The savages are now professors in academia 😂

Since when did humans become animals? Why do we have this tendency to downgrade ourselves? The fact that humans are having lots in common with other living creatures does not make them the same. Humans have a massive distinctive difference from the rest of the living things, and it is a critical thinking, complicated philosophy, highly intellectual scientific work! That tendency to devaluate humans to the level of instincts of the normal animal world is absolutely unacceptable!

All (we) care about is food the main distribution. How did we get to the point of famine How do we get food to grow for large population

Lori WOW professionalism about Sociology methods in data analysis thank you.

Fabulous thank you all...❤

I wonder if she knows that 'often' also works very well l on it's own 😁

Exellent lecture.

What questions do anthropologists try to answer? What methods do they use? This talk didn't answer those questions for me.

I like sociology ❤

Funny 😂😂.

You're a genius.. ❤

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🌍 *Governance systems steer individual and social behavior to reach shared goals and address specific problems identified by society, including collective action problems.* 00:56 🤝 *Complex systems and uncertainty challenge governance systems, like in the case of Global Climate Agreements, which struggle with spatial and membership mismatches.* 02:50 🧩 *Increasingly, governance faces problems for which standard practices don't fit well, such as climate change, prompting the need to expand the toolkit of governance practices.* 04:48 🏗️ *Governance focuses on steering human behavior in response to societal problems, with mechanisms designed to create, implement, and evaluate governance systems.* 11:29 🏛️ *Implementation and effectiveness of governance systems are critical, as legal challenges can impact their functioning, as seen in the Clean Power Plan.* 16:16 ♻️ *Governance performance criteria include effectiveness, sustainability, efficiency, equity, and resilience, depending on the context of the issue.* 26:52 ❄️ *Researcher has worked extensively on large-scale systems, including atmospheric issues, climate change, marine issues (e.g., fisheries), and the Polar Regions, highlighting the impact of climate change in the high latitudes.* 28:44 🌐 *The "problem of fit" in governance systems involves spatial mismatches, like those seen in migratory bird populations, where governance across jurisdictions is crucial for effective management.* 29:43 🌍 *In complex systems like migratory patterns, spatial compatibility is a significant challenge due to the need for different regions to match.* 30:14 🌐 *Membership mismatches, as seen in agreements like the Kyoto Protocol, can arise when commitments don't adapt to changing circumstances, such as China becoming a major greenhouse gas emitter.* 32:08 💧 *Formula or allocation mismatches can occur when resource allocation mechanisms, like the Colorado River Compact, don't account for the variable nature of the resource.* 34:30 🌿 *Some governance systems effectively match the biophysical and socio-economic circumstances, while others fail to do so.* 36:54 🌊 *Large-scale systems, like the management of the Rhine River, have achieved success in improving water quality through effective governance.* 37:49 ❄️ *The Antarctic Treaty System has been successful in preserving Antarctica for peaceful and scientific purposes, showing effective governance on a global scale.* 38:16 🌎 *As we enter the Anthropocene, challenges related to fit in complex systems are increasing due to globalization, human domination of systems, and teleconnections.* 44:05 🔀 *Bifurcations, rather than oscillations, are becoming characteristic of complex socio-ecological systems, raising questions about the adaptability of traditional governance models.* 45:03 🪄 *Governance systems need to be agile and nimble to respond quickly to changing circumstances and avoid lock-in effects, which can hinder adaptability.* 46:54 ⚖️ *The focus on legally binding and entrenched regulatory systems may not align with the need for agile governance in the face of complex challenges in the Anthropocene.* Made with HARPA AI

I came here as someone who researched at the fringes of sociology and really enjoyed this interesting and informative presentation, which has given me some pause for reflection on my own work. Thank you!

I came here as someone who researched at the fringes of sociology and really enjoyed this interesting and informative presentation, which has given me some pause for reflection on my own work. Thank you!

Thanks more happiness

Bulshit! Every not successful politolog becomes a sociolog😊

I love his teaching style and this is the first time I'm watching him,

It's so similar to psychology or better saying that intertanglae....

love a good word cloud

I like this professor and I dream to invite him to Arunachal Pradesh India someday!

Doctor Mengele had a degree in anthropology

Quite instructive.

how can one get your notes ?

...

Fantastic session. Loved it. Great work.... Thanks lori..... Loved your presentation from india❤

Great presentation!

THANK YOU GOD BLESS YOU ALL AND YOUR LOVED ONES

There are no 'classical' (true) economists of the Adam Smith mold around today. Contemporary "economists" ar all political economists, not concerned with achieving maximum outputs with minimum inputs. but only concerned with how outputs are redistributed once they are produced.

This Man seems very anxious

Lori Peek is an enthusiastic speaker.

