That last clip sums it up...

"Neither mysticism nor the creed of self-sacrifice is compatible with mental health or self-esteem." -Nathaniel Branden-

Is Tommy still with us today?

where is the rest of the video?

Professor Dawkins Promoting Evolution as a FACT rather than A Theory Must be Met with Intellectual Opposition. The Onus is on Prof Dawkins and Darwin to Explain Some Very Difficult Anomolies with ET.

I think Dawkins is retarded. He has to be. No one's that stupid

"Science if interesting, and if you don't agree, you can fuck off." So what about the other 95% or so, who simple aren't interested? Are they condemned? Will Dawkins convince them? - No, he says, "they can fuck off".

Gulbis is a joke

Do you have other episodes?

🟪1. DO ATHEISTS SUFFER FROM 'ATHEISM'? My experience with atheists and atheists-evolutionists (scientific pantheists) during debates etc. is that they are probably suffering from some unique form of mental depression, not from 'Atheism'. Why? Simply because they are so angry, bitter and cynical all the time, hence the reference to the atheist's 'ABC' (always ANGRY, BITTER & CYNICAL). If the reader does not believe me, just check the remarks and responses of atheists below on this page and the many others on other such pages when or where Christians dare comment or make some kind of contribution. Furthermore, many atheists (not all) usually are known not only for their anger, bitterness and cynicism, but also for their blasphemous and profane expletives during debates and polemics in public. Follow the polemics in print as a case in point; they clealy have no respect or fear of the Creator. They will, at the drop of a hat, curse and insult God with the very mind, tongue and lips created by the very God in the first place, demonstrating the magnificent, divine magnanimity of God toward atheists ... He lets the sun shine on and the rain fall on Christian and pagan atheist alike. Why atheists are so angry, bitter and cynical could possibly be explained in the fact that the Bible refers to them as the "wicked" and the "ungodly". So, naturally they will feel the affront acutely; I too, probably would have felt that way had I chosen Atheism as my grand vocation in life and had to be referred to as the "wicked" and the "ungodly". 2. ATHEIST-EVOLUTIONISTS AS 'SCIENTIFIC PANTHEISTS'. "Pantheism's central tenet is that the universe, the earth, and nature are divine and so they should be treated as sacred." (Internet source). Whereas Christians believe in the virgin birth of Jesus Christ, the atheists, on the other hand, reject the idea of the virgin birth of Jesus Christ (as "impossible") but, instead, believe in the accidental, random, spontaneous virgin birth of the Cosmos through 'Evolution' from nothing as a sheer coincidence. and not as "impossible". Coupled with the atheist-evolutionists' almost divine reverence for nature and science ("scientism") it stands to reason that atheist-evolutionists, people who have chosen Atheism-Evolutionism as their 'religion-of-choice', will ultimately be experienced and labelled as 'scientific pantheists'.

Utter nonsense.

🟪1. ATHEISTS (SCIENTIFIC PANTHEISTS) NEVER CEASE TO AMAZE. Amazing. There are still atheists (scientific pantheists) on this page that 'believe' (sic) humans are primates; i.e., the same people who: - when they send a chimpanzee to the zoo, will put the chimp in the cargo hold of the airplane (along with dangerous animals!) instead of letting it ride with its 'nearest cousins' (sic) in the passenger compartment. - when the chimpanzee in the zoo gets sick, they will call for a qualified veterinarian specialising in wildlife care, instead of calling for a general practitioner (doctor) the way they will do for the chimp's 'nearest cousins' when they get sick. - will often speak to chimps for hours, days, weeks, months and years on end trying in vain to make intelligent and meaningful contact with the brute beast, but, however, will not speak as much as 5 minutes to God (the Creator of the chimp in the first place). - cannot produce a single example of a transmutation or transmediary/transitional organism (an organism in the process of evolving into a different organism) as evidence for Evolution. - cannot even produce a single fossil of such a transmutation or transitional, transmediary organism as evidence for Evolution over hundreds of thousands of stages of "evolutionary" development.. - say such silly things as, "Nature rewards survivors with longevity!" (DSTV: NG Wild). In plain English: "Animals that survive will live for a very long time!" (They call this "science"?). - say there is no such thing as Absolute Truth ... except for the absolute truth of Atheism (scientific pantheism). - show the middlefinger to God, the Bible and the Ten Commandments but, when their car gets stolen at the mall, they scream blue murder and run to the nearest police station for an affadavit/sworn statement and a case number for the insurance guys because suddenly it dawned on them that surely stealing is wrong. - say such silly things as, "Humans are primates!" but will show up at a debate dressed up as if they are not primates, but human beings wearing clothes as God intended for them to do. Do the math: If they really were primates, why are they not walking around stark naked? Animals also have rights you know. Why are they rebelling against God but are still dressing up with clothes like obedient and subservient little human, not primate, minions suffering from a brain injury? - believe that all animals are in a state of evolutionary flux (are all still 'evolving') but then they go ahead and classify animals biologically into fixed, permanent little classification boxes? - say that they do not believe in Intelligent Design but marvel about the intelligence of some animals while speaking about 'Natural Selection' all day long ... 'selection' an activity suggesting a 'pre-programmed intelligence' of some kind. P.S. Darwin's distinction between 'Artificial' and 'Natural Selection' is disingenuous and anyway also artificial itself. The Bible teaches that God (as in the person of Jesus Christ affirmed) is the Author of Life, not Evolution. - while others (like Christians and other 'creationists') are pre-occupied with LIFE, are instead pre-occupied with DEATH, hence 'The Death-Cult of Darwinism'. 2. IS EVOLUTION STUPID OR WHAT? Atheists (scientific pantheists) believe 'Evolution' created the world, making one wonder who created Evolution in the first place. Be that as it may, is Evolution stupid or what? Why would it create a world full of people (2 billion+) who do not believe in Evolution, dismiss Evolution as a death-cult and prefer to follow God, the Bible and the Gospel of Jesus Christ instead? How will a "science" (sic) divided against itself ever succeed or survive?

