What if there are no such statements like these in the question?? Any approach for that?

Thankyou Sir!

Bekar explanation 😢

4:34

I want to learn more maths from u saab

😮😮😮 it was a good video,

Sir take lessons about permutations and combinations

Sir, I approached this question by taking two scenarios, in the first case Carrey is a liar and in the second case, Carrey is an alternator. So for the alternator situation, I again got two cases, with T F and F T. But in the end, I got the same answer as you, that Nolan got the hero no. 1 award, so is this approach correct?

how can i see your pdfs?

this is the best explanation which is available on the internet

Wonderful explanation! Thanks a lot! Very helpful

Thank you Sir

Sir thank you so much u cleared my all doubts 😊 plz make a video on logical deduction

Thank you sir...🙏🏼🙏🏼

Thank you so much sir 🙏

I have watched many videos on this topic and no one explained this concept as clearly as you did...thank you so much sir 🙏🙏🙏

Thank you so much . Could you please make a video before CAT regarding faulty weight method of shopkeeper in percentage chapter. There are a lot of videos but sir I find your explanation very helpful. Thank you.

best explaination

Shouldn't the question be phrased as "If a sum's compound interest" or "If the compound interest of a sum becomes three times in 4 years". This question's phrasing makes it look like P + P(1+R/100)^N = 3P as only the sum becomes 3P and not the interest. Why is only the interest taken as 3P instead of P + I = 3P? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thank you so much sir.

No matter how much I paid ,nobody could teach me this concept so clearly and so beautifully ,hats off to you Sir .Thank you for this

Name of the policeman is "Hare"

👏👏👏

Ur series on binary logic is a gem. Very few videos on KZbin will provide so much conceptual clarity in such short time. Please discuss as many reasoning topics as possible

Didn't get 😭

How is multiplication factor becomes 1.4?

Thanks it was helpful

Splendid ☺️

Sir, all this long I kept looking for videos to understand this and your playlist was truly a blessing. Thanks a lot sir.

A big thanku to you..this will surely help me to accumulate things.. perhaps the question section..was quite deligent..as compare to unacademy..🤞

Thank You Sir. You Have Explained It Brilliantly.

Thank u sir ❤️

thank u so much sir

The existence of the Alternator is so arbitrary! How is this binary logic, if you have to use a third option like that. And why not use a "Randomizator" instead of the Alternator? It works just the same. Or a skip Alternator, which does T F F T T F F T T ... So... not a Truthteller, not a Liar, so deffinitely an Alternator... or anything else for that matter (that's not a truthteller or a liar) What a joke!

if p is not an alternator can not be false in liar's assumption then how can it be false in the alternator assumption?

Awesome explanation. Great video. Really admiring

Great logic , love your videos

Students need more teachers like him, What a great way of explanation for this complicated topic.

Nice explanation sir!! Bt i doubt coz generally questions has 1 TT 1 liar & 1 alternator, bt here it's not like that infact here we hv two alternators.....m .confused🤔

Thankyou so much sir.......it's of a great help 🙏

You Should Be Thanked More Often.

Sir Not very Much clear... found problem while solving the questions...Need to clear some doubt????

Sir plz tell.. how to solve if there are only two people.. then who will be alternative