Made by AI everyone -- with Google NotebookLLM - anyone can access this AI tool for free, feed in a PDF, and make a faux podcast like this.
@Vejita1218 сағат бұрын
Not ther smartest conversation I have heard.
@saulorocha375522 сағат бұрын
These two have an artificial, staged, and unnatural way to interact that is, in lack of a worse name, terrible! And all these nonsense talk: ok, sure, yeah, hm… whenever one ends a short sentence, man, that’s infuriating (and sometimes comical).
@frederickanderson1860Күн бұрын
We have 6 senses we have another common sense.of we don't have that we never know what is reality.
@frederickanderson1860Күн бұрын
Imagine having x ray eyes like a superman or have the ability to fly the same speed as light. We not built for that , therefore evolution what way is it developing ??.
@frederickanderson1860Күн бұрын
They say that the Greek language has a word for everything. Hebrew is totally different very little letters yet we don't understand that Hebrew use concrete terms not abstract ideas. A fly eyes are not like ours, imagine having such eyes we go mad.
@Meta4MonkyКүн бұрын
Good voices and points but sounds choreographed
@davve34613 сағат бұрын
It's AI generated. Says so in the channel description. I heard recently there's a new ai model that can generate entire podcasts
@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858Күн бұрын
I enjoy your podcast very much. There's a fine balance between doing philosophy and being a cartoon. It seems to me the likely viewers of your videos are not so ignorant as to not know the basic ideas of a particular philosopher. So you've got at least 80% cartooning -- it's a good script -- and very little philosophy that hit home. It's like when a hamburger is made mostly of sawdust. I enjoy your podcast very much. I might advise you to do more philosophy and be less of a cartoon. Keep up the good work. Whomever your viewers are, I think they like what you're doing. But those of us who are not basically total beginners want more philosophy. *Throws two cents into a bucket*
@raginald7mars4082 күн бұрын
.as a German Biologist - this is about the End Phase of Domestication - we race unstoppable to the Techno Sphere Abyss - we become Sheeple on the Techno Sphere Farm - Slaves of Robots to maintain it until we Self Extinct . - This may be the Path of any Civilization - Self Extinction and the Evolution of the Techno Topos World - that is able to colonize the Cosmos - as it never needs anything of the Bio Sphere. All tools we ever invented, created, mass produced - were abused to kill each other. We even kill ourselves with food and excess pleasures of all sorts Things to Come - H G Wells many more to come The End of the Bios Sphere is the Start of the Techno Sphere
@escher44012 күн бұрын
How do you make these AI podcasts last that long?
@pichirisu3 күн бұрын
fuck yeah
@jjmelendez23435 күн бұрын
Wait are these videos AI????
@branchesofphilosophy5 күн бұрын
Yes the audio is generated by Ai. See channel description
@StephanBreuerFLYING11 күн бұрын
Ai is amazing lol
@AyazKhanJ12 күн бұрын
interesting
@Hairfire15 күн бұрын
Sounds like an AI. Two AIs actually
@branchesofphilosophy15 күн бұрын
@@Hairfire That is correct
@CalebIgnace17 күн бұрын
AI Podcast alert!!
@YourFriendlyGApilot20 күн бұрын
The part on consciousness was interesting, but it is quite surprising that in 2014, with all the published psychological and neuroscientific evidence against it someone would still argue for the Whorfian hypothesis in summer form.. 🤷
@branchesofphilosophy19 күн бұрын
The concept of "actuality" is central to Honderich’s theory and requires careful consideration. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping how the author sees language as contributing to our understanding of consciousness. Ultimately he concludes that lingualism does not adequately explain the difference between conscious and linguistic representations. He suggests that while lingualism avoids some of the problems of other representation-based theories, it fails to account for the "actuality" of conscious thoughts, making them seem no different than marks on a page.
@YassenChapkanov20 күн бұрын
To the person behind this channel, thank you for the effort put into making this ai shorts. They have a great utility to me To everyone else, I encourage you to treat those summaries as trailer for reading the actual books if you find them interesting. AI is not a substitute for personal engagement.
@branchesofphilosophy18 күн бұрын
This is exactly right. I could not agree more
@glennsimonsen842121 күн бұрын
So smug. So ignorant.
@johndoe-qz1rl21 күн бұрын
Is this AI generated?
@branchesofphilosophy20 күн бұрын
Yes audio is generated by Ai as in the channel description
@bankiey22 күн бұрын
Book of Tobit is relevant to this subject matter
@bankiey22 күн бұрын
Hell yeah, Dunbar. Dunbar’s number in particular has been a fascinating rumination
@josephorlando524423 күн бұрын
For an honest understanding of Pinker's trends view the writing of the illustrious scientist and philosopher David Berlinski.
@branchesofphilosophy22 күн бұрын
Thanks for the recommendation
@josephorlando524423 күн бұрын
Steven Pinker needs to get a real job.