What a wonderful lecture! It's simply unbelievable .Thank you so much for all your efforts. Even though I am not an English speaker, I have found this lecture very easy to understand. Your method of explaining things is very clear and also attractive. I wish you all the best in your career and good continuation. My great wish is to see you giving this lecture at the university in my city .Who knows?

Humans Reuse Food & Fluids All The Time the Difference Has to Do woth Comparing the Velocity of the transformation of resources to and from the lifecycle of a closed loop system

Scarcity is An Issue of The Utility of Built Systems & Process Engineering

Every resource is scarce

Why would you want to move to the complex? It begs the question if our lives are more complex; or that we are surrounded by complex narratives. Let's take motherhood. It isn't that complex; unless you notice the encroaching opinions, state, policies etc on personal lives. Maybe that is just the fact that we poor so many people in cities?

10:54 -- This is why i have, so far at least, chosen NOT to pursue a PhD or to work primarily in academia. Excess emphasis on concepts and theory squeezes out reality. While ever more theorists talk about reality, human actions are leading ever more species -- possibly including our own -- right up to, and for far too many species, already, over the cliff of extinction. Sociology is far too important to remain theory-focused and -driven. Sociologists, along with economists, historians, philosophers -- and really all other "social scientists", academics, and scientists, would do well to shut down all universities for at least a year in order to walk and travel deep into the world, without any books or papers, equipped only with an open heart and a deep desire and ability to observe and listen to the ever-more dramatic plight of humans, sentients, and life-systems everywhere.

great

I love sharing this with my "Living in the Anthropocene" class (where we imagine different ways we might live in the future, based on anthropological data about different ways humans have lived in our entire history). And I love telling them that Paige is also super nice & funny & has crazy style sense! Thank you, Paige, for helping me to help my students adapt to a very frightening future.

Very inspiring introduction on the concept of political ecology. I will be starting a Unit module on this concept tomorrow and this is a very good way to inspire me on the module. I am a PhD Student at the University of Bristol UK. Thank you Prof P. West.

Bullshit !

