Tesla described Einstein's relativity work as "a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors". Gravitational lensing is simply refraction. Gravity is a Reactionary force. The resistance of the mass to being accelerated by an external force. Motion is absolute. Nothing can travel faster than light. Motion is absolute (bounded) to the frame of reference. Light travels in its own frame of reference. Space and Time are separate frames of reference. There is no Relativity. No time-dilation. No gravitational lensing. No mass attraction. Mass is not an actionable force. Newton's laws of Motion. F=ma. Force comes from Acceleration of the mass. Not the mass itself. E=mc. Acceleration defines/creates mass. Mass does not create acceleration. Congratulations. Those of you looking for a god to worship have picked the worst god possible. You are not going to find the fountain of youth or eternal life in Einstein’s relativity nonsense. Not a single experiment has validated Einstein's relativity nonsense. Not a single experiment. In fact, many have disproved. The bowling ball and feathers in a vacuum chamber. An increase in mass did not result in an increase in acceleration. Mass is not an actionable force. The Hafel-Keating synchronized clock experiments. Both clocks used the same amount of energy. Where is the time-dilation if they both had the same amount of runtime on the battery? Where are the biometrics showing decreased heart rates? Nasa's flight log data shows accelerated heart rates during lift-off. Accelerated. Not decelerated. Proving that motion is absolute (bounded) to the frame of reference. Galileo-> the tides are the result of the Earth's motion in space. Not some unquantifiable force emanating from the moon. How can a celestial object with 1/4th the size of the earth have more gravitational pull than the earth? JWST imaged a solar system with a bulge on the opposite side of the Jupiter size planet. Once again, how can the miniscule gravity of a planet .1% the mass of the parent star gravitationally affect the star? E=mc where mass is a form of energy and c is absolute acceleration of the mass. The point at which energy is transformed into another form of matter. E=mc then becomes E=a, or Everything comes from Acceleration. Not Mass. Acceleration. The Equivalence Principle. Acceleration creates gravity. Newton's laws of motion. Action and Reaction. Acceleration creates gravity. A Reactionary force. You've wasted your time on this video. Einstein was a fraud. Said motion was absolute and then claimed it to be relative. Said gravity came from Acceleration then backflipped and said mass warps space. What are the properties of space? Space has no properties becsuse its not a physical entity. Mass is just stored energy. How can it warp something that doesn't exist. The only reason you have idiots like Einstein running around claiming everything is relative is because of the alternative. E=mc. Acceleration defines mass. What defines Acceleration. F=ma. Acceleration creates force. What creates Acceleration. The Bible invokes the hand of god. Giordano Bruno theorized an infinite universe with no cosmological center. As Carl Sagan would say, Both possibilities are equally frightening to a physisist. How do you get something from nothing. How can the universe have always existed. Newton saw where F=ma was going. What creates Acceleration. And buried his head in the sand and let the flat earthers interpretation of the observation prevail. There is no evidence for gravitational attraction. There is no evidence for relativity. There is, in fact, plenty of evidence to the contrary.

Bro that was awesome

I see no proof at 4:40: the fact that the three triangles are congruent doesn't evidently imply them to be the result of multiplying each square by the same number.

I’ve seen hundreds of videos about Einstein and relativity. This is top 3 for me. Glad I found it

I mean if he purposely disseminated wrong information as a practical joke then its not a surprise a lot of his math got lost or forgotten.

excellent video... explanation... personal anecdotes making it seem I was there... well done!

Great music in the foreground.

Of Course the best mathematician will be the Chinese

Ai video 😢

2:50 I am out for now. GL HF

What is the point of using 17th century English in the translation? It's not contemporary with the source, and doesn't help explain it.

Sorry but your historical accuracy and reliability is disastrous. You’re spreading lies after lies in a sea of bullshit. You should be a shame. Everyone of you claim is false. Let’s start by the end when you claim that Einstein « verified » « his GR equations » in Mercury perihelion anomaly. This is blatant bullshit since Schwarzschild himself, before publishing his two master piece papers, immediately wrote a personal letter to Einstein in November, to politely inform him that Einstein approximate calculation was circular and mathematically false, but that he, Schwarzschild, had nevertheless found an exact solution. So Einstein didn’t « verify » anything, to start with. And so Einstein actually didn’t ever do anything with « his » GR equations. Imagine Maxwell pretending to have discovered EM equations, but being incapable to solve them, nor to predict or verify anything with them… how absurd is that! Thirdly Einstein didn’t discover « his » GR equations. Grossman did in 1912 by simply writing down the Euler-Lagrange equations for a riemannian Lagrangian. Einstein rejected them radically following his mesmerizing inner fairy tails. Which broke their partnership since Grossman understood that Einstein didn’t even understand what covariant actually means. And indeed Einstein was totally lost afterwards publishing randomly false ideas after false ideas, until he met Hilbert in 1915, and realise that Hilbert had discovered by his own and by the same method, the same correct GR equations that Grossman did three years earlier. And you’re saying bullshit again in claiming that Hilbert equations « were not exactly… ». Blatant lye. What is your evidence. Because on the contrary there is a well know scandal about Hilbert article having been caviarded on the precise page and passage where his GR equations were written. But there is no doubt that his equations are GR ones since he derives them by the same method and premises as Grossman did. It takes a few lines for a good student to perform the easy calculation. Not to speak of skilled mathematicians as Grossman and Hilbert. On the contrary all that was a total out of reach mystery for Einstein who was extremely ignorant in Mathematics. It took him 10 years not to master a fundamental tool that was perfectly mastered by Poincaré, Planck, Grossman, Hilbert. But there is more of your bullshit when you claim Minkowski invented « space time » blabla. Shear nonsense. All Poincaré articles on Relativity, from 1895 to 1905 express explicitly all the relativistic quadratic invariants, not only space-time ones but also the EM ones. And when Poincaré corrected immediately Lorentz 1895 original incorrect space-time transformations, he proved them rigourously based on group theory. Which is the Poincaré group that summarize the entire theory of Relativity. At that time Einstein was failing his bachelor. And Poincaré achieving the theory of Relativity. Starting in 1985 when he realized that « aether » concept plays no actual role in Hertz theory of EM, and that it was thus essentially obsolete. Than in 1885-1890 when he discovered the revolutionary two ways clock’s synchronization algorithm that is the physical core of Relativity. Then in 1895 when he exposes the correct space-time transformations, and with it the hyperbolic space-time quadratic invariant. Before officially upgrading in 1900 the old Galilean mechanical principle of relativity, to a universal principle, governing all physics, and explaining the failure of MM experiments to all orders. Poincaré also established in 1900 in an article for Lorentz Nobel prince jubilee, the existence of inertia for light and EM, and its consequence : the famous formula E=mc^2. And so, not only Poincaré did all the job, with some help from Lorentz, to established the theory of Relativity, which was essentially achieved in 1900, but applies such achieved theory, the 5 june 1905, in front of the Paris Academy, to gravitation, and predicting gravitational waves propagating at the speed of light. So please stop repeating like a blind perrot all the bullshit propaganda others perrots have spread before you. Be a minimum serious and with accurate historical facts. Wiki is also full of bullshit. One has to read the original articles. Especially Poincaré ones from 1885 to 1906, which shows that he has been during 20 years, the actually discoverer and builder of the theory of Relativity, with some help from Lorentz.

