Could you just tap into the electric universe and eliminate electric meters. Would be happy to pay for the required infrastructure.

Hello 👋, on what date was this video recorded or edited? Could you please tell me.

Hola 👋, en que fecha fue editado o hecho este video grabado? Me podrían decir por favor.

Donde encuentro el video conpleto?

¿Capacitan?

*DIOS LO PERMITA: SÍ ÉS POR EL BIÉN DE LA HUMANIDAD, GRACIAS POR SU EXTRAORDINARIO TRABAJO DE AÑOS, VIDA Y COMPARTIR LA SABIDURÍA QUE DIOS LES DIÓ*

Boltzmann who showed that gravity cannot heat a system, that the thermodynamic state of a system is not affected by gravity: “In an adiabatic column of air exposed to gravitation, a gradient of pressure and density arises such that the ratio of pressure and density remains constant.” Because the ratio of pressure and density is an energy term, constant ratio means constant energy, i.e. constant temperature, so NO heating occurs. This means cosmology is debunked, as cosmology utterly requires that mass(gas) attracts mass(gas)to heat and pressurise for the formation of stars. Lawrence Krauss: “….. one of the key worries I have as a cosmologist right now is that we have these ideas and these parameters and every experiment is consistent with this picture ….. and yet nothing points to the fundamental physics beneath it.” Gravity cannot be both its own cause and effect. No system can do work on itself, as that violates one of the core tenets of physics, and yet consensus gate keepers claim mass can attract itself to itself, this violates thermodynamic law. Gravity: let’s not forget Gravity is per default not understood, ever since Newton claimed to not “feign hypotheses” - which he has done of course in many other respects though, and privately in letters also for Gravity. He called it “pressure” and got really close with this notion as we will see: everything in nature is the result of pressure mediation, magnets, light, atoms….. and gravity. We need to let go of are first: that gravity is a mutual attraction of two bodies, that the bodies “attract” each other, and second: that one mass alone already HAS gravity: even Newton, despite claiming to not feign hypotheses, maintained that gravity is not a property of matter, that the only intrinsic property of matter is the resistance to being set in motion. His equation - misguided as it is in calling it a force - nevertheless expresses the fact that one mass does not HAVE gravity: F=GmM/r^2 … one of the two masses missing and the equation collapses. Magnetism is a state of Dielectricity undergoing loss of inertia, that is discharge of capacitance, which manifests as three dimensional force vector in the geometry of the torus. Here is a good opportunity to rectify our vocabulary: a nuclear blast is NOT the “release of energy”, it is the release of capacitance, which is the loss of energy, which is the creation of space. That’s why such a blast “displaces” everything in its way, to make place for the newly created space. Space is the negative image of pure potential or charge, it is the after effect of a divergent magnetic field. If Magnetism represents the motion of discharge, Gravity on the other hand describes the motion of charge, Gravity is the hyperbolic field of counter-space, it is the opposite of Magnetism which is the toroidal field of space. Often Gravity is likened to Magnetism, but this likening feels always awkward because obviously Gravity is not polarised, it has no “poles”. If Magnetism (i.e. discharge, space, divergent loss of capacitance) is force, then Gravity is not only not a force, it is the opposite of force, it is not a phenomena of objects, it is a phenomena against space, that is, the erasure of space. Gravity is an anti-Torus, a move towards counter space.

Well done

Like si tampoco entendiste

Interesante.

It was really nice.

Well done.