Yes sociology is lover ❤️✨🌍

Seems like the cosmic ray count has dropped significantly yet we are supposedly going into a grand solar minimum. By the same token people used to wake up at 3:00 a.m. during the grand solar minimum because they're internal clock was being interfered with by the changes in the climate. People will often wake up at 3:00 a.m. go visit with neighbors have food make babies stay up for a few hours and then go to bed. The official explanation is the invention of the street lamps LMAO you can't get more clown world-ish than that for an explanation. This did not account for those people living outside of those areas with those dimly lit so-called lampposts. What accounts for people not waking up in the 60s and '70s at 3:00 a.m. on mass? When there was much more well-lit roads and Commercial signage and things like that? So it would appear as though valentiness or cova's paper on Grand solar minimum is the real deal, and not this global warming and narrative they've been pushing. In fact I think that they produce this global warming hoax to distract us from the opposite end of the climate Spectrum. A good tactic of many magicians in fact distract you with the left hand and point you to One Direction while they perform Shenanigans with the other. I have to hand it to these Central planner techniques through the use of hijacking and threatening climate scientists as the climate gate emails clearly demonstrates. In which they were threatened with their lives if they didn't push the global warming narrative. I find myself waking up at between 2:00 and 3:00 a.m. eastern time for some reason. And I'm almost certain this is a widespread problem. And I believe it's the Circadian rhythm of the human body and mind that is being interfered with by the changes in climate. Hence my reference to the human bodies internal clock, meaning the circadian rhythms. My earlier reference to cosmic ray is being low is because usually cosmic rays are very high during onset of many ice age. The high count of cosmic rays increases the production of low Lane clouds as well as potential activation of tectonic plates earthquakes and volcanic activity this adds to more reduced sunlight due to Ash and excess production of clouds. Factor in also the lower solar output and we have a perfect recipe for potentially 2° to the downside which is actually all that it was required to bring on a mini Ice Age along with the other factors mentioned. Of course mainstream is going to focus on this magical volcano that seems to be the only source for the initiation of the last mini ice age, yet one factor alone does not make up all of the combined elements that goes to creating the mini ice age. And I believe I've mentioned those. But anyway we are going to a period with lower cosmic rays coming in because the sun's more active and the heliosphere is blocking more cosmic rays yet this will be short-lived if Valentina zarkova is correct that we are indeed in a modern Grand solar minimum 2020 to 2053. And then a period of warmth for a decade and then 100 Years of Mini Ice Age. Other scientists concur with this Theory, it's very sound the science is there except of course mainstream will always point us in the wrong direction as we have entered a new paradigm of cult science, this idea that scientism the new religion can answer all questions around how to structure Society for great climatological changes as well as answer many moral and ethical questions, such as justification for eugenics and reduction of so-called human resource numbers all for the sake of saving the planet meanwhile we can be hit with a massive asteroid causing an extinction level event but in the meantime we've engaged in very dystopian socioeconomic and psychosocial human population management strategies. Human depopulation methodologies are all for the purpose of mitigating what occurs when you have a parasitic monopolistic economy which creates massive economic boom bust Cycles which then put Central planners in a position from which they have to reduce human resources in line with a much lower carrying capacity of the economy to sustain those human populations, because after all it is economic productivity that determines how many humans can be carried just like in nature aside from ideal climatological conditions and resource acquisition and availability,. Ultimately massive economic boom bust Cycles being timed by Central planners to the very predictable Grand solar minimums and Grand solar maximums for the most maximization of the climate from which to then maximize the monopolistic socioeconomic arrangement to time the economic boom bust Cycles too the downturns in solar activity as well as the optic in solar activities. So basically they time the economic boom bust cycle depending on the solar cycle, so if we are going into a grand solar minimum they will make certain that they produce all this artificial monopolistic oriented economic boom and then when the solar cycle goes towards a grand solar minimum they begin to prepare for the bust cycle of the economy. This is not to be confused with 10-year predictable boom bust Cycles which are created by monopolistic monetary and economic policies but rather more massive Global wide economic collapses timed to the onset of a grand solar minimum. Makes sense because during Grand solar minimums food production is limited thus causing hardships on human populations as well as pestilence disease so on and so forth. At the opposite end of the spectrum when we have these Grand solar maximums we have ample food crop production, wealth building conditions, better nutrition lower likelihood of malnutrition and from their disease pestilence so on and so forth longer life spans better quality of life in general. Please understand that I'm putting together the hard science that you will not find unless you stumble upon it, like finding that needle in the haystack or a little Miss missing piece of the puzzle as well as good strong knowledge base of how the world operates based on economic and monetary fundamentals over a period of 6,000 years and gauging that to the 400 or so years of solar Cycles to find the patterns to support this theory of mine. I understand people in The Sciences are very deficient in understanding of economic fundamentals as they are mostly educated by Marxist academic professors, thus they are prevented from understanding that freedom can only come from economic productivity by the individual who then uses the fruits of their labor to initiate life on their terms, the basic means from which to negotiate life without having to relinquish all of your rights and ability to make decisions on your own. Please forgive me for the massive amounts of incoherence littered throughout much of this is due to lack of sleep and the inefficient error written Google voice to text translator I'm using at the moment. I would be completely tickled to death if someone would comment on this or give me a thumbs up or down to indicate that you have actually read and understood the entirety of my text post. I thank you immensely and if you feel like you have gained some important knowledge than you are indeed very welcome and please verify which will be very difficult because Google has been watered down I'm sorry that's the truth and then spread this knowledge to others

Thanks

Specialist in particular things make more alienate form on other.

😍🔥

Well explained

Is Dana fisher a trans-female ?

Oh yes, the true intellectuals. The one-sentence-is all-I-have-to-offer kinds of intellectuals I've come to know so well. Here to effortlessly corroborate another one-sided interpretation in a field they know nothing about. Now I agree with the major points, but what I don't agree with is how you make no attempt to remind listeners that the West were not the only ones indulging in slavery throughout history, and not just that, (but in keeping with your own logic) why should the acts of a few (or few hundred million) who happen to identify themselves the same as I do (i.e. Western) be taken as the architype of Western people? Isn't this exactly the same thing you're trying to put an end to - the classification of all individuals based on a collective identity associated with the acts of (less than all) individuals? All branded as an objective pursuit of your own, and an extension of the enlightenment whether you want to see it that way or not. And then to pick up on natural law, that is exactly at the core of justifications to post-enlightenment ideas too! A summary of modernity say we're all innately selfish, whereas opposing arguments would say we're naturally altruistic. Modernists could meet in the middle, and agree people are neither entirely selfish nor altruistic... could you? 9:00 Says someone with a mandate to bring child-like people in to the modern world hehe, you really don't write it do ya! I'm not saying that it was all roses 300 years ago, but what I will say is that the primary attempt of post-modern thinkers in the last century is to replace traditional markers of success or truth with superficial, artificial or just plain out backwards markers. So it's not just about repositioning intellectuals within society, it's actually not even about that at all despite being championed as such. Rather it's about maintaining the power traditionally associated with intellectualism and changing the protocol required to attain such titles, just as the word art has encompassed more meaning in the last century. Taking it away from being thought of as having a particular skill, to now represent people who want to poo on a canvas too.

I am from India and I am sociology honours student and this lecture lots of help me to understand 💖

I wanna learn too. Hv jst started watching