i watch asmond evryday God bless asmond and his family

After thinking about 5 minutes, and making my coffee mug. The group will have 4 members (all male). (I am planning of having female groups). In which Nostalgia members so far are their main leader: Hokuto Kurogane. Hokuto is ultimately a former classmate/friend of Akiki (The MC). After Akiki moved out of the small tightly knit neighborhood, Hokuto and Akiki lost contact. [Due to Akiki training to become an Idol] but due to Hokuto hearing through grape vines that Akiki *becomes* an Idol. 😂❤ (I got more but i dont want to drag on!) (Thank u for cooking on the video!)

BRO U JUST GAVE ME A NEW IDOL GROUP CONCEPT FOR MY STORIES/OCS. ❤ Nostalgia is probably gonna be the name. As for the character I probably gotta start making them 😂 I think their theme will be the concept of Nostalgia, such as the happiness, sadness and somehow regret?. 😅

Although, most (triple AAA companies) lack creativity. We can change that, by working hard on our own individual works/projects! ❤ 😊

Why are smash fans so determined to class it as a fighting game. Is it so that it makes them feel better about playing a kids party game. It really is just like an expanded version of one of the games on Mario Party lol

I have a cold was doing pretty well can’t lie, you called him a bum…

Question: is virtua fighter a fighting game? You said yes, virtua fighter is an arena fighter, it does not match the blueprint of trad fighters, it follows very different rules and an entirely different movement scheme, and the same is true with Tekken, it shares similarities but is extremely different from any trad fighter. This is why we have sub genres, because so many *types* of fighting games are still called fighting games. Arena fighters, trad fighters, platform fighters, they are all fighting games. Even street fighter doesn’t follow the defined rules that you gave for a fighting game: static unchanging stages? Street fighter games have multiple times had modes with dynamic stages, while those weren’t the main mode of the game, but they still were included as part of the game. The same is true of mortal kombat, has stage hazards that can be used as weapons or tools against the opponent. Soul caliber allows to knock people off the stage. There’s also modes in many trad fighters where there is no normal health bar and the health is not the goal to win that mode. By your own definitions well established traditional fighting games are not fighting games. Something else that you need to consider is that smash played in competitive play does not usually have dynamic stages, or have very small amounts of dynamism, it doesn’t have items because they are turned off. Your entire basis for argument is predicated on the idea that subgenres just. . . Don’t exist? Plat fighters are fighting games, not just smash even though it’s different from the traditional idea, arena fighters are fighting games even though they are different from the traditional idea, every subgenre of fighting game is still a fighting game, because the label of “fighting game” is broad, genre definitions are flexible, which means you don’t get to claim that it’s “diluting” the genre. The fact that the general community recognizes platform fighters implies that it is and has already been established as being contained within the fighting game genre, they are included in fighting game events, they are included in the discussion of fighting game balance and design. You claim that defining smash as a fighter requires changing the definition of a fighting game, but in fact I’d argue that you are trying intentionally change the definition for the sake of excluding smash from it, the general definition of fighting games does not say anything about the stage dynamics, the requirement for health bars, nor that it must be on a 2 dimensional plane. In fact, the definition of “platform fighter” is that it is a sub genre of fighting games. You are the one twisting and trying to change genre definitions, not the other way around

1:08:04 I was looking at the wrong points the whole time, PP don’t change.

Your analysis sucks, and your channel is tiny because your analysis sucks, which is why nobody in the comments agrees with you.

It is objectively by the definition

I mean your whole argument relies on us accepting YOUR definition of a fighting game, but you never laid out why we should? Why does a fighting game need to have health bars? why does it need to have rounds? and who decided those were the rules? If you did, by whos authority do you declare you definition the objective definition? I typed in "fighting game definition" in google and got this answer. (A fighting game is a type of action video game where two or more characters fight each other in close combat: ) well shit looks like this includes smash... The truth is "what is a fighting game" is probably no different from asking, "What is the best colour?," Or "What is moral?" It is at the end of the day, its probably just subjective. There is no objective definition beyond it "feels" like a fighting game, and if enough people feel that it is, we will widen the category to include it. just my two cents.

It's a fighting game with kirby controls

Nobody cares, honestly.

