Openly Secular - Killah Priest
1:53
8 жыл бұрын
Steven Hewett - Openly Secular
3:34
8 жыл бұрын
Richard Stravinsky - Openly Secular
3:31
Peter Wood - Openly Secular
3:00
9 жыл бұрын
Nicole Niebler - Openly Secular
1:26
Miri Mogilevsky - Openly Secular
2:18
Michael Nelson - Openly Secular
2:05
Michael J Berntsen - Openly Secular
2:31
Matthew Kovacs - Openly Secular
3:04
Mary Johnson - Openly Secular
2:29
9 жыл бұрын
Malia Kortright - Openly Secular
1:55
Lyz Liddell - Openly Secular
2:47
9 жыл бұрын
Lauren Hiner - Openly Secular
1:51
9 жыл бұрын
Kelly Lingro - Openly Secular
1:51
9 жыл бұрын
Katrina Halfaker - Openly Secular
2:12
JT Snipes - Openly Secular
2:57
9 жыл бұрын
Jason Bush - Openly Secular
2:09
9 жыл бұрын
Jacob Byers - Openly Secular
1:39
9 жыл бұрын
Hilary Weiss - Openly Secular
3:44
9 жыл бұрын
Graham McCann - Openly Secular
3:13
9 жыл бұрын
Gleb Tsipursky - Openly Secular
4:07
German Beard - Openly Secular
2:51
9 жыл бұрын
Georgina Capetillo - Openly Secular
1:46
Gage Wilkinson - Openly Secular
3:07
Dilpreet Randhawa - Openly Secular
2:48
Deep Mukecrjee - Openly Secular
3:19
Debra Ashby - Openly Secular
2:47
9 жыл бұрын
Darrel Ray - Openly Secular
4:06
9 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@dewittgilmore4353
@dewittgilmore4353 Ай бұрын
Say how you really feel young man!
@nancybreshears6456
@nancybreshears6456 2 ай бұрын
You can be a Christian and not celebrate religion. To me religion is a bunch of rituals. That's where you find people all wrapped up in their religious rituals and not in the Savior. I prefer to believe that Jesus Christ is my Savior without the Hail Marys, etc, but that's just me.
@DB-qw6xq
@DB-qw6xq 2 ай бұрын
I seriously doubt that at 6 years old he was saying to the other children in his Sunday School that 'this doesn't make any sense' (i.e. religion, God etc). For a start, the very first signs of someone reaching a stage where reason begins to become part of a child's intellect is 7 years old, minimum. Also, these atheists seem to all be in denial of the history of atheism, particularly as it is expressed in Communism, Naziism, and North Korea et al. So when people like Lancie state that 'religion' (and there is frequently a deliberate melting of all religions together to give the impression to their listeners that all religions are all the same) manipulates, what he is actually stating is that he thinks that by being atheist his mind is much freer and more enlightened than if he was 'religious'. Of course this is a crazy idea, as a huge amount of people who beleived in God (and specifically in the Catholic Church) were the most important thinkers in history, for example: Newton (discovered the laws of gravity and motion); Roger Bacon ("Grandfather" of the scientific method); Fr. Georges Lemaitre Catholic Priest (The Father of the Big Bang Theory); Nicolaus Copernicus (pointed out that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun); Louis Pasteur (considered the inventor of vaccines). The list is huge, here's a Wikipedia link. This is just the clergy scientists, there were very many lay Catholic scientists too. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Catholic_clergy_scientists#:~:text=These%20churchmen%2Dscientists%20include%20Nicolaus,Christopher%20Clavius%2C%20Nicolas%20Steno%2C%20Athanasius
@randysills4418
@randysills4418 2 ай бұрын
I was a pianist/organist music director for forty years and after finally making it through all that I have decided that I have gone secular...
