Thank you for spotting the typo. At 7:28 there should be a minus sign in the top expression that gives the minus sign we see in the top espression at 8:05.

I'm glad it was useful for you...

You are welcome!

Thank you Mohammed! I am glad this video has been useful to you.

Hi Lukas thanks for your kind words and suggestion. Ok. I'll try to find the time.

Hi Marcio Nele you are right. It's a good book, but relatively unknown. Enjoy!

Hi Ravi I'm glad you have found it useful

Thank you for your message. What exactly do you have on mind?

@@thermofluidsscience7164 I mean same problem solved in Laplace Transformation method

Hi Gwata. Thank you!

Hi Truong, you are correct, thanks so much for pointing this out. This is corrected in the next line when it is written without the imaginary unit. Bye!

Hi Serajee, thanks for your comment. Sure, that's a great idea. Anything in particular you would like to suggest? Bye

@@thermofluidsscience7164 sure, there is a book "fundamentals of aerodynamics by J.D anderson," also "Aerodynamics for Engineering Students E.L. Houghton." can you go through example problem of these book. it will really help students in aerospace engineering.

@@serajeemdtoriqularman5955 I will try my best,. To start with, you can take a look at our video on the derivation of the Bernoulli equation kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWq3nJ2Gg9Cjr9U

Hi Omar, I'm glad it was useful for you.

I think if you are serious about fluid dynamics, you have to learn the physics, no matter if you are a mathematician, physicist, or engineer of any kind. This book is for anyone who wants to take the next step from a first introductory course.

Thermofluids Science i see. I am thinking of studying fluid dynamics deeper after I finish the fluid mech chapter on my intro physics textbook. But every fluid dynamics book I’ve found so far talk about fluid dynamics from engineer’s point of view. i am looking for the full physics theory on this topic. You know, the one that a physics major would read

@@enricoh9469 In this order: 1. Fluid Mechanics by Falkovich 2. Physical Fluid Dynamics by Tritton 3. Elementary Fluid Dynamics by Acheson 4. Pozrikidis's book 5. Incompressible Flow by Panton 6. Introduction to Fluid Dynamics by Batchelor 7. Fluid Mechanics by Landau Lifshitz

Thermofluids Science thanks man. I have ordered the pozrikidis’ book as soon as I watched your review. Will check out the other books you recommended

@@enricoh9469 Good luck!

Hi Antonio, I'm glad you liked it! Thank you!

Thanks! Much appreciated. Have a safe day.

Hi Hina, thanks for your note. In the classical Stokes problem the solution is periodic because the wall forcing is periodic so Fourier in time works best. But if you want to study the *initial* value problem in time, so from rest, when the wall starts oscillating, then, yes Laplace may work. This problem was solved in the '60: www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/abs/transient-for-stokess-oscillating-plate-a-solution-in-terms-of-tabulated-functions/9EFA9C559CA1886519E39BAB064C5099 I might do a video on that! Thanks!

Thanks! and you are welcome

Hi Lohit, thanks for the comment. Think in terms of the limit r going to zero and the case where C1 is finite. This limit would give you an unrealistic singularity. Then the only possibility is that that term is not there and C1 must be zero. You would get a 0/0 undetermined limit of you had numerator and denominator both tending to zero, but this is not the case because C1 is identically zero. I hope this helps!

Hi Javeria, thanks for the suggestion. What do you mean exactly? Oscillating wall with magnetic field or fixed wall and oscillating magnetic field?

You are welcome! Hopefully, I'll find the time to make more videos soon. Stay tuned.