Good morning bro

Happy sunday.

Love mean patience ful action

Hello, you can send your rolls or disposable camera to a film lab. There they can develop and scan your film. They will usually email you your pictures. Hope this helps!

@@vEL.mp4 thank u very much!! 🙏

LETS DO IT! my insta is vel_mp4

If you need always with you compactness and invisibility - Ricoh. For versatility, ease of control, video - Fuji.

@@KingFiercer_zip 🙏🙏🙏

Ricoh really isn't wide enough for landscapes or street art, but if you chose that, go with the III and not the x, for sure. I love the grs, but you would probably be better off with the Fuji.

@@balboa0621 Thank you for your advice. The simplicity of GR is so tempting. I'll consider again.

@@balboa0621 GR III is 28mm full-frame equivalent, which is just slightly not as wide as an iphone 11 in landscape mode, iirc. So it's still pretty good but not super wide. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm going to comment on this, and I hope that you can take a random strangers opinion with a grain of salt. When you are in public, you have no idea who is filming or taking pictures of you every single day. You pass by hundreds of cameras from companies or fellow travelers without ever knowing it. I understand that someone could get upset if they had a very intimate or personal moment that was taken by a random stranger. However, I have had these discussions with people. The way that I frame it is that the special moments in public that we can catch are not any different from a painter who would recreate a memory. We snatch that period of time and utilize the moment to tell a story. The story is never about the subject, but about human emotion. If anyone I take a picture of asks me to delete it, I do. Immediately. I tend to take pictures of people as they look at me so they have every chance of letting me know how they feel. I use a ricoh gr iii exclusively because I don't look like a pro photographer. I don't want people to feel as if they are being used. I want people to see a photo and understand that the raw human emotion we capture can convey a feeling.

@@kiler2death Beautiful. And Thank You for a your insightful reply. I 100% agree your respectful approach. I only hope more souls like your good self have that level of consideration. But you did highlight one of my main issues though; 'We snatch that period of time and utilize the moment to tell a story. The story is never about the subject, but about human emotion' We are not directing actors that are being paid to be on set. As you (rightly) wrote, we are composing our own story out of someone else's, sometimes intimate moment, or even re-contextualising. but the end product will always be yours.Which is cool. What's less cool is publishing that image online, especially on KZbin/instagram. The away the art. We are just someone with a camera, taking a photo. There is a certain entitlement with this genre that I feel many folk subscribe to, (folk unlike your cool self). Besos.

To be honest with the internet and smart phones your privacy is longgggg gone. Humans picked convenience over privacy

I absolutely agree with you but would go further. Since these so called 'art' photographs are to be shared across the interweb I think it is reprehensible to take a shot of a person or small group without explicit permission. This is NOT art in any shape or form, it is intrusion. I also see no validity in the premise that the photographer is choosing to show a situation or emotion that he/she has imagined. What right do you have to 'imagine' whet the feelings of a complete stranger are? Quite frankly if I found someone covertly taking a shot of me I would feel complete justification in shoving the camera where the sun doesn't shine. For instance how do you know when you take your piece of 'art' that the photograph won't be seen by a parent or partner with disastrous results leading to family disruption or maybe divorce? I would go as far as to ask how do you know that the young person in your image is actually above the age of consent? It can be very difficult to tell nowadays. You don't know, and I for one would demand you keep your 'art' away from individuals. None of these so called 'street scenes' that feature individuals are in fact street art. To my mind, and something I have no quarrel with, street scenes should be just that. Scenes showing architecture, scenes showing environment and transport, scenes showing street activities, for instance a market, an entertainment or work being undertaken in that street. So long as these pictures don't compromise the privacy of the individual they are perfectly valid. And as for the person who felt that so much of his life was now in the public domain, well I feel sorry for you for allowing details of yourself to become so public. Something I fear that you will come to regret when you are older and wiser.

@@petergoodman8378 in in complete agreement with you Peter.

All these pictures are straight out of camera!

I used the Go Pro Hero 8

Thank you!! All these pictures were taken using P mode or the automatic mode. I often shoot from the hip, so I use the snap focus feature, but you need to train your eye to know the exact distance the subject is from you.

Thank you for the feedback!!