@markbeshay
@markbeshay 2 ай бұрын
This DID NOT AGE WELL😭😭🤣
@elizabethg0809
@elizabethg0809 3 ай бұрын
I’m not really sure who this dude thinks he is fooling 😂 The face and large hands 😂😂😂😂
@aarons5724
@aarons5724 3 ай бұрын
I have always loved Davidson's more or less wholesome presentation. I am saddened that he somehow lost his way on this topic. I'm a philosophy major--and a preacher's kid. I can tell you that in one religion class, I was exposed to a number of very difficult textual difficulties in the scriptures. Without seeming overly mystic, I can tell you that I went away from the parsonage (where I lived with my parents and siblings) and fasted for three days. I came back more securely Christian than when I left. No, I still couldn't answer all the issues, but I was able to realize that, in time, there would surely be some sort of reconciliation. After all, while my mind couldn't solve some thing, I knew in my heart of hearts the wonderful things I had felt in the presence of the Lord. Now, as I am a couple years from retirement, I finally realized that I don't believe in "inerrancy." That is, I am NOT going to throw away my religion and the great security that it brings me just because someone found an issue I couldn't resolve. BUT I FINALLY FOUND A WAY TO COMBAT ALL THAT. First, the Bible is an invaluable book even if there is not God. It's a book of history, philosophy, ethics, and advice. But what if there are some errors in it--even in the original manuscripts? The Bible tells us that "men were moved on" by God to write. I imagine every preacher would say that there were times when God "moved on them" to preach. But I cannot imagine anyone acting like the ENTIRE sermon was, word-for-word, from the Lord. And yet the MESSAGE was from the Lord. Let me put it the way it works for me.... There are all sorts of difficulties in the scripture. Even the Resurrection accounts cannot be believably reconciled. BUT GUESS WHAT ONE THING THE BIBLE NEVER ONCE HAS THE SLIGHTEST DIFFERENCES ABOUT? Jesus rose from the dead! And if that truly happened--and so far as we know, every last person who said they SAW the resurrected Christ (and thus would be in the position to KNOW the truth) was willing to suffer and die without recanting. You can't get a half dozen people to hold up a lie when there is a little pressure put on them. But about the resurrection--NO ONE BLINKED! And if that is true, WHO CARES ABOUT THE minor and tiny details (none ever damaging doctrine) that one can raise? And if someone cannot see that...then they're not really wanting to see at all.
@ZOltan190D
@ZOltan190D 4 ай бұрын
They have right.Real love,selfless love,self sacrificial love for the benefit of the other and to my detriment became only a mythology and tribal superstition in our days.So they can do what they feel and wish because our world is centered only to ''me''.
@MrMGUIL
@MrMGUIL 4 ай бұрын
This, too is evangelism.
@againstthemodernworld8187
@againstthemodernworld8187 5 ай бұрын
Gay
@sacerdotusTV
@sacerdotusTV 5 ай бұрын
He was afraid to debate us.
@banjoist123
@banjoist123 6 ай бұрын
My mentor with whom I am in 100% agreement. And it can be tricky in bluegrass music, especially in the South where half of what gets played is religious, and many bands play exclusively at churches. I just stay very quiet and hope people respect me as much as I respect them.
@slvrcross
@slvrcross 6 ай бұрын
jew
@rockoplane
@rockoplane 6 ай бұрын
I like this guy!
@bas6628
@bas6628 7 ай бұрын
Wow she's gorgeous. Id marry her
@InstruMentalCase
@InstruMentalCase 7 ай бұрын
Funny seeing this, as I’m a nonbeliever as well and I’ve even met fellow atheists coincidentally through one of Wernick Method’s Bluegrass jam camps here in Texas of all places!
@unitedstates1ish
@unitedstates1ish 8 ай бұрын
Do you think your life, your talent, your good looks, your success your fame your wealth came from nothing? Perhaps when you are taking your last few breaths on earth you will realize your mistakes. It’s never too late.
