 48 months your monthly payment is going to be 800… and considering bachelor degrees make around 52,000 a year at a good job… that’s still insane, sure it’s not forever but this example is based off of you getting a job immediately out of college… I have a bachelor’s in mechanical engineering and I thankfully received a scholarship… and it took me years before my internships turned into a paid position.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
So you’re actually trying to say that Dave is right about this? I love it! You’re wrong, but I love the passion to stand up for Dave, even when he’s saying something ridiculous! Let’s just think for just a second. . . Dave’s saying there’s no such thing as a good student loan (as in never) and I’m saying that the situation is the boss! He didn’t say as a general rule, he said “there’s no such thing” as a good student loan. You can’t possibly think he’s right about that can you? He’s the one spewing hyperbole, im just suggesting that his statement is obviously hype. I’m sure he doesn’t actually believe it either. I never used student loans myself but I’m not ignorant enough to say that it never makes sense. Honestly, im amazed that anyone would even attempt to say that he’s right on this. If you said, I agree that in general people should avoid using student loans or something to that effect, then it would be a different story. I’m just saying that Dave’s being extreme on this, but that’s what he does. Dude is a master marketer more than master od giving good financial advice. Here’s my take, we need to think for ourselves instead of letting Dave (or anyone else) do it for us
@BernardBouchard-qq9kq2 ай бұрын
Brother and sister Bob and Jane Bob did not go collage and makes 60 thou.Jane went to college and makes 200 thou. Jane says she can't pay her loans.
@christianallen372 ай бұрын
Intersting scenario! So, do you agree with Dave that there is absolutely no good reason to take out a student loan?
@BernardBouchard-qq9kq2 ай бұрын
@@christianallen37 everybody poor mouth's.pay your own loan that is what gives it value.
@darkalityleonid41143 ай бұрын
landlordship isn't "wealth accumulation" it's wealth extraction. Landlords produce nothing and demand the value generated by people who actually produce wealth. Shelter is a human need, not an investment, and anyone who doesn't understand that has no place in a civilized society.
@christianallen373 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! My job is to help people build wealth. . . And investing in real estate is without question a way to do that. That said, I als very much disagree with your idea that landlords produce nothing. What about when they build actual properties for people to live in? I can’t figure out how they “produce nothing.” Sounds more like you just don’t like what’s being produced.
@ShamolChandra443 ай бұрын
Thanks for clearing up the confusion around the Investment Optimizer strategy! This video sounds perfect for anyone who wants to get the most out of it. Definitely going to check out the Investor Quiz too.
@ShamolChandra443 ай бұрын
Money Insights, you guys are always on top of it! Love that you're tackling life insurance from a different angle. Definitely subscribing for more financial wisdom!
@bearvault40864 ай бұрын
It sounds this is for only with real money, Can i get a policy of 10k a year for 5 year consistently and not get a loan yet, let it mature there and use the strategy after that, since i dont need it for short term,
@christianallen374 ай бұрын
Great question! Yeah, we tend to speak in terms of our averages but you could certainly do the plan you stated. Even better, you don’t need to wait for 5 years to borrow and use it for investing. . . That can happen anytime you have cash value in the policy, even if it’s only 10 grand. It could also make sense to wait and let it grow if you’re not finding investments you like at the lower amounts.
@66chubbs4 ай бұрын
I just subscribed to your channel to learn how to invest
@christianallen374 ай бұрын
Awesome! Welcome. Im a little biased but this is a good place to learn how to invest! In fact, we’re hokding a virtual summit (featuring Daymond John) and a bunch of other financial experts on September 12th that you should make sure to be at! It’s going to be awesome and it’s totally free!
@ClintFrerich-sd4bt4 ай бұрын
Yall didn’t answer why he’s wrong, only that he is wrong. As an investor this Wlife is garbage
@christianallen99474 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment! This is a small clip of a much longer conversation, but we definitely get into it! And, I’m a HNW investor and I use WL to increase my returns and give me a ton of ancillary benefits (tax, death benefit, liquidity, safety, etc) Im also fortunate to work with 1500 high income investors as clients who effectively use WL to increase their returns too!
@bsoxs45245 ай бұрын
these guys are insurance and annuity salesmen, they receive massive commissions on anything they sell, please do not listen to them. investing your own money is far better
@machsixer5 ай бұрын
Agreed. Give The Phil Ferguson show a listen. He stresses to avoid those products as well.
@christianallen99475 ай бұрын
It’s true! We love using the combination of life insurance as a wealth creation tool (not the investment), alternative asset investing and effective tax strategy as the primary pathway to building generational wealth. . . especially for our clientele which consists almost exclusively of high income and HNW individuals. And yes, we get paid a lot (in the form of commissions) for helping people effectively execute the strategies we teach and recommend. Those facts don’t make what we teach any less impactful. It’s still without question the most effective methodology I’ve seen to building prolific wealth. . . And I’ve been meeting with clients for 20 years so I’ve seen a lot of varying philosophies. Finally, as a 7 figure earner myself, I do exactly what I teach my clients to do. I live what I teach. What’s crazy is that it helped a regular Joe like me build a 20M net worth by 40. I’m also fortunate to have 1500 (give or take) successful clients who do the same. Thanks for your comment!
@christianallen99475 ай бұрын
Yeah, that’s a great comment! I think that’s totally reasonable to be concerned about. My hope is that they would grandfather anything from before a tax law change rather than completely moving the goal post. . . And yet, there’s no guarantee of that so you want to go in with eyes wide open!
@TheNotimprezed5 ай бұрын
My problem with the Roth (and I put money into both regular 401k and Roth 401k) is I'm increasingly convinced we are not far from tax law changes that will make the gains in the Roth taxable. Maybe it will be treated as taxable income, maybe capital gains, maybe a new tax specific to Roths, but our representatives have buried the country in debt and they will be jacking tax rates up in the future. Taxing Roths is easy pickings in terms of it only affecting a limited number of voters.
@christianallen99475 ай бұрын
I agree! Any roth is likely going to be a better option from a tax standpoint. There are some contribution limits and potentially investment limitations but I’m all for a self-directed Roth 401K!