This is fantastic, and I'll definitely be using it to help push for my agency to try Statamic. Was hoping you'd touch on the difference between the Grid and Replicator fields, and when you'd pick one over the other.
@MartyFriedel4 ай бұрын
If you to go back to earlier versions of Statamic, the differences were a bit more obvious. Grid, by default, uses a "Table" layout like I have in the video. But also now has a "Stacked" layout which can make it look like the Replicator. Grid also has the ability to label the button to add a new row. When creating your Grid, you need to pick your fields for each row - and you can only have one set. But with a Replicator, you can have multiple Sets (and organisation) which makes it ideal for a Page Builder - so when you add a new item, you can choose what Set you want. I've got another talk coming up in September on building maintainable sites in Statamic so that will be covered more there too. With Replicator you can also have controls to expand and collapse all sets - which is good for long lists to make it easier to drag-and-drop or view without having every field visible. At their core, they're very similar - multiple items can be added to an ordered list. But subtle little differences separate them based on use case. For a Page Builder, or if I want the author to pick a different row Set of fields, I'd use Replicator. But for something like Session times which is always a Date and Times, then Grid works too. Both have valid uses, but at the same time, could possibly take the best of both to combine them in to a single fieldtype. Hopefully this helps a little.
@1971ekc Жыл бұрын
A million thanks!
@Anna-gv7vo Жыл бұрын
OMG I've been looking for something like this for so long! Thank you so much! I'll be following you!🤗
@gd44652 жыл бұрын
Best action in years !!!
@MartyFriedel Жыл бұрын
I'm glad you found it useful! 👍
@SpaklesDr2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. My action after recording fails to record and reproduce the "blend-if" slider change. Do you know why?
@VickGaza2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir !
@yeti-i2f3 жыл бұрын
Thank you perfect !
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
Really glad you found it useful! :)
@CookiestMonsterr3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
No way near your timings, but I was stoked to actually finish it 😉
@PitNeex3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! 👍 It is crazy that Photoshop doesn't have this option...
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
Given "photo" is in the name I agree 😜
@MaddiemanGames3 жыл бұрын
Really useful, thanks! 👍
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
Glad you have found it useful - handy little tweak.
@fgssafetyschool32733 жыл бұрын
Awesome work. I really appreciate it. Thanks Marty!
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you found it useful Frans :)
@jimisfot95923 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this!!!
@MartyFriedel3 жыл бұрын
Happy that you found it useful : )
@marcinbera18424 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate! Mainly use LR but final posto processing I do using PS and that feature was missing. Now, thanks to you, PS is great as well :) .
@MartyFriedel4 жыл бұрын
I'm really glad you've found it helpful - that was my biggest missing feature when I started doing more in Photoshop too.
@iankendall4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Most helpful, thank you. Never understood why it's not there already in PS. When in a levels adjustment layer, if you press 'alt' and click on the black point and white point slider, you do get indications as to CMYK (i think) clipping.
@MartyFriedel4 жыл бұрын
Not quite sure what you're asking there, sorry?
@iankendall4 жыл бұрын
@@MartyFriedel I wasn’t asking a question, just pointing out that there is a way - I think - to see clipping without they helpful method you demonstrated.
@markv74584 жыл бұрын
Super! It's hard to believe Adobe took this out of Photoshop
@MartyFriedel4 жыл бұрын
It's such a useful feature, hey!
@heldersanches4 жыл бұрын
Congrats! The most useful macro around. Thanks for sharing.
@MartyFriedel4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome - I'm really glad you found it useful.