What a incredible shot

Dawkins is awesome. Tyson, not so much.

Needs enhancement to show the tennis ball.

Ron Wyatt's "discovery" of the Ark of the Covenant is a fraud: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3yroIaQp96dj5I

About every single Catholic priest who knows Holy Fire miracle happens every single year (at least it happened so far) ONLY when Eastern Orthodox Church prays but DO NOT tell about it in their churches. All souls (Matthew 18 10-14) that could be helped by exposing the Truth about Holy Fire miracle be asked from those priests and in the Judgement day. Same to anyone who knows but chooses not to mention, afraid that this would prove Orthodoxy as the best path to God.

NDT has little courage. he always takes the position that makes him the most popular with the greatest number of people. Dawkins and Carl Sagan seem to care about that very little.

Уже и вопрос нестоит,Это все Рукотворное а официалы жалкие.

there is a few comedians that really make me laugh. but this BabOon literally makes me laugh so HARD i cannot stop. He is so fkn funny. if i lost my legs and arms and someone played this to me 0:24 id probably laugh

Le genre de marteau géant coincée Lui aussi est artificiel ???? L erosion ptetre !!!!

0:24 lol

I am watching Almagro's career again, especially for his magnificent backhand, in my humble opinion from the aesthetics he was the best after Wavrinka, I like it much more than Gasquet's. He was a tennis player, to say the least, with an unstable personality (the shouting, ... well, I can put up with it), but bad gestures or voices towards the ball boys seems indecent to me. Estoy viendo de nuevo la carrera de Almagro, en especial por su magnífico revés, desde mi humilde criterio desde la estética era después de Wavrinka el mejor, me gusta mucho más que el de Gasquet. Era un tenista cuanto menos de personalidad inestable, (los gritos , ...bueno, lo puedo aguantar), pero malos gestos o voces a los niños recogepelotas me parece indecente.

I would rather know nothing than some random bullshit from a bunch of people who couldn't even understand gravity or sun or the moon

Dam i never relised some people believe religion and god literally ..my father told me stories from ancient indian tales/mythology like krishna , ramayaa and otyers, greek mythology , Egyptians mythology but he told me these are all stories back when i was 7 or 8

Haas should have been penalised at least 3 times for racguet abuse

The great Dawkins❤❤❤❤

My teacher set this video as homework. Well done

Superb🤣🤣🤣👏👏

Richard Dawkins is one of the primary reasons, (the origin of the arguments) that I myself am an Atheist. He didn't convince me, but he did open my eyes to hypocrisy and unsound reasoning.

The "Codex Pray" (around 1190) shows the shroud in every detail - right down to the four burn marks. - The result of the C14 analysis (claimed origin of the linen 1260-1390) is thus wrong from the outset. The scientists at the time therefore had no idea whatsoever about earlier depictions of the shroud. Otherwise they would never have published their obviously wrong result.

Oh dear !! an ENTIRE compilation of the founding father of thought crime being sarcastic! Not enough while just working under the deceptive cloak of New Atheist bigotry where he'll often go OUT OF HIS WAY to critique something that his designs caused. Dawkins THOUGHT CRIMES models are somewhat like when Ted Bundy broke free. New Atheisms THOUGHT CRIME MODEL escaped from its cage where it once lived after laying down the blueprints for what its legal for a christian to THINK & DO by LAW. Now its got out into the general sociological environment its shutting down EVERYONES FREE SPEECH

In Yoga which is the science of the soul God EXIST.. God is a spirit or soul being.. spirit is a point source of conscious energy and God is NOT a Muslim or Christian or Hindu and NEVER wrote the Koran or Bible or Hindu books 🙏

religion has something to do with manipulation of the mind of naive people

In the United Kingdom(Britain), those Earth energies, are discussed at length. Hugh Newman from @MegalithomaniaUK channel is a subject matter expert andhas a great deal of information on that topic as well as many others related topics.