What a dumb video. "Why I dont classify this video game sub-genre as a different type of video game genre, that have obvious differences even though they kinda fit in the same broad category" Like, yeah, they have differences, we get it. Different things, who cares, its not that deep. Yeah a platform fighter is not a traditional fighter. There's still the word "fighter" after platform tho, yk y? Cus it kinda fits. They're fighting. But yeah, different genre. Seriously, arguing how to classify things is the dumbest type of discussion there is, because its so arbitrary and you can do it however u feel like. Just set the parameters. Dont you have anything more interesting to argue about? "Smash is not a fighting game" argument is not really that interesting. Fighting game nerds dont like it, or dont want it mixed in. Woah, the world is gonna end watch out. K bruv, dont care. Ok its not a fighter its a platform fighter. Big deal. Game still runs the same. Idc. What a boring argument. Coulda spent your time making something else. Anything, at it would've been more entertaining. Jesus.

It already is deal with it

It does have the fighting mechanic of light, medium and heavy with neutral, tilt and smash and it has the grab, attack, block triangle like fighting games do.

Your Mindset is bad. It is the game and watch fighting game.

I am not a bot.

I am not a bot.

I am not a bot.

Merry chungus! Smash brothers is the earthbound fighting game.

Smash brothers is the kirby fighting game.

Smash brothers is the mario fighting game.

Smash brothers is the fire emblem fighting game!

Smash brothers is the fire emblem fighting game!

Smash brothers is the fire emblem fighting game!

Smash brothers is the fire emblem fighting game.

Smash will always be a fighting game in my heart

i thinks its really pointless to argue smash isnt a fighting game cause guess what if ur not calling it a fighting game ur calling it a platform fighter wow big difference it deadass does not change much its just a sub genre of fighting games really all there is to it

People need to realize that "Fighting Game" is shorthand. Street Fighter 2 was specifically designed to be a new genre called "Competitive fighting" or what we'd now call a 2d fighter. That is itself a subgenre of "Fighting game" in which originators are like...Karate Champ and stuff, the kinda games that inspired SF2 and were called Fighting games long before it. Because SF2 didnt spring from nowhere, nor did SF1, they were progressive evolutions of what'd come before, as with all Genres. Smash isnt a "2d fighting game" like SF, no. but it IS a fighting game. Like...Core-A-Gaming did a whole video on it like just watch that, fr

Smash is a plataformer fighting game A genre of fighting games and people fight in platforms to launch others away

Personally I think categorizations of forms of art will always be slightly vague at the very least. Regardless of what the authors'/artist's intent is, how it is received is entirely subjective. We use other examples within genres as points of reference to be able to help communicate relations between things. I think its a silly debate at all, whether or not a piece of art checks the same boxes as the "standards" of the genre. It isnt relevant to nor effects how people use or receive that art. I understand that you are trying to not be opionated, but even the view of games like street fighter/tekken being THE standard for the EXTREMELY broad term of "fighting game", is in itself opinionated. Yes, its an opinion that many share, but it is still an opinion. What fits the definition of a "fighting game" IS subjective, because how the heck is art ANYTHING but subjective 💀 If a song has a banjo, it doesnt mean its a country song. But on the other hand, a country song doesnt HAVE to have a banjo to be a country song. Genres, categories, classifications, theyre all just ways to try to communicate/narrow down a very broad definition. Whens the last time everyone agreed exactly on what defines an RPG? Same situation. Its all opinions.

japanese soldier who kept fighting 29 years after wwii, give it up bruh

The crackles make my brain feel like popcorn, top 10 takes to fall asleep to

Bruh are you santa? Cause you keep on delivering 😂❤ happy holiday to everybody, love you <3

13:34 No. Smash is not an evolution of fighting games or within the fighting game realm. It is a continuation of how to make platforming different. Different genre entirely. I love how you dilute the definition for fighting games to mash Smash right into it. Bot no. It is not a fighting game no matter how hard you try. You are not fighting in this franchise. You are brawling. You are mashing. You are smashing. But not fighting. Some EVO pros can make fighting games look like playing chess. But even that is far removed form the templates of Smash games.

Damn son! Like a golden chicken nugget...

Alpha characters are still the best to me. Cody Charlie not Nash , Adon, Guy , Rose, is gen alpha?

Normals should chip if u block a punch you still gonna feel it. It’s realistic. Still the best game 4,6, 2

Good games today, folks! I felt pretty good about my play, but my Akuma still needs some game. Whachy'all think?

I do see your point made in this video, but honestly, this conversation topic has been going on long enough that I think it's safe to say it's a, "to each their own" typa thing now.

What would you consider smash to be if its not a fighting game?

Still gonna play sparking zero after this!. Regardless of this video. (Good on u for the content!) 😂

it may just be because I'm old but like who cares just put on some fuckin deodorant and stay away from kids

Smash genre is a platform fighter, its a subgenre of fighting games. It doesn't function exactly like a fighting game, but in a lot of ways they share similarities, so platform fighters are a subgenre.

this is dumb as hell. a fighting game is one where characters fight each other