Public energy streams could be co-located with electrolyzers, to greatly accelerate savings or profits from hydrogen based logistics systems.
@FlameofDemocracy6 ай бұрын
Superb work. Thank you for this excellent presentation.
@rodneypantony35517 ай бұрын
MLA Bob advocated hydrogen for years and it's a great advance. However it seems climate change model is predicated upon man-made causation and man-made solutions. IF in fact sea level fluctuations occurred prior to industrialization, then it's different. Alberta should send a team to check the physical evidence.... Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels. KZbin Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy. Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT. Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses. It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are. Arcadia, Netherlands can estimate the cost of raising ports 40 metres. Exemplia gratia 100 ports for necessities of life at 100 billion per port.
@eugeneleroux18428 ай бұрын
Thank you for a brilliant and very relevant presentation.
@volks-electrolyzer9 ай бұрын
exzellent presentation, thank you very much.
@aishwaryababu935210 ай бұрын
Hi Pat, where would you find more information on the methodology of the study? To better unserstand assumptions and limitations of the findings
@terenceiutzi4003 Жыл бұрын
How on earth do you expect to extract it without massive pollution?
@sjsomething4936 Жыл бұрын
I too am unclear exactly what will power these hydrogen extraction processes, I’m interested in understanding if it is a legitimate method of storing energy or just another dead end being touted by the FF energy with reasonable sounding presentations. The current FF production processes release alarming amounts of “waste” methane and there is no real enforcement of the violators. If the same is to happen with “blue” hydrogen production then we’ll be looking at expensive alternatives to gasoline, natgas and so on and still producing more CO2 than we intended. I also question whether the cost of the infrastructure to realistically deliver an H2 economy is less than massively spending on ultra energy efficient homes and heat pumps.
@brushlessmotoring Жыл бұрын
What do you think the $/kg for distribution will be?
@PyroManiacbwl Жыл бұрын
I truly hope NACFE will be including human life lost in their efficiency calculations. Hydrogen combustion related deaths will be enormous if we allow hydrogen storage and transportation to become widespread. Japan, South Korea, and Europe have already experienced related deaths. How exactly do you expect to perfectly contain the universe's smallest element?
@raymondleury8334 Жыл бұрын
Hydrogen in transport or energy is an uneconomic pipe dream. This is simply too inefficient to be worth pursuing. The gas industry wants us to believe it's feasible because they know darn well that gray hydrogen is much less expensive than green hydrogen.
@JC-kb8vb Жыл бұрын
Why is inefficient, Dr?
@amraceway11 ай бұрын
@@JC-kb8vb The cost to transport it is worth more than the gas. Hydrogen as a fuel is being promoted by the fossil fuel industry as a means of greenwashing.
@ssnider420 Жыл бұрын
I wish the major companies would be stepping up the RD and implementation of this technology
@volks-electrolyzer Жыл бұрын
very intersting thx
@Mikey-mike Жыл бұрын
I am a physicist, retired, and worked at NASA in the USA and Linde AG in Germany on hydrogen propulsion. Hydrogen is not an energy source but is an energy store. Hydrogen leaks and eats through everything. Please stop wasting your time on hydrogen. Also, battery and wind mills and solar will require a 7000 times increase in mining and manufacturing, all requiring fossil fuel, to build and maintain. Also, nuclear is prohibitively expensive and this does not include to cost of waste storeage. Stop being in denial. This is peak oil, the end of the fossil fuel roller coaster ride.
@JC-kb8vb Жыл бұрын
Yawn.
@terenceiutzi4003 Жыл бұрын
Can you contain it at room temperature without using extremely toxic suspensions?
@sjsomething4936 Жыл бұрын
On social media, everyone is a retired NASA scientist it seems. You stated quite a lot of points, and have nothing to support most of them. You also don’t suggest any answers or solutions other than to continue burning fossil fuels. So why not just GTFO if you don’t have anything productive to add? I’m more inclined to believe that you’re in fact a petroleum industry troll, or just a troll in general.
@JesseDavid07 Жыл бұрын
Speaker needs to avoid reducing his volume or tone of voice. Is tough to understand him.
@JesseDavid07 Жыл бұрын
Excellent summary
@ghazanfarsheikh44 Жыл бұрын
Good work
@wilfriedschuler3796 Жыл бұрын
How are going to produce your ammonia? Don´t tell me Haber Bosch.
@nxgrs742 жыл бұрын
The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZnvMm6ptYr56Y7c The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
@suhaibsyed12122 жыл бұрын
👍
@yourbruhgirl2 жыл бұрын
🙌🏻
@rodneypantony35512 жыл бұрын
I propose Edmonton hydrogen hub look into an arrangement with Toyota to fill and distribute the new Toyota hydrogen cartridges. I propose Edmonton Hydrogen Hub approach the Minister of Defence and Deputy Prime Minister to co-develop a roadmap for the Canadian Forces and NATO. I propose Edmonton Hydrogen Hub business development surveys the best fuel for robotics including automobiles, drones, flying cars and so forth. Hydrogen is fueling semi autonomous cars and fueling forklifts. So it's already associated or packaged with robotics. I'm retired but delighted by advances in science and technology
@macalister88812 жыл бұрын
Hydrogen for power plant ,s may happen some day if the explosion risk is nill ? But fuel cell,s for cars will never happen , the way things are made and maintained today high tech cars on hydrogen will never happen in my life time , ever ...