In HW I think I remember one of the death messages being nothing was ever proven in court, which may be evidence to prove that this is what the retcon is

is that the guy from your turn to die

13:38 this whole time i thought the guy sitting on the chair was phone guy

Purple only when using the working uniform. Yellow outside of work

What is The Week Before??

yttd OST mentioned. Based.

Jeremy Fitzgerald is the scout from TF2

Dude I absolutely love how you put subtitles in your videos. I greatly appreciate the effort keep it up ☺️

I just wanna say, I like the video, but I swear the golden Freddy 1987 jumpscare was added cuz people made rumours about entering 1987 and scott wanted to fuck with people, maybe I'm just misremembering it, I'm not even a fnaf fan anymore, I just really like the first game, nice video btw, I relaly enjoyed it :)

I never understood what Cassidy had to be the vengeful spirit, besides the spirit using masculine pronouns.

i personally think Brussel's FNAF timeline is the closest to Scott's intended story. id recommend giving it a watch and showing him some support

I miss when fnaf was about mysteries and the community solving things. Now it’s about pizza plexes and Remnant😐

I think yes. While some questions have been raised at the identity of Golden Freddy, I think it’s generally been resolved. And with the release of the book about Phone Guy, all the questions raised in FNAF 1 have been answered, for now.

I think the bite of 87 was originally fredbear but when Scott expanded the story he changed it from 87 to 83 and the bite of 87 was the mangle bite

I think that William put the blame on someone and got away or he actually got to prison and escaped by causing riot and probably have connections with the mob.

FNAF 1-3 was when I was invested in the lore when 4 was released I started to be indifferent about it and didn't care about anything past SL I like the simple and dark story of a deranged serial killer accidentally bringing his victims back to "life" by hiding their bodies in animatronics and the story concluding with their spirits being set free after they end up killing him with Springbonnie suit none of that "I build a circus with robots to kill children", "I always come back", and Burntrap bullcrap

Mike Schmidt got fired twice for odor. Like bro take a damn bath man 😭

garageband loop ahh background music

I was always confused by people genuinely believing Vlad since I thought it was so obvious he was lying. Guess people really are way too quick to take things at not even face value

This is so random but the beat drop at 15:57 made me dance a bit

I think people think too much about the "wound first inflicted on me" line. William killed some kids. Out of all the kids he killed the first one was Charlie - Henry's daughter. The wound first inflicted on him. Other "wounds" are the victims of the MCI. The death of the crying child is an accident and has very little to do with Henry imo

I absolutely love this channel. I don't agree with everything but i love your energy!

TLDR: I think there's more evidence for this theory than what's presented in the vid but ultimately disagree. Occam's razor, dig? Eh. I like the presentation but I think I disagree with the conclusion. I feel like some more relevant evidence would be how William is still kicking in security breach. I'd have bought that UCN was basically the nightmares Michael had everytime he tried to sleep, he probably feels very guilty for being related to the big bad serial killer and if we believe that fnaf 4 is also his nightmare (not a common theory but eh) they'd be precedent for gameplay of his nightmares. What would the greatest nightmare of a serial killers son with a guilty conscience and blood on his hands be? Becoming his father. Also, have you ever had one of those dreams where you go to work and do a shift? Fuck, if my job were as terrifying as Michael's (not to mention a job you'd need to have full attention at lest ye die) I'd have nightmares about it too. He very literally knows ALL of these animatronics via hands on experience. It's kinda like the story about how Scott had a nightmare about Bonnie when he was developing fnaf 1. The old man consequences audio where everyone thinks it's William shouting Michael would make sense if these were Michael's nightmares. Him telling Michael to drop the quest to find his father because it's clearly causing him distress would make sense. And when Michael goes into the pond, when he "goes deeper" like he's been doing, he gets punished. The final cutscene if golden freddy twitching and shit would make sense if it's fred bear, aka the brother Michael accidentally killed literally haunting his dreams. I think thus theory is still more of a stretch than William taking a sabbatical in hell before returning in security breach, but I think it's less of a stretch than the one in the vid.

So I don't hate this theory but I take issue with the mound. Here's where I thought you were going and what I think would be more likely. -William is out of his suit when he kills her in a panic. I agree with the rain logic, makes perfect sense. -The rain makes the suit inoperable. No one can fit inside it as the springs have sprung. How does he get the suit away from the crime scene? -William always hides his victims in suits. Obviously he's not hiding the kid in HIS suit for a number of reasons, but I think it's unlikely this serial killer breaks his habit. My conclusion is he drags away his spring Bonnie suit and buries it to collect it later. He can't get in it to move it away, so essentially according to this theory it would be stuck at the crime scene unless he drags it away. So according to this he buried his victim AND must take his inoperable suit away? I think it's more likely the serial killer buried his murder disguise and collected it later. That feels like something a serial killer would actually do, y'know?

4:02 Yes we do. The Fourth Closet confirms her death year. 1983.