@hopelessnerd6677
@hopelessnerd6677 9 ай бұрын
Thanks, KZbin algorithm! JD is the twin I never knew I had! He's exactly right. Religion is based on fear and guilt. Guilt at being born defective, and the fear that if you don't buy into the religion, you're going to suffer for eternity.
@silasshaw5182
@silasshaw5182 9 ай бұрын
Christianity does not reconcile to earthly truths and those who are very bright and talented are inclined to have more difficulty accepting its tenants. I’ve been where Pete is but went on to become a believer and disciple of Jesus Christ. For me, nothing else compares to following a higher authority that is above all nature. I see the world through a different lens and it’s the best thing that’s ever happened to me.
@rclark565
@rclark565 10 ай бұрын
I realize I'm commenting on this video 8 years after it was posted, but FWIW, thank you for this Pete. I'm also secular and a banjo player - it's so good to know there are more of us out there.
@The_Wizard_Owlin_Celestial
@The_Wizard_Owlin_Celestial 10 ай бұрын
I went from Christian to Scientologist to Atheist its been a great journey to non belief
@loreli6052
@loreli6052 11 ай бұрын
I love this!
@kincamell2
@kincamell2 11 ай бұрын
Gratitude
@coolmagicmagic4018
@coolmagicmagic4018 11 ай бұрын
Thank you Michael! I use several of your effects to illustrate the Gospel (Good News).
@onefoot7
@onefoot7 11 ай бұрын
I'm not an atheist, but I find this video very refreshing and awesome, especially compared to fakee Christian BS all the time, very refreshing , thank you
@SonzOfEnoch
@SonzOfEnoch Жыл бұрын
Killah Priest is a Freemason just like Gza' Gza is also a Freemason' Liquid Swords album cover has freemasonic symbols all on the cover' is part of the occult in the video 7 Crowns of God you can clearly see Priest promoting Freemasonry covering half his face and showing only 1 eye of lucifer all seeing eye in his video very clearly' he promotes Chakras and Yoga in a lot of his rhymes and ancient egyptian mythology which is Pagan demonic belief system in the New Age' Priest defo is promoting New Age religion.... Anyone who denies Yeshua Hamashiach as Lord and Saviour Denies his Crucifixion to be raised on the 3rd day will perish in death and will be in the Lake of Fire for all Eternity' but those who Believeth in him and follow him in faith shall have everlasting life. Romans 10:9-10 True Nazareens we do not follow or refer to ourselves anything to do with religion' Jesus Christ Yeshua The Messiah is God the Son and every knee and head shall bow before Christ' we are people of Faith not Religion. I used to be a Wu Tang hardcore fan' don't get it twisted Wu Tang do not promote Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour neither do they beleive' Black Consciousness 5% Nation of Islam is from Satan to deceive the black community to be worshipped as being gods' this is Satanic and goes against the Old or New Testament' Al Lah meaning The God is a Pagan Deity of Hubal the Moon Goddess that was worshipped in Petra and Mecca pre Islam not The God of Abraham Isaac and Moses not the same god as Yahuwah. Rza and Method Man are in the Occult and Baphomet Worshipers in the industry again Freemasonic for money and fame to stay relevant in the Industry you gotta pay homages to the Hermaphrodite GOAT. you can clearly see Rza covering his right Eye (Freemasonic Symbolism) and Method man throwing the upside down Pyramid hand signals in his photo shoot poses at the awards.
