Thank you so much! I always post every two weeks on Mondays, 6pm, CET :)

Definitely need to get into 'Bridgerton.' I like period pieces both in movies and TV series. 'Downton Abbey' and 'The Gilded Age' are both excellent.

Thank you so much! And thank you for the recommendations, I will have a look into those!

@@crazeful_jessiegrace Please do. My pleasure. Honored to be a subscriber to your channel.

Thank you! Honestly, it's a disease, I can't unsee those details anymore xD

Also, they could focus more on shooting cheaper scenes - as it happens to be the ones the fandom keeps saying they do not get enough from. Basically, the most expensive is shooting on location and big scenes - for Bridgerton, it's the balls. The more people in the scene, the longer it takes (and more expensive it is). The balls scenes easily take days to shoot. The smaller the scene, especially when shot in their studio (e.g. the insides of Bridgerton and Featherington houses are all film sets), the cheaper it is. And yet, people keep complaining that we do not get enough of family banter and one on one scenes between protagonists (and not only between the romantic leads, but also other protagonists, e.g. they want more scenes between Kate and Eloise, or Pen and Bridgertons other than Colin and Eloise, or Pen and the modiste or lady Danbury). We do not really need a ball every episode.

@@berlineczka exactly this. It makes me remember how the director of Pride & Prejudice got the cast into the house they would be shooting in to make them more comfortable within the space. With a ready made set there is such an opportunity to really play into the families dynamic more. Also I need the gaffers to find a way to light the scenes without it feeling like the house lights are on or one lone candle. There isn't enough contrast in the final product. I personally blame digital for killing a lot of artistic choices that film made iconic. Season 3 made everything look yasified. from the make-up and styling to the lighting and angle choices. Nothing felt soft and romantic...just overly blurred to make all pores and realism disappear. They removed the "texture" that gives personality to any project.

@@madelion24 Definitely. I couldn't agree more.

Money definitely can buy you talent. But taste, on the other hand, is not as easily acquired.

don't think it's the same: the scenery and backgrounds are much better in rings of power. The difference in budget and skills is there and you can see it both in quality of the renders and in variety (wheel of time shows the same shot over and over again like they have 4 different scene and are so small they can only use 2 camera angles). I'm with you about the show overall: if you feel the quality of the production for the postproduction, everything else, literally, is lacking and the costumes are a valid example. Some dresses and armor are great, but other look like they run out of money like for the numenorian ones. Also, the great designs for the movies have no real translation if you think about how all these races and cultures look the same. Plus, many shots are a waste of time and money like the one from the top view shown in this video: you don't need it for the story but looks cool. Same for the valinor scene when Galadriel is travelling on boat, its amazing but deeply wrong from a story telling way: they made her go with it all the way till almost the end to finally realized that's not what she wants and end up swimming half or more of the ocean. It's idiotic and a waste of money.

A few 'screensavers' and not much else, LOTR is still infinitely superior cinematography, including costumes and even CGI (and LOTR was 20 years ago!)

@@bdleo300 yes, if you think about that most of the cool shots are a waist or not even usefull to the narration, like the camera pointed to the clifs to show how cool the shot is. Spending money wisely will also give more power only when needed

I’m not in post production but I graduated last year in film and have found no avenues to get my career going, would love a video describing how it works

@@rainabaileyyy I will make a video about it, that's a good idea, but my quick tip for you is to just apply to as many film companies as you can, make sure you prep your portfolio well, get credits to whatever projects you've already done, maybe even create an IMDB profile, and show them that you're an asset to their team they don't want to miss. If you want to work on film sets I can reommend looking on the site "Crew United". I think it's a world wide website a lot of production companies use to look for set runners, camera assistens, gaffers, drivers, etc. If you look there and get a job you might be able to build up your contact list from there and further make your way into the industry. I wish you good luck on your journey!

OMG, I love that idea!