Commentaire très probablement hors sujet mais dont je suis incapable de retirer de ma tête en voyant un coup comme celui-là : be careful what you wish for (ce qui se traduit de nombreuses façons en français et probablement en plusieurs autres langues, incluant l'anglais).

👍

Love it! Thanks for the share 👍

Please upload kohlschreiber vs haas valencia 2013

You know what I think of click bait? Come a little closer Marius....

que joya de video!

The solar system but getting crazyer.

Whether you're an atheist or a theist, you should definitely take a serious listen to Dawkins, as he'll either strengthen your beliefs or cause you to change them.

it has been demonstrated also in badminton that hawkeye sucks! it's just a mafia to adjust some matches, favouring players that should advance! same thing has doping or red cards in football. Betting companies pay off best for this!

Unfortunately, not many aussie players following in leytons' big shoes. drought season downunder. ladies same after barty's phenom win last year. game, set, match.

There are two different languages. There is the language of the atheist and there is the language of Yahweh. There is no communication between the two because the atheist does not want to communicate in the same way that Yahweh wants to communicate. For example, Yahweh says, “Let us reason together, though your sins be as scarlet...” (Isaiah 1:18). The first thing on Yahweh's lists for discussion is your sin. However, for the atheist that topic is the last thing on the list. Also, it's not what you believe in, it's about what you love (Mark 12:33). The atheist's remedy to explain all his theories and to discredit the Genesis story is to add the construct of billions of years. But on the other hand, everything in Genesis is created in its adult form from the beginning. The trees, the animals, mankind are all created in their adult form. That also includes the universe. And an adult universe would and should appear to be billions of years old. Atheist do not understand that consciousness is not a chemical formula which could ever be created in a lab. When we talk about the elements we are talking about our experience of the elements through the miracle of consciousness. I would agree that the churches today are defective. In fact, the Apostle Paul pronounced a curse on most churches today because the main Christian denominations of today preach a different gospel than what Paul preached. To quote exactly what Paul said, “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:8). Both apostle Paul and Peter preached the same gospel and quote from the prophet Joel (2:32) saying, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of Yahweh shall be saved." (Romans 10:13 and Acts 2:21). The English translations say “Lord” instead of “Yahweh.” But “Lord” does not translate “Yahweh” it is a substitution of a totally different word altogether. This substitution activates two additional curses because if you substitute a word you are both adding and subtracting at the same time. “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.” (Revelation 22:18, 19) We are commanded by Messiah that, “...repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.” (Luke 24:47). In other words, we are supposed to preach the gospel that came out of Jerusalem and not preach the gospel that came out of Antioch, or Rome, or England, or New York, or Chicago, etc. By the time the gospel got to Antioch it had already been perverted as we read, “...And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.” (Acts 11:26). The problem with this is that YHWH spoke of a people called by His name (Deuteronomy 28:10; 2 Chronicles 7:14; Isaiah 43:6, 7; Daniel 9:19; Amos 9:12; Acts 15:17). YHWH did not choose the name “Christian” for Himself. The people of Antioch chose that name and all the so called main denominations of today embrace that name “Christian” for themselves. When Peter and Paul preached the gospel they quote the prophet Joel, “Whosoever shall call on the name of YHWH shall be saved.” (Joel 2:32; Acts 2:21; Rom. 10:13). I ask you, how many of the church fathers and so called main denominations of today preach that gospel? None of them. Absolutely none! Paul makes it very clear that the end result of him preaching the gospel was that the people would call on the name YHWH. He says in (Rom. 10:14,15), The preachers are sent. They preach. The people hear. The people believe. The people call on the name YHWH (Rom. 10:13). I ask you, how many of the church fathers and so called main denominations of today preach that gospel? None of them. Absolutely none! It took only one generation after the death of Joshua for the children of Israel to forget the mighty works of YHWH which He had worked through Moses and Joshua and to began to serve the idols of the people around them (Judges 2:7-13). It took only one generation. ...

I think there needs to be understanding on how hawkeye technology determines the ball bounce. It counts the first contact between the ball and the court until the peak contact. In other words, if the fur of the ball touches the court, it counts as first contact. And when the ball is fully compressed, that's where hawkeye will take the peak contact measurement. With this standard, the ball mark cannot be used to determine where the ball had first touched the court as I have seen hawkeye call balls good, which otherwise would've been called long if we were to look at the mark. This is because the fur had touched the line, then made a mark outside of the line. But hawkeye will call it in

GORAN KRALJ NAJBOLJI TENISAC👏🏼👏🏼🌺🌺🌺🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷

Problem is though find the same weaving throughout the entire shroud. If it was just that section then you would have an argument. The difference between the different labs was determined to be different cleaning processes.

I just had someone link this video as evidence for a Jesus era shroud of Turin. Needless to say, I was not impressed.