@josephthomasmusic
@josephthomasmusic Жыл бұрын
There are a lot of false assumptions behind this trick. The first assumption is that committee decided on the council of Christ. This is obviously not true because the scriptures themselves actually show Jesus claiming to be a deity and not denying this when the Pharisees tried to Stone him for blasphemy. So the document itself is already claiming Jesus's Divinity before the council of nicea came to a consensus of what the text was saying. So that's the first argument proves that the council of nicea discovered the claims of divinity made by Jesus not that they came to determine his divinity. The other assumption is when the people asked if he had any evidence to prove that he was the Messiah, Michael says no, but this is clearly in contradiction to what the scripture say. When Jesus clearly performed the miracles in front of the people that was evidence to them that he was the Messiah and he was claiming the same titles that are only given to God himself. The second assumption is in the following two questions where the people ask the if he can promise that the next two things will not happen. On what grounds does that make the view that Christianity is false simply because people abuse it? That would be like me saying that atheism is false because of the mass murders committed by Pol pot, Mao Ze Tung, and Stalin prove that atheism false. The immediate return of the atheist is that they didn't kill in the name of atheism. So what? You're still saying that because of the actions of people necessitates that the truth of that religion should be put to question. If anything it only proves that the claims of that religion are true because people are acting in accordance with their sinful and will still try to distort the message for their own purposes regardless. So the assumptions that Michael is using in his card trick are based usually on ignorance and subjective bias.
@starofjustice1
@starofjustice1 7 ай бұрын
The false assumption is that you took this way too literally. Honestly. Mistaking a card trick for a history lesson! It's a quick and dirty analysis of why Christianity is so hecked up. Why people accept the claims of religion based on warm feelings and wanting to be part of a special group. Whether it's valid or not. All the horrible things that people let religious leaders get away with, because he says the right things to make it sound like he's doing God's will. Even if he's contradicting the bible. People cherry picking the parts of God's book they like, and ignoring the parts that are inconvenient for them. But you missed it because you could only focus on a card trick not being 100% historically accurate. Which is hella ironic, because all the problems with Christianity he brings up *are* historically accurate. But the believers ignore them, because they're afraid of being ostracized from the group. Which is exactly the point he's making by everyone in the story just going along with it.
@josephthomasmusic
@josephthomasmusic 7 ай бұрын
@@starofjustice1 Pretty ironic because if I did the atheist card trick only make the "Messiah" in the trick an atheist, saying "Become an atheist" and the people asked "Can you provide proof that God does not exist?" "Can you guarantee that you guys are more moral than religious people?" "Can you guarantee that we won't be looked down upon in society?" And the atheist Messiah said no to all three questions, you would be hating on the trick for the exact same reasons that I'm raising. Also you're completely misrepresenting my point. My point is not that the trick is bad because of the plot within the patter itself. I'm addressing the assumptions, not the trick behind the assumptions. So my whole post is about beliefs not about tricks. The fact remains that every worldview including atheism has been used to justify violence and mass murders. So if you want to talk about historical accuracy then let's talk about real historical accuracy which is that even atheists like yourself are perfectly capable and using anything to justify violence in the name of darwinian evolution. Also I find your comment that Christians are cherry-picking what they want to leave out of the scriptures and what they want to keep it in the scriptures laughable because that has nothing to do with whether or not Christianity is true as opposed to atheism. And by atheism I'm defining it as the belief that God does not exist, which is the classical definition. If you're going to tell me that atheism is not a worldview because it is a lack of belief in God, that would just be going into semantics. Behind every trick there is a message that the performer is intentionally trying to convey is that there are certain things about religion and Christianity in general that you should reject. As a performer if I go out and I tell people to change the world one smile at a time, I'm doing so with the intention to make them consider that bring smiles to people's face makes all the difference in one day. So let's not pretend that the pattern was designed to convey the specific message that Michael intended to portray in his performance. Besides the very fact that you're even responding to me shows the extreme lengths that some skeptics will go to just to justify any amount of mocking towards Christianity and religion at the cost of sacrificing what the actual facts areso if you want to convey a message about an opposing viewpoint, that's totally fine, but represented correctly and not just from your own lens. Intent is always prior to content. Always remember that.
