@24.00 The reason there are so many different interpretations of the regulations online is because the regulations themselves are poorly worded, light on detail and often contradictory. I have read the regulations many times over and have interpreted them differently each time (as have many other professionals of whom I have spoken to locally).
@johnkellett77975 күн бұрын
I started my training to be an architect in 1978 , then and for many years the practice for architects was to submit drawings that demonstrated the design that met the requirements of the building regulations. The profession was the PD already. What changed. The understanding that the role of the BCO was to inform non-professionals that their scheme didn’t meet. BCOs never had the role of advice, LAs did not have the insurance cover, what changed? Under the BSA someone can be competent without having the documentation proving ability (professional memberships etc). Why? Those who do not have the qualifications proving ability are shouting that being a registered/chartered professional doesn’t proof competency! Why is that? Surely the important competence is the ability to carry out the task as evidenced by qualifications and professional memberships. The Act needs rewriting to require ‘designers’ to have the relevant professional qualifications to carry out that duty etc etc. That is the law in most of the developed world, why does the UK have to be different by not defining ‘competence’ of ability as being the relevant registered/chartered professionals. It would simpler, easier to police and far more useful.
@jennieharris7 ай бұрын
🤪 "Promo SM"
@johnlang21088 ай бұрын
No clue to how building control is involved in the building process. Yet we have taken all the burden of tragic Grendel incident. fame Judith Hacket, 60% of all building control officers have left the industry after the draconian measures you have put on our sector. If you want to prevent another Grenfel then bring back Clerk of works and more stringent measures to test cladding products. The majority of BCO’s only work on domestic jobs under 11m. RICS and CABE chartered building control surveyors are now having to go through traumatic vetting processing to remain in their roles in an already stressful and staff depleted industry. This legislation will not change the industry but only drive BCO’s out of it 🤬
@christopherparker737710 ай бұрын
In studying these classifications you guys have put together, I'm trying to understand where the definitions for each of these are stored. I cant see them on the excel spreadsheets. Am i missing something to find them?
@akshaykorlekar11 ай бұрын
Very good ! Informative. Got to understand NBS Chorus and the NBS Universe overall so very well.
@johnkellett779711 ай бұрын
There is nothing in the Building Safety Act that I can see that prevents un(der)qualified building designers from continuing in business unchecked. All they need to do is either self-certify as 'competent' or talk clients into believing they are. There are thousands of architectural designers/consultants, engineers and surveyors etc with no relevant qualifications and there are thousands of clients and contractors who make decisions they are not actually qualified to make. Why didn't the Act address those issues by merely requiring all buildings be designed by those qualified to do so, a simple piece of legislation enacted by most developed nations. Hooray for the demise of D&B, I've not experienced it working well in my 40 year plus experience. It did work however when working for a developer that carried out all work from finding the site through design and construction to managing the site after completion.
@jamesdecross103511 ай бұрын
Agreed. My own two take-aways from this discussion is that this Act aims to continue the CDM regulations into the life of the building after construction, AND the one great weakness of this new legislation is the paucity of protection offered to those duty-holders now required. There is a long history of abuse of duty-holders in many industries, not least in architecture and construction.
@adambrennan120211 ай бұрын
Anything we can do if the specification names are not showing up, but it is showing the number of specifications...?
@sergejodymongbo8817 Жыл бұрын
Do you have uniclass 2015 french version?
@MiteshParmar Жыл бұрын
Brilliant video! Thanks
@user-bk9bh7tu6h2 жыл бұрын
Would it be possible to know where the follow-on videos are in this series? Thanks
@JK-ui4qs2 жыл бұрын
An excellent video. You simplify very in-depth documentation and make it easy to understand. I am a Building Control Surveyor so I am very glad to see these changes coming into effect. Would you be willing to carry out this speech in person for the company I represent? Thank-you.
@yoshitasahishnamanne94302 жыл бұрын
Insightful!
@johnkellett77972 жыл бұрын
An excellent presentation but as noted previously in a number of such presentations these processes are very much geared to larger projects. However having had to step down from multi-million pound projects to mostly domestic extensions the loss of the Schedule of Work approach to small scale and refurbishments works is unfortunate as it is the method known and used by facility managers, surveyors and small contractors. Some guidance as to how Chorus can be used as a suitable replacement for the SofW would be welcome.