Scott cawthon is like that one asshole english teacher that has you look into every single detail about everything and makes you do a research paper

Why are you unsatisfied with it you were wrong the entire time afton isn’t literally purple he’s yellow any time he’s show as spring Bonnie it makes more sense being afton the whole time in all of the serious because it’s not about another family it’s not about Henry it makes no sense to be any other person then afton and it was just confirmed by the creator yet you just wanna be right

I don’t understand how you completely gloss over the fact Micheal is sitting in front of the tv when afton returns home

Clearly this is at another point in time because it’s confirmed it’s afton it can’t be Michael because he’s literally sitting at the tv telling him to go easy on his brother who ran away i completely disagree with your whole theory so far half way through the video

Why would he change the name of the car? It’s clear it’s been him for a long time since the original showing of Charlie just people didn’t want to believe it was afton it’s honestly no offense to you kinda dumb to hope for Scott cawthon to change his own details of his story if you were thinking midnight motorist wasn’t afton makes that part of whatever theory’s you have wrong

Why does everybody think Henry wasn't involved with the murdering?

The easiest FNAF lore was the one Scrimpus McGrimpus adapted in his analog horror tapes. It’s possibly the easiest and most “accurate” and linear form of the FNAF storytelling we could have

why is the top of william aftons head a different shade of purple in the into the pit minigame its so unnecessary and distracting

garageband ass music

The Week Before is the first book to mention the Fnaf 2 location

I'd say the wording of NG+ is important. It isn't a continuation, it's a "new adventure." This NG+ supposes Ralph always had a phone on him. Bronwen probably doesn't exist, and the FNAF 1 animatronics may still have been restless, but never tried to escape Freddy's. You could also argue that the streamlined path that the phone gives is the actual canon path. You'd actually lose out on a lot of items and interactions, but it forces you into a pretty linear path that makes it easier to say, "this is officially what happened to Ralph in canon."

Me omw to watch a fnaf video just to get jumpscared with YTTD ost

No one has figured out how the animatronics fit in the vents. And how they knew they could use the vents in the first place. *Credit* Lake in the dark productions

new points about Cassidy being a girl: in the itp game folders it would be possible to put together a drawing and when the parts were put together there would be 6 children instead of 5 in MCI (it being theorized that the sixth would be Andrew or Oswald) but you can see it in the drawing that there are two girls in MCI, one on the right being Susie with blonde hair and the other on the right having her hair with two tails, which means that yes, that girl from LOGBOOK was in MCI and also in another image from mci that this time it was really In the game the child on the left seems to have hair with 2 small tails if you try to notice the shadow. I know this may be contradicted by some, but putting together these tips from itp plus several other things, if it really means that Cassidy is indeed the girl you saw in the logbook, in other words, cassidy is indeed a girl! and just maybe that kid in the movie could actually be Andrew!

In my head cannon Jeremy Fitzgerald is the victim of the bit of 87 and is the Scout from TF2 whos first name was Jeremy, his last name was never revealed, and he cannonically dies on December 4th 1987. I don't care if Scott himself tells me I'm wrong, its my headcannon.

PLZ turn the background music volume down.

Here’s how I think it went down In the survival logbook, Jeremy mentions that he feels like he’s being followed home. The week before shows that the animatronics are able to follow people home and hunt them down. So here’s how it goes .Jeremy returns home after his final night . Foxy follows Jeremy but is unable to find his house or is unable to get in . The next day Jeremy wakes up and gets ready for his dayshift job, but foxy can still walk during the day so he’s able to follow Jeremy . Jeremy makes it to the dayshift before any customer show up . Foxy surprise attack him removing the frontal lobe and returning back into the storage room. . Employee show up see that Jeremy is absolutely cooked They called the hospital yada yada yada

I still believe the orange guy is actually William's father

Me? *I still don't buy it.*

Something I think that is entirely forgotten is that typing 1987 in the custom night didn't give you a Golden Freddy jumpscare originally, that was a featured added pretty quickly after the theories really started flowing in after people started spreading rumors that typing in 1987 would give you a secret cutscene revealing the bite, at least very rarely. Scott's way of curtailing this was to simply have it trigger an event that would crash the game: the Golden Freddy jumpscare.

PAGE 44 IS NOT CANON

William talks to the crying child as threw the Fredbear plushie. He acts like an apathetic friend since his better off being a friend than being a dad

12:34 "We have a group of 6 to consider other than the MCI: The 6 gravestones in the forest with the big tree in FNAF 6" Ah yes, instead of the MCI+Charlie, this cutscene refers to the 6 graves stones meant to represent the MCI+Charlie. Makes perfect sense

3:40 Foxy actually always has his eyes glowing like that throughout the entire game. 12:53 Actually FNaF 1 does associate IT'S ME with Golden Freddy. When you encounter Golden Freddy during the Nightshift, IT'S ME hallucinations will always occur the moment you close the Camera Tablet after seeing the Golden Freddy Poster in Camera 2B - West Hall Corner. Also something I'd like to point out is about the year of which FNaF 1 takes place in. When the game first released, MatPat connected the game to be somewhere from April 1990 - 1996 due to U.S. federal minimum wage, as in it was the closest pay to the actual pay in the game (And then he assumed 1993 due to his theory making a connection to a real-life incident that occurred in 1993.). One major problem with this is that the pay in the actual game is $4 per hour, while minimum wage was $4.25 per hour in that timeframe, which makes the 1990s illogical, but most people disregarded this, probably due to profit-at-all-cost practices that FazBear Ent. was implied to take later in the series, but logically with the evidence the first game alone provided, FNaF 1 could only take place in either 1987, 1988, or 1989, with 1989 being the most likely answer as it would fit the "many years ago" description given to the MCI in the newspapers best. And in The Week Before, a lot of pop culture references are made, and they supposedly all date to 1989 at the latest.