@Known-unknowns25 күн бұрын
Sounds like they're reading from a script 😐
@conexionneuronal882025 күн бұрын
that was an amazing summary, thank you 🙂
@РодионЧаускин27 күн бұрын
Robinson Joseph Jackson Jennifer Hernandez Margaret
@underbelly6927 күн бұрын
Gpt much ?
@edenaut21 күн бұрын
they didn't want to get their own hands dirty
@BAAAAAAAAAAA28 күн бұрын
At least mark this shit as AI
@YassenChapkanov29 күн бұрын
Surprisingly good for AI given the short time format.
@shook9935Ай бұрын
Your channel is gold , thank you from the bottom of my heart , for uploading this video
@shook9935Ай бұрын
Please I want to know who is talking is an AI, or real being
@branchesofphilosophyАй бұрын
Audio is generated by Ai. See description
@SonamHoaniАй бұрын
Wow.
@dheeraj_oneАй бұрын
This AI generated slop is freaking irritating. Right click Click on the video and then click don't recommend channel.
@brianmorin5547Ай бұрын
AI to AI podcasts need to be banned
@giantessmariaАй бұрын
thanks, fascinating topic, can't get enough of this stuff!
@esmameryem1905Ай бұрын
Very good podcast even though it’s AI 🥳
@joebullock5450Ай бұрын
Good use of notebook!!!!
@BenuTuberАй бұрын
Why not be transparent about it being AI generated?
@branchesofphilosophyАй бұрын
Its included in the description
@TheAncientColossusАй бұрын
AI is getting out of hand. I thought real people were talking until 3 minutes into the video. Something felt off and uneasy. Turns out it IS AI-generated. My heart literally dropped.
@2fishes-q5hАй бұрын
Pretty well done for under 13 minutes 👏
@2fishes-q5hАй бұрын
4:20 not true in space and time because everything is moving.
@2fishes-q5hАй бұрын
How does one explain "up prior knowledge" of space and time to a person born blind?
@szymonbaranowski8184Ай бұрын
The closest are Neanthertals and they live in us, at least some of us.
@ArtraducАй бұрын
This is wonderful, thank you so much! I have been reading and watching videos about metacognition and agency because it is part of a project I am developing. I will get my hands on that book as soon as I can! I liked your observations about words and thoughts. I have been dealing with this in particular since my focus is on foreign languages. I started to talk a little bit about this on my channel, but I see it more as something that I explore as a work project and as a philosophy of life. I do believe that we need to focus on human agency now that AI has become so advanced. I see more and more content about AI agents being deployed in work tasks and how they will be part of our everyday life soon. This is part of why I think we all need to review our own sense of metacognition and agency.
@foodbadgersnewАй бұрын
sir your makig these videos?
@branchesofphilosophyАй бұрын
I am the editor. The audio content is created using Ai
@timothybell5698Ай бұрын
I want you to consider what most of your waking life is actually like. When you walk down the street, or drive your car, or what have you, you're not freely making decisions. You don't freely choose to put one foot in front of the other, you choose to walk and the rest happens, more or less, habitually. Perhaps it occurs to you to test your freedom of will. "Well, I can start walking backwards if I so choose", and just to be thorough about things you actually perform the experiment and start walking backwards, but what does this actually suggest about free will? That we only have it when it occurs to us we do? The choice to start walking backwards is ultimately predicated upon an abnormal thought, and thus cause and effect remains, with the cause being the desire to prove that you are the cause. What about all those moments when free will is just not on your mind? What about the antecedent that led to you walking down the street in the first place? Did it occur to you to just go for a walk? Was it a binary choice between watching TV and going for a walk? Did you pick it from a mental list of options? I don't want to go as far as to say "free will absolutely does not exist", but I think it ought to be examined. Patients taking certain medications (esp. dopaminergic drugs such as antipsychotics) may claim to have a heightened sense of subjective "free will", but objective examiners might see them as engaging in predictable behaviours for the medication they are taking; they smoke more, they overeat, they do all the things one would expect with these medications. But if you ask them they say "oh, well, it's because I have more free will now, it's because I have more self-control, which means I can choose to smoke and also choose not to smoke." What I'm getting at here is that whatever free will is, it's unscientific, because no matter how unfreely one seems to behave objectively, they can always claim that, subjectively, they are the freest they have ever been. My mother used to tell me to think before I speak. This seems like bad advice to me. If I am analysing every word I am about to say, consciously crafting each sentence before I say it, then I will say nothing, because I will be unable to participate in a conversation which flows naturally. I would say that most of what we do we do without conscious choice, and that those that do ruminate over every decision are the least free among us, since such ruminating inevitably leads to analysis paralysis.
@timothybell5698Ай бұрын
Whoops, I mean, cool theory about how cells have free will.