@eleganteimbecil16553 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine is an architect, this might interest her.
@joshisyourface3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, would love to gain experience in this sector!
@danielkrajnik38173 жыл бұрын
looks great, but looking forward to more walk-throughs and guides
@shalinikarajesh124 жыл бұрын
not able to add tiles in the revit file
@AnonymousAlaskan4 жыл бұрын
As a construction communications and technology experts, we saw the impact of COVID on the move to remote and distributed teams as an opportunity to get into the management of outsourced structural engineering, design, detailing and document service - save money and keep the projects moving forward. @t
@jpblitz21044 жыл бұрын
This video could be improved if it lost its rather distracting heavy music, run the slides a bit slower... and perhaps contained a bit more useful technical information!
@mohdmashood56855 жыл бұрын
Which software this
@louisebew53035 жыл бұрын
Incredible speech
@wakinestus53446 жыл бұрын
good videos, please links to download revit architecture 2017
@lessan19836 жыл бұрын
What programs have been done ? Design this video
@lessan19836 жыл бұрын
Quels programmes ont été réalisés ? Concevoir cette vidéo
@andrewheron73956 жыл бұрын
Great video BUT how do i install the NBS plugin?
@daniyalmohammed36156 жыл бұрын
Shehzad very good.
@shaikarif44107 жыл бұрын
Bim is only useful for civil?
@TheNarratorworld5 жыл бұрын
BIM is useful for everything
@muffdriver697 жыл бұрын
This didn't really explain anything other than showing fancy 3D presentations of a 3D building and its components.
@DavidRidlen7 жыл бұрын
It is amazing how this did not explain BIM at all. Is it an application? This only explained the result, not how the process works.
@micheltheauvette62837 жыл бұрын
See how our UK colleagues at National Building Specifications (NBS) use an activity-based working (ABW) environment, showing different workpoints, collaborative areas, and beautiful interior design arrangements of ABW furniture.,
@pitzi6667 жыл бұрын
What is the intro song called? Running from 0-40 sec, and who is the artist?
@JohnKellett_kreativarchitects7 жыл бұрын
The curse of Revit. As architects we do not need or want manufacturer specific models at any design stage in a BIM model. We need parametric objects that can be given the IFC attributes of the product we need. The sourcing of products occurs later, after Stage '3' and sometimes after '7'. Why has everybody been conned into making unnecessarily detailed decisions too early and then waste time changing the object for another one several times? Treat BIM like the drawing board process: stencilled shape write rotting, add notes to describe what is required, draw the actual chosen product only if the 1:20s of that room are required. Pointless hours of BIM modelling are saved by not being manufacturer specific if not needed :-) Only then do you get the important efficiency benefits.
@thenbs7 жыл бұрын
Hi John, thank you for your comments.Our research into this subject show that 71% of the industry agreed with the statement ‘We need manufacturers to provide us with BIM objects’ www.thenbs.com/knowledge/nbs-national-bim-report-2017 Our NBS National BIM Library provides generic and manufacturer objects to support (a) different stages of the design process and (b) different specification responsibilities depending on procurement routes. Hope that helps!
@JohnKellett_kreativarchitects7 жыл бұрын
That is because 71% of respondents are using Revit and do not understand that in oder to design a building you DO NOT start by adding the detail. When using drawing boards we used simple templates to say where an object was going. Later documents such as the 1:20s and NBS specified what the object was in detail. BIM works that way too if you are not using Revit. The project starts with the generic and proceeds to the specific. Revit works the other way round and encourages the detail first. Could that be due to commercial link up with product suppliers? As an architect, the design team determines the criteria the building products need to meet, then procure them. Working the other way around explains a lot of the problems! Providing a generic object is parametrically dimensionally corrects the IFC detail and information within the model can describe the rest. That is efficient and improves on traditional techniques. Constantly swapping in and out different manufacturers BIM objects as the project progresses to accord with the choice at that particular time is just time wasting. By the time the project is being constructed the final choice of product can be helpful and is needed by the FM team. Choice of product often changes after tender so generic objects are best for the design team until a 'fix' is made.