@starofjustice1
@starofjustice1 7 ай бұрын
@@josephthomasmusic >>Pretty ironic because if I did the atheist card trick only make the "Messiah" in the trick an atheist, saying "Become an atheist" and the people asked "Can you provide proof that God does not exist?" "Can you guarantee that you guys are more moral than religious people?" "Can you guarantee that we won't be looked down upon in society?"<< Exactly my point. It's just a dumb card trick. The mechanics are proof of nothing. Do you have any idea how many variations of Sam the Bellhop there are? Using similar premises and inclusions but telling slightly different stories. It's easy to manipulate the mechanics and presentation of something like that, and it has no deeper meaning. >>And the atheist Messiah said no to all three questions, you would be hating on the trick for the exact same reasons that I'm raising.<< I don't love this trick. But I do stand against ignorance parading as wisdom, which often comes from religion. A topic mentioned in the video. >>Also you're completely misrepresenting my point. My point is not that the trick is bad because of the plot within the patter itself.<< The point was NEVER about the trick. Who's misrepresenting, again? >>So if you want to talk about historical accuracy then let's talk about real historical accuracy which is that even atheists like yourself are perfectly capable and using anything to justify violence in the name of darwinian evolution.<< You are assuming what I am. You are also further assuming that I excuse violence, because you seem to think all atheists have beliefs rooted in darwinism. That is false. Even I know atheism is not a belief structure or organized group, although the religious like to portray it as such. >>Also I find your comment that Christians are cherry-picking what they want to leave out of the scriptures and what they want to keep it in the scriptures laughable because that has nothing to do with whether or not Christianity is true as opposed to atheism.<< You assume that's what I am again. Besides, it certainly does muddy the waters, as I'll go into a bit below. >>Besides the very fact that you're even responding to me shows the extreme lengths that some skeptics will go to just to justify any amount of mocking towards Christianity and religion at the cost of sacrificing what the actual facts<< Telling you how you're mistaken is not extreme lengths. I didn't even do anything like curse at you. And that there are Christians who do things like abuse their positions of authority and cherry pick the scriptures (let alone the flock turning a blind eye because they're afraid of endangering their own position) is not a matter of opinion. Those ARE facts, and the truth is being preserved by pointing it out, not sacrificed. If our mistakes go unaddressed they'll just keep happening. >>areso if you want to convey a message about an opposing viewpoint, that's totally fine, but represented correctly and not just from your own lens. << Look man, turn that mirror around for a minute. No matter what I believe, I'm not the one claiming to speak with the wisdom of an ultimate being as my basis. Problem is, even the Christians can't agree on what they believe, which is why Christianity is the most fractured thing in human history (because of things like letting church authority get away with abuse of their positions, cherry picking and misrepresenting the scriptures, as raised previously). How about before you start talking about real truth untainted by subjectivity, you guys clean up your own mess. >>Intent is always prior to content. Always remember that.<< Indeed. Like catchphrases to make things sound profound, when they are not. I am not a child. I am not lulled by buzzwords and aphorisms. Have a good week, and remember while it's good to question, it's always best to question yourself. 😃
@josephthomasmusic
@josephthomasmusic 7 ай бұрын
@@starofjustice1 "It's just a dumb card trick. The mechanics are proof of nothing." - Hahaha that's exactly MY point. My point was NEVER about the trick. You're insisting that my point IS about the trick, so yes, you are misrepresenting my point. "But I do stand against ignorance parading as wisdom, which often comes from religion. A topic mentioned in the video." - Again that's ironic because SKEPTICS or CRITICS of religion can be just an ignorant. You seem to be inferring that "ignorance parading as wisdom" is most common in religion and inferring that skeptics/atheists cannot be ignorant. But that begs the question, "ignorance of what"? What are religious people ignorant of? "The point was NEVER about the trick. Who's misrepresenting, again?" - Hahaha you still are because my point was NEVER about the trick. It's about the message that the trick is being used to convey. Do you seriously have a problem with me criticizing the message? Yes there are facts about Christianity's abuse, but there are also facts that are true for the atheist camp, but somehow its not