This was the password game before the password game

21:17, but all possible directions are straight lines. This makes it so confusing for the ant.

Mary had a little lamb, whose fleece was white as snow, and every where that Mary went, that lamb was sure to be equal to 1/5 + 1/7 of the dappled lamb plus the yellow lamb.

I did not understand a single word of this.

HOW DOES THIS GUY HAVE ONLY 13K SUBS????? I EXPECTED AT LEAST 300K..... CRIMINALLY UNDERRATED

Sicily was by all accounts considerably more verdant in the 3rd century BC than at present; even so, I don’t think the island’s pastureland would be nearly enough to sustain that kind of bull...🐂🐄

These Greeks were (are) 🤪...

Imagine Archimedes watching this video. He'd he proud of your explanation and humanity for finally finding it's solution

white people be bored fr 😭 type of people who know alotta things but who dont know what to do

I FEEL so much how Archimedes must have felt. I LOVE playing around with numbers just for fun ^-^ Not even sarcastically. Theres something so satisfieing in having loads of numbers, and finding relations and new numbers. Its a lot of fun.

None of the math is particularly hard. Its just a lot of work. Like... A LOT of work. But with today's math, the method is actually quite easy. And I wouldnt be suprised if people like Archimedes used similar math to ours.

Beautiful video

Thanks

Why are they emaciated?

Imagine possessing the intellectual power to craft a message so intricately encrypted that it can't be unlocked for 2,000 years. A message so ahead of its time that only future civilizations, armed with technological advancements unimaginable today, could finally decode its secrets. The sheer audacity of it: knowing that your words, your thoughts, your vision will remain locked in a digital vault, untouched by the passing centuries. The people of your time won’t understand it. They can't. It's not meant for them. It’s a conversation with the future-a legacy preserved not in stone, but in cryptography, safeguarded against the erosion of time. What would you say, knowing that it won’t be heard until 4024? Would it be a warning? A manifesto? Perhaps the answer to a question we haven’t even thought to ask yet. Whatever it is, the real brilliance lies in the act itself-creating something that transcends the bounds of time, ensuring your voice echoes across millennia, just waiting for the right minds to finally listen.

Forget cow level Archimedes figured a cow multiverse.

That’s a lot of milk

I think they are high

Getting ready to start my phy 405 hw this just motivated tf out of me thank you

And I thought my Math teachers were 'terrors' for their Math problems.

I always struggled with math in high school but at 23 watching this video this made perfect sense to me?

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWPdmGV8fL1nmaM Is anyone else confused by the fact that this part of the video implies that Newton's equations predicted light would bend in the presence of massive objects? I thought there was no such inference from Newton's work. Can anyone help me with this?

Me gusyan las vacas, ¡Son muy monas!

who needs so many cattle?

imagine Archemedies ghost appears to tell you you're wrong

sounds like a real cowtastrophe…

Archimedes did all that just to be stabbed to death by a legionary, and all those works put together in Alexandra just to be burned by Caesar.

ummm, I think you are missing a crucial point here, the place of this herd, it is in sicily, if the numbers are too large, it will be illogical to contain them all in sicily, so it is better to calculate the area of the island, and the area the that a cow/bull occupies, you get the rest i believe. in this you will need to consider few more variables, like the varying size/area of a cow and a bull or a baby cow, also considering all the ratios that you got and applying it to the different areas those cattle take up, the actual area of the island, since there are trees, houses, .. that would be illogical to not estimate and deduct it from the area. maybe Archamedes just wanted to know how his fellow mathematician thinks, more logically or more numbery/pure math.

Archi needed to get out more. sheeesh.

Those AI cows are the stuff of nightmares

Question is did Archimedes solve his own problem or not?

In before his solution is just “there are no cattle”

Certainly, this problem got milked for ages.

I didn't understand the math in this video (this was recommended to me, i'm very weak with mathematical stuff) but this was very interesting nonetheless!

1:00 I bet you have never thought why the area is side times side.

1:47 Is there a specific name for this?

Would be funny if the answer was 0

no he badly repeated something vedic but poorly like all of the western knoledge before christianity and islam destroyed civilization replacing it with a hell and a marketplace hell.