okay to point that out, and you ignoring that fact is proving my point. "You are assuming what I am." - That, you are, correct on. I assumed that you were an atheist, because most of the time it's only ATHEISTS who comment in response. So if you not an atheist, then I apologize. But that does NOT in the least bit take away from my original point, which is that the message is what needs to be scrutinized, not the trick. You're fine with scrutinizing religion but apparently not okay with me scrutinizing your criticism of religion in return, which is the point that I was making from the beginning. IF I turned the mirror back on the atheist, all of the sudden that's not fair. It's a double standard. "You are also further assuming that I excuse violence, because you seem to think all atheists have beliefs rooted in darwinism. That is false. Even I know atheism is not a belief structure or organized group, although the religious like to portray it as such." - I said, "atheists... are perfectly CAPABLE of using anything to justify violence in the name of darwinian evolution." That's exactly what Stalin did, what Pol Pot did, what Mao Ze Tung did. All atheists. Do you deny that atheists are capable of justifying violence also. For some reason, skeptics ALSO get offended by this fact as well, not just Christians over things like the Inquisition. Come on dude. Let's be reasonable here. "Telling you how you're mistaken is not extreme lengths." - Ignoring counteracts and misrepresenting my point IS extreme lengths, bud. The fact of the matter is that Michael closes two questions of what the "Messiah" should guarantee will "not happen" assumes that the truth of Christianity should be reject on its abuse. But by that logic, atheism should be rejected on the same grounds of Stalin's abuse of power. My point is that theoretically, when you examine the claims of Christianity, if Christians commit evil, it is a VIOLATION of the moral law giver's code. If atheists commit evil, it is a LOGICAL outworking of whatever they believe IN PLACE of the moral law giver, and that's a huge difference. So if you want to talk about facts in terms of Christians' abuse, then be fair and talk about atheists' abuse too. But even then it is still irrelevant to whether or not atheism is true or Christianity is true. "No matter what I believe, I'm not the one claiming to speak with the wisdom of an ultimate being as my basis." - Doesn't matter. When you say religion can exude ignorance pretending to be wisdom, that assumes that 1) skepticism/atheism doesn't do the same thing in practice 2) religion is ignorant of what the skeptic views to be realistic, which begs the questions as to what the skeptic believes is reality. That is a claim which ALSO requires the burden of proof. When you define atheism as a lack of belief, you are doing so to avoid taking the responsibility of the burden of proof whenever you make claims about religion. I'm using the word "you" in generic terms. Yes religion makes claims that require the same onus, but to say that atheists who make claims are not required to back up their claims because they don't have a belief, but rather "lack a belief" is just intellectually dishonest. EVERYONE has burden of proof, but for some reason, atheists believe they are magically exempt from it WHENEVER they make claims. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" is a slogan based on SUBJECTIVE opinions on what type of evidence is required. It is NOT an objective standard of evidence. So that statement is subject to giving extraordinary evidence for itself because it too is an extraordinary claim. So it's self-defeating. "Problem is, even the Christians can't agree on what they believe, which is why Christianity is the most fractured thing in human history" - That's an example of a claim that requires the burden of proof. Since when does denominational disagreement have any bearing on whether or not Christianity is true. Again I could just as easily say the same thing about atheists, but that would still not determine whether or not the claim "God does not exist" is true. It's a moot point. Christians hate when other Christians act our violence, yet they still remain Christians because hypocrisy does not make the belief system false. All it does is prove that Christians acting out violence are wrong according the standards of Christianity. So your point and Michael's point does nothing to justify skepticism of Christianity as a whole, only Christian hypocrisy, of which I am in the same boat. So why should I become an atheist? That's the point. The message is conveying an imperative to look at religion from the lens of a skeptic, but that would require ignoring additional counteracts and turning the mirror back on itself as you rightfully point out. So again you're not disproving my point. You're only proving it.
@raynekraven
@raynekraven Жыл бұрын
maybe it is because of language barrier, but I am a bit lost as to what is secularism?
@zhess4096
@zhess4096 11 ай бұрын
laïcité
@angelagarcia2468
@angelagarcia2468 Жыл бұрын
Prayers for this person.
@tryscience
@tryscience Жыл бұрын
You make this look, goooood :) seriously, right there with you. My folks, it was the same. And I had to go through Sunday school, masses, etc.... personally, I would have rather learned Calculus.
@OyarsuofMars
@OyarsuofMars Жыл бұрын
He should have picked up books by CS Lewis, John Sanford, Josh McDowell, but instead he read books by people who told him what he wanted to hear.
@tryscience
@tryscience Жыл бұрын
John, you were so fortunate not to be forced to follow religion. If someone tries to preach to you, tell them you're pretty sure there are such peoples as Aboriginals, Eskimos, Africans, Native Americans, and Asians.... *So much for Noah's Ark, where the only humans in all of the Earth to survive, were Noah and his family.*
@natashka8880
@natashka8880 Жыл бұрын
Terrific message. Thank you for sharing. I hope this inspired others!
@benjaminewering5329
@benjaminewering5329 Жыл бұрын
Such an awesome voice and excellent way of pronunciation
@bas919
@bas919 Жыл бұрын
I'm deeply honored for being recruited to HAPI directly by her. Respect.
@ffrtheted7671
@ffrtheted7671 Жыл бұрын
If only people were as intelligent as this lovely human being ❤
@goofoffbert
@goofoffbert Жыл бұрын
Pete - you're even more awesome than I thought! Thank you for sharing. I'm a U.S. Veteran and I'm Openly Secular.
@richardhedd3080
@richardhedd3080 Жыл бұрын
A religion that wants to kill anyone who leaves it is a human tragedy.
@ltcolumbo9708
@ltcolumbo9708 Жыл бұрын
Well done...lol. Message approval noted
@lynnmckenna9934
@lynnmckenna9934 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this!
@nancychristian7487
@nancychristian7487 Жыл бұрын
I have always admired you, but n I w you have a supportive friend for all time. You expressed my feelings exactly.. thanks again so much. You restore my faith in mankind...thank you❤
@The_Wizard_Owlin_Celestial
@The_Wizard_Owlin_Celestial Жыл бұрын
I have a picture of me with these 2
@robertlee8042
@robertlee8042 Жыл бұрын
Totally with you. Deists think less of themselves than atheists. Any goodness in a man rests with that man. Any evil, likewise. We are responsible. Not some imagined overlord.
@theflyingcandleguyme6144
@theflyingcandleguyme6144 Жыл бұрын
My belief in God comes from personal experience. Religion is more of a language and a culture to me. I appreciate his honesty and to my knowledge the creator of this universe appreciates him as well. The beautiful thing about reality is that it is what it is and the humble and open minded are most likely to achieve their full potential as a being. God did not put us here to close our minds in fear or submission. His put us here to learn and to understand. I find more humility and desire to know the truth in this man than in most of my religious peers combined and I believe when he learns of God it he will actually be humble before god. He doesn’t need someone’s church to do this. True followers of decency tend to not shout it from the roof tops as they practice whatever faith they have more effectively thru their attitudes and example. Christ said it is by their fruits ye shall know them and Q is truly a masterpiece of a presentation.
@Eric.E.
@Eric.E. Жыл бұрын
Do this with a Mental Photography deck to add an extra layer of metaphor at the end.
@eliasgarcia8157
@eliasgarcia8157 Жыл бұрын
He said the word “wrong” a lot. Wrong by what moral standard?
@PepperEnt.
@PepperEnt. Жыл бұрын
3:43 💯
@PepperEnt.
@PepperEnt. Жыл бұрын
0:57 ✅
@PepperEnt.
@PepperEnt. Жыл бұрын
Amen Lol
@michaelderenne9838
@michaelderenne9838 Жыл бұрын
Good on him for not believing in